Starmer tells Zelenskyy it was ‘perfectly reasonable' to suspend elections during war
Show key events only Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
Keir Starmer has spoken to Volodymyr Zelenskyy to express support for him 'as Ukraine's democratically elected leader' after Donald Trump claimed Ukraine's president was a 'dictator'
A Downing Street spokesperson said:
The prime minister spoke to President Zelenskyy this evening and stressed the need for everyone to work together. The prime minister expressed his support for President Zelenskyy as Ukraine's democratically elected leader and said that it was perfectly reasonable to suspend elections during war time as the UK did during the second world war.
Ukraine had been scheduled to hold elections in 2024, but they were cancelled due to the full-scale Russian invasion of the country launched by Vladimir Putin nearly three years ago in late February 2022.
Other senior political figures have also reacted to the US president's comments. Conservative opposition leader Kemi Badenoch said Zelenskyy was 'the democratically elected leader of Ukraine who bravely stood up to Putin's illegal invasion'. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said Trump's comments 'must be where the line is drawn' Share Show key events only Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
Lisa Nandy has urged for the 'heat' to be taken out of public conversations about peace proposals to end the war caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine after a day of heated exchanges between US president Donald Trump and Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Speaking on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, the culture secretary said:
I think we need to take the heat down from what has become a very heated conversation in public over recent days. That's what the prime minister has been doing, meeting with European leaders, speaking to President Zelenskyy. Next week, he'll travel to the US to meet with President Trump.
Downing Street said that Keir Starmer spoke to Zelenskyy last night to reassure him that the UK saw him as Ukraine's democratically elected leader, and not a 'dictator', as Trump had claimed.
Nandy continued, in an apparent reference to the negotiations that led to the Good Friday agreement, by saying:
The truth is that if we want a solution to what is happening in Ukraine –and we absolutely do, because it's in British interests to do so, and it's the right thing to do – then we know in our country from the experience of dealing with very difficult matters on our own shores, that the only way that you reach a solution is to bring all parties around the table, to take the heat down, to have cool heads, and to bring people together for a negotiated solution.
Justin Webb repeatedly questioned Nandy on whether the UK government agreed with Trump's wording or not, but she diplomatically refused to be drawn in to an outright direct criticism while saying she was clear that the UK has a different view to the US president. She said:
We've got our own view as the UK. And our view is that the US matters, Ukraine must be involved in negotiations about Ukraine's own future, and that Europe matters as well.
And we need to make sure with all parties around the table that our alliance doesn't fracture. We're absolutely committed to Nato. We have to hold that coalition together. We have got a real threat here in Vladimir Putin. We have got to work together with our allies in order to make sure that we don't just win the war and win the peace in Ukraine, but we also make sure that we don't see the like of this happening again.
Webb put it to Nandy that 'would it not be reasonable for the prime minister to publicly contradict' Trump on claims Zelenskyy was a 'dictator' who had done 'a bad job', and she replied:
The prime minister has made his own view clear. He spoke to president Zelenskyy in the last few days and made clear that he understands, first of all, that he is an elected leader, and we consider him in the United Kingdom to be a legitimate leader.
We do not consider president Zelenskyy to be a dictator. He was elected by the people of Ukraine. And the reason that there haven't been elections is because of Russian aggression, and that is something that is out with Ukrainian control. We stand with Ukraine, and our belief in that, our support for Ukraine is unshakable. Share
Keir Starmer has spoken to Volodymyr Zelenskyy to express support for him 'as Ukraine's democratically elected leader' after Donald Trump claimed Ukraine's president was a 'dictator'
A Downing Street spokesperson said:
The prime minister spoke to President Zelenskyy this evening and stressed the need for everyone to work together. The prime minister expressed his support for President Zelenskyy as Ukraine's democratically elected leader and said that it was perfectly reasonable to suspend elections during war time as the UK did during the second world war.
Ukraine had been scheduled to hold elections in 2024, but they were cancelled due to the full-scale Russian invasion of the country launched by Vladimir Putin nearly three years ago in late February 2022.
Other senior political figures have also reacted to the US president's comments. Conservative opposition leader Kemi Badenoch said Zelenskyy was 'the democratically elected leader of Ukraine who bravely stood up to Putin's illegal invasion'. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said Trump's comments 'must be where the line is drawn' Share
Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of UK politics for Thursday. Here are the headlines … Keir Starmer has spoken to Volodymyr Zelenskyy to express support for him 'as Ukraine's democratically elected leader' after US president Donald Trump claimed Ukraine's president was a 'dictator'
On Thursday morning minister Lisa Nandy said that the heat needed to be taken out public discussions about any peace deal in Ukraine
Shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said on Thursday that she could not comment on the motivation behind Trump's attack on Zelenskyy and that 'there are no clear solutions right now', offering tentative Conservative support to any plans to put British troops on the ground in Ukraine
The Labour government has announced a £270m Arts Everywhere fund for arts venues, museums, libraries and the heritage sector. Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Nandy are expected to make appearances today to promote the programme
Plans by the Labour government to prevent refugees who arrive in the UK on a small boat, lorry or via other so-called 'irregular' means from becoming a British citizen are facing their first legal challenge
Defence secretary John Healey is in Norway, and foreign secretary David Lammy is at a G20 ministerial meeting in South Africa
It is Martin Belam with you again today. You can reach me at martin.belam@theguardian.com. I do find it useful if you let me know if you spot my inevitable typos, errors or omissions. Share
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
10 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Cynthia Erivo crowned best actress at BET Awards
Hosted by Kevin Hart, Monday's BET Awards celebrated the work of black people in music, entertainment, film, sports and philanthropy. The London-born star, who rose to worldwide prominence last year for her role in Wicked, was also nominated for the BET Her Award — which recognises empowering songs that focus on women — for her rendition of Defying Gravity. Grammy Award-winning rapper Doechii used her acceptance speech to sharply criticise US President Donald Trump's handling of protests in Los Angeles. The Swamp Princess takes her crown again! Standing ovation please for the #BETAwards Best Female Hip Hop Artist, @officialdoechii 👑 In case you couldn't tell, we're your biggest fan! — #BETAwards (@BETAwards) June 10, 2025 Collecting the award for best female hip-hop artist, she accused the president of 'creating fear and chaos' in his response to demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids, which sparked days of protest across the city. 'I do want to address what's happening right now, outside the building,' she said. 'These are ruthless attacks that are creating fear and chaos in our communities. In the name of law and order, Trump is using military forces to stop a protest, and I want you all to consider what kind of government it appears to be, when every time we exercise our democratic right to protest, the military is deployed against us.' Mr Trump announced plans to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to California to quell the protests, which began on Friday. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the move was 'essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States'. The decision drew sharp criticism from Democratic politicians, including California Governor Gavin Newsom, who called the move 'purposefully inflammatory'. London-based girl-group FLO missed out after picking up nominations for best group and the Bet Her award for their track In My Bag, featuring GloRilla. Fellow UK artists Bashy and Ezra Collective earned nominations for best international artist, while multi-genre artist Odeal and R&B singer kwn were shortlisted for best new international act. Kendrick Lamar, who led the pack with 10 nominations, took home awards for album of the year and best male hip-hop artist. He also won video of the year and video director of the year for his hit Not Like Us, as well as best collaboration for Luther, his track with SZA SZA won best female R&B/pop artist, while Chris Brown took home best male R&B/pop artist. The evening featured a star-studded cast, including actor Jamie Foxx, with performances by Ashanti, Mariah Carey and GloRilla. Foxx, Carey, gospel star Kirk Franklin and Snoop Dogg were honoured with the ultimate icon award for their contributions to community, entertainment, and advocacy. Miles Canton, Luke James and Lucky Daye delivered an R&B tribute to Quincy Jones, who died in November.
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
No rush for US energy as Asia's imports slip under Trump: Russell
LAUNCESTON, Australia, June 10 (Reuters) - Asian countries aren't rushing to buy U.S. energy commodities, even though lifting imports of crude oil, liquefied natural gas and coal will help meet President Donald Trump's demand for lower trade surpluses. While rare earths may be the immediate talking point in the current talks between the Trump administration and China, the real action behind any deal will be in the big three energy commodities. The same is true for other Asian economies seeking to curry favour with Trump and get a better deal than the hefty tariffs imposed on many in his so-called "Liberation Day" measures announced on April 2, and subsequently paused for 90 days. But in the four full months since Trump returned to the White House, Asia's imports of U.S. energy commodities have actually fallen from the same period last year. Imports of crude oil from February to May declined to 1.53 million barrels per day (bpd) from 1.55 million bpd in the same period in 2024, according to data from commodity analysts Kpler. Asia's imports of U.S. LNG were 4.78 million metric tons in the February to May period, down 40% from the 8.04 million tons in the same four months last year. Arrivals of all grades of coal were 13.79 million tons in the four-month period, down from 14.19 million tons from February to May last year. What these numbers show is that Asia, the world's top commodity importing region, isn't increasing its purchases of U.S. commodities. What the numbers don't show is that within the broader picture there are some dynamics at work that show that some Asian countries may be in the early stages of trying to ramp up imports of U.S. energy. India is buying more from the United States, with Kpler estimating imports of 253,000 bpd of crude oil in the four months from February to May, up from 175,000 bpd over the same period last year. June crude arrivals are forecast by Kpler to be 439,000 bpd, which would be the second-highest monthly total on record. While U.S. oil is still less than 10% of India's total imports, the fact that it is rising in what is a competitive market for pricing may indicate a desire to do more trade with the United States. India has also been buying more U.S. coal, with Kpler data showing imports of 3.1 million tons in May, the highest on record. India's imports of U.S. coal were 8.82 million tons in the four months from February to May, up 12% from the 7.85 million tons for the same period last year. Similar to crude, U.S. coal is a small percentage of India's total coal imports, but the rising imports are worth noting given U.S. coal has a more costly freight component than its competitors from Indonesia, Australia and South Africa. Outside of India, other Asian coal importers haven't been increasing shipments from the United States, with second-biggest buyer Japan importing 1.75 million tons in the February to May period, down from 2.15 million tons for the same months in 2024. Japan has also been buying less U.S. LNG, with only 1.04 million tons arriving from February to May, down from 1.75 million tons for the same period in 2024. The drop in shipments of U.S. LNG to Asia is most likely price-related as higher spot prices have seen cargoes move to Europe, which is using LNG to refill natural gas storages depleted during the northern winter. The loss of China as a market for U.S. LNG amid the ongoing tariff war has also hurt U.S. volumes to Asia, with Kpler showing no cargoes arrived in the world's biggest buyer of the super-chilled fuel in March, April and May. China's imports of U.S. coal have also dropped to almost zero, with only one cargo of around 35,000 tons arriving in May, according to Kpler, while no crude was imported in May. Outside of India, the only other major importer in Asia that has increased its purchases of U.S. energy is South Korea, with imports of crude rising to the second-highest on record in May at 593,000 bpd. South Korea has also lifted its imports of U.S. LNG in recent months, with May's 560,000 tons the highest since October last year, with Kpler forecasting another increase in June to 570,000 tons. However, the overall picture is that Asia's commodity importers are largely holding back on increasing imports of U.S. energy. It may be the case that they are still planning on using imports as leverage in talks with the Trump administration, or it may also be the case that the delivered prices of U.S. crude, coal and LNG are not competitive. But for now buying more U.S. energy in order to lower trade surpluses is not yet a thing in Asia. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Family visa income threshold should not rise to skilled worker level
Skilled workers are only eligible to come to the UK if they earn a salary of £38,700 or more, compared to £29,000 required mainly for British citizens or settled residents to bring their partner to the country under family visas. The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) set out its recommendations after a review requested by the Home Secretary to look at how to set a minimum income requirement (MIR) for family visas that balances economic wellbeing and family life. The previous government planned to introduce the higher threshold for family visa applicants to be equivalent to the skilled worker level. But the committee's report said: 'Given the family route that we are reviewing has a completely different objective and purpose to the work route, we do not understand the rationale for the threshold being set using this method. 'We do not recommend the approach based on the skilled worker salary threshold as it is unrelated to the family route and is the most likely to conflict with international law and obligations (e.g. Article 8).' Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights is the right to private and family life that can be applied to migration cases in the UK. The UK's current £29,000 threshold is high compared to other high-income countries reviewed by the MAC. The analysis found a high proportion of applicants for partner visas are women and 90% are under the age of 44. Pakistan is the largest nationality to use the route applying from outside the country. The committee's analysis gave some options that a threshold of £24,000 to £28,000 could give more priority to economic wellbeing, such as reducing the burden to taxpayers, than on family life. It also suggested a criteria of £23,000 to £25,000 to ensure families can support themselves but not necessarily require them to earn a salary above minimum wage. Chairman of MAC, Professor Brian Bell, said: 'While the decision on where to set the threshold is ultimately a political one, we have provided evidence on the impacts of financial requirements on families and economic wellbeing, and highlight the key considerations the government should take into account in reaching its decision.' While the committee said it is not possible to predict how different threshold changes would impact net migration, it said lowering the amount to £24,000, for example, could mean an increase of around one to three percent of projected future net migration. The report added: 'Determining the MIR threshold involves striking a balance between economic wellbeing and family life. 'Whilst a lower threshold would favour family life and entail a higher net fiscal cost to the taxpayer, a higher threshold (below a certain level) would favour economic wellbeing. 'But a higher number of families would experience negative impacts relating to financial pressures, prolonged separation, relationships, adults' mental health and children's mental health and education.' The committee advised against raising the threshold for families with children as despite them facing higher living costs, the impacts on family life appear 'particularly significant' for children. It also recommended keeping the income amount required the same across all regions of the UK. The MAC also said their review was 'greatly hindered' by insufficient data and urged for better data collection by the Home Office on characteristics of each applicant to be linked to outcomes to inform further policy decisions. Reacting to the recommendations, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the report shows that raising the salary threshold will drive migration numbers down and urged for the threshold to be increased to £38,000. 'Migration figures remain far too high. It's time to end ECHR obstruction, raise the salary thresholds, and take back control of who comes into this country,' he said. 'As Kemi and I said on Friday, if the ECHR stops us from setting our own visa rules, from deporting foreign criminals or from putting Britain's interests first, then we should leave the ECHR.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'The Home Secretary commissioned the independent Migration Advisory Committee to undertake a review. 'We are now considering its findings and will respond in due course. More broadly, the government has already committed to legislate to clarify the application of Article 8 of the ECHR for applicants, caseworkers and the courts.'
