Trump and Newsom Face Off in Trial Over National Guard in LA
Trump sent the troops to Los Angeles to address protests against immigration arrests in the city. Most of the troops have been recalled but a ruling in favor of California could hamstring the president's ability to respond to domestic emergencies, the government argues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says D.C. has been 'overtaken' by crime. The data tells a different story.
The president announced Monday that federal authorities would be taking control of the capital's police force. President Trump announced Monday that the Washington, D.C., police force will be placed under the control of the federal government in order to 'restore law, order and public safety' in the nation's capital. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people. And we're not going to let it happen anymore,' Trump said during a press conference Monday morning. D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department will temporarily be overseen by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, the president said. He added that 800 National Guard troops will be deployed to deal with the 'dire public safety crisis' in the city. Trump also zeroed in on D.C.'s homelessness problem, which, he argued, had made some of the capital's most important public spaces 'disgusting.' 'We're going to be removing homeless encampments from all over our parks — our beautiful, beautiful parks — which now a lot of people can't walk on,' he said. Trump does have the power to oversee what happens in D.C. because of its unique role as home to the nation's seat of government. The law gives the president the power to temporarily take over the city's law enforcement operations. Trump did not say how long federal authorities would be in charge of D.C.'s police. Trump invokes the Home Rule Act to take control of the Washington, D.C., police. What the act says he can and can't do. What's happening with crime in D.C.? The president's description of crime in Washington, D.C., is not reflected in official statistics, which show that the city had its lowest violent crime rate in 30 years in 2024. The rates of homicide, sex abuse, assault with a dangerous weapon and robbery all fell by at least 25% compared to 2023, according to statistics from the U.S. attorney's office for the district. The total number of nonviolent property crimes in D.C. also dropped last year, according to FBI data. Year-over-year statistics only provide part of the picture. A longer timeline shows that D.C. — like the country as a whole — has gotten much safer over the course of the past several decades. In 1991, there were 482 homicides in the nation's capital, more than two and a half times as many as there were in 2024. It's not just homicides. The rate of violent crimes in D.C. has dropped by two-thirds since its peak in the early 1990s, according to FBI statistics compiled by data scientist Jeff Asher. Over the same period, the number of nonviolent property crimes has been cut in half. Like most of the rest of the nation, D.C. did see a spike in violent crime, particularly homicides, after the COVID-19 pandemic. The city's overall violent crime rate has dropped back down to pre-pandemic levels, but the number of homicides is still slightly elevated. How does D.C. compare to other U.S. cities? While Trump's claims about crime rates in the capital aren't consistent with official data, it is true that D.C. is one of the most dangerous cities in the country, at least in terms of homicide rate. While its relatively small size meant that it had far fewer total homicides than metropolises like New York and Chicago, D.C. had the fourth-highest per-capita homicide rate of any major American city last year, according to a nationwide analysis conducted by researchers at the Rochester Institute of Technology. What about homelessness? Washington, D.C., does face persistent challenges with homelessness. The question of whether the problem has gotten dramatically worse in the city depends in part on the timeline you look at. This year's annual Point-in-Time count tallied just over 9,600 people experiencing homelessness across the city. That's a significant increase from 2022, when there were roughly 7,400 people counted. If you look further back in time, however, even the elevated numbers from 2025 are still well below where they were throughout the 2010s, when the homeless count consistently topped 11,000. D.C. is also not alone in seeing an increase in homelessness over the past few years. Nationwide, the total number of homeless people hit the highest level ever recorded due to a combination of inflation, wage stagnation and skyrocketing housing prices, according to federal data.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could the Supreme Court overturn same-sex marriage? This case hopes to roll back the ruling that made it legal.
Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed after refusing to file marriage licenses for same-sex couples, is hoping to overturn the Obergefell v. Hodges decision. The Supreme Court is being asked to hear a case that seeks to undo the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which allowed same-sex couples to get married. This challenge of Obergefell, the first since 2015, comes from Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed in 2015 after being held in contempt for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Davis, who refused to file the marriage licenses due to her religious beliefs, is appealing a damages verdict against her: a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys' fees. Now she is taking her case to the Supreme Court on the grounds that Obergefell was wrongly decided and infringes on her First Amendment rights. This is not the first time Davis has attempted to overturn the damages against her. In 2019, she petitioned the Supreme Court to dismiss the lawsuit, but the court declined to hear her case. More recently, in 2025, a panel of judges from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals also rejected her claims. Davis's challenge is concerning to LGBTQ+ advocates, as overturning Obergefell could undo the legal right to gay marriage. That 2015 ruling stated that same-sex couples must be allowed to marry and that all states must recognize those marriages. At the time, Davis's court battle was a direct challenge to Obergefell — but the ruling held. But now Liberty Counsel, the conservative group representing Davis, is asking the Supreme Court to overturn both the Sixth Circuit decision and the Supreme Court's initial decision in Obergefell. Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel's founder and chair, stated that Davis's case 'underscores why the U.S. Supreme Court should overturn the wrongly decided Obergefell v. Hodges opinion, because it threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman.' Could gay marriage really be overturned? What would that mean? The new makeup of the Supreme Court could favor Davis. Since 2015, the Supreme Court has become more conservative, with three justices — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — appointed by President Trump during his first term. While this does not necessarily mean the conservative majority would rule in Davis's favor, should the court choose to take her case, the latest request sounded alarm bells for many LGBTQ+ advocates. And there is recent precedent for overturning previously decided court cases. For example, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, ending federal protection for abortion rights after nearly 50 years. In his concurring opinion of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned Roe, Justice Clarence Thomas stated that the court should reconsider Obergefell and other cases related to rights based on the Constitution's due process clause. Should Obergefell be overturned, 32 states have laws on the book that would ban gay marriage — though, thanks to a 2022 federal law, they would still have to recognize unions that were already legally performed. Then-President Joe Biden signed the Respect for Marriage Act, which overturned the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act and ensured federal recognition of same-sex and interracial marriages. However, the law does not force states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cuomo says rent-stabilized tenants should pay at least 30% of their income in rent
NEW YORK — Andrew Cuomo on Monday said that as mayor, he'd push to require New Yorkers looking to move into rent-stabilized apartments to pay at least 30% of their income in rent every year. The 30% requirement would, by definition, make those new tenants rent-burdened. The proposal, called 'Zohran's Law,' is a political shot at Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani: Over the weekend, Cuomo accused Mamdani, who makes $142,000 as a state assemblymember, of being too wealthy to live in his rent-stabilized apartment. 'They are supposed to be for hard-working men and women, but far too many rich people are taking advantage,' Cuomo said of rent-stabilized units. 'We must stop the Zohran Mamdanis of the world from gaming the system and boxing out lower income New Yorkers who are barely scraping by and Zohran's law will do that.' The new proposal, however, wouldn't actually give Mamdani the boot from his $2,300-a-month one bedroom. The new rules would take effect after the current tenant leaves the apartment. Rent-stabilized units are generally cheaper than market-price units because rent raises are restricted by the city's Rent Guidelines Board, and low-income tenants make up over half of their occupancy citywide. Mamdani has said he moved into the apartment when he was making $47,000 a year. 'Cuomo shells out $8,000 a month for a luxury Midtown apartment — more than most New Yorkers make — no wonder he's so out of touch,' Darius Gordon, Executive Director of the Met Council on Housing, said in response to Cuomo's proposal. 'He has no idea what it's like to scrape together rent every month. Every New Yorker deserves the protections of rent stabilization: automatic lease renewal and limits on outrageous rent hikes.' Earlier on Monday, Mamdani slammed Cuomo's accusations as a desperate attempt to take him down politically and proof he lives 'rent free' in the ex-governor's head. 'There are important conversations to be had about housing, but this is not what he's seeking to lead,' Mamdani said at a Midtown press conference. As governor, Cuomo signed into law a policy effectively blocking landlords from removing a unit's rent-stabilization status if the tenant earned more than $200,000 in two years back-to-back. 'Instead of admitting that his housing record is a failure, Cuomo is pushing a proposal that would only apply at the point of vacancy, do nothing to address current abuse of the system, and rely on landlords to act as income police,' Todd Shapiro, a spokesperson for Mayor Adams' campaign said. 'That's not leadership — it's political theater.' _____
