USM steps up support for students amid SST-driven cost hike
Among the key initiatives is the expansion of the Menu Rahmah programme to all residential college cafeterias, offering nutritious meals at affordable prices to ease students' financial burdens.
USM vice-chancellor Professor Datuk Seri Ir Dr Abdul Rahman Mohamed said the university remained committed to safeguarding student welfare amid rising economic pressures.
"This initiative is expected to provide some relief, especially for underprivileged students," he said in a statement today.
A special task force — chaired by Professor Dr Azlan Amran, who is currently discharging the duties of deputy vice-chancellor (student development affairs and alumni) — has been established to develop both short- and long-term strategies to support students affected by the cost-of-living crisis.
Students in urgent need of assistance are encouraged to contact the university's Welfare and Special Needs (OKU) Unit under the Division of Student Development Affairs (BHEPA).
The university's Zawain USM initiative has also been activated to distribute financial aid via special allocations to students requiring support.
"Targeted assistance for B40 students will continue and be strengthened to ensure they are not directly impacted by rising living costs," Abdul Rahman added.
The Food Bank @ USM initiative — which provides daily essentials and basic food items — has also been expanded to further assist financially vulnerable students.
USM is also actively pursuing external collaborations to enhance these efforts. One example is corporate partner Yusuf Taiyoob Sdn Bhd, which has pledged to donate nasi lemak meals daily to ensure students are not left hungry during their studies.
Meanwhile, BHEPA, in collaboration with the Student Representative Council (MPP), is conducting a survey to gauge the impact of inflation on students.
The survey focuses on key cost areas such as food, printing, e-hailing fares, and other daily essentials — with the findings to inform more targeted, long-term strategies.
Cafeteria operators have been reminded not to raise food prices, as they remain bound by pre-SST contractual agreements.
USM is also extending its support to off-campus students (Petas), ensuring they benefit from these measures.
In the longer term, the university is reviewing the rental rates of on-campus business premises to avoid burdening vendors and triggering further price hikes.
"These efforts reflect USM's continued commitment to prioritising student welfare and ensuring no one is left behind as we navigate the current economic climate," Abdul Rahman said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
10 hours ago
- Barnama
PM Anwar Flags Off 2025 KMJG Convoy, Marking Start Of National Month Celebrations
MUAR, July 27 (Bernama) -- Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today flagged off the 2025 Kembara Merdeka Jalur Gemilang (KMJG) convoy at Dataran Tanjung Emas here, marking the official start of the National Month celebrations and spreading the spirit of patriotism across the nation. The historic event saw participation from a wide range of groups, including civil servants, gig workers, motorsport enthusiasts, security forces, and for the first time, local fishermen who proudly displayed the Jalur Gemilang as they sailed along the Muar River. A total of 59 fishing boats, manned by the local fishing community, along with vessels from the Department of Marine (2 units), Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) (3 units), and the Marine Police (2 units), were all adorned with the Jalur Gemilang. In total, 172 participants were involved, symbolising the support of rural and coastal communities for the nation's independence. In addition, 88 land vehicles joined the convoy, with 133 participants from various agencies and organisations, including the Malaysian Information Department (JAPEN), Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM), Pos Malaysia, Johor state government departments, the BMW K16 Motorsport Club of Johor, and gig economy vehicles. The convoy will pass through 88 checkpoints - 44 in Peninsular Malaysia, 20 in Sabah, 22 in Sarawak, and two in the Federal Territory of Labuan, before concluding at Dataran Putrajaya on Aug 31, the location of the 2025 National Day celebrations. Present at the flag off ceremony were Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil, Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi, and Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar. The launch event featured various community-centered programmes, including the Kita MADANI Carnival, with activities such as colouring contests, Bintang Suara MADANI, cultural performances, and local heritage displays. Additionally, the MADANI Community entrepreneur booths brought together micro and small business owners from across the country, while the MADANI Sales programme and booths offering services from both government and private agencies were set up to engage the public.
Sinar Daily
12 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Paying more and understanding less under the new SST - when policy starts to feel like a prank
YOU wake up, scroll the news, and there it is. The Sales and Service Tax (SST) naik lagi (increases). No warning. No explanation. Just another quiet announcement slipped under the door like a final notice you did not know was coming. What was already expensive becomes just a little harder to justify. Raising taxes is not the issue. Every country needs revenue. But when new taxes arrive without conversation, context or empathy, they stop feeling like policy and start feeling like punishment. This is not governance. It is a widening gap between those who make the rules and those who live by them. In 2024, the Prime Minister declared a war on sugar. It was a solid move. Malaysia has Southeast Asia's highest rate of diabetes. One in six adults has it. Over half the population is overweight. Our roti canai is glorious, but our blood sugar is alarming. So we understood the logic. Tax sugary drinks. Encourage healthier living. We cut down our Milo ais (iced Milo). We nodded along. Then came news that fruits were being taxed. The one food group every doctor, campaign, and mother tell you to eat more of. Suddenly, healthy eating sounded like a lifestyle upgrade. Finance Ministry later clarified that SST only applies to imported fruits, not locally grown ones. Technically, this makes sense within the luxury classification framework. But practically, it complicates everyday lives. Many of the fruits Malaysians regularly consume such as pineapples, bananas and certain melons are imported depending on season and supply. It is unrealistic to expect households to rely solely on local produce. Some fruits are simply not available locally or differ significantly in taste and quality depending on origin. What was once a routine grocery item is now framed as a luxury. That framing is what makes the policy feel out of touch. We are being told to live healthier while watching nutritious choices become more expensive. It is like telling people to exercise more, then taxing the tools to do it. Running shoes, for instance, fall under taxable goods. If wellness is truly a national priority, policies should align with the lived cost of pursuing it. When the Prime Minister joked that if avocado is taxed, then do not eat avocado, it echoed a past that still stings. A few years ago, when grocery prices soared, another Prime Minister said if you cannot afford it, eat kangkung. The backlash was swift and loud. These comments, while perhaps meant in jest, reflect a deeper disconnection. People are not just budgeting avocados. They are budgeting protein. They are rationing electricity. They are quietly dropping fruits, supplements and essentials from their shopping lists. And just like that, food became a punchline. Just Fruits staff were seen arranging local and imported fruits following the new tax on imported fruits, with apples and oranges exempted as they are not grown locally and are popular during festive seasons on July 28, 2025. (BERNAMA PHOTO) The frustration is not just about the cost of living. It is about the lack of clarity, sincerity and structure in the way these changes are communicated and implemented. There were no widespread town halls. No consultative surveys that invited the public in. Policy changes roll out like surprise quizzes, and everyone pays if they fail. And I could not help but wonder if anyone in government is listening at all. Starting this month, the new RP4 electricity tariff was implemented. The base rate is now 45.40 sen per kilowatt hour. On paper, users could save up to 19 per cent if they use electricity during off peak hours and meet technical conditions. Large scale commercial users such as data centres face rate hikes of up to 14 per cent. For most households, the impact depends on how and when they consume electricity. Time of use pricing and targeted subsidies make sense theoretically. But practically, the average consumer may not have the tools, understanding or flexibility to shift usage. Without proper guidance, the burden quietly returns to the consumer. The middle class, particularly the M40, is especially affected. They earn too much to qualify for subsidies but not enough to comfortably absorb new costs. They receive no exemptions. But every change from SST to RP4 seems to land hardest on them. It is not that they are being ignored. It is that they are being assumed resilient. Even the recent minimum wage increase left a sour note. It raised the baseline for new hires but offered no mandate to adjust wages for existing workers. Someone loyal for five years could now earn the same as someone hired yesterday. That is not wage progress. It is wage erosion. Not too long ago, RM2,000 a month could rent a modest home and support basic meals. Today, that same amount might not even secure a studio apartment, let alone cover groceries and transportation. Prices have surged. Wages have stalled. And now, more taxes. More adjustments. More announcements. The rakyat is not asking for miracles. We are asking to be heard. We are asking for transparency, logic and respect. We are asking for policies that make sense when they reach the checkout counter, the electricity bill, the pharmacy. Because this is not about rejecting taxes. It is about ensuring fairness. It is about designing systems that work with, not against, the public's reality. You cannot tell people to eat healthy and then make fruit cost more. You cannot promote wellness while keeping wages stagnant. You cannot claim affordability while shifting more burdens onto the rakyat's backs. Even healthcare reform has turned into a question mark. The new medical and health insurance/takaful (MHIT) scheme, aimed at offering affordable insurance coverage, is proposed to be voluntarily funded through our EPF (Employers Provident Fund) Account 2. That is our retirement fund. That is emergency money. The last thing most people want to touch. And I could not help but wonder how long we can keep borrowing from our future to survive the present. Malaysia does not lack talent or ideas. We lack alignment. We need policies that consider context, behavior, timing and impact. We need clearer messaging, better engagement and actual feedback loops. Not just press conferences. This is not to say the rakyat is crumbling. But the pressure is real. The resilience is not infinite. The mental load of budgeting, adapting, and adjusting is growing heavier. We understand the government needs revenue. We also know times are tough globally. But the rakyat needs dignity. We need coherence. We need to be included, not just informed. Because when people do not understand why they are being taxed, they feel punished. When announcements come without explanation, they feel disregarded. When food becomes a joke and fuels a gamble, they feel alone in the system meant to support them. At this rate, it is not just SST and TNB bills that are climbing. It is anxiety. It is frustration. It is the quiet cost of being unheard. And the most painful irony of all is that the checkup for rising blood pressure might just be paid for with our retirement savings. Muhammad Naim Muhamad Ali, PhD, also known by the moniker Naim Leigh, is a Communication and Media Studies lecturer at the University of Wollongong Malaysia. The views expressed in this article are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Sinar Daily.
Daily Express
13 hours ago
- Daily Express
Why ‘Sabah for Sabahans' justified
Published on: Sunday, July 27, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 27, 2025 By: Datuk John Lo Text Size: NATIONAL Leaders Should Manage Nation, Let Sabah Leaders Manage Sabah. Let us clear this out of the way first. Meaning of Sabah leaders is that they are from Sabah-based parties. Best if federal leaders can concentrate providing economic leadership on nation building. Let Sabah parties to govern Sabah for two reasons: [1] Malaysian Economy is not doing that great. Malaysia's performance is ok but far from best that we are capable of. Malaysia has potential to be at the top if the national leaders can solve racial-based politics, low productivity, lack of direction in innovation and research and poverty. Dragging down Malaysia are two major causes: First is rampant inflation that is plaguing the poor and young families. Second is unprecedented massive corruption. Big corruption, in 10s and 100s of millions of cash stashed in homes and billions overseas. Latest 'handouts' from PMX will not solve fundamental economic problems. They are for temporary 'feel good' or 'shiok Sendiri' only. Very little enhancement of economic capacity. The new appointment of more than 4,000 doctors is very beneficial for all Malaysians. [2] Turbulent Global Economy. Challenges in Multi-polar World. National leaders are providing insufficient leadership, direction, and clarity for Malaysians in these very uncertain times. Excessive domestic politics has blurred their responsibility in this very important aspect of economic management. It is logical to let Sabahan leaders manage Sabah. Federal leaders should not interfere. Focus on solving the national problems. Sabah leaders are capable of managing Sabah. CM Hajiji's economic restructure for Sabah is on course and will, in time, yield the desired results for Sabah. In addition, he has reclaimed some rights in oil and gas. The base of a burgeoning vibrant manufacturing industry has already been established. ECoS will solve Sabah's power problem. By 2030 there shall be no power issue. ECoS has done it within two years of its existence. The Federal government had no plan and failed to do so in 30 years. Sabahans are Malaysians as any Malaysian of other states. 'Sabah for Sabahans' does not dilute our Malaysianess. It must be stated here and now that Sabah is part of Malaysia, Sabahans are Malaysians just like any Malaysians of other states. Don't be distracted by any leader trying to steer us away from pursuing 'Sabah for Sabahans'. Such leaders have dubious ulterior motives. These following facts must be remembered always by all Sabahans and Malayans: Sabah is a direct signatory of MA63, 1/3 of Malaysia. Sabah is not 1/13 or 1/16 if the 3 federal territories are included, of Malaysia. These facts have become inconvenient truths and are often forgotten by many federal and some Sabah leaders. Many of them, for bizarre reasons, want Sabahans to forget Sabah's special role/position in the formation of Malaysia. 'Malaysia for Sabahans' more relevant slogan, says Ahmad Maslan. What is the meaning of 'Malaysia for Sabahans'? The ideal situation would be that Malaysia, of which Sabah is 1/3, would give Sabah a fair deal in all matters, especially in economic development and investment promotion. Sabah should have been looked after and assisted with extra help in development funding for Sabah to catch up with other states. Sabah's resources like oil and gas should have been used for the development of Sabah's economy from the very beginning. What does history tell us? Unfortunately, it has been a very sad story. The hard facts are that Sabah today is the 2nd poorest state, most of Sabah's resources have been siphoned off or controlled by non-Sabahans. Sabah has become well-known for poverty and bad infrastructures. To summarise, it has been a very bad nightmare. No one can blame Sabahans' scepticism on slogans like 'Malaysia for Sabah' from Malayan leaders. Should Sabahans want 'Malaysia for Sabah'? No one can blame Sabahans' heightened scepticism of this slogan which has been sold to us in various versions for many years. With due respect, this slogan seems to have come as an after-thought, an off-the-cuff remark. Better and easier for Sabahans to swallow if there is a properly prepared presentation of what 'Malaysia for Sabah' means to Sabahans in real term in this coming election. Sabahans, especially young better educated Sabahans, are no longer naïve. They aren't afraid to vent their frustrations. 'Malaysia for Sabahans' vs 'Sabah for Sabahans' These 2 slogans can be the best complements for nation building if only the federal government has lived up to the letter and spirit of MA63. Experience is telling us otherwise. History should have also taught Sabahans a lesson of self-discipline, the pitfalls, and dire consequences of political disunity. In view of numerous past unpleasant experiences [remember the 47 years old procrastination of 40% share of revenue?], it is better for Sabahans to have 'Sabah for Sabahans' so that we can build up and strengthen Sabah first. It is also time for Sabahans to grow up, not dependent on others, to exert our equitable rights and not to wait for charity and manna to fall from heaven. Sabahans must adopt 'Sabah for Sabahans' to regain self-respect. [1] 'Sabah for Sabahans' is a natural desire for all Sabahans, no difference from 'Selangor for Selangoreans' or 'Bangsa Johor'. Any Sabah leader not subscripting to this ought to have their heads examined. [2] Time for Sabahans to mature, to take charge and be responsible for our own destiny and future within Malaysia. Sabahans cannot continue to rely on others to make decisions for Sabahans. [3] Time to have our legitimate voice in major decisions that affect the nations like financial and budgetary policies and their implementations. Sabah is almost voiceless now. [4] As 1/3 partner of Malaysia, Sabah should and must have 1/3 representation in all federal agencies like Khazanah, all GLCs and GLIC. They don't give any attention for or implement any meaningful projects in Sabah. [5] Time for Sabahans to secure all our legitimate rights under MA63, our equitable rights for economic funding to develop our own state. [6] Time for Sabahans to have priority of our resources for the benefit of Sabahans. Like present siphoning off CPO must stop or impose higher sales tax of 15%. The CPO must be used for Sabah's downstream. [7] Sabah must be included in foreign trips by PM for investment promotions. [8] Federal government must give Sabah approval authority of RM2.5 billion on investment in manufacturing. Present RM2.5m is a joke. This amount cannot buy a semi-D now. 'Sabah for Sabahans' must be Encouraged by all Sabah leaders. Sabahans do not crave for what is not ours. Sabah is very far from getting what is rightfully ours, what Sabah is entitled to as 1/3 partner. 'Sabah for Sabahans LAST' is no longer acceptable by Sabah's young generation. They are deeply aware of and abhor the economic deprivations inflicted on Sabahans since MA63. 'Sabah for Sabahans' has room for a junior role for Malayan parties. As a trade-off, Sabah parties can support Malayan parties at federal level. Fair is fair. Priority is for all Sabah parties to unite for the sake of Sabahans, present and future generations. Good for Malaysia when 'Sabah for Sabahans' has made Sabah strong economically. 'Sabah for Sabahans' can Succeed only with Political Unity in Sabah. A strong Sabah will strengthen Malaysia economically and enhance its international prestige. 'Sabah for Sabahans' is a national asset. Sabah, now the 6th direct contributor to the national GDP will be able to contribute much more. Sabah's indirect contribution is much bigger cos most of our oil and gas and CPO are being shipped out to fuel industrial growth in Malaya. Malayan national leaders should let Sabahan leaders manage our state. For the future of all Sabahans, Sabah parties must fight for 'Sabah for Sabahans'. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
