Irish mogul Paul Coulson insists on $300m to walk away from Ardagh
Paul Coulson
has told Ardagh bondholders that its shareholders need a payment of at least $300 million (€254 million) to walk away from the debt-laden packaging giant he built through decades of acquisitions.
Ardagh Group
, which is based in Luxembourg and produces glass bottles and metal cans in facilities spanning Europe, America and Africa, has been at the centre of contentious restructuring negotiations about more than $10 billion of debt built up in the era of cheap money and low interest rates.
After Ardagh announced in May that talks had broken down about a restructuring in which Coulson – the group's former chair who has voting control of its shares – would retain a stake, discussions have shifted to whether the Irish entrepreneur and other shareholders would hand over the whole company in exchange for a one-off payment.
Coulson has insisted that Ardagh shareholders need $300 million in order to consider walking away, according to people familiar with the discussions, with other strict conditions around securing the money swiftly.
READ MORE
[
Paul Coulson faces last stand in battle to retain control of Ardagh
Opens in new window
]
While bondholders earlier offered $250 million to these shareholders, the Irish businessman has already rejected their proposal, according to the people familiar with the matter. Coulson has relayed that the group's shareholders will not accept anything less than $300 million, they added.
A tough negotiator with a flair for financial engineering, Coulson's previously lucrative investment in Ardagh rose from the ashes of a troubled airline leasing business in the 1990s.
After winning a multimillion payout from a legal settlement with the investment bank that advised him on a disastrous takeover deal by the aviation finance firm, Coulson ploughed the windfall into a stake in Ardagh, which was then a small Dublin-based bottling company.
Through a series of debt-fuelled acquisitions, the businessman transformed Ardagh from a regional Irish bottler into one of the world's biggest producers of both glass and metal drinks containers. In the process, Coulson became a billionaire because of the value of his stake, making him one of the richest people in Ireland.
Ardagh for decades has been a frequent issuer of junk bonds, serving as a bellwether of the market for riskier debt in Europe. During the height of low interest rates and quantitative easing, Ardagh's parent companies pushed the envelope in issuing risky payment-in-kind bonds that can pay bondholders interest in the form of more debt.
Coulson has in the past profited from buying up Ardagh's riskier bonds at a discount during periods of market volatility, riding out jitters around the sustainability of the group's debt with his stake in the business intact.
But, in recent years, Ardagh has been hit by interest rate rises, surging costs at its energy-intensive plants and a slowdown in demand at the large drinks manufacturers that are the group's main customers.
While Coulson controls more than 50 per cent of Ardagh's voting rights, his economic stake is smaller. All Ardagh shareholders would receive a piece of the $300 million in accordance with the size of their stake under the proposal.
Control would then pass to Ardagh's unsecured bondholders, which would also write down part of their debt. The group's riskiest payment-in-kind bonds would be fully written off in exchange for a small minority stake in the business.
The unsecured debt is largely held by hedge funds, including London's Arini Capital Management and Los Angeles-based Canyon Partners, which separately filed a lawsuit against Ardagh and Coulson in March alleging that a restructuring could siphon value away from lenders. Ardagh last month filed to dismiss the claim in New York courts on the basis that it contains 'numerous fatal flaws'.
Ardagh is split into several different silos and subsidiaries, with its metals packaging division listed on the New York stock exchange. Debt at this listed Ardagh Metals Packaging unit, which has 24 per cent of its shares freely traded and held by other investors, will not be affected by the proposed restructuring.
Ardagh and Coulson declined to comment.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
State on course for high end of multibillion EU fines as emissions reductions slow
The decline in Ireland's greenhouse gas emissions has slowed, according to fresh data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data, putting the State's likely compliance costs at the higher end of estimates, Provisional figures released on Friday by the EPA increase the likelihood that legally binding 2030 climate targets will be missed by a large margin after momentum achieved in 2023 was lost. Ireland could have to pay out between €8 billion and €26 billion to its EU partners if it does not step up climate action swiftly, the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council said in February. Ireland's greenhouse gas emissions decreased by just 2 per cent in 2024, down from a 6.8 per cent figure the previous year. READ MORE The EPA warned meeting national and EU commitments will be 'extremely challenging'. Ireland's national target is to reduce emissions by 51 per cent in 2030 compared with 2018. In 2024, greenhouse gas emissions were 12 per cent below 2018 levels. Separate EPA projections in May indicated a 23 per cent reduction by decade end. Minister for Energy and Climate Darragh O'Brien told the Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy on Thursday that the latest forecasts showed the country would at best cut emissions by only half the amount required by 2030. But he accepted there was a legal requirement to meet science-based targets and to adhere to carbon budgets, adding he was not 'raising the white flag' yet. 'We have to redouble our efforts to get as close as possible to our 2030 targets,' he added. EPA director general Laura Burke said that although 2024 data is moving in the right direction, 'it is not at the necessary scale and pace'. She added: 'If Ireland is to meet our first carbon budget, a further 10 per cent reduction in emissions is needed in 2025, which will be extremely challenging.' The EPA figures show a reduction of 1.1 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO2eq) compared with 2023, with reductions in most sectors – except for heating of homes and buildings. Energy including electricity continues to be the exception, with sustained reductions in line with targets. Transport and agriculture, however, reversed positive 2023 trends with modest declines compared with targets in the Government's climate plan and strict carbon budgets. In total, 54Mt CO2eq were emitted last year – excluding substantial emissions from land use and forestry. Energy industry emissions decreased by 8.9 per cent in 2024 to an all-time low of 7.2 Mt CO2eq. This was due to power generation using renewables (39.6 per cent) and increased imported electricity via interconnectors. It was also the first year that peat was not used in generation. Agriculture emissions decreased by 1.7 per cent (0.3 Mt CO2eq), primarily due to a 2.9 per cent reduction in cattle numbers. In contrast, there was a 10.6 per cent increase in nitrogen fertiliser use. Last year saw the first post-Covid decrease in transport emissions but that was only by 1.2 per cent decline, having increased by 6 per cent in both 2021 and 2022 and by 0.3 per cent in 2023. Industrial emissions decreased by 4.6 per cent due to declines in coal and oil usage. Emissions from buildings (residential, commercial and public) increased by 5.6 per cent due to a colder winter and increased use of fossil fuels. EPA senior manager Dr Tomas Murray said: 'Both agriculture and transport each require significant reductions of 5.6 and 15.5 per cent, respectively, in 2025 to meet reduction targets.' The 51 per cent reduction by 2030 target 'will be unattainable unless every sector meets their reduction target and sectoral ceiling', he added.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Student accommodation developer challenges decision to rezone land near UCD to open space
Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown Council's decision to rezone lands owned by a student accommodation developer from residential to open space was done for valid planning reasons, the High Court has been told. The council made the argument in defending an action brought by developer Colbeam Ltd, which is challenging the local authority's 2022-2028 county development plan arising from the rezoning decision. Colbeam has sought to build a 698-bed student accommodation complex at Our Lady's Grove, Goatstown Road, Dublin 14, which is about 850 metres from University College Dublin (UCD). The developer previously secured planning permission from An Coimisiún Pleanála for the development, but this decision was quashed following a separate, successful High Court challenge. READ MORE Colbeam had bought the site in 2017 from the Congregation of the Religious of Jesus and Mary for €13 million. The land – which had been part of a wider campus that includes Our Lady's Grove primary and secondary school – was zoned residential under the council's 2016-2022 county development plan, which was in effect at the time of the purchase, Colbeam has said. But before adopting the 2022-2028 county development plan, councillors adopted motions to rezone Colbeam's land from residential to open space. On Thursday, David Browne SC, for the council, said councillors adopted motions to rezone primarily for planning-based reasons. These included consideration for open space at the Our Lady's Grove campus and concerns about incremental development on that space. Colbeam has argued that councillors had regard for 'irrelevant consideration' in adopting the motions to rezone. But Mr Browne said that if the principal reason for the rezoning decision was a planning one then that was a valid decision. Mr Brown said certain remarks made by councillors in debating the rezoning motions were indicative of 'marginal' considerations in the decision to rezone and should not invalidate the decision. On Wednesday, Neil Steen SC, for Colbeam, had argued that councillors had regard for 'irrelevant consideration' in adopting the motions to rezone. One of these irrelevant considerations arose from purported comments made at the meeting by Fine Gael councillor Barry Saul, one of the members who initially proposed to rezone the land. In advancing the argument to rezone the lands, Cllr Saul referred to 'a failure of moral obligation' on the part of the Congregation of the Religious of Jesus and Mary to maintain a required level of open space on their lands, Mr Steen said. The open space requirement arose from an 'institutional land' designation. Mr Steen said Mr Saul made it explicit that part of his intention in supporting the rezoning was to address this 'failure'. Counsel said moral obligation was an irrelevant consideration in the decision to rezone. Mr Steen said his clients were entitled under legislation to a decision uncontaminated by irrelevant considerations. He said if the court found councillors took an irrelevant consideration into account in making the decision to rezone then the decision should be quashed. Mr Justice David Holland will give his ruling at later date.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish unification would cost €152m annually to give Northern Irish civil servants pay parity, report says
The cost of paying for unification would be €3 billion in the first year and the need for a subvention from the United Kingdom would disappear after nine years, if not earlier, a new study argues. The report, published on Thursday, is the result of research conducted by Dublin City University (DCU) and the Ulster University Economic Policy Centre, partly funded by The Ireland Funds. The cost of unification given in the report takes into account transfers from the Treasury in Whitehall, along with the cost of bringing wages and pensions in the North into line with the Republic . The deficit in public finances would last for between five and nine years, depending on economic growth, but would gradually decline over that time, according to the report, authored by Professor John Doyle, vice-president for research in DCU. READ MORE Bringing wages for public sector workers in the North into line with their better-paid equivalents in the Republic would cost taxpayers an extra €152 million per annum for 15 years. However, the costs of dealing with Northern public sector and state pensions would be a fraction of the costs estimated by others, requiring an additional €115 million per annum, over 40 years. 'If Northern Ireland replicates growth of the best Eastern European economies between 2000 and 2023, its gross national income would reach the same level as the Republic in 25 years, but the fiscal deficit would end in year five,' says the report. The study describes itself as the first peer-reviewed report 'to calculate the cost of unity over the first 10 years which takes account not only of the subvention, but necessary investment and gradual economic convergence with the rest of the island'.
