
The Salt Path and the sins of memoir
It is not, to put it mildly, a good look. At a time when household finances are stretched and the government is cutting benefits for the sick and disabled, author Raynor Winn stands accused of exaggerating her husband's illness and misrepresenting the circumstances of their destitution in her 2019 memoir The Salt Path – and getting rich via book sales and film rights in the process. Cue fury from betrayed readers (and, undoubtedly, a few jealous writers) on X, and a spate of solemn op-eds on the line between fact and fiction.
As the author of a memoir myself, I admit the story left me unscandalised. Yes, the allegations, if accurate, make a mockery of The Salt Path's claim to be nonfiction. But to tell you the truth – and would I, dear reader, do anything else? – I've come to have low expectations of the average memoir. The genre defined by fidelity to the facts is, on average, a poor guide to deeper truths about human beings. If you want to understand people, you're better off reading fiction.
To be sure, few books beat a brilliant memoir. The best – Primo Levi's Auschwitz testimony If This Is a Man, James Baldwin's searing race chronicle Notes of a Native Son, Annie Ernaux's spare sociological masterpieces – combine the artistry of a great novel with the electric frisson of self-exposure. But for every thrilling confession by a Thomas De Quincey or a Tove Ditlevsen, there are countless frauds and duds.
Naturally, the frauds get the headlines. Winn joins a long and ignoble list of autobiographers accused of deception. The canonical modern example is James Frey, unmasked on Oprah after fabricating parts of his addiction memoir A Million Little Pieces (and recently profiled by the New York Times, unrepentantly recalling the scandal from a house full of Matisses and Picassos bought with his royalties).
Before Frey came Binjamin Wilkormiski, author of a feted Holocaust memoir who turned out to be neither a survivor nor Jewish. Wilkormiski was defended by fellow 'survivor' Laura Grabowski, who swore she remembered him from Birkenau – until it transpired she was in fact Laurel Wilson, author of her own hoax memoir of ritual abuse, Satan's Underground. But frauds are much rarer than duds. Since the 'memoir boom' of the late Eighties and Nineties – led by superb originals like Mary Karr's The Liar's Club and Frank McCourt's Angela's Ashes – the demand for truly revelatory personal narrative has outstripped supply.
A deluge of mediocrity has filled the gap. The journalist Will Storr recently detailed how AI has already perfected the bland tone and nebulous detail that makes for a viral Substack confessional. So much for the hope – floated by David Shields in his manifesto Reality Hunger – that autobiography might offer an answer to the artifice of modern life. Of course, in all literary forms the dross outweighs the gold. But the paradox of memoir is that the form premised on truth is usually so poor at delivering it. That's because we are, on the whole, thoroughly unreliable narrators of our own lives.
One problem lies with the fallibility of memory. It isn't just that we repress unbearable truths, as Freud taught. Psychologists have shown how memory is itself a storyteller, weaving together experience, imagination, beliefs and memories of memories into a plausible version of what might have happened – and then selling it to us as the truth. Even if memory were trustworthy, a host of factors militate against truthful autobiography. The story of your life is the story of your most important relationships. And a good story, as every creative writing teacher knows, requires conflict and moral nuance. To tell your life story, you have to reveal unflattering things about the people you love: parents, lovers, siblings. Few have the stomach for that.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Nor are most people willing to write unflatteringly about themselves. When I tell people I've written a memoir, they sometimes tell me about some episode from their own life they'd like to write about. These stories are often fascinating – but not always for the reasons their tellers think. Often the most interesting parts are the ones they're unwilling or unable to see. People want to tell their life story with all the moral and psychological nuance stripped out, leaving them as virtuous victims or heroic survivors (or, seemingly in Winn's case, both).
All good memoirs find solutions to these problems. A certain ruthlessness with the feelings of others can help: I admire the cold honesty of Rachel Cusk's memoir of motherhood A Life's Work, even as I wince for her children. Some depend on a kind of masochistic self-exposure: see Karl Ove Knausgaard. Another solution is to be French. Their less censorious literary culture than ours licences greater self-disclosure, producing the Nobel-winning Ernaux as well as the undeniably narcissistic but peerless Emmanuel Carrère.
It can help if you've already cut ties with family members before you write about them. One reason many classic memoirs – like Jeanette Winterson's Why Be Happy When You Can Be Normal? – are about escaping religious upbringings is that their authors are relatively free from the usual ties of filial loyalty. Or you can wait until the people you're writing about are dead, as Edmund Gosse did before writing his immortal account of childhood Father and Son.
Some of my favourite memoirs find creative formal ways of engaging with the slipperiness of self-narration. In Night of the Gun David Carr applies the methods of investigative journalism to reconstruct his own past as a crack addict. Lauren Slater's Lying: A Metaphorical Memoir is a stunning Nabokovian experiment that recounts the author's struggle with a rare variant of epilepsy characterised by compulsive fabulism.
But successful memoirs are exceptions. We're much better at seeing through other people's hypocrisies and contradictions than our own. That insight underpins the narrative revolution pioneered by Jane Austen: the blending of a character's innocent perspective with the author's more knowing one. If Elizabeth Bennett had written her own story, it would be a banal tissue of vanity and delusion. But when Austen told it, she invented 'free indirect speech' – and the modern novel.
The messy truth behind the Salt Path may well turn out to be neither Winn's inspiring redemption story nor the cynical fraud imagined by her online critics. Perhaps it's something more interesting: a case of two people backed into a corner by bad luck and terrible decisions, who stumbled onto a slightly too perfect escape – and found themselves trapped in their own distortions once it succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. Whatever actually happened, it would make a gripping story. Just don't expect Raynor Winn to be the person to tell it.
[See also: The Salt Path is Scientology for the middle classes]
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Take the near-impossible quiz that was used to determine if applicants at Vogue were fit for the job
Vogue magazine is the cream of the crop in the fashion world, and many dream of working at elite publication - but could you have hacked working at Vogue during its prime? Luckily for the fashion forward amongst us there's a way to see how you'd fare working the fashion bible. The New York Times recently released an interactive quiz to determine where your strengths - and weaknesses - lie. As per the Times, to work for famed Vogue editor Anna Wintour in Vogue's glory days, you had to know a little bit of everything. The quiz, which was created by Wintour's top editors, is based on a real exam that was given to those applying for an assistant position at the publication in the '90s. It would test the applicants elite cultural literacy and quiz them on a 'declaration of what mattered to Vogue.' The original '90s exam consisted of a whopping four pages full of 178 notable people, places, books and films - all of which had to be identified on the spot by the applicant. However, The Times' quiz - which you can take here - made it a tad easier than the original, with a multiple-choice format instead. The interactive quiz uses names and cultural references on the original exam - although the publication noted that applicants in the '90s didn't have the luxury of multiple-choice. It consists of eight different sections, with each section focusing on a different area of knowledge - and the results have been mixed. Questions in the quiz are mainly New York focused, for example, you're asked to name a 'Seventh Avenue Fashion House' (DKNY) or a 'See-and-to-be seen disco popular with the fashion crowd' (Studio 54). Eager quiz-takers flocked to the comments section to share their results - with many claiming despite the quiz deeming them a great fit, they still wouldn't have stood a chance in the illustrious Vogue offices of the '90s. '32/32 but as a somewhat short person of color who won't wear heels and will never fit into a size four dress, it could have been 1000/1000 and I still would not have gotten the job,' one user commented. '32/32 so passed the test but I would not have fit in during the '90s - overweight, pimply, leftist, who wore plaid and jeans,' wrote someone else. 'In the early 2000s I was the subject of an article in Vogue for my profession. They used my words and not my picture. I think if Wintour saw what I looked like she would have cancelled the article. '32/32. I had a career In fashion. At my first interview at 23, my soon to be boss asked, "Can you lie and be deceitful?" to which I promptly answered 'yes' and got the job,' recalled someone else, jokingly adding: 'Ah the '80s.' The original '90s exam consisted of four pages full of 178 notable people, places, books and films - all of which had to be identified on the spot by the applicant. Wintour is seen in 2019 Others found the quiz difficult, admitting they 'could not have done it without multiple choice.' The results either informed the quiz taker they didn't pass if they didn't do well, their resume would be kept on file if they scored somewhere in the middle, or, for those who score high enough, they passed. Then '90s era of Vogue has long been a fascination by fashion lovers and culture critics alike, with former British editor-in-chief Edward Enninful declaring that the '90s turned the fashion industry 'upside down.' In 2024, Hulu released a six-part series titled In Vogue: The 90s, which delved into the decade's most defining moments. In 2023, a former assistant of famous editor Wintour, Lily Stav Gildor, 31, shared what it was really like to work for her. Gildor worked as one of three assistants to the Editor-in-Chief of US Vogue from January 2014 to May 2015 and has gone viral on TikTok sharing her experiences at the magazine - and what she learned. Gildor revealed London-born Wintour taught her 'connections are the most important thing.' 'I learned, so so much from her. I learned about business I learned about fashion I learned about media. And in the last year I started my own business as a textile designer and it's still use the information today,' she gushed. Questions in the quiz are mainly New York focused, for example, you have to name a 'See-and-to-be seen disco popular with the fashion crowd' (Studio 54) In her book, Anna: The Biography, author Amy Odel interviewed several of Wintour's former assistants to get the rundown on how a typical day of Wintours' looked Anna's staff reportedly started preparing for her arrival at the officer at 7:30am. One of the interns begins to respond to Anna's emails, listens to her voicemails, writes out messages for her, sets out the daily newspapers, and get Anna's coffee and breakfast, according to Back Row. One of her former assistants, who chose to remain anonymous, compared some of their actual work moments to the movie The Devil Wears Prada. 'Whenever she wasn't in the office, was when you were able to get those things done. Then she'd come into the office. It was very much like in The Devil Wears Prada when they're all like, "She's coming!" the ex-assistant said. 'I was always scrambling to get ready. You're literally putting things away, making sure everything looks great.' The book also claimed that just like in the movie, one former assistant was advised to not go to the restroom until another was present. Wintour first became editor in chief of Vogue in 1988 and is credited with completely transforming the famed fashion magazine. She is also behind making the Met Gala what it is today - a red carpet event attended by the fashion elite, as she handpicks the celebrities and makes sure to greet them personally. In June, Wintour told staffers that she will be stepping down from her role as Vogue's editor-in-chief. She will continue to hold her position as Condé Nast's global chief content officer and global editorial director at Vogue, and the new head of editorial content will report directly to her. As chief content officer, Wintour oversees every brand globally, including Wired, Vanity Fair, GQ, AD, Condé Nast Traveler, Glamour, Bon Appetit, Tatler, World of Interiors and Allure.


Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The secret Cornish hideout where the Salt Path couple have taken refuge from the furore over memoir's ‘fabrications'
When they set out on their now infamous Salt Path walk, Raynor Winn and her husband Moth were homeless, had just £115 in cash and a tent bought on eBay to live in. Fast-forward 12 years, three best-selling books and a hit film starring Gillian Anderson later and the couple's living conditions have clearly taken a turn for the better.


North Wales Live
3 days ago
- North Wales Live
Days left to nab free audiobooks by top-rated authors for three months at Amazon
Audiobooks have become a favourite for those who enjoy literature on the move, be it during a stroll, household chores or driving. With an extensive range of books available in audio format, keeping up with the latest releases can be costly - but an Amazon Prime deal offers Prime Members the chance to indulge in audible literature at no cost. Prime Members can nab themselves 3 months of Audible for free. Members can select one bestseller or new release each month, which will be theirs to keep, and they can listen unlimitedly to thousands of included audiobooks, podcasts, and originals from July 6 to July 31. After the three-month period, the subscription continues at £8.99 per month. Audible boasts a vast selection of audiobooks. For instance, listeners could tune into Sunrise on the Reaping: A Hunger Games Novel, narrated by actor Jefferson White, known for his role as Jimmy Hurdstrom in Yellowstone. The book chronicles the fiftieth annual Hunger Games, where twice the usual number of tributes are taken from their homes, reports Wales Online. Another choice is A Court of Thorns and Roses Book 1 by Sarah J. Maas, the first dramatised audiobook adaptation of the number one New York Times bestselling series. The novel now features a full cast of actors, immersive sound effects and cinematic music. For those keen on farming tales, there's also Diddly Squat: A Year on the Farm by Jeremy Clarkson which welcomes listeners into Jeremy's agricultural adventure - alongside his partner Lisa, Kaleb the tractor operator, Charlie, Ellen the shepherd and his head of security and dry stone wall builder Gerald. If Audible isn't the preferred choice for enjoying favourite books, readers could alternatively explore Google Play Books which offers a selection of both complimentary and paid titles, collections and options spanning fiction, non-fiction and real-life accounts to select from. Spotify also provides a variety of Audiobooks through its Premium service that permits up to 15 hours of audiobook listening with numerous titles to pick from. Nevertheless, the titles available on Audible have received excellent ratings. For instance, Sunrise on the Reaping: A Hunger Games Novel has achieved an impressive 4.7 out of 5 star rating on the Amazon platform. One reviewer commented: "'Sunrise on the Reaping' is one of those rare prequels that deepens the original story rather than simply leaning on nostalgia. I genuinely loved this book." Another said: "Sunrise on the Reaping is everything I hoped for in a Hunger Games prequel - and more. Suzanne Collins dives deep into the twisted roots of the Games, set 24 years before Katniss volunteers, and the result is equal parts chilling and fascinating." "This book captures the emotion of the characters better than any of the other books in the series," remarked another listener. However, not everyone was enamoured with all of the audiobooks. One individual reviewed Diddly Squat: A Year on the Farm and said: "I was expecting this to be a full narrative of the first year on the farm. Turns out it's extracts from his column in the Sunday Times which have been arranged in a sort of yearly order. No doubt there will be snippets I've not heard of before from watching the TV series, only read first few chapters, but initially I'm disappointed."