G7 to discuss further sanctions if Russia fails to come to negotiating table, PM says
G7 allies will discuss further sanctions on Russia if Vladimir Putin does not agree to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine, Sir Keir Starmer has said.
Speaking last night en route to the G7 summit in Canada, the prime minister said the conference is an opportunity to have a broad conversation with allies about global security in a "constructive way".
His comments come as efforts by the US president to bring Russia and Ukraine to the table for peace negotiations continue to fail, while the UK government and European allies continue to plan for a "coalition of the willing" to enforce any peace deal.
The prime minister is currently in Canada to attend the G7 summit - the annual meeting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the US, and the UK, as well as the EU.
Speaking to journalists on the plane, Sir Keir was asked if he expects additional sanctions on Russia to be agreed by allies.
He continued: "My long-standing view is, we need to get Russia to the table for an unconditional ceasefire. That's not been really straightforward.
"But we do need to be clear about we need to get to the table, and that if that doesn't happen, sanctions will undoubtedly be part of the discussion at the G7."
1:51
Sir Keir added that he has a "good relationship with President Trump", which is "important" amid ongoing conflicts, such as between Israel and Iran.
"I think the G7 is our opportunity to look at, as we are, the global economy, security in that global economy, trade and the economy as well, and more matters of national security," he said.
"I've been saying, for probably the best part of six months now - we're in a new era of defence and security, a new error for trade and the economy.
"And I think it's really important for Britain to play a leading part in that, and that's what I'll be doing at the G7, talking to all of our partners in a constructive way."
Mr Trump returned to the White House in January with a pledge to rapidly end the war in Ukraine.
After President Zelenskyy had a blazing row with the US president in the Oval Office, Sir Keir accelerated his plan for a "coalition of the willing" - countries that would be prepared to provide troops or other means to ensure any eventual peace deal with Russia.
But talks between the US and Russia on moving towards any kind of ceasefire have yet to bear fruit, and attacks on Ukrainian cities continue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
21 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Letter: Prime Minister has misled voters since his election
All politicians stretch the truth, but few do it with the frequency and shamelessness of Keir Starmer. He came to power promising 'honesty and integrity', a pledge that may turn out to be his most misleading of all. From the moment he ran for Labour leader, Starmer misled the public. He pledged to uphold Jeremy Corbyn's policies, abolishing tuition fees, lifting the two-child benefit cap, and nationalising key services. All were swiftly abandoned once he secured the leadership. It seems this has worked for him, so he's made it a habit. During the election campaign, Starmer gave the impression that Winter Fuel Payments and a cap on social care costs would be safe. Both have now been dropped. He said taxes wouldn't rise for working people, yet his Budget hits them through higher prices and lower wages, thanks to a £25 billion national insurance hike. He promised swift compensation for 1950s-born Waspi women. That too has vanished. Farmers were told they'd get certainty, instead, they've been hit with new inheritance taxes. Even his touted EU deal lacks detail, with vague claims and no transparency about what the UK is giving up, including 12 more years of access to British fishing waters. As the Institute for Fiscal Studies noted, the £22 billion black hole in Labour's Budget 'was obvious to anyone who dared to look.' But Starmer and his Chancellor pretended not to see it. Voters aren't fooled. When leaders routinely tell us things we know aren't true, and do so with utter confidence, it's not just dishonest, it's corrosive. Britain deserves better than this calculated deceit. Roman Jones
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump orders Ice to expand deportation of migrants
US President Donald Trump has ordered an expansion of the detention and deportation of migrants across the country as protests against his policies a post on Truth Social, Trump called on federal agencies to "do all in their power" to deliver "the single largest mass deportation programme in history", naming Los Angeles, Chicago and New York as specific cities are among the many where large-scale protests have broken out against raids on undocumented migrants since 6 has faced legal challenges and criticism for his response to the protests - particularly his deployment of the military to quell the demonstrations. Trump said he had directed the "entire administration to put every resource possible behind this effort". He also promised to prevent "anyone who undermines the domestic tranquility of the United States" from entering the various federal offices including the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice), he wrote "you have my unwavering support. Now go, get the job done!"The post came at the end of a day that saw a new wave of protests against Trump's policies across the 15 June, the "No Kings" movement demonstrated in cities stretching from Los Angeles to New York. Those demonstrations also coincided with a military parade in Washington DC to mark 250 years of the US army, which was held on the president's 79th person suffered life-threatening injuries after a shooting at a No Kings march in Salt Lake City, Utah. Police say it's not clear if this incident was politically also ordered immigration authorities to focus their efforts on sanctuary cities - those that limit their assistance to federal immigration authorities - which during the protests have become a source of tension between federal and state in these places have defended their legal rights to protect undocumented command to expand deportations signals a follow-through on Trump's campaign promise to provide the "largest deportation programme of criminals in the history of America".Opinion polls suggested this policy had widespread support in the build-up to the 2024 US election. Since the deportation programme has grown, however, protests have only new order came just hours after the Trump administration directed immigration officials to largely pause raids on farms, hotels, restaurants and meatpacking plants, according to the Reuters news agency.
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why Putin and Xi will be panicking over Iran
Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping will be following the conflict in the Middle East with deep concern as the Iranian regime appears increasingly frail. Both countries have publicly spoken in support of Iran by strongly condemning Israel for its attack that has so far killed top personnel, and hit defence systems, military targets and nuclear enrichment sites. As Iran is weakened, both China and Russia lose a key partner that shares an interest to rage against what they see as US hegemony in the region. Russia loses yet another portal through which it could attempt to regain supremacy in the Middle East, following the December fall of dictator Bashar al-Assad in Syria, where it used to have a robust military presence. 'They do share disdain for Western values and systems,' said Tuvia Gering, a China and Middle East specialist at Israel's Institute of National Security Studies. 'They also learn from each other and share technologies on how to suppress their own populations.' But as tensions escalate, the partnership with Iran is 'increasingly turning into a liability'. One area where Russia is not worried about is a continued supply of Iranian drones, which have been key in its war on Ukraine, noted Nicole Grajewski, a nuclear policy expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who specialises in Russia and Iran. Drone factories set up in Russia are capable of producing independently without Iranian support – as many as 2,700 a month. But the most pressing issue is a mutual concern that Iran will use heightened tensions as a pretext to withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and race toward building a weapon – something Tehran had previously already threatened. China and Russia both have nuclear weapons, and as is the case with all countries holding such firepower in their arsenal, neither are particularly keen to see Iran develop its own. It would mean less control over Iran, as the latter would be far less dependent on the fearsome dragon and bear. China, as the biggest customer of Iranian oil products, will suffer from Israel's attacks on Iranian oil and gas facilities. Beijing imports as much as two million barrels of oil a day from Iran, which accounts for a significant portion of its energy needs. If conflict escalates and Iran attacks the US military presence in the UAE and Saudi Arabia – also key energy suppliers to China – then the latter could see further disruption to its energy supply. 'It's an energy security risk,' said Mr Gering. 'For a country already suffering under the strain of an economic downturn and a trade war [with the US], it's not an ideal scenario.' Long-term sanctions on Iran make it a poor trade partner, which means China won't benefit as much on infrastructure investment projects, and Russia won't have a buyer for defence materials. There is a scenario where, once the dust settles, both could 'increase their arms exports, but Iran doesn't have the capital to pay for this, so it would probably be barter', said Ms Grajewski. A weak Iran isn't beneficial, as 'both China and Russia have a preference for these stable authoritarian regimes with similar outlooks on the international system'. On the surface, Iran's partners are acting as expected, but behind the scenes, a flurry of activity reflects deepening worries about the current situation spiralling out of control. Russia, for instance, called for an emergency meeting of the UN nuclear watchdog's board to be held Monday morning to discuss the impact of Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Putin has held calls with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, and Mahmoud Pezeshkian, the Iranian president, and Donald Trump, going so far as to offer to mediate. Xi has come out to say, 'Israel must be stopped.' China, too, has engaged both sides, with Wang Yi, ther foreign minister, speaking with his Iranian and Israeli counterparts. Russia was not as diplomatically active in the last round of Israel-Iran strikes in October 2024. This 'might be because the Kremlin views this as more of a situation that's uncontrollable', said Ms Grajewski. There may be 'concerns about this spilling over, also the destabilisation of Iran and its interest in the region, could be one of the rationales behind the outreach'. Beijing is gritting its teeth in the event of regime change – as there was in Afghanistan and Syria in recent years – so that they can 'make nice with whoever is left to rule', said Mr Gering.
