logo
Medicaid handouts only create dependency. Able-bodied adults should work.

Medicaid handouts only create dependency. Able-bodied adults should work.

USA Today7 hours ago

Does Medicaid need an overhaul? Does Republicans' proposed $800 billion cuts go too far – or not far enough? Readers respond in USA TODAY's Opinion Forum.
With the deadline for President Donald Trump and Republicans' "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" on the horizon, Americans are turning their attention to a major provision of the budget bill: changes to Medicaid.
The bill calls for sweeping changes, including cuts of nearly $800 billion to the program, a mandatory work requirement of 80 hours per month, and an overhaul of the current Medicaid and Medicare systems – consolidating them for the purpose of centralized enrollment. Additional changes include banning federal funding for gender-affirming care and transitioning procedures and reducing the amount of federal funding allotted to states for noncitizens.
As Congress debates these provisions before a final vote in the Senate, Americans are sounding off – largely in support of the program. More than 71 million Americans benefit from Medicaid, and new polls from KFF Health found 83% of respondents have a favorable view of Medicaid. More than half of respondents who are enrolled in Medicaid say changes to the program will make it "very difficult" to afford medications (68%), see a health care provider (59%) or get alternate insurance coverage (56%).
A June 11 Quinnipiac University poll found half of American voters polled said funding for Medicaid should go up, not down, while an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll released June 16 found that 50% of Americans think we spend too little on Medicaid.
But we wanted to hear from you, our USA TODAY readers, directly. We asked what changes, if any, you want to see to the program and how Medicaid has impacted your life or the lives of those you know. Do the proposed cuts go too far? Or not far enough? Here's what you told us for our Opinion Forum.
I couldn't have made it as a mom ‒ or cancer survivor ‒ without Medicaid
As a Stage 3 breast cancer survivor, mother to a son with profound disabilities and a full-time working member of society, I've had to navigate the unimaginable. Without Medicaid, I could not have managed any of it.
The program covers our son's in-home care, and it gave me the ability to focus on both my treatment and career. For families like mine, Medicaid is not a luxury ‒ it is the foundation that holds everything together. Proposed cuts threaten the care millions rely on. We must protect Medicaid so parents are not forced to choose among their health, their job and their children's needs.
— Caroline Johnson, Louisville, Kentucky
Able-bodied people should be working. Entitlements weren't meant to last forever.
As I understand it, the only people who would be cut from Medicaid are able-bodied adults who would need to work a minimum number of hours a week to keep receiving it. I don't believe that disabled people, older folks and children would be affected. Also, illegal migrants would be kept off, because American taxpayers are not responsible for paying their way. We have enough American citizens who need help.
Those who are not supposed to get these entitlements should be cut. These entitlement programs were never meant to be a way of life. They were supposed to be a safety net only for those who really needed them. Able-bodied adults should work.
There is pride in working for what you need or want. Handouts only cause dependency, which is not good for anyone. Every citizen who is able should strive to be independent.
The same should go for food stamps. It should only be for the really needy disabled, elderly and children with low incomes.
— Renee Bertoni, Holley, New York
Real government waste is MAGA's excess
I am a retired Health and Human Services Department worker. I think this administration is so shortsighted about Medicaid and food assistance cuts for working families and individuals. If low-income people and working families have inadequate food and no medical coverage, it hinders their ability to work and function in society. All people deserve medical coverage and nutritious foods!
I don't think I will ever support Republicans again.
This is supposed to be a government for the people, by the people and of the people. These MAGA supporters are all lacking in human decency. Yes, I believe they will cut more and more because they are focused on self-indulgence. Increase taxes for the wealthy who have too much and know that "trickle-down economics" is just a buzz phrase. It doesn't work.
Big cuts were made to the federal work force with no strategy and no concern for talented and dedicated employees, along with lots of publicity for fake fraud claims that didn't exist. The minions are hard at work trying to sell the public on their distorted strategy: more for them and less for everyone else.
Let's think about the waste of the Trump military parade. That's what's shameful.
— Joyce Schulz, Tawas City, Michigan
As an ER doctor, I saw what cuts to Medicaid would cost us all
As an emergency physician, I cared for uninsured patients who were signed up for Medicaid insurance in the emergency department. Medicaid health insurance allowed these patients to follow up with primary care doctors and providers who otherwise could not afford to care for uninsured people.
Studies show that adding Medicaid insurance saves lives. And taking away Medicaid insurance leads to worse health outcomes. I am very concerned that any cuts to Medicaid insurance would lead to avoidable illness and even death for newly uninsured patients.
Primary care physicians and specialists cannot afford to care for patients who lose their Medicaid health care coverage. Also, rural hospitals and rural clinics would lose a significant portion of their financial support from Medicaid. Primary care providers and rural hospitals would be forced to close their doors, leaving uninsured patients without access to care.
I am afraid that Republican politicians will choose tax cuts for the rich over Medicaid health insurance for the poor.
I think that Republican politicians should have their own government health insurance taken away from them. Why should taxpayers pay for the health insurance of these well-off Republicans who are voting to take away Medicaid from poor people?
— Gary Young, Sacramento, California
I've worked hard to get everything I have. Democrats don't seem to see people like me.
I don't see the problem with having work requirements. If you can work, why not? As a taxpayer, I pay for my own medical insurance. I am single and have no dependents. I have no fault with us having a Medicaid program for the elderly, children and disabled, but that should be it unless you are working and need a short-term helping hand. I have been working full-time since I was 22, so I don't understand people having an issue with a work requirement to get medical coverage.
I think we have to cut spending across the board. I hear Democrats talking about taking things away, but I don't seem to hear anything from them about how to cut spending. We are over $36 trillion in debt. If spending is not controlled, our country could go bankrupt, and then no one would have any programs to use.
What is the Democrats' plan to get the debt under control? They had the past four years to do it, and you see where we are. I'm tired of the talk about these cuts going to the billionaires. We don't know for sure where it's going, and you can't understand how tired of this rhetoric people are.
Additionally, I would like to see the cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development and Department of Education all codified so these programs do not exist. There seems to have been a bit of waste and abuse over many years that needs to be dealt with.
I make under $70,000 a year, so I have worked hard to get where I am. I was a Democrat for over 35 years, and about five years ago, I went Republican, as parties seem to have switched. I believe that the Democrat Party is full of elitists who feel we poor peons will do what they tell us, rather than realizing a lot of peons can think for ourselves and should not be condescended to and not told we are bad peons if we disagree with them.
— Teresa Loy, Tucson, Arizona
My brother was saved by Medicaid. Many more would die without it.
My brother had AIDS/HIV and AIDS-related cancer. He was too sick to work and relied on Medicaid for all his medical benefits, both physical and mental.
He eventually worked for the nonprofit Hope and Help in Orlando. He was a mentor to others, a champion, an activist, an orator and a published writer. He died in August 2020. All his efforts and the efforts of many would die in vain without their medication that was available through Medicaid.
I'm extremely worried. The effects aren't self-contained, and the negative effects would permeate into an already strained system. Medical insurance is unaffordable in this country's economy, and it only gets worse.
The Republicans need to vote according to the wants and needs of their constituents and reinstall empathy in their party. Maybe that will resonate and 'trickle down.'
We have to limit tax cuts for the wealthiest. And here's a novel idea: Let's go back to a time when employers paid for employees' health care and pensions. Those two items can't be supported by today's salaries.
— Karen O'Donnell, Lake Mary, Florida

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

With its stock in sharp decline, Trump's media company will buy $400 million of its own shares
With its stock in sharp decline, Trump's media company will buy $400 million of its own shares

San Francisco Chronicle​

time27 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

With its stock in sharp decline, Trump's media company will buy $400 million of its own shares

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's media company plans to buy back up to $400 million of its stock, which have lost 46% of their value this year. Trump Media and Technology Group, which operates the Truth Social media platform, said Monday that the acquisition will improve its financial flexibility. It will retire the shares after they are purchased, meaning these particular shares can't be reissued. Companies can drive their stock higher by acquiring or removing the number of company shares outstanding. Trump is the largest stakeholder in Trump Media, with about 114 million shares. Shares of Trump Media rose just over 2% Monday. But the shares appeared to peak about a month after the company went public in late March. Shares have been on a steady, downward trajectory since. The company said early this year that it lost $400.9 million in 2024 and its annual revenue declined 12% to $3.6 million. After winning the U.S. presidential election in November, Trump transferred all of his shares in the company — worth around $4 billion on paper — as a gift to the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust. Trump's shares amounted to more than half of the company's stock. The company said Monday that it will fund the buyback separately from its Bitcoin treasury strategy. Under that plan, institutional investors will buy $2.5 billion in the company's stock with the proceeds going to build up a bitcoin reserve.

With its stock in sharp decline, Trump's media company will buy $400 million of its own shares
With its stock in sharp decline, Trump's media company will buy $400 million of its own shares

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

With its stock in sharp decline, Trump's media company will buy $400 million of its own shares

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's media company plans to buy back up to $400 million of its stock, which have lost 46% of their value this year. Trump Media and Technology Group, which operates the Truth Social media platform, said Monday that the acquisition will improve its financial flexibility. It will retire the shares after they are purchased, meaning these particular shares can't be reissued. Companies can drive their stock higher by acquiring or removing the number of company shares outstanding. Trump is the largest stakeholder in Trump Media, with about 114 million shares. Shares of Trump Media rose just over 2% Monday. But the shares appeared to peak about a month after the company went public in late March. Shares have been on a steady, downward trajectory since. The company said early this year that it lost $400.9 million in 2024 and its annual revenue declined 12% to $3.6 million. After winning the U.S. presidential election in November, Trump transferred all of his shares in the company — worth around $4 billion on paper — as a gift to the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust. Trump's shares amounted to more than half of the company's stock. The company said Monday that it will fund the buyback separately from its Bitcoin treasury strategy. Under that plan, institutional investors will buy $2.5 billion in the company's stock with the proceeds going to build up a bitcoin reserve. Trump Media joins other companies with similar cryptocurrency strategies, including cloud and mobile software developer MicroStrategy, which is building a reserve containing billions worth of bitcoin.

Polls show Trump's big bill is unpopular as Republicans stare down their deadline for passage
Polls show Trump's big bill is unpopular as Republicans stare down their deadline for passage

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Polls show Trump's big bill is unpopular as Republicans stare down their deadline for passage

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is facing political headwinds for his 'big, beautiful bill' as Republican leaders hope to begin votes on it in the Senate this week. Specifically, five new surveys indicate that the GOP is losing the battle of public opinion on a major piece of legislation they're aiming to pass by July 4. Nonpartisan polls released this month show that voters have a negative perception of the bill. The House-passed version, which is facing modest revisions in the Senate, would extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts while slashing taxes on tips and overtime, and enact a series of spending cuts to Medicaid and other programs. A Fox News poll found that 38% of registered voters support the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' based on what they know about it, while 59% oppose it. The survey found that the legislation is unpopular across demographic, age and income groups. It is opposed 22%-73% by independents, and 43%-53% among white men without a college degree, the heart of Trump's base. A Quinnipiac University poll found that 27% of registered voters support the bill, while 53% oppose it. Another 20% had no opinion. Among independents, 20% said they support it and 57% said they oppose it. A KFF poll found that 35% of adults have a favorable view when asked about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' while 64% have an unfavorable view. Just 27% of independents said they hold a favorable view of it. A survey from Pew Research Center found that 29% of adults favor the bill, while 49% oppose it. (Another 21% said they weren't sure.) Asked what impact it would have on the country, 54% said 'a mostly negative effect,' 30% said 'a mostly positive effect' and 12% said 'not much of an effect.' A poll by The Washington Post and Ipsos found that 23% of adults support 'the budget bill changing tax, spending and Medicaid policies,' while 42% oppose it. Another 34% had no opinion. The bill reduces Medicaid spending through new work requirements and eligibility rules. Overall, the House-passed version is projected by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office to increase the national debt by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. 'The great, big, beautiful bill will grow the economy like it has never been grown before,' Trump, who has pushed hard for its passage, wrote earlier this month on Truth Social. In a recent NBC News Decision Desk poll asking Americans what issue matters most to them, 51% picked 'maintaining current spending levels on programs like Medicaid,' 21% picked 'continuing and expanding income tax cuts and credits' enacted by Trump in 2017, and 28% picked 'ensuring that the national debt is reduced.' The Senate is eyeing some changes to the House's bill, but nothing that alters its basic structure. For instance, the Senate is weighing less aggressive cuts to clean energy funding and more aggressive Medicaid spending reductions. Senate GOP leaders are hoping to hold a vote on the package this week. They can only afford three defections, assuming all Democrats oppose the bill, and several Republican senators have raised an array of concerns with it. The final product that passes the Senate will also need to go back through the House before it can go to Trump's desk for a signature. 'It needs work. And they don't have 51 votes,' Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told NBC News, taking issue with a provision that changes how providers are taxed. 'They've got to fix the provider, the rural hospital issue. ... They cannot defund rural hospitals.' There are some nuances in the polling. The Washington Post-Ipsos survey found that extending the 2017 tax cuts 'for people of all income levels' was popular among adults by a margin of 49%-26%, but extending them specifically for incomes above $400,000 was unpopular by a margin of 30%-49%. The Post-Ipsos poll found that 52% of Americans supported work requirements for able-bodied adults to receive Medicaid, while 33% opposed them. But that policy became unpopular when voters were told that the CBO estimates 8 million people would lose health coverage as a result of the bill: 63% said that is unacceptable, while 18% said that's acceptable. (The latest version of the bill is projected to result in more than 10 million losing their coverage, according to the CBO.) The Quinnipiac poll found that just 10% of voters want to decrease Medicaid spending, while 40% want it to stay about the same and 47% want to increase it. In recent days, the Senate bill has been scrubbed by the parliamentarian, the chamber's in-house referee tasked with ensuring all the provisions comply with the rules for the so-called 'budget reconciliation' process Republicans are using to pass it. The process allows the majority party to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold, effectively cutting Democrats out of the process. Some pieces of the bill have been knocked out in that process, according to a Democratic budget aide, including a provision to cut federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) spending and require states to shoulder a larger burden. That will be subject to the 60-vote threshold and removed from the bill, along with a controversial policy sought by Republicans to restrict the power of courts to issue injunctions against the federal government. Other provisions that were dropped include cuts to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and repealing authorizations under the Inflation Reduction Act. Senate Republican leaders hope to roll out the remaining provisions of the bill this week and begin voting on it, with the target of passing it by July 4. No votes have been scheduled yet. For now, Senate Republicans are crafting the bill with the goal of finding 51 votes in the chamber, even if that makes it unpalatable to the narrow House majority. For instance, they're slashing a $40,000 cap for state and local tax deductions down to $10,000, which a critical group of House Republicans in high-tax states have made clear is a nonstarter for them. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, slammed what he called 'major backsliding on the IRA green new scam subsidies' in the House bill, calling the more modest cuts a red line for him. 'I'm not going to vote for a bill that does that,' Roy told reporters. That sets up a confrontation with the House, where Republicans also have a narrow majority, in order to craft a version that can clear both chambers. Meanwhile, Democrats are planning to make the bill a centerpiece of their message to voters in the 2026 midterm election. 'It's no wonder the so-called moderate House Republicans continue to lie about their Tax Scam: the Big, Ugly Bill is wildly unpopular with the American public and they know their vote for it will lose them the majority next year,' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Justin Chermol said in a statement. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store