logo
Mexican border town sees fewer crossing attempts, deportations than expected under Trump

Mexican border town sees fewer crossing attempts, deportations than expected under Trump

Fox News02-07-2025
Amid busy streets scattered with pedestrians, stray dogs and the Mexican National Guard lies Nogales, Mexico, where local business owners deliberate on how the second Trump administration has affected crime, border security and more.
"Drug trafficking has been controlled a lot, there's barely any now. It's not like it used to be," Filiberto, a Mexican native who owns a photography business right outside the walkable entry point into Mexico, said.
Juan, an entrepreneur at a local eatery, told Fox News Digital, "We've gone through very tough times because, although right now — this past year, these last two years — there's been some calm in terms of insecurity, in earlier times we had a lot of problems."
"I don't know if it's the same or worse — in truth, I don't know. But there's a lot that's very bad," Angelica, a local flower shop owner, said. "Here in my neighborhood, in my surroundings, yes, I live peacefully, thank God."
From "better" to "the same," some locals credited Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, while others discussed how relations with the United States have changed over time with different leaders.
When asked about how border security updates under President Donald Trump have affected Nogales, various residents pointed out the construction of local shelters created in anticipation of mass deportations.
"Many measures were taken here to [prepare] for Trump's announcement… that a wave of people would come," Filiberto said.
"Well-equipped shelters were built, and they were practically empty — 10, 15, 30 people a day. So they dismantled them. I think now they don't exist anymore or they were reduced, because it wasn't what they threatened it would be," he added.
The border city's mayor, Juan Francisco Gim Nogales, echoed the sentiment of his community members in an earlier interview with Fox News Digital, saying, "We receive 60 migrants on average. So, nothing to do with the number we expected and with all the infrastructure we prepared."
"There aren't as many people wanting to cross the border anymore… There used to be a lot, but things have calmed down a lot," food vendor Juan said. "The National Guard is watching the Mexico–U.S. border closely… the [number of] people who used to come from the south in caravans have decreased a lot. In fact, we've never had as much calm as we do today."
Long-time Nogales resident Filiberto reflected on how crossing the border has changed over the past three decades.
"There was a lot of camaraderie, a sense of community. We used to cross into the U.S. without a problem, two, three, four, five times a day — without any obstacles. The problem started when the U.S. began putting up barriers, both for visa procedures and even for crossing," he said.
In response to questions about how Trump's border strategy has affected crossing attempts, most inhabitants referenced how new measures have impacted local sentiment about attempting to cross into America and noticeably smaller lines at ports of entry that have barely "seen anyone."
"I think maybe fewer people are crossing, but there are still some. Many people don't stop trying," Angelica remarked.
"There are not that many people that want to cross anymore. With what Trump is doing, people are starting to think about going back or staying put," local store owner Mario said.
"The border is very well guarded," a new entrepreneur setting up her storefront added. "[But] people always want a better life, thinking that the U.S. is better."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sen. Van Hollen says an armed National Guard in DC would be ‘troubling'
Sen. Van Hollen says an armed National Guard in DC would be ‘troubling'

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. Van Hollen says an armed National Guard in DC would be ‘troubling'

Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., on Sunday underlined his stance that President Donald Trump deploying the National Guard to Washington, D.C., over concerns of high crime and the level of homelessness amounts to an "abuse of power." "All of this is a total abuse of power. It's a manufactured emergency," Van Hollen said in an interview with "This Week" co-anchor Martha Raddatz. "Obviously D.C. can do more to reduce violent crime, as we can across the country. But as you pointed out, crime in D.C. is at a 30-year low and a downward trajectory. So, this is all an opportunity for Donald Trump to play dictator in Washington, D.C." "The way the law is written, it appears he has the legal authority. And Mayor [Muriel] Bowser conceded that. So, what is the abuse of power here?" Raddatz pressed. MORE: Trump admin live updates "The abuse of power is claiming that this is an emergency. And everybody who is watching what happens knows that this is not an emergency in Washington, D.C.," Van Hollen argued. Violent crime levels have decreased compared to years prior, down 26% since 2024, a 30-year low, leaving outstanding questions over why Trump deployed roughly 800 troops around the city. Over the weekend, several Republican-led states announced additional Guard troops would also deploy to Washington to support the president's mission. As some outlets report the National Guard could be armed soon, Van Hollen said, "Well, that's very troubling, because, as you know, the National Guard, first of all, is not supposed to engage in any local law enforcement activity. We have the Posse Comitatus Act that prohibits them from engaging in local law enforcement. And so I'm not sure what it is that they need to do where they need to be armed." Despite fierce criticism from Democrats like Van Hollen and protests from some Washington residents, the White House has defended its decision to surge federal law enforcement to the city and bring in the National Guard as necessary and legal. Here are more highlights from Van Hollen's interview On D.C. police chief saying additional law enforcement 'positive' Raddatz: The mayor suggested this week that the surge of -- of federal police could be useful in fighting crime. And there is a crime problem in D.C. We all live here. I want you to -- I want to play you something that D.C.'s police chief, Pamela Smith, said this week. Pamela Smith (video clip): You're talking about 500 additional personnel in the District of Columbia. And as you know, we've talked about the fact that we're down in numbers with our police officers. And so, this enhanced presence clearly is going to impact us in a positive way. Raddatz: So, do you see anything positive about this? Van Hollen: Well, I understand the position the police chief is in. The best way to help the police chief in Washington, D.C., is for President Trump and Republicans in Congress to give them the $1 billion in money that belongs to them so that they can hire those police, rather than bringing in these federal agents. I would also say, Martha, I would think that taxpayers all over the country, federal taxpayers, have to ask themselves how it is that we are using resources, national resources, the FBI, the DEA, folks who are supposed to be out and about protecting the country from violent criminals, and now they're spending their time taking down tents of homeless people in the District of Columbia. I would think people all over the country would worry about that diversion of resources. On what Congress does if Trump goes past the 30-day limit Raddatz: The -- the president says he's going to maintain control of D.C. police past this 30-day limit, no matter what Congress does. So, then what do you do? Van Hollen: Well, that clearly is a violation of the statute. And so, we'll end up right back in court. Of course, the president also thought he had the ability to essentially take out the police chief and have his people come in and run the police department. A federal judge already said that that was not authorized. And in the same way, his ability to extend it beyond 30 days is not authorized. And so, they're going to have to pass this statute in the -- this extension in the Congress. And I don't think that that's going to pass. On his reaction to the Trump-Putin summit Van Hollen: Well, Martha, there's no sugarcoating this. Donald Trump, once again, got played by Vladimir Putin. Vladimir Putin got the red carpet treatment on American soil. But we got no ceasefire, no imminent meeting between Putin and [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy. All the threats and sanctions that, you know, Donald Trump talked about, apparently, have been set aside. Donald Trump got flattered by Vladimir Putin. But when it comes to Ukraine under European allies, this was a setback. I do believe that Congress now, the Senate in particular, should move forward on bipartisan legislation that has over 60 senators as co-sponsors that would impose sanctions on Russia and Vladimir Putin. Personal relations are important. And I have no objection to people talking. But you want to have a clear objective in mind. Clearly, Vladimir Putin had a clear objective in mind. And he came to Alaska and gave up nothing, whereas, you know, Donald Trump said he had hoped to do, you know, a ceasefire, he had hoped to fly in Zelenskyy maybe even while Vladimir Putin was there. None of that happened. And meanwhile, they've taken the pressure off the sanctions. I mean, again, Donald Trump was supposed to impose sanctions on Russia weeks ago now, and nothing. So, this was a victory for Vladimir Putin.

Three arrested in murder investigation after woman fatally assaulted
Three arrested in murder investigation after woman fatally assaulted

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Three arrested in murder investigation after woman fatally assaulted

Three arrested in murder investigation after woman fatally assaulted Three men have been arrested in a murder investigation that was launched after a woman in her 20s was fatally assaulted, police said. The Metropolitan Police were called to Chadwell Heath, east London, just after 5.30am on Saturday after reports of an assault. Paramedics also attended but the woman was pronounced dead at the scene in Chadwell Heath Lane, the force said. A 35-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of murder and two men, aged 21 and 22, were arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender, it added on Sunday. 'Early enquiries by detectives indicate this is an isolated incident and those involved are believed to be known to each other', the Met said. A cordon is in place and a police tent was erected in the driveway to a residential care home. The woman has not yet been formally identified but officers believe she was in her 20s. The victim's family have been informed and are being supported by family liaison officers, the force added. Detective Superintendent Brian Hobbs said: 'Our thoughts remain with the victim's family and friends in light of this truly tragic event. 'Although we have now made arrests, local residents will continue to see an increased number of officers in and around the area while our investigative work is carried out. 'I would ask anyone who was in the area of Romford, who may have seen or heard anything suspicious, to speak to us.' Anyone with any information about the incident is asked to contact police via 101 quoting 1625/16Aug, or call Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store