logo
Hungrier kids, missed check-ups: Trump's cuts to childcare make it a lot harder to be a parent

Hungrier kids, missed check-ups: Trump's cuts to childcare make it a lot harder to be a parent

Yahoo03-06-2025
'People don't think about those parents,' Angelique Marshall, a Washington, D.C.-based at-home childcare provider, told Salon. Most of the parents the 56-year-old serves have children with disabilities and don't have much flexibility in their schedules. 'They have to go to work to be able to take off when the children need surgery or they have a serious illness or impact on their life.'
Under the Trump administration, the nation's pandemic-stressed child welfare system has taken a hit through temporary funding freezes, staffing cuts and Project 2025-aligned moves to weaken critical programs. The changes — some part of President Donald Trump's effort to slash social spending — place a strain on the government's distribution of funds and support for programs like Head Start and the Child Care and Development Fund, argued a group of U.S. senators in an April letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. By the time those changes trickle down to providers like Marshall and the families she serves, the impacts feel much more like crashing waves.
That's why Marshall counted herself — and her students — among the attendees of last month's "Day Without Child Care" action in Washington, D.C. Organizers had asked that parents call off work and providers close their doors to demonstrate how critical childcare is to the nation's daily grind. But Marshall chose to keep the doors of her daycare, Ms. P's Child and Family Services, open; her parents, she said in a video call, can't afford to go without work for a day, even if it's in protest.
At Washington's Freedom Plaza, a makeshift field day took place, where children enjoyed free swag, food and activities. Meanwhile, parents and providers shared stories during a rally at the plaza while organizers with SPACEs in Action, a nonprofit advocacy organization, led visits with city council members to advocate for early childhood education funds.
'Children and families with low-income wages, they won't get a quality start in education at all, and it's not because a child can't learn, it's because the underinvestment effect that they have [on] the overall potential,' Marshall said. 'We're going to see a downslide if they don't get the help and support they need because you're talking about defunding them, but you're not talking about what you're going to do with them.'
The administration's effort to cut some 10,000 jobs at the Department of Health and Family Services has resulted in a roughly 37.5% reduction in staff at the Administration for Children and Families, which oversees childcare and child welfare programs. Those layoffs included staff of the Office of Child Care and Office of Head Start, a federal program that provides early childhood education, social and health services to more than 750,000 children of low-income families up to age 5 — and that was flagged for elimination in Project 2025. The reduction in force also shuttered five of the 10 ACF offices, which helped ensure that grants reached individual facilities in 22 states and five territories, and acted as liaisons between program administrators and the government.
The Trump-backed reconciliation bill passed by the House on May 22 also stands to make matters worse for children and families. The bill threatens to cut more than $700 billion from Medicaid and nearly $300 billion from SNAP through 2034, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates of an earlier version of the bill. Medicaid serves more children than any other age group, while SNAP provides food assistance for more than 40 million people, including some 16 million children.
Marshall said she became a childcare provider in 1995 out of need, having searched for nearly five years for someone who could care for her daughter, who she said has intellectual disabilities, while she worked for the federal government. After exhausting all of her options, she opened Ms. P's Child and Family Services in the downtown Washington area to provide services to middle- and low-income families with disabled children. Not long after she opened her doors, she realized that other parents of children with disabilities faced similar hurdles while not fully understanding how best to support their kids with the limited knowledge of disabilities available at the time.
The issues she faced have become more complicated for her and the families she works with, as childcare has become less affordable. Living in Washington under Trump also means that a good portion of her clients are federal workers — or at least they used to be. Marshall said that several of the parents she serves have lost their jobs as a result of DOGE's recommended federal layoffs, which a judge blocked on May 22. Combined with threats to federal funding for public assistance, it has been too much for many of them to bear, she said.
'We're supporting the most vulnerable children in the District of Columbia and their parents who are working, and the ones who work in the federal government, who lost their job, who're now having mental health issues and breakdowns and anxiety — I mean, they're unpacking a lot of new things, and people are not realizing it,' she said.
Potential funding cuts to needed federal services, alongside the stress of job loss and parenting a child with a disability, create layers of hardship that many of these parents are struggling to navigate, Marshall added. 'That's like an onion.'
As her families adjust to the upheaval in their lives, Marshall said she's had to make some changes herself. She has had to lay off two members of her four-person daycare staff since January on account of Congress' 2025 budget change for D.C. Even with the pay equity fund's support, the increased costs and 80-to-100-hour work weeks associated with providing care for children with a range of disabilities also mean she's unable to pay her remaining staff more than the mandated minimum, let alone what she believes they're worth.
While Marshall said she's left the door open to her former employees to return should they choose if the funding increases again, she's also had to work with parents to find temporary solutions to the problems introduced by their new normal. In some cases, she's helped some parents with resumes as they start job hunts, facilitated exchanges of leftover baby formula and clothing, and connected them with others to create a sort of weekend childcare network.
'It's all about strategizing and thinking through some things,' Marshall said. 'I mean, if we got two parents who lost their jobs and on the weekends you want to work, let's see if this parent will be able to take care of your child, since they have the same disability. It's all about community and building it.'
In Washington, SPACEs in Action organizers pressed council members to vote for Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser's then-upcoming budget proposal, which promised to fully fund child care programs, including the Early Childhood Educator Pay Equity Fund, a fund that supports childcare facilities in offering competitive minimum wages and healthcare for staff.
Destynee Bolton, a childcare organizer for SPACEs in Action, told Salon that they also wanted to make sure that the funding included increases and adjustments to account for inflation and program educators' growth in credentials.
Meanwhile, the city is facing a $1.1 billion shortfall for the 2025 fiscal year after Congress decided to revert its budget to the 2024 fiscal year allotment, following the House of Representatives' refusal to vote on a new proposal. While Bowser has invoked a law allowing the city to autonomously increase its budget, she also planned to reduce city spending by $410 million in response to the federal budget cuts.Taken together with the threats to public assistance, these potential cuts to local dollars will only worsen the inequities in education, food security and health care access already affecting the district, Bolton said.
'That means a child loses their education, and then they lose that access to food security, in addition to Medicaid services being cut as well,' she said in a video call. 'Not being able to have that security — that means that children and families, low-, middle-income, working families, won't be able to go to doctor's appointments and get health advice that they would need.'
Bowser, however, unveiled her response to the district's budget deficit on May 27, which included full funding for core childcare programs like the Child Care Subsidy Program and the pay equity fund. While her proposed budget still needs approval from the D.C. Council, the mayor also asserted that the city was still calling on Congress to restore its spending to its initial budget.
Both Bolton and Marshall say that a substantial federal and local investment in early childhood education through a comprehensive approach to the workforce and revenue raisers, as well as an equitable tax system, would alleviate the difficulties that low- and middle–income families face.
'If high earners in D.C. are to contribute at the same level that low- to middle-income individuals have to contribute, that would help a lot with the programs that we have in the district,' Bolton said. 'They're able to have more viability because it's always the same thing every year — something always ends up on the chopping block.'
The impact of New Mexico making childcare free for about half of the state's children is a prime example of the value of adequate investment in childcare, Bolton added.
Five years after implementation, the state began to see the percentage of New Mexicans falling below the federal 'supplemental' poverty drop from 17.1% between 2013 and 2015 to just 10.9% today, according to The Guardian. Simultaneous wage increases for childcare workers in the state had a similar effect, with just 16% of childcare providers living in poverty compared to 27.4% in 2020.
Marshall questioned where the funds the Trump administration has recouped from layoffs and federal funding freezes will be going — and why it couldn't go to childcare.
'I believe that the United States of America is one of the most industrialized countries, but we do not budget childcare as an essential part of the infrastructure. Why not?' she said. 'But let me tell you, you can tell a lot about the heart of the nation when you have to care for the most vulnerable children and the seniors, and when you don't care and you're just throwing things away, what are you doing?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. Revealed Why He Wears Jeans To Work Out
RFK Jr. Revealed Why He Wears Jeans To Work Out

Buzz Feed

time5 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

RFK Jr. Revealed Why He Wears Jeans To Work Out

Fox News' Jesse Watters hit Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. with what he described as 'the question that everybody is wondering about' on Tuesday. Namely, 'Why do you wear jeans when you work out?' Kennedy, known for exercising in his literal (denim) sweatpants, answered: 'Well, I just started doing that a long time ago because I would go hiking in the morning and then I'd go straight to the gym and I found it was convenient and now I'm used to it so I just do it.' 'OK,' the Fox News host replied to the vaccine skeptic that President Donald Trump has entrusted with his 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda. 'There were a lot of theories, but that makes perfect sense,' Watters claimed, without offering to explain the sense he claimed there was. Fox News / Via Watch here: Jesse Watters: "Why do you wear jeans when you work out." RFK Jr: "Well, I just started doing that a long time ago... I would go hiking in the morning and then i'd go straight to the gym." Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explains why he was wearing jeans during the "Pete and Bobby… — Fox News (@FoxNews) August 20, 2025 Fox News/X / Via

Trump team makes mortgage fraud its newest revenge tool
Trump team makes mortgage fraud its newest revenge tool

Axios

time35 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump team makes mortgage fraud its newest revenge tool

Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook is the latest target of one of the Trump administration's new pathways to pursue its perceived enemies: alleged mortgage fraud. The big picture: Trump has waged a revenge tour from his seat in the White House, with prominent members of his grudge list now facing probes from a MAGA-aligned DOJ. If the accusation against Cook evoked a sense of déjà vu, that's because the Trump administration is also investigating Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) on similar grounds. Driving the news: Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte, a Trump ally, referred Cook to the DOJ over allegations she "falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud under the criminal statutes." Pulte alleged that Cook took out a mortgage on a property in Michigan, which she represented as her principal residence — and shortly after, took out a loan on a condo in Atlanta that was also described as her principal residence. He further alleged she listed the condo as a rental property in 2022. Trump subsequently called for her resignation. It comes as the president has sought leadership of the central bank that will be more responsive to his rate-cutting instincts. Cook was appointed to the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors in 2022 by then-President Biden, and her current term runs until 2038. Axios' Neil Irwin describes her as a relatively dovish member of the board, who ironically has shown openness to the kinds of interest rate cuts Trump is seeking. Worth noting: Trump and his company were found liable by a New York judge for inflating his net worth in his civil fraud case, in which James accused him of overstating his worth to obtain favorable treatment from lenders. Trump has challenged the ruling. Context: Mortgage fraud is defined as a material misstatement, misrepresentation or omission related to a mortgage loan. But it is not the same as making a paperwork error in a mortgage document. A recent LoanLogics report found that around 11.5% of all U.S. mortgage loan file content contained errors or missing information over the past decade. Zoom out: The president has also accused Schiff — a longtime foe and a member of the House Select Committee that investigated the Jan. 6 riot — of engaging in an alleged "sustained pattern of possible Mortgage Fraud," a claim Schiff slammed as a "baseless attempt at political retribution." Schiff, in a video shared last month, dismissed Trump's claims against him as "false," saying, "the basis of his accusation is that I own a home in Maryland and I own a home in California." He continued, "Big surprise, members of Congress, almost all of them own more than one home or rent more than one home." Flashback: Earlier this year, Pulte alleged in a criminal referral to Justice Department officials that James, who successfully brought a civil fraud case against Trump, had "falsified bank documents and property records to acquire government backed assistance and loans and more favorable loan terms." James' attorney, Abbe David Lowell, described the allegations as "improper political retribution" in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi. He acknowledged mistakes on mortgage documents — like James' father referring to her as his spouse — but said Pulte had "omitted numerous other records ... which refute the allegations of impropriety or make clear that a mistake on one line had no significance." Between the lines: The president's ire burns hot for those involved in his legal cases and the litany of investigations he faced. The Justice Department issued two subpoenas to Jame earlier this month, including one requesting information related to the president's civil fraud trial. The DOJ is investigating whether her office violated Trump's civil rights. What we're watching: Ed Martin, who was tapped to lead the DOJ's so-called Weaponization Working Group, told Fox News' Maria Bartiromo over the weekend that "if somebody did something wrong," referring to James and Schiff, "we're not only going to hold them accountable, we're also going to look at everything else that they've been doing." Martin continued, "When you're a liar, you lie, not just on one thing. When you're a cheater, you cheat, not just on one thing."

Mistrust in CDC shooting's wake
Mistrust in CDC shooting's wake

Politico

time36 minutes ago

  • Politico

Mistrust in CDC shooting's wake

AROUND THE AGENCIES More than 750 Health and Human Services staffers signed a letter sent to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress this morning, warning that he's 'endangering the nation's health by repeatedly spreading inaccurate health information.' A shooting at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Atlanta headquarters on Aug. 8 was not random, the letter says. The suspected shooter, who law enforcement said was motivated by his distrust of the Covid-19 vaccine, fired multiple rounds into four buildings on the CDC's Atlanta campus. No CDC employees were injured. The shooter died at the scene after shooting and killing a DeKalb County police officer. 'The attack came amid growing mistrust in public institutions, driven by politicized rhetoric that has turned public health professionals from trusted experts into targets of villainization — and now, violence,' the letter warns. Kennedy's actions endanger public health, they argue, pointing to Kennedy referring to the CDC as a 'cesspool of corruption,' saying mRNA vaccines failed to effectively protect against Covid-19 and the flu and then canceling $500 million in mRNA vaccine development projects, and disbanding the CDC's panel of vaccine experts and appointing replacements, some of whom have expressed skepticism about vaccines. 'These dangerous and deceitful statements and actions have contributed to the harassment and violence experienced by CDC staff,' the letter says. In addition to HHS staffers who signed anonymously or with their full names, former CDC officials joined the letter, including Dr. Anne Schuchat, a former top official' James Mercy, who directed the CDC's violence prevention division; Tom Simon, who led scientific programs for the violence prevention division; Jay Butler, former deputy director for infectious diseases; and Dr. Barbara Marston, who helped lead the agency's Ebola response. HHS did not respond to POLITICO's request for comment on the letter. Key context: The letter comes after hundreds of NIH staffers sent Director Jay Bhattacharya a letter in June, laying out their concerns about the delay and termination of grants, staff firings and a spending slowdown since President Donald Trump's inauguration. Nobel laureates, former NIH Institute and program directors and other leaders in the scientific community also signed the missive. Bhattacharya, who has said that free speech is among his policy priorities, met with a small group of staffers in July to hear their concerns. At the meeting, he pledged not to retaliate against those who signed the letter, which was modeled after the Great Barrington Declaration that Bhattacharya co-authored in 2020 to protest pandemic lockdowns. What's next: Staffers' request to Kennedy: Stop spreading misleading information about vaccines and affirm the CDC's scientific integrity. They also want Kennedy to guarantee the safety of the HHS workforce by ensuring HHS has fully functional emergency procedures and alerts. Kennedy should also take 'vigorous action to remove high-profile online material targeting the federal workforce, such as the widely seen 'DEI watchlists,'' they added, referring to a website run by the conservative nonprofit American Accountability Foundation, which posts names and photos of federal employees online. The foundation says the watchlist highlights the prevalence of diversity, equity and inclusion roles in government. Critics say it invites online harassment of private citizens. The HHS staffers asked their boss to take action by Sept. 2. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. AI scribe companies promise to help doctors bill more. The result will likely be higher health care costs that trickle down to patients, Stat News reports. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. FUTURE THREATS The artificial intelligence boom is ushering in chatbots that act — more and more — like people, our POLITICO colleague Aaron Mak reports. OpenAI's GPT-4.5 can ace the Turing Test, which evaluates whether a machine can fool a user into thinking it's human. The bots also serve as therapists, and, at least in one case, a bot got engaged to a human. Increasingly lifelike large language models are both a technological marvel and a conundrum for laws designed to regulate flesh-and-blood people. With growing worries about AI's harms, from emotional manipulation to addictiveness, how do you assign liability to something that seems to have so much autonomy? The anxieties were brought to a head last week when Reuters reported that Meta's internal policies permitted its AI to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.' Where Congress stands: The revelation triggered a bipartisan furor in Congress, POLITICO's Morning Tech reported this week. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said Meta 'has failed miserably' to protect children, and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) accused the company of being 'morally and ethically off the rails.' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) also launched an investigation into Meta on Friday. The company did not respond to POLITICO's request for comment. But all these calls for regulation raise the question: Who or what, exactly, do you regulate? It might not seem obvious that a company should be liable for its chatbots — each AI 'personality' adapts its responses based on interactions with a user, so they can act in unpredictable ways. But if you view chatbots as products instead of synthetic people, the regulatory problem becomes a bit more familiar. Even if a company doesn't have an explicit policy allowing chatbots to engage in unhealthy conversations with children, for example, you can still require safety features to proactively mitigate such behaviors. Ava Smithing, advocacy director at the Young People's Alliance, a youth advocacy group, told POLITICO, 'It's not about regulating a fake person, it's about regulating the real people who are deciding what that fake person can or cannot say.' Congress hasn't proposed any laws to regulate AI companions. In the meantime, advocates are trying to apply existing product liability laws to restrain these anthropomorphic chatbots. In the courts: In a landmark case that will set a major precedent in AI law, a Florida family is suing over a chatbot that allegedly formed a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old boy, leading to his suicide. Matthew Bergman, the family's attorney, is tackling AI by adapting product liability strategies he picked up representing asbestos victims. Bergman makes a novel argument in the suit that intentionally designed its chatbots to be so lifelike that they could emotionally exploit users to get hooked on its service. He's also contending that it was foreseeable that the bots would threaten young users' mental health. A federal judge in Florida rejected bid to dismiss the suit in May. The company declined to comment on the litigation but told POLITICO that it's implemented new safety measures for young users. The court held a discovery hearing in the case last week. In the states: Without a serious effort from Congress, states have been taking the lead on chatbot regulations. New York enacted a law in May requiring an AI companion to send regular reminders that it's not human and refer users to crisis centers if they're at risk of hurting themselves. California is considering a bill to prohibit companion chatbots from rewarding young users at unpredictable intervals, a trick that slot machines use to keep gamblers addicted. Lawmakers in Hawaii are also looking at legislation to restrict chatbots that mimic humans for advertising.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store