Home Office to sell RAF Scampton on open market
The RAF Scampton site, near Lincoln, had been earmarked by the previous Conservative government to accommodate migrants, but the plans were scrapped by the Labour administration in September.
West Lindsey District Council previously announced plans to buy the site in a deal which it said would unlock £300m of investment for the area.
However, a government spokesperson said: "We must comply with market regulation of public land, rather than just handing it to the council."
In a statement, the Home Office said the site had run up costs of more than £60m between March 2023 and September 2024.
"We have taken swift action to review and discontinue the use of RAF Scampton as asylum accommodation, in order to save the taxpayer millions in projected site costs.
"The sale of the site is taking place in line with the process for disposing of Crown land," a spokesperson added.
West Lindsey said it was notified in a letter from Dame Angela Eagle MP, minister for border security and asylum.
According to the authority, the letter said that "in parallel to this decision the Home Office is committed to continuing work with West Lindsey to progress their interest in the site".
The council announced its development plan for the site in March 2023, which included proposals to transform the site into a business, aerospace and heritage centre.
Sally Grindrod-Smith, director of planning and regeneration at the authority, said there was "a clear plan to secure the long-term investment this site needs".
"Given the well-documented constraints such as contamination, heritage concerns, planning, and infrastructure challenges, a public-private partnership is the only realistic way forward," she said.
She added that the council's preferred development partner, Scampton Holdings Ltd, remained committed to the project.
Chairman of Scampton Holdings Peter Hewitt said: "This has been going on for a long time and we've faced many ups and downs.
"No sooner were we announced as the preferred bidder, having been through a six- month public tender process, the [previous] government said they were putting migrants on the camp.
"We are just cracking on in a straight line," he told BBC Radio Lincolnshire.
In a post on X, the Conservative MP for Gainsborough, Sir Edward Leigh, who previously supported local residents in opposing the asylum plans, described the move as "madness" when there was a deal ready to go.
"They're just trying to cover their tracks because they wasted £64m and three years trying to house migrants there," he added.
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Council hopes to buy RAF Scampton site by November
Asylum seeker cabins removed from RAF Scampton
Leaders seek talks on former RAF Scampton future
Plans to house asylum seekers at RAF Scampton axed
Home Office
West Lindsey District Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Florida removes rainbow crosswalk outside Pulse nightclub
A rainbow crosswalk near Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Fla., honoring the victims of one of the nation's deadliest mass shootings, was painted over late Wednesday after close to a decade, part of a state and nationwide effort to scrub 'political banners' from public roads. The Pulse Memorial's crosswalk, first painted in 2017, honored the 49 people killed in 2016 when a gunman opened fire at Pulse, an LGBTQ-friendly nightclub. The city of Orlando purchased the site in 2023, planning to demolish the building, which has been closed since 2016, and construct a permanent memorial in its place. Florida state Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith (D), who in 2016 became the first openly gay Latino elected to the Legislature, called the crosswalk's removal a 'disgusting betrayal' in a post on the social platform X. 'Of course they did this in the middle of the night,' Smith said Thursday in a nearly two-minute-long video in front of the painted-over crosswalk, 'because they knew what they were doing is wrong.' Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), responding to Smith's video, said, 'We will not allow our state roads to be commandeered for political purposes.' In June, DeSantis omitted references to LGBTQ and Hispanic people — communities disproportionately affected by the Pulse shooting — in an annual order honoring the tragedy's victims. DeSantis recognized both groups in nearly identical orders issued during each of his last five years in office. In 2019, his first year as governor, DeSantis issued an amended proclamation after an initial statement honoring Pulse Remembrance Day also declined to mention LGBTQ people. DeSantis at the time said he was not involved in drafting the first proclamation and requested that his office issue a new one once he became aware of the omission. The state's decision to remove the rainbow crosswalk at Pulse comes as President Trump's administration doubles down on efforts against diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, and transgender rights. In July, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy instructed governors to produce a list of 'arterial segments,' including intersections, in each state. 'Taxpayers expect their dollars to fund safe streets, not rainbow crosswalks,' Duffy said on social media. Florida officials in recent months have instructed cities throughout the state to remove rainbow-painted crosswalks and intersections or risk losing transportation funding. In June, Will Watts, an assistant secretary for the Florida Department of Transportation, wrote in a memo that 'surface art' not directly contributing to traffic safety 'can lead to distractions or misunderstandings, jeopardizing both driver and pedestrian safety.' 'Any identified non-compliant traffic control devices or pavement markings currently installed on Florida public roads are to be immediately remedied, i.e., removed, modified or replaced,' Watts wrote in the memo. He mentioned specifically surface art 'associated with social, political or ideological messages or images.' In a statement posted Thursday to social media, Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer, a Democrat, said the city is 'devastated' by the crosswalk's removal. 'This callous action of hastily removing part of a memorial to what was at the time our nation's largest mass shooting, without any supporting safety data or discussion, is a cruel political act,' Dyer said. 'The City of Orlando's safety crosswalks were all installed in close coordination with the state and adhere to national safety standards. In fact, the crosswalk that is part of the Pulse Memorial was installed by the state.' A spokesperson for Florida's Transportation Department did not immediately return to The Hill's request for comment or answer questions about Dyer's assertion that the crosswalk was removed without supporting safety documentation. Brandon Wolf, a survivor of the Pulse shooting, also condemned the crosswalk's removal. 'In the dark of night, they came to erase our show of solidarity, our declaration that we will never forget,' Wolf wrote Thursday on X. 'The cowards who feel threatened by our lives should feel lucky they didn't have to bury the ones they love — then watch the state come & desecrate their memory.' Wolf, a spokesperson for the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest LGBTQ advocacy group, lost two close friends, Drew Leinonen and Juan Guerrero, in the shooting at Pulse. The state LGBTQ rights group Equality Florida said it plans to gather peacefully at the Pulse Memorial on Thursday evening, calling or Floridians across the state to 'make their visibility undeniable' with rainbow stickers, clothing and flags and by using the hashtag #ShowYourRainbow on social media. In a news release, the organization called on cities throughout Florida to install 'permanent exhibits of LGBTQ visibility.' 'For decades, Florida politicians have tried to criminalize LGBTQ existence, dismantle families, and create a climate where violence is normalized. Monuments, murals, and rainbow crosswalks are not just symbols; they are powerful celebrations of LGBTQ existence,' the group said. 'They are our commitment to remember, and our promise that these harms will not be inflicted again.'
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
John Roberts Joins All Liberal Justices in Supreme Court Dissent
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Trump administration can move forward with slashing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal research funding as part of its effort to roll back diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. In a narrow 5-4 decision, the justices lifted a lower court order that had blocked $783 million in cuts made by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The majority's unsigned order frees the administration to proceed with canceling grants already targeted for elimination, while leaving in place restrictions on the administration's guidance for future funding decisions. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court's three liberals in dissent, warning that the funding freeze should have remained in effect while litigation continues. The ruling is the latest legal victory for President Donald Trump, allowing his administration to accelerate its plan to cancel hundreds of existing grants while a broader lawsuit plays out in the lower courts. Plaintiffs—including a coalition of 16 Democratic state attorneys general and public-health advocacy groups—warned that the cuts would inflict "incalculable losses in public health and human life." They argue that many of the canceled studies address urgent issues like cancer treatments, infectious diseases, and maternal health. The Justice Department countered that research funding decisions fall squarely within the executive branch's discretion and should not be "subject to judicial second-guessing." Lawyers for the administration also claimed that programs marketed under the DEI label may "conceal insidious racial discrimination," echoing a broader push by Republicans to dismantle DEI programs across federal agencies, schools, and corporations. At issue in the case is only a portion of the $12 billion in NIH research funding already cut under Trump's orders. In its emergency appeal to the Supreme Court, however, the administration also challenged nearly two dozen other judicial orders that have blocked similar funding cuts in related cases. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that federal judges should not be hearing these disputes at all, insisting that claims belong in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims under a previous Supreme Court ruling that allowed cuts to a teacher-training program. But the plaintiffs insist that research grants are categorically different from contracts like those in the teacher-training case. They contend that grants cannot simply be canceled midway without catastrophic consequences—disrupting careers, wasting years of work, and undermining data integrity in scientific studies. "Halting studies midway can also ruin the data already collected and ultimately harm the country's potential for scientific breakthroughs," they told the court. Earlier this summer, U.S. District Judge William Young in Massachusetts sided with the challengers, calling the abrupt NIH cancellations arbitrary and discriminatory. Young, a Reagan appointee, expressed shock at the administration's approach. "I've never seen government racial discrimination like this," he said during a June hearing, later adding: "Have we no shame." An appeals court left his order intact before the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court. While Thursday's ruling represents a major procedural win for the administration, the underlying lawsuit remains unresolved. The outcome could reshape the boundaries of federal authority over scientific research funding—and determine whether longstanding DEI-related initiatives in public health survive the administration's aggressive rollback. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shreveport Police Department unveiled its new Mobile Command Center
The Shreveport Police Department unveiled its new Mobile Command Center Wednesday morning in the location of the cities third future police substation on St. Vincent Ave. This command center marks a new era for Shreveport Police Department and replaces the former 1990s model. Shreveport Mayor Tom Arceneaux said, "this is the latest in equipment... this facility is like a driving building and we are pleased to open this up and to have this vehicle available." The older model command center is not going to the junk yard but will be used for other purposes. The former command center will be taken to area schools for education. This new command center was purchased through the 2021 Bond proposal money. According to Smith, this new vehicle cost $1,066,816. He said, "this is the latest and greatest, best technology, best vehicle there is out there for emergency command centers. Shreveporters I want you to know that you are number one in the world." This state-of-the-art mobile command center will enhance the Shreveport Police Departments ability to respond efficiently to community events, emergencies and large-scale incidents. Located on the new vehicle are multiple monitors that are capable of displaying drone and camera footage as well as area for police personnel to conduct meetings during large-scale incidents. Every government vehicle has an identity and this command center's call name is MCC #1. During the unveiling Wednesday morning Arceneaux placed the placard on the new command center. Smith said, "this puts this vehicle in service and gives it an identity." More: Shreveport Police Department unveils newest substation Thursday in west Shreveport Makenzie Boucher is a reporter with the Shreveport Times. Contact her at mboucher@ This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: Shreveport Police Department unveiled its new Mobile Command Center Solve the daily Crossword
