No rush for US energy as Asia's imports slip under Trump: Russell
LAUNCESTON, Australia, June 10 (Reuters) - Asian countries aren't rushing to buy U.S. energy commodities, even though lifting imports of crude oil, liquefied natural gas and coal will help meet President Donald Trump's demand for lower trade surpluses.
While rare earths may be the immediate talking point in the current talks between the Trump administration and China, the real action behind any deal will be in the big three energy commodities.
The same is true for other Asian economies seeking to curry favour with Trump and get a better deal than the hefty tariffs imposed on many in his so-called "Liberation Day" measures announced on April 2, and subsequently paused for 90 days.
But in the four full months since Trump returned to the White House, Asia's imports of U.S. energy commodities have actually fallen from the same period last year.
Imports of crude oil from February to May declined to 1.53 million barrels per day (bpd) from 1.55 million bpd in the same period in 2024, according to data from commodity analysts Kpler.
Asia's imports of U.S. LNG were 4.78 million metric tons in the February to May period, down 40% from the 8.04 million tons in the same four months last year.
Arrivals of all grades of coal were 13.79 million tons in the four-month period, down from 14.19 million tons from February to May last year.
What these numbers show is that Asia, the world's top commodity importing region, isn't increasing its purchases of U.S. commodities.
What the numbers don't show is that within the broader picture there are some dynamics at work that show that some Asian countries may be in the early stages of trying to ramp up imports of U.S. energy.
India is buying more from the United States, with Kpler estimating imports of 253,000 bpd of crude oil in the four months from February to May, up from 175,000 bpd over the same period last year.
June crude arrivals are forecast by Kpler to be 439,000 bpd, which would be the second-highest monthly total on record.
While U.S. oil is still less than 10% of India's total imports, the fact that it is rising in what is a competitive market for pricing may indicate a desire to do more trade with the United States.
India has also been buying more U.S. coal, with Kpler data showing imports of 3.1 million tons in May, the highest on record.
India's imports of U.S. coal were 8.82 million tons in the four months from February to May, up 12% from the 7.85 million tons for the same period last year.
Similar to crude, U.S. coal is a small percentage of India's total coal imports, but the rising imports are worth noting given U.S. coal has a more costly freight component than its competitors from Indonesia, Australia and South Africa.
Outside of India, other Asian coal importers haven't been increasing shipments from the United States, with second-biggest buyer Japan importing 1.75 million tons in the February to May period, down from 2.15 million tons for the same months in 2024.
Japan has also been buying less U.S. LNG, with only 1.04 million tons arriving from February to May, down from 1.75 million tons for the same period in 2024.
The drop in shipments of U.S. LNG to Asia is most likely price-related as higher spot prices have seen cargoes move to Europe, which is using LNG to refill natural gas storages depleted during the northern winter.
The loss of China as a market for U.S. LNG amid the ongoing tariff war has also hurt U.S. volumes to Asia, with Kpler showing no cargoes arrived in the world's biggest buyer of the super-chilled fuel in March, April and May.
China's imports of U.S. coal have also dropped to almost zero, with only one cargo of around 35,000 tons arriving in May, according to Kpler, while no crude was imported in May.
Outside of India, the only other major importer in Asia that has increased its purchases of U.S. energy is South Korea, with imports of crude rising to the second-highest on record in May at 593,000 bpd.
South Korea has also lifted its imports of U.S. LNG in recent months, with May's 560,000 tons the highest since October last year, with Kpler forecasting another increase in June to 570,000 tons.
However, the overall picture is that Asia's commodity importers are largely holding back on increasing imports of U.S. energy.
It may be the case that they are still planning on using imports as leverage in talks with the Trump administration, or it may also be the case that the delivered prices of U.S. crude, coal and LNG are not competitive.
But for now buying more U.S. energy in order to lower trade surpluses is not yet a thing in Asia.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British citizens among 9,000 immigrants to be sent to Guantanamo
At least 9,000 undocumented immigrants, including British citizens, are to be sent to Guantanamo Bay detention camp, according to reports in the US. The first transfers are due to start within days, as the Trump administration ramps up its campaign to deport illegal immigrants. In January, Donald Trump announced plans to house 30,000 migrants in the notorious camp on Cuba, which was previously used as a military prison to house combatants captured during George W Bush's 'war on terror' following the September 11 attacks on the US. According to documents seen by Politico, the plan is to hold the migrants at the camp for a short period before deporting them back to their home country. Guantanamo currently holds roughly 500 people. This move represents a further toughening of the administration's immigration policy, which has seen masked snatch squads lifting suspected illegal immigrants off the streets. The official reason for detaining migrants at Guantanamo is to free up space in migrant detention centres in the US itself, especially with the White House setting a target of 3,000 arrests a day. However, critics say the administration believes using Guantanamo will serve as a deterrent for new illegal immigrants and encourage those already in the country to self-deport. An estimated 800 Europeans are on the list of potential Guantanamo detainees, with the Washington Post saying they include British and French citizens. It is a move which has reportedly alarmed European diplomats, given that they have previously co-operated in the repatriation of their own citizens. 'The message is to shock and horrify people, to upset people,' one State Department official told Politico. In Washington, a court is considering a plea to outlaw the use of Guantanamo to house migrants, with the American Civil Liberties Union claiming they are being held in dire conditions in a rodent-infested camp, where detainees are denied a weekly change of clothing and adequate food. In its writ, the ACLU accused the administration of using Guantanamo 'to frighten immigrants, deter future migration, induce self-deportation, and coerce people in detention to give up claims against removal and accept deportation elsewhere'. This was denied by the US Justice Department, which told the court that Guantanamo is being used as a temporary staging post. Previously, nine British citizens were held at Guantanamo, of which five were repatriated in March 2004. A further nine who had residency status in the UK, but not citizenship, were also held at the camp.
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
China's Li says US-China reach framework on trade, will report back to leaders
LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang said on Tuesday that the Chinese and the U.S. negotiating teams had agreed a framework on trade after two days of talks, and would take that back to their leaders. "The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting," Li told reporters.
Powys County Times
24 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
US marines deployed to LA have not yet responded to immigration protests
US marines that deployed to Los Angeles on orders from President Donald Trump have not yet been called to respond to the city's immigration protests and are there only to protect federal officials and property, a commander said. The 700 marines and another 2,000 US National Guard troops were sent to LA on Monday, escalating a military presence that local officials and governor Gavin Newsom do not want and that the police chief says makes it harder to handle the protests safely. Marine Corps Gen Eric Smith told a budget hearing on Capitol Hill that the battalion has not yet been sent to any protests. The marines were trained for crowd control but have no arrest authority and are there to protect government property and personnel, he said. It came as Mr Newsom filed an emergency request in federal court on Tuesday to block the Trump administration from using the National Guard and Marines to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles. The governor's request said it was in response to a change in orders for the Guard. The Guard members were originally deployed to protect federal buildings. It was not clear if the change in mission had begun and Mr Newsom's office did not immediately say how the state was notified about the change. Mr Trump doubled the number of Guard troops being deployed soon after the first wave of 2,000 began arriving on Sunday following days of protests driven by anger over the President's enforcement of immigration laws that critics say are breaking apart migrant families. The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward… — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 9, 2025 Mr Trump left open the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act, which authorises the president to deploy military forces inside the US to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It is one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a US president. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' he said on Tuesday from the Oval Office. 'But I can tell you last night was terrible, and the night before that was terrible.' The demonstrations continued on Monday but were far less raucous, with thousands of people peacefully attending a rally at City Hall and hundreds more protesting outside a federal complex that includes a detention centre where some immigrants are being held following workplace raids across the city. The protests in Los Angeles, a city of four million people, have largely been centred in several blocks of downtown and a few other spots. At daybreak on Tuesday, guard troops were stationed outside the detention centre, but there was no sign of US marines. Obscene slogans were directed at Mr Trump and federal law enforcement remained scrawled across several buildings. At the Walt Disney Concert Hall, workers were busy washing away graffiti on Tuesday morning. In nearby Santa Ana, armoured vehicles blocked a road leading to federal immigration and government offices. Workers swept up plastic bottles and broken glass near buildings sprayed with graffiti. Mr Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Mayor Karen Bass and Mr Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. They say he is putting public safety at risk by adding military personnel even though police say they do not need the help. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said in a statement that he was confident in the police department's ability to handle large-scale demonstrations and that the Marines' arrival without coordinating with the police department would present a 'significant logistical and operational challenge'. Mr Newsom called the deployments reckless and 'disrespectful to our troops' in a post on the social platform X. 'This isn't about public safety,' the governor said. 'It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego.' The protests began on Friday after federal immigration authorities arrested more than 40 people across Los Angeles and continued over the weekend as crowds blocked a major road and set self-driving cars on fire. Police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. Demonstrations spread on Monday to other cities nationwide, including San Francisco and Santa Ana, California, as well as Dallas and Austin, Texas. Authorities in Austin appeared to use chemical irritants to disperse a crowd that gathered near the state Capitol. The Trump Administration's escalation and provocation in California inflames tensions and incites violence. Now, the President of the United States said he would arrest a sitting American governor just for disagreeing with these actions. This is a hallmark of authoritarianism… — Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) June 9, 2025 Texas governor Greg Abbott posted on social media that more than a dozen protesters were arrested. The Pentagon said deploying the National Guard and Marines costs 134 million dollars (£98.8 million). That figure emerged just after US defence secretary Pete Hegseth engaged in a into a testy back-and-forth about the costs during a congressional hearing. Mr Hegseth said the department has a budget increase and the money to cover the costs, and he defended Mr Trump's decision to send the troops, saying they are needed to protect federal agents doing their jobs. Meanwhile, Democratic members of California's congressional delegation on Tuesday accused the President of creating a 'manufactured crisis' with his orders to send in troops. Nancy Pelosi contrasted Trump's actions with his handling of the January 6 2021 insurrection at the US Capitol when law enforcement officers were beaten. 'We begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it,' Ms Pelosi said. California's attorney general Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit over the use of National Guard troops following the first deployment, telling reporters that Mr Trump had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. He sought a court order declaring Mr Trump's use of the Guard unlawful and asking for a restraining order to halt the deployment. The President said the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not deployed the Guard. US officials said the marines were needed to protect federal buildings and personnel, including immigration agents. A convoy of buses with blacked-out windows and escorted by sheriff's vehicles arrived overnight at a Navy facility just south of LA. Despite their presence, there has been limited engagement so far between the Guard and protesters while local law enforcement implements crowd control. On Tuesday Mr Trump visited Fort Bragg in North Carolina to mark the 250th anniversary of the US Army and addressed the troops in a speech. 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' he said. Mr Trump said that Los Angeles would burn to the ground if he had not sent in military forces. A Trump administration order restored the name of the special operations forces base back to Fort Bragg. It was part of an effort to turn back a Biden administration move in 2023 to remove base names that honoured Confederate leaders. The North Carolina base had been renamed Fort Liberty.
