Iowa DOGE mulls whether the state needs 99 counties
Why it matters: Iowa's county structure is deeply rooted in the state's identity.
Yet some have fewer than 5,000 residents, raising questions about the viability of redundant local governments and infrastructure, including 100 courthouses across the state.
Catch up quick: Reynolds issued an executive order creating Iowa DOGE Task Force in February, appointing an all-Republican committee to steer it.
Its aim is to maximize taxpayer money, leverage emerging technology and refine workforce and job training programs.
County consolidation was among the ideas floated in June when task force members agreed to do more research before making a final report in September.
Flashback: Ideas for county consolidation have been on some lawmakers' minds for decades, including in 2004 when former state Sen. Matt McCoy (D-DSM) introduced legislation that would have created a legislative study committee to explore it.
The measure never advanced.
Yes, but: In February, McCoy — who is now the chairperson of the Polk County Board of Supervisors — told Axios that consolidation or increased collaboration among local governments is becoming necessary, especially given state-level efforts to cut property taxes.
Reality check: Cutting the number of counties would require a constitutional amendment, potentially presenting a major political challenge.
A more efficient option could be "a regionalism approach," which would expand existing cost-sharing and cooperative service models among counties rather than eliminating county lines, Andrea Woodard, executive director of the Iowa State Association of Counties, tells Axios.
The big picture: While full-scale county mergers are rare, several states have pursued regional service delivery or structural consolidations to cut costs and boost efficiency.
The intrigue: Iowa has already regionalized certain services, including mental health and substance abuse systems, and consolidated some state government agencies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
24 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Senator Asks IRS to Investigate Nonprofit Group for Alleged Ties to Hamas
A Republican senator has asked the IRS to investigate a group for alleged ties to Hamas and questioned its nonprofit status. In a letter to IRS Commissioner Billy Long, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) asked the IRS to look into the nonprofit status of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and investigate whether it has ties to the Hamas terrorist group and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Los Angeles Times
25 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump says Intel CEO is ‘highly conflicted,' calls for resignation
Chipmaker Intel is the latest tech company facing political pressure from President Trump. On Thursday, Trump called for the immediate resignation of Intel Chief Executive Lip-Bu Tan, who took the helm in March to turn around the beleaguered chipmaker. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Trump didn't say what the conflicts were in his post, but his remarks came after Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board, expressing national security concerns about Tan's reported ties to Chinese companies. Cotton cited a report from Reuters that said Tan has invested in more than 600 Chinese firms and some of them have links to the country's military. Trump's calls for a resignation adds to a list of issues Intel already has to deal with. The 57-year-old tech company, once the most valuable U.S. chipmaker, is trying to keep up as the race to dominate artificial intelligence escalates. The Santa Clara company has been losing money and seen its stock plunge while it falls behind rivals such as Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. As of Thursday morning, Intel's share price was down 2% to $19.92. The company didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump said Wednesday during an event in which Apple announced an additional $100 billion investment in the United States that he plans to place a tariff on semiconductors but there won't be a charge for companies building in the United States. While he praised companies like Apple and Nvidia, he also criticized Intel. 'Intel was just taken over the coals. They were taken to the cleaners, frankly, and moved to other places in particular Taiwan,' Trump said at the event. Intel, known for making the 'brains' that power computers, has been investing heavily in its foundry business, taking on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., which makes chips for other companies such as Apple and Nvidia. During the Biden administration, the U.S. Department of Commerce awarded Intel roughly $8 billion to support manufacturing and advanced packaging projects in the United States.
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Should You Invest Your Retirement In Private Equity Funds?
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA - NOVEMBER 04: Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump holds a campaign rally at the PPG Paints Arena on November 04, 2024 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. With one day left before the general election, Trump is campaigning for re-election in the battleground states of North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Michigan. (Photo by) Getty Images On August 7th, 2025, President Trump is set to sign an executive order that instructed regulatory agencies to examine and clarify existing regulations to allow Americans to invest their retirement funds in cryptocurrency investments, private equity funds, and other alternative investments. Until now, if you wished to invest your retirement funds in anything beyond the market, you would have to rely on a self-directed IRA. Self-directed IRAs could be used to invest in a variety of assets, such as gold, and Peter Thiel famously invested in Palantir with his Roth IRA, shielding billions of gains from taxation. If Americans could invest in private equity funds, should they? Unlike actively managed mutual funds, the majority of which do not beat the S&P 500, do private equity funds beat the market? Research by University of Chicago Graduate School of Business professor Steven N. Kaplan and MIT's Sloan School of Management professor Antoinette Schoar discovered that on average, private equity returns tended to perform similar to the S&P 500, even after fees. More importantly, they measured persistence too. A fund that performed well in the past tends to continue to perform well. If you're able to find a market-beating private equity fund that will allow you to invest, it's not a terrible idea. First, not all private equity funds beat the market. And the ones that do may not allow you to invest in them. Next, the biggest disadvantage of private equity firms is their illiquidity. They tend to have multi-year hold periods in which you cannot sell your shares. The ones that do allow you to withdraw your funds early often allow it after a big penalty. It's not unheard of for a fund to have a required hold period of 7 to 12 years. This can become a challenge if you need to take required minimum distributions. They also tend to charge significant fees. There is usually a management fee plus carried interest, which can reduce your returns. Finally, and this can be a positive or a negative, it's difficult to value the fund. The lack of transparency can be a good thing, especially in a volatile market. If you can't touch your money, it's less important to know how valuable the fund is. It depends on your needs and how that investment fits with your overall portfolio. Most investors will not need to invest in private equity but your specific situation may warrant a different decision. Right now, you still can't invest in cryptocurrencies, private equity funds, or other alternative investments in your retirement funds. The executive order only directed regulatory agencies to review current policy and regulations but it feels like it's only a matter of time before those policies change to allow for it.
