
Young Aussie mum calls out her local Bunnings for 'targeted' move in store
Madeline Wood, 31, said she had gone to the hardware store to replace some light globes and had brought the old ones with her in a bag.
The young mum claims she was singled out and followed by a staff member wearing an earpiece because her arm and leg tattoos were showing.
'I've got (ear) stretches, it's hot today so the tattoos on my legs are showing, and I was obviously profiled,' Ms Wood claimed in a TikTok video.
'I work in retail management. The business I work for has undercover loss prevention officers... I understand their role and I understand what they look like.
'This one guy has his earpiece in or his AirPods. It's normal for them to be on the floor, the people on the cameras are telling them who to look at because they think that they're stealing.
'I had my light globes out, I was checking the boxes to make sure they're the same ones. Then I had to find some heat lamps and went to ask someone for those cause I couldn't find them.
'I then went back to the aisle and I saw the loss prevention guy looking at all the light globes that I had been touching, probably trying to assess whether or not I had swapped my ones over, or if I had stolen some, I don't know.'
@_madelinewood
Massive rant so hold on 2x speed but I'm so sick of being followed around retail stores by security just because of the way that I look! Anyone else have this happen or am I just the lucky one? #rant #bunnings #theft #fyp #aussiemum #momlife #mumsoftiktok
♬ original sound - _madelinewood
Ms Wood said she learned in her role in retail management that offering to help customers often deterred would-be thieves while it also boosted customer service.
She said the experience was even more infuriating because she spotted two customers pocketing items as as she was leaving the store, noting: 'That undercover could have been watching for that instead of watching me'.
Ms Wood's video garnered a flood of comments from Aussies saying they have had a similar experience in their local Bunnings.
'They do this to me, I have tattoos, coloured streaks in my hair and eyeliner. I also manage in retail and the people who actually steal never get watched,' one said.
'In Coles the other week, a guy was literally following me down every single aisle, I get you have a job to do, but it made me feel like I was doing something wrong,' another said.
'I own a security company and even I get followed in a couple shops,' a third said.
Another suggested Ms Wood should 'make a complaint' as they had once had a security guard 'rip' a trolley put of their hands. 'Needless to say she doesn't work at that Coles anymore,' they said.
Bunnings has insisted it does not profile customers.
'Creating a safe and welcoming environment for our team and customers is important to us, and this is reflected in the diversity of our team,' Bunnings Director of Stores, Rod Caust, told Daily Mail Australia.
'Like many retailers, we sometimes have loss prevention contractors in our stores who are engaged through an external licensed provider and are trained in monitoring customer behaviour.
'Discrimination and profiling have no place in our business and are not part of our loss prevention practices.
'All team members and security personnel receive rigorous, regularly reviewed training focused on safety, legal responsibilities, and respectful engagement — not appearance, background or personal characteristics.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
WA lawyer referred to regulator after preparing documents with AI-generated citations for nonexistent cases
A lawyer has been referred to Western Australia's legal regulator after using artificial intelligence in preparing court documents for an immigration case. The documents contained AI-generated case citations for cases that did not exist. It is one of more than 20 cases so far in Australia in which AI use has resulted in fake citations or other errors in court submissions, with warnings from judges across the country to be wary of using the technology in the legal profession. In a federal court judgment published this week, the anonymised lawyer was referred to the Legal Practice Board of Western Australia for consideration and ordered to pay the federal government's costs of $8,371.30 after submissions to an immigration case were found by the representative for the immigration minister to include four case citations that did not exist. Justice Arran Gerrard said the incident 'demonstrates the inherent dangers associated with practitioners solely relying on the use of artificial intelligence in the preparation of court documents and the way in which that interacts with a practitioner's duty to the court'. The lawyer told the court in an affidavit that he had relied on Anthropic's Claude AI 'as a research tool to identify potentially relevant authorities and to improve my legal arguments and position', and then used Microsoft Copilot to validate the submissions. The lawyer said he had 'developed an overconfidence in relying on AI tools and failed to adequately verify the generated results'. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'I had an incorrect assumption that content generated by AI tools would be inherently reliable, which led me to neglect independently verifying all citations through established legal databases,' the lawyer said in the affidavit. The lawyer unreservedly apologised to the court and the minister's solicitors for the errors. Gerrard said the court 'does not adopt a luddite approach' to the use of generative AI, and understood why the complexity of migration law might make using an AI tool attractive. But he warned there was now a 'concerning number' of cases where AI had led to citation of fictitious cases. Gerrard said it risked 'a good case to be undermined by rank incompetence' and the prevalence of such cases 'significantly wastes the time and resources of opposing parties and the court'. He said it also risked damage to the legal profession. Gerrard said the lawyer did 'not fully comprehend what was required of him' and it was not sufficient to merely check that the cases cited were not fake, but to review those cases thoroughly. 'Legal principles are not simply slogans which can be affixed to submissions without context or analysis.' There have been at least 20 cases of AI hallucinations reported in Australian courts since generative AI tools exploded in popularity in 2023. Last week, a Victorian supreme court judge criticised lawyers acting for a boy accused of murder for filing misleading information with the courts after failing to check documents created using AI. The documents included references to nonexistent case citations and inaccurate quotes from a parliamentary speech. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion There have also been similar cases involving lawyers in New South Wales and Victoria in the past year, who were referred to their state's regulatory bodies. However, the spate of cases is not just limited to qualified lawyers. In a NSW supreme court decision this month, a self-represented litigant in a trusts case admitted to the chief justice, Andrew Bell, to have used AI to prepare her speech for the appeal hearing. Bell said in his judgment that he was not criticising the person, who he said was doing her best to represent herself. But he said problems with using AI in preparing submissions were exacerbated when the technology was used by unrepresented litigants 'who are not subject to the professional and ethical responsibilities of legal practitioners'. He said the use of generative AI tools 'may introduce added costs and complexity' to proceedings and 'add to the burden of other parties and the court in responding to it'. 'Notwithstanding the fact that generative AI may contribute to improved access to justice, which is itself an obviously laudable goal, the present case illustrates the need for judicial vigilance in its use, especially but not only, by unrepresented litigants.' The Law Council of Australia's president, Juliana Warner, said sophisticated AI tools offered unique opportunities to support the legal profession in administrative tasks, but reliance on AI tools did not diminish the professional judgment a legal practitioner was expected to bring to a client's matter. 'Where these tools are utilised by lawyers, this must be done with extreme care,' she said. 'Lawyers must always keep front of mind their professional and ethical obligations to the court and to their clients.' Warner said courts were regarding cases where AI had generated fake citations as a 'serious concern', but added that given the widespread use of generative AI, a broadly framed prohibition on its use in legal proceedings would be 'neither practical nor proportionate, and risks hindering innovation and access to justice'.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie accused of trying to smuggle 4kg of meth out of Thailand in household item
An Australian man has been arrested after trying to board a flight to Perth while allegedly carrying meth concealed in soap bars. The 68-year-old was apprehended before he reached the departure gate at Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok, on Sunday. He was arrested after 4.26kg of meth was allegedly found hidden inside his baggage. Customs Department spokesman Panthong Loykulnan said the Australian national was arrested by narcotics and Airport Interdiction Task Force. Officers were acting on a tip-off, reported the Bangkok Post. Mr Loykulnan said he had been flagged through intelligence as a high-risk traveller. Authorities allege the Australian was attempting the smuggle the drug back to his home country. The illicit drug was allegedly found concealed in several bars of soap packed in boxes in a bag, while more was also hidden in a concealed suitcase compartment. Mr Loykulnan said authorities had made it a priority to crack down on the drug smuggling trade. Customs workers at Suvarnabhumi Airport have made almost 200 drug seizures involving heroin, cocaine and meth, since October. Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said it is providing consular assistance to an Australian man detained in Thailand.


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The wannabe Sherlocks and Agathas think they know why Erin Patterson became a killer. CANDACE SUTTON has the evidence that proves they've fallen for a narcissist's lies
Few murder mysteries have captured the public's imagination like the Leongatha mushroom poisonings. But whenever a macabre true-crime tale dominates headlines, you inevitably have wannabe sleuths who are convinced they have it all worked out.