Virginia GOP's gay-porn disaster a lesson to Republicans: primaries matter
Ahead of next year's congressional midterms, the first big test of the GOP's strength since Trump returned to office comes this fall in New Jersey and Virginia.
While Republicans always expect an uphill battle in New Jersey, Virginia ought to be favorable territory — after all, the GOP won every statewide office there just four years ago with Glenn Youngkin atop the ticket.
Advertisement
But it's Youngkin and company, not Trump, who are on the verge of forfeiting Virginia to the Democrats this year.
What went wrong is a tale of botched succession and inadequate intra-party competition.
Republicans nationwide need to pay heed to the Virginia party's self-immolation.
Advertisement
The big story isn't the sex scandal engulfing the GOP's openly gay candidate for lieutenant governor, John Reid.
It's not even the role Youngkin and the head of his Spirit of Virginia PAC — who's since had to resign — played in promoting the scandal in a botched effort to force Reid to drop out.
Sex and betrayal make great headlines, but the lieutenant governor's race — and Reid's apparent dalliances with drag queens and pornography — is a sideshow: The race that matters most is for governor.
With term limits preventing Youngkin from succeeding himself, his lieutenant governor, Winsome Earle-Sears, expected to get her turn at the top of the ticket.
Advertisement
And she has: The primary isn't until next month, but because Earle-Sears' challengers dropped out before the deadline to appear on the ballot, she's the default nominee.
In fact, there's no primary competition for any statewide office, although a challenger to Reid who gave up earlier, businessman John Curran, is now attempting a write-in campaign.
Republicans in Virginia, like those in many other places, think competition is a fine thing except when it comes to their own races.
And the major factions of the party, which until recently were the Christian right and country-club moderates, have long preferred to settle their differences in the close confines of party conventions rather than in primaries.
Advertisement
The rise of MAGA hasn't changed much: Reid seemed unbeatable before the Youngkin circle exposed his antics because he's a talk-radio host popular with the populist right.
But the party's habit of quashing competition applied even to him, until Youngkin's coterie changed their mind (and changed it too late — Reid is still probably unbeatable in the primary, only now much weaker in the general election).
Each well-managed faction preferred not to have a primary fight, so all of them together avoided one, deferring to Earle-Sears as the next in line for the marquee spot on the ticket.
That was a mistake.
Earle-Sears was reassuring to the party's right wing four years ago, as a black woman (and immigrant from Jamaica) in the post-George Floyd era who'd served in the United States Marine Corps and was outspokenly anti-abortion and supportive of gun rights.
Moderates might have perceived her as inexperienced — she'd served two years in the House of Delegates in the early 2000s — but Youngkin's coattails with centrists carried Earle-Sears and the rest of the ticket to victory.
Once in office, however, Earle-Sears made some rookie mistakes, looking ahead to running for governor in her own right by trying to court the moderates who weren't so keen on her — while losing support with right-wingers, especially once she started to opine on national politics.
Advertisement
'I could not support him. I just couldn't,' she told Fox News in 2022 about the possibility of another Trump bid for the White House.
'A true leader understands when they have become a liability,' she said.
She felt differently by the time Trump locked up the GOP presidential nomination last year, but the damage with MAGA voters was already done.
The result was that Earle-Sears remained too well-positioned to challenge, but is ill-prepared to maximize conservative turnout or win moderates the way Youngkin did.
Advertisement
Her response to the Reid controversy has also been alienating both supporters of the man who hopes to succeed her as lieutenant governor and those who want to cut him loose:
'John Reid is the Republican nominee for Lt. Governor. It is his race and his decision alone to move forward,' she stated on Facebook.
'We all have our own race to run.'
Advertisement
She trails the presumptive Democratic nominee, Abigail Spanberger, in all early polls by an average of nearly 7 percentage points.
Earle-Sears and Reid both needed the kind of close scrutiny they would have received in a competitive primary.
A tough primary might have weakened the eventual nominees — but they would hardly be weaker than they are now, and early exposure of their vulnerabilities might have allowed the party to pick better.
Primaries can be unruly, but if the GOP wants to avoid a rout next year, it will have to put its candidates to stricter tests than they've faced in Virginia.
Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
‘I wouldn't want her in my district': Some Dems want Kamala Harris to sit the midterms out
After more than two decades serving in elected office — rising from San Francisco district attorney to California attorney general to senator and, ultimately, vice president and Democratic presidential nominee — Harris said she was eager to find a new way to be engaged, albeit one that would still maintain her profile with everyday people. 'I want to travel the country,' she told Colbert. 'I want to listen to people. I want to talk with people. And I don't want it to be transactional where I'm asking for their vote.' Her bearish assessment about the state of the country was, in Colbert's words, 'harrowing,' leading Harris, who is focusing on a book tour and potential non-profit initiative, to insist she was not disengaging from civic life entirely. 'In this moment where people have become so deflated and despondent and afraid, those of us who have the ability — which I do right now, not being in an office or in a campaign for that office, to be out there and to talk with folks and remind them of their power,' she added. A Harris spokesperson declined to comment for this story. While there is plenty of skepticism within the party's ranks about her viability in 2028, many prominent Democratic leaders still effuse praise for Harris and have touted her as a key asset for candidates in the midterms. Asked if he wants her to run in 2028, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, her former running mate, told POLITICO, 'I would welcome it. I think she was a great candidate. I think she would make a great president. I saw how she thinks. I saw how she cares about people. So if that's her decision, you know where my heart is.' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who's considered a potential presidential contender himself, boasted about Harris after a bill-signing ceremony this week, calling her a 'terrific spokesperson' with a storied career who can help Democrats speak to the economic challenges facing working people. 'Frankly, those of us who believe that we need change in this country right now, need all the help that we can get to try to overcome what's ahead and to win in the 2026 elections,' Pritzker told reporters. 'And so I welcome her to that fight.'
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
Cory Booker's message to the Democratic Party: Don't bend the knee to Trump
Democratic Sen. Cory Booker is imploring his party to fight back harder against President Donald Trump, arguing that history will remember some for their 'complicity' in 'bending the knee' to him. In a wide-ranging interview with CNN's Manu Raju, Booker argued that Democrats can gain credibility with voters by showing they're concerned about the American people rather than their party. The New Jersey senator also weighed in on whether his party should embrace its most progressive wing and urged his own state to consider redrawing House maps to fight back against a GOP-led redistricting effort in Texas. As Democratic voters demand a more aggressive approach toward Trump from party leaders, Booker told CNN he's 'going to continue to do what leadership is' and reprehended institutions for what he viewed as caving to pressure from the president. 'What I want to see more people doing is not doing what some law firms have done, bend the knee to Donald Trump. Not doing what some universities have done, bend the knee to Donald Trump. You see major corporations who want some merger approval not standing up on principle but bending the knee to Donald Trump. That to me is outrageous,' Booker said. 'History is going to remember these people for their complicity in what is a guy that's going to severely try to undermine our government – who already incited a riot on our Capitol,' the Democrat said. 'This is a moment in history where people are going to ask, 'Where did you stand? Did you bow to an authoritarian leader or did you stand strong and fight?'' Booker clashed with Democrats this week as he sought to amend several bipartisan police benefits bills with language that would stop the Trump administration from withholding Department of Justice grants for political reasons – arguing it is already happening in New Jersey. In impassioned remarks, Booker said members of his party are complying with Trump as he 'violates the Constitution' and 'trashes our norms and traditions.' 'How far are we going to let (Trump) go until we draw a line and say, 'I don't care where it is, on the floor of the Senate, within our communities, we're going to stand and fight against this authoritarianism?'' Booker told CNN. Booker said he wants Democrats to be aggressive when it comes to redistricting efforts, as Republican-led Texas is moving ahead with a Trump-backed strategy to redraw the state's congressional map to try and gain more House seats. The senator suggested Democrats should do the same in New Jersey despite the Democratic Party's past rhetoric about the importance of nonpartisan redistricting. Democratic Senators Cory Booker, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Amy Klobuchar got into a heated debate on the Senate floor over law enforcement benefits legislation, as Booker alleged that jurisdictions in blue states will have trouble accessing the benefits due to their resistance to the Trump administration's immigration agenda, and railed on Democrats for folding rather than fighting back against the president. Trump 'thinks you should break the rules for Democrats to sit back and just say, 'OK, we're going to play by the queen's rules,'' Booker told CNN. 'No, I'm telling you right now we need to win in the midterm. We need to stop him from cheating, from lying, and from stealing the election. And if they're doing something to add their congressional seats, we need to look at our ways of doing that right now,' he said. Booker's political call to arms comes as Democrats struggle with frustration with the party among their base, some of whom appear to be turning to more progressive leaders like the Democratic nominee in the New York City mayor's race, 33-year-old Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani. Like many Democrats, Booker declined to say whether he supports the Mamdani, who delivered a surprise primary victory in June. 'New York City, I love you. You're my neighbor. You're about 10 miles from where I live. You guys figure out your elections,' Booker said. 'I'm going to focus on mine.'
CBS News
39 minutes ago
- CBS News
Texas House panel passes new redistricting map that adds more GOP seats
A Texas House panel on Saturday advanced a draft congressional map aimed at adding five new Republican districts next year over protests from Democrats that the proposal would suppress the votes of people of color. The chamber's redistricting committee approved the map on party lines, 12 to 6, after spending much of Friday hearing testimony from U.S. House Democrats from Texas and members of the public largely opposed to the plan. The map could be considered by the entire state House as early as next week. Earlier in the hearing, GOP lawmakers said that they are redrawing the state's congressional map to advantage Republican candidates, setting aside a legal justification offered by the U.S. Department of Justice and making their political motivations explicit for the first time. "Different from everyone else, I'm telling you, I'm not beating around the bush," Rep. Todd Hunter, the Corpus Christi Republican carrying the bill, said about the goal of the map. "We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance." Texas Republicans launched the redistricting effort after pressure from President Donald Trump's political operatives, who demanded state leaders redraw the map to help Republicans maintain their slim House majority ahead of a potentially difficult midterm election. The House redistricting committee released its proposed redo of the map Wednesday. It slices up districts in the Houston, Austin and the Dallas areas, yielding five additional districts that would have voted for Trump by at least 10 percentage points in 2024. In 2024, Trump won 56.2% of votes in Texas. Under the current lines, Republicans hold 66% of Texas' 38 House seats. The new map aims to push that share to 79%. "Political performance does not guarantee electoral success — that's up to the candidates," Hunter said. "But it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts." Gov. Greg Abbott, in adding redistricting to the special session agenda, cited a letter from the Justice Department claiming that four Texas districts were unconstitutionally racially gerrymandered. But on Friday, state Republicans were unequivocal that their goal was not to fix racial gerrymandering — which several have testified under oath does not exist in the current map — but to give the GOP the greatest chance of controlling as many as 30 congressional districts. "These districts were drawn primarily using political performance," Hunter said, citing Republican gains made across the state since the Legislature last redistricted in 2021, especially among Latino voters. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds. But under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the map cannot diminish the voting power of people of color. At Friday's hearing, Democrats argued that the proposed map unconstitutionally packed voters of color into some districts while spreading them throughout others to reduce their ability to elect their preferred candidates. "Every citizen should have equal access to choose their representation, instead of crowding Black people to the point that all the Black people in the state only have two representatives, and all the Latinos in the state are crowded up to the extent that their voting power is diminished," U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas told state lawmakers during the hearing. Though people of color make up most of Texas and have driven almost all of the state's population growth in recent years, the new map creates 24 districts that are majority-white — two more than the current map, which is under trial for possibly violating the Voting Rights Act. Republicans rejected the idea that the proposed map would suppress voters of color, noting that it would create one new majority Hispanic district and two new majority Black districts. But all three are almost precisely 50% Black or Hispanic, which Democratic lawmakers said at the hearing is not enough to ensure they're able to elect their candidates of choice. U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey of Fort Worth, whose seat would be partially dismantled under the new lines, noted that his district was drawn by a federal court "to ensure that communities of color, Black and brown Texans, could finally have a voice in Congress." "Now, that voice is again under threat," he said. "This is a map that was drawn behind closed doors — as we've heard here today — to dismantle representation and weaken our power in turn." It could take months, if not years, to resolve any legal challenge against the proposed map. A lawsuit against Texas' current maps, passed in 2021, finally went to trial last month, almost four years and several election cycles after they went into effect. In the meantime, Republicans in the Legislature have the votes to pass the map as it's drafted. Democrats, locked out of power in the statehouse, have few tools at their disposal to fight the map's passage. The nuclear option is to flee the state and deny Republicans a quorum to pass any legislation — an expensive and politically tenuous move that state House Democrats were still considering ahead of the full chamber vote. At Friday's hearing, the only time the public would have to comment on the House's proposed map, Democrats begged Republicans to slow or stop redistricting entirely. "This is not a Texas map. It is a Trump map," said U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, an Austin Democrat. "It was imposed by President Trump, who has a stranglehold on Congress, and the only question here is whether he also has a stranglehold on this Texas Legislature."
