New York drivers are about to lose 300,000 parking spots throughout the city
A new bill, Intro. 1138, pushed by the City Council's Progressive Caucus aims to ban vehicles from parking within 20 feet of crosswalks at all intersections, a practice known as 'daylighting.' Supporters say the move will save lives by improving visibility for drivers, cyclists and pedestrians. Critics say it's a costly overreach that will gut 10-percent of the city's free parking supply.
Sponsored by Queens Council Member Julie Won, the so-called 'Universal Daylighting' bill would bring the city in line with a long-ignored state law already on the books. It would also require the Department of Transportation (DOT) to install physical barriers like planters or bike racks at 1,000 intersections per year to ensure drivers don't sneak back into the cleared space.
That added infrastructure, however, comes at a price. The DOT estimates full-scale implementation could top $3 billion, and not everyone is convinced it's money well spent.
'If this unhardened daylighting were implemented citywide, we think we could expect an increase of up to 15,000 injuries in a year,' DOT deputy commissioner Eric Beaton said (per amNewYork), pointing to internal studies that show minimal benefit from simply removing cars without 'hardening' the corners.
Still, advocates say the bill is long overdue. In a 2023 op-ed, Open Plans co-director Sara Lind noted that over half of pedestrian deaths and injuries occur at intersections.
The numbers are sobering: In 2024, NYC saw 119 pedestrian deaths—a sharp 18-percent increase over the year before. Tragedies like the deaths of 7-year-old Dolma Naadhun and 16-year-old Jael Zhinin in Won's district helped catalyze support for the legislation.
But opposition is mounting, especially in car-reliant areas like Staten Island, where Borough President Vito Fossella slammed the proposal as a '$3 billion parking ticket.'
The bill has a majority of Council sponsors, and the Progressive Caucus has made it a year-end priority. Still, it remains unclear if Speaker Adrienne Adams will bring it to a vote. Until then, New Yorkers can only wait—and circle the block.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 hours ago
- The Independent
Schumer on the ropes: Weak Trump responses see Democratic leader suffer worst-ever slide in polls
If he can't make it here, can he make it anywhere? A new poll from Siena College shows that half of New Yorkers do not like how Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is handling the second Donald Trump presidency. The survey finds that 50 percent of New Yorker state voters have an unfavorable opinion of Schumer — who has served in the Senate since 1999 and became minority leader in 2017 — and just 38 percent have a favorable opinion of him. Schumer faced considerable criticism from many in his party in March after he voted for a stopgap spending bill that Republicans jammed through the Senate despite a majority of the Senate Democratic caucus and all but one House Democrat voting against it. In the days leading up to the vote and even after, numerous Senate Democrats voiced their strong opposition despite the fact that voting against it would lead to a government shutdown. And many Democrats mocked Schumer for seeming out of touch and geriatric after he led a fairly milquetoast protest in front of the Treasury Department in February chanting, 'We will win.' In the spring, he received even more criticism when he told CNN's Dana Bash on State of the Union that he'd sent a 'very strong letter' with 'eight very strong questions' that even had the journalist near rolling her eyes. The polling represents the 74-year-old Schumer's lowest numbers since he became a senator, according to Siena College, which has tracked his approval back since February 2005. Prior to his time in the Senate, he served in the House of Representatives for 18 years. During his time as majority leader, Schumer held together a tenuous coalition of 50 Democrats in the first two years of Joe Biden's presidency, passing Covid-19 relief legislation, the first major piece of gun legislation in almost 30 years, an initiative to promote the manufacturing of semi-conductors in the United States and the Inflation Reduction Act, Biden's signature climate and health care law. During the next two years, Schumer focused heavily on confirming Biden's judicial nominees. But many Democratic voters see him as ill-equipped to stand up to Trump. In January, 45 percent of New Yorkers had a favorable opinion of him and 41 percent had an unfavorable opinion of Schumer. The decline in favorability appears to come from a drop among Democrats and residents of New York City. In January, 68 percent of Democrats had a favorable opinion of him, with 23 percent of Democrats having an unfavorable opinion of him. But his favorable number among Democrats dropped to 49 percent and 39 percent of Democrats have an unfavorable opinion of him. Schumer also seemed to see a decline in support in his hometown of New York City. In January, 55 percent of New York City residents had a favorable opinion of him and 35 percent had an unfavorable opinion of him. Now, 39 percent of residents of New York City have a favorable opinion of him and 46 percent have an unfavorable opinion of Schumer. One of the few groups where his approval increased came among Jewish voters. Earlier this year, Schumer released a book about antisemitism and he remains an outspoke supporter of Israel even as many in his party continue to criticize the war being prosecuted against Gaza by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In Januaty, 45 percent of Jewish New Yorkers had a favorable opinion of him and 47 percent had an unfavorable opinion of him. Now, 52 percent of Jewish New Yorkers have a favorable opinion of Schumer and 43 percent have an unfavorable opinion of him. Schumer does not face re-election until 2028, when there will be another presidential election. Democrats face long odds to retake the Senate in 2026 and are hoping to flip states like North Carolina and Maine as they pray for miracles in Ohio, Texas and Iowa. But many have hoped that a more progressive Democrat like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the democratic socialist congresswoman who represents the Bronx and Queens, will stage either a primary challenge or run if Schumer retires.
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Council considers funding boost for Oxpens bridge
A council is due to make a decision about how much to spend on a controversial bridge in a cabinet meeting later, the city council will consider a report that proposes increasing the project budget for the Oxpens River scheme, which is now estimated to cost £14m, rather than £10.3m, would link Grandpont Nature Park to Oxpens Meadow, to provide a walking and cycling route between planned group Friends of Grandpont Nature Park said the bridge would be an act of "ecological vandalism and blatant misuse of public funds". The group also said the path between Osney Mead and the new bridge was not fully floodproofed, and that people would have to cross a section of the towpath under the rail bridge which is known to flood launched a judicial review after plans for the bridge were approved last year but it was dismissed by the High Court in group has submitted an appeal and is waiting to hear whether it can city council said the increase in cost was due to the inflation of construction costs, caused by the delay from the judicial local authority said in a recent report the bridge would now cost an extra £3.7m due to the legal delays and increasing construction costs.A spokesperson for the group described it as "an incredible" amount of public money and said the structure would be "wrecking the only woodland on the main path through Grandpont Nature Park in the process".Construction works on the bridge is to begin in early 2026 and the city council is aiming for completion by February 2027. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Time Out
a day ago
- Time Out
This Harlem train station just got a meaningful new name
Your morning commute just got a little more historic. Over the weekend, Governor Kathy Hochul signed legislation officially rechristening the 110th Street-Central Park North subway stop on the 2/3 line as 110th Street-Malcolm X Plaza, a change timed with the 51st Harlem Week Festival and steeped in Civil Rights history. The renaming plants one of New York's most famous activists firmly into the city's transit map, right at the corner of Central Park North and Malcolm X Boulevard (aka Lenox Avenue). It's also now the closest station to the recently revamped Davis Center at the Harlem Meer, meaning you can hop off the train and be in prime park territory in minutes. And before you panic, no, the routes aren't changing; your 2 or 3 will still run between 96th and 116th Streets as usual, just with a fresh name on the signs and subway announcements. Malcolm X's connection to Harlem runs deep: He first lived in the neighborhood in 1943 and returned in 1954, remaining there until his assassination in 1965 at the Audubon Ballroom. The renaming joins a slate of new honors for the neighborhood, including Hochul's signing of another bill establishing the Harlem Renaissance Cultural District, stretching from 110th to 155th Streets between Fifth Avenue and the Hudson River. The governor called the area 'sacred ground for Black art and culture and music and thought,' likening today's energy to the creative explosion of the 1920s. City leaders and community members say the new name is a daily reminder for New Yorkers and visitors alike. 'Every rider who passes through will encounter the name of a man who dared to speak truth to power, who demanded dignity for the oppressed, and who inspired generations to rise above adversity,' said Councilmember Yusef Salaam, one of the Exonerated Central Park Five. For commuters, the update might be as simple as noticing a new placard on the platform. But for Harlem, it's another step in preserving and promoting the neighborhood's role in shaping the city—and the country's—cultural and political history.
