Covid-style tests for womb cancer to be offered
Women with signs of womb cancer can be offered a less invasive test to rule out disease after it was approved for use in the UK.
The new test, WID-easy, uses some of the same technology used in Covid PCR (polymerase chain reaction) tests.
Traditionally, women with signs of womb cancer would need a transvaginal ultrasound scan or a hysteroscopy – where a tube with a camera is used to look inside the womb to confirm or rule out disease.
The new PCR test is a simple swab, which is sent off to a laboratory for analysis.
Scientists then look for changes in the DNA that indicate whether womb cancer is present.
If the test indicates that a woman has womb cancer, then she would need a biopsy to confirm or rule out the diagnosis.
Potential for widespread use
The test, developed by Sola Diagnostics, has been approved in the UK by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency for use by women over 45 who have abnormal uterine bleeding.
This means that it is immediately available to private clinics, and it is hoped that it will be made available for widespread use in the NHS.
Analysis of the test, which was developed by researchers from University College London (UCL) and the University of Innsbruck, was published in Lancet Oncology in 2023.
'The... test delivers fast results and shows improved performance compared with a combination of imaging index tests,' the authors wrote at the time.
The test also significantly reduces the number of false positives, which could mean fewer healthy women would be sent to have invasive hysteroscopy or biopsy procedures.
The inventor of the test, Professor Martin Widschwendter, from UCL's Institute for Women's Health and the University of Innsbruck in Austria, said: 'The WID-easy test is the first test of its kind in the UK – using a simple swab method to detect womb cancer.
'We are proud to have developed a test that addresses an urgent gap in women's health and performs well across all women.'
'Minds put at rest sooner'
Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of The Eve Appeal, a leading gynaecological cancer charity, said: 'Currently in the UK, the tests to investigate abnormal bleeding and check for womb cancer can cause stress and discomfort. The usual test is a hysteroscopy, which many find painful and invasive.
'A test which is less painful and more acceptable is to be welcomed by many.
'One of the key groups who may benefit from this test are black women who more often receive a late-stage diagnosis for this cancer…
'The WID-easy test could enable the many thousands of women who experience abnormal bleeding, and where cancer needs to be ruled out, to potentially avoid painful tests like a hysteroscopy and have their minds put at rest sooner, saving them from unnecessary stress.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
See our Sun like NEVER before: European Space Agency unveils the first ever photo of our home star's south pole - and says the best snaps are yet to come
The first ever images of the sun's south pole have been snapped by satellite launched by the European Space Agency (ESA). Until now, every image of the sun has been taken from straight on, along the 'elliptical plane' - the flat disk on which all planets orbit. But by tilting its orbit to 17 degrees below the equator, the ESA's solar orbite r has managed to reveal a side of our home star that has never been seen before. Soon, the probe will tilt its orbit lower for an even better view - meaning the best images are yet to come. By meeting up with Venus once every few orbits, the orbiter can use the planet's gravity to shift and tilt its orbit. This has already allowed the probe to make some exciting new discoveries about the sun, and the researchers behind the project say that revelations are on the way. Dr Hamish Reid, an astronomer at UCL and UK co-investigator on the orbiter's Extreme Ultraviolet Imager, told MailOnline: 'This moment is very significant; we have been waiting decades since we first started observing the Sun to catch a glimpse of the poles. 'This really is the missing piece of the puzzle in our understanding of the solar magnetic field.' Solar Orbiter used three instruments to capture images of the sun's hidden south pole, each looking at the sun in a different way. The Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) was used to study the sun in visible light and map the surface magnetic field. The Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUI) captures ultraviolet light to reveal million-degree charged gas in the Sun's outer atmosphere. Meanwhile the Spectral Imaging of the Coronal Environment (SPICE) instrument reveals the layers of the sun's atmosphere by capturing light from different temperatures of charged gas. Dr Sami Solanki, of the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, says: 'We didn't know what exactly to expect from these first observations – the Sun's poles are literally terra incognita.' Already, these observations are helping scientists understand how the sun's ever-changing weather could impact Earth. The sun's magnetic poles flip roughly once every 11 years in a process known as the solar cycle. This flip coincides with a period of massively increased activity known as the solar maximum, sending huge solar flares and waves of ejected material hurtling towards Earth. While these events can have serious consequences for our planet's electronics and communications systems, we don't know enough about the sun's magnetic poles to predict exactly when a solar maximum will occur. Professor Lucie Green, an astronomer at UCL and co-investigator on the EUI, says: 'Being able to observe the poles is vital for understanding how the Sun's magnetic field operates on a global scale, leading to an 11-year cycle in the Sun's activity.' One of the Solar Orbiters' first observations is that the magnetic fields at the sun's south pole are currently in a state of disarray. A normal bar magnet will have a clear north and south pole, but the sun's south pole currently has both north and south magnetic fields present. This only happens for a short time during the solar maximum right after the magnetic poles flip. After the flip, the polarity will slowly build up over the next five years to create clear north and south poles, bringing the sun to its most stable period known as a solar minimum. Scientists still don't fully understand how this build-up process happens, but the Solar Orbiters' new position should help them find out. Professor Green says: 'We'll see previously unobserved high-latitude flows that carry magnetic elements to the polar regions, and in doing so sow the fundamental seeds for the next solar cycle.' In addition to capturing the changing magnetic fields, the Solar Orbiter has captured the first look inside the south pole's different layers. The SPICE instrument measures the light, or spectral lines, sent out by specific chemicals when they are heated to known temperatures. By tracking these spectral lines, the Solar Orbiter can work out how fast clumps of solar material are moving in a process called 'Doppler measurement'. Tracking how these particles move between the sun's layers is vitally important since it can reveal how this material is flung out of the sun in the form of solar wind. Solar wind is responsible for triggering the Northern Lights but can also damage satellites in orbit, disrupt power grids on land, and bathe astronauts in dangerous radiation. Having now dropped below the equator, the Solar Orbiter could now help scientists understand this disruptive phenomenon. aDr Frédéric Auchère, an astronomer from the University of Paris-Saclay and SPICE team leader, says: 'Doppler measurements of solar wind setting off from the Sun by current and past space missions have been hampered by the grazing view of the solar poles. 'Measurements from high latitudes, now possible with Solar Orbiter, will be a revolution in solar physics.' However, these are just the very first observations and scientists say that more measurements and even more discoveries are yet to come. Large parts of the data from the first images still need to be analysed, with the full dataset expected to arrive back on Earth by October this year. In the years to come, all ten of the Solar Orbiter's instruments will collect vast quantities of data as further meet-ups with Venus shift the craft to an even more tilted orbit. Eventually, the Solar Orbiter will hit an angle of 33 degrees below the equator, giving an extremely clear view of the sun's southern pole. Dr Daniel Müller, ESA's Solar Orbiter project scientist, says: 'This is just the first step of Solar Orbiter's 'stairway to heaven'. In the coming years, the spacecraft will climb further out of the ecliptic plane for ever better views of the Sun's polar regions. 'These data will transform our understanding of the Sun's magnetic field, the solar wind, and solar activity.' Solar Orbiter is a European Space Agency mission with support from NASA to explore the Sun and the effect our host star has on the solar system — including Earth. The satellite launched from Cape Canaveral in Florida in February 2020 and reached its first close approach to the sun in June 2020. It was built in Stevenage, England and is loaded with a carefully selected set of 10 telescopes and direct sensing instruments. Solar Orbiter will fly within 26 million miles (43 million km) of the solar surface to closely inspect our star's poles. Scientists are investigating how the sun's violent outer atmosphere, also known as its corona, forms. This is the region from which 'solar wind' — storms of charged particles that can disrupt electronics on Earth — are blown out into space. Through Solar Orbiter, researchers hope to unravel what triggers solar storms to help better predict them in future. The Solar Orbiter's heat shields are expected to reach temperatures of up to 600C (1,112F) during its closest flybys. It will work closely with Nasa's Parker Solar Probe, which launched in August 2018, and is also studying the Sun's corona.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Peanuts or almonds? Rice or millet? Planet-friendly grocery shopping choices go beyond cutting meat
It's one of the most impactful climate decisions we make, and we make it multiple times a day. The U.N. estimates about a third of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, the main driver of climate change, come from food. That pollution can come from several links in the food supply chain: how farmland is treated, how crops are grown, how food is processed and how it's ultimately transported. Maybe you've already heard the short answer to minimizing your diet's impact on the planet: eat more plants and fewer animals. The data backs up that suggestion. Emissions from meat-rich diets are four times higher than that of vegan diets. But so much focus on meats overshadows many other food choices that also impact the environment and can contribute to global warming. Here is a look at other important grocery store decisions: Proteins Swapping one serving of chicken per day for beef cuts a diet's emissions nearly in half. Ruminant animals such as cows, sheep and goats are the top drivers of emissions. Those animals "are associated not only with nitrous oxide emissions, but they're also related to direct methane emissions because they burp them up while they digest food,' said Marco Springmann, professorial research fellow in climate change, food systems and health at University College London. Springmann said processed animal products have a higher impact on the planet, too: 'You need 10 times the amount of milk to make one unit of cheese.' So — and this is true of most food groups — the less processed the food, the smaller the environmental impact. Plant-based proteins like legumes, beans and nuts all boast a much lower climate impact. Grains The standout here is rice, and not in a good way. ' Rice uses a ton of water. It uses gobs of fertilizer. There's flooded rice paddy fields, and that water actually breeds all kinds of bacteria, and those bacteria produce methane gas,' said eco-dietitian nutritionist Mary Purdy. Purdy said the most planet-friendly alternative is just eating a bunch of different grains. 'The wheat, corn and soy world is very, very familiar to us because we've been seeing it. It's been heavily marketed. When was the last time you saw a commercial for millet or buckwheat?" she asked. Diverse diets, Purdy said, incentivize biodiverse agriculture, which is more resilient to erratic weather — a hallmark of climate change — and makes healthier soil. Fruits and vegetables When it comes to produce, minimizing impact is less about choosing between foods and more about buying based on the way that food was grown. Conventionally grown produce 'very likely is using pesticides, fertilizer, and maybe more water because the soil isn't healthy,' said Purdy. Purdy said organic labels, such as Regenerative Organic Certified, indicate those foods had a smaller climate impact when they were grown. The tradeoff is that organic food has a lower yield, so it requires more land use and is often more expensive. Local and 'in season' foods also have a smaller climate impact, but not just for one of the reasons you may be thinking of: emissions from international shipping. Every day, thousands of large ships transport goods, including produce, around the world, and the fuel they use is heavily polluting. However, "it's mostly those local emissions on trucks that are actually impactful, not the international shipping emissions," Springmann said. Also, food grown nearby tends to be grown in a way that fits with the local climate and is less harmful to the environment. "We're not trying to grow oranges in some place in a greenhouse,' Purdy said. Butter and oil Plants win out over animals, again. Vegetable oils are less impactful than butter or lard. Springmann also said tropical oils are healthiest in moderation, such as those from coconuts or palms, because they have a higher fat content. Plus, palm oil is associated with deforestation. As for nut butters, almonds might be a great option for limiting carbon emissions, but they require a lot of water. One study out of Tulane University found that a serving of peanuts has an emissions footprint similar to almonds but 30% less impact on water use. Don't waste food Throwing less food away might sound obvious, but roughly a third of food grown in the U.S. is wasted. Meal planning, freezing leftovers and checking the fridge before heading to the grocery store all help cut waste. 'The climate impact, the embedded water use, all of the labor and different aspects that went into producing that food, that all gets wasted if we don't eat it,' Blackstone said. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Major change to NHS cancer screening tests as health chiefs reveal millions of women affected
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MILLIONS of women will be offered NHS cervical screening less often under radical new changes. Those under 50 will only be called forward every five years - instead of three like they currently are. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Health chiefs say new testing approach is backed by clinical evidence and 'more personalised' Credit: Getty The plans, announced on Tuesday by NHS England, are said to be "in line" with "major" clinical evidence that suggests just as many cancer cases would be detected. Health chiefs said the changes would enable 'millions of women and people with a cervix in England to benefit from more personalised cervical screening'. "This new guidance is good news for those at low risk because they will no longer need to go for cervical screening as often," Athena Lamnisos, CEO of The Eve Appeal, said. Scotland and Wales have already introduced this protocol, which will start in England from July 1. Under the NHS screening system, which replaced smears, cells are tested for the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), which causes almost all cervical cancer. Traditional smear tests, also known as pap smears, looked for all abnormal cells directly but were less accurate than the new cervical screening tests. Currently, women aged 25 to 49 in England are offered such checks every three years, with screening every five years for those aged 50 to 64. If HPV is found, checks are then repeated each year, with further investigations if any cell abnormalities are found. More regular screening is also offered to those with a recent history of HPV. Under the new system, checks on those with positive results will remain annual. Cervical cancer could be eradicated as HPV vaccine slashes 90% of cases But the standard gap for those who test negative will extend from three years to five for women aged 25 to 49. This is because research shows they are at very low risk of cervical cancer for the next ten years and can safely wait longer to be screened again. This puts it in line with the gap for older women, in a similar approach to that adopted by Australia, the Netherlands and Sweden. Under the NHS plan, if a woman aged between 25 and 49 had a negative result, but previously had a positive test, they would still get a test three years later. Health chiefs said the new approach was more 'personalised' than previous approaches. Screening will also continue to be offered to trans men if they still have a cervix. 3 3 A DIY cervical screening test that women can do at home could be rolled out on the NHS Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. 'Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine – which Cancer Research UK scientists helped develop – have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress. 'If you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation – speak to your doctor.' DIY cancer check Cervical screening programmes and HPV vaccines have reduced rates and save 5,000 lives each year. Around 3,300 new cases are identified annually - that's around nine every day. And one in 130 women in the UK will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in their lifetime. Earlier this year, the NHS announced an at-home cervical screening tests could be rolled out in England from early 2026 for free. A new trial, known as the King's College London YouScreen trial, is the biggest to date and shows how the DIY kit can boost the numbers of women getting screened. Figures show that cervical screening uptake is declining, with nearly a third of women in England - particularly younger women - not taking up their most recent test. Experts say women may refuse testing due to a lack of convenient appointments, embarrassment and worries about the test causing pain. The new plan includes expanding the "ping and book" service, which sends reminders for screening appointments.
