logo
Did Harvard reject Trump? Is that why he holds a grudge against the university?

Did Harvard reject Trump? Is that why he holds a grudge against the university?

First Post31-05-2025
Trump's biographer, Michael Wolff, has claimed that the US president's anger towards Ivy League colleges, especially Harvard, comes from the fact that he failed to make it to the prestigious college. However, the White House denied the claims, saying Trump never applied to the 'overrated, corrupt' institute read more
According to presidential biographer Michael Wolff, Trump's anger toward Harvard University does not stem from Barron's rejection, but from the fact that Trump himself never made it to Harvard. Representational image
Earlier this week, rumours lit up social media claiming that US President Donald Trump was going after Harvard University because his youngest son, Barron Trump, had been rejected by the Ivy League school.
But the speculation was quickly put to rest by First Lady Melania Trump, who clarified that Barron never applied to Harvard in the first place.
Now, a new theory has surfaced, this time from Michael Wolff, the President's biographer, suggesting that Trump's grudge against the university might be more personal than anyone thought.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to him, Trump's anger does not stem from Barron's non-existent rejection, but from the fact that Trump himself never made it to Harvard.
So, is Trump's feud with the elite institution actually about his own past? What exactly did Wolff say? And how is the White House responding to these claims? Here's a closer look.
Trump has a 'grudge' against the Ivy League?
During a recent episode of The Daily Beast podcast hosted by Joanna Coles, the conversation turned to Trump's apparent hostility toward elite universities. Coles noted how many in Trump's circle are Ivy League alumni.
'It's also odd because so many of the people around Donald Trump went to Ivy League universities. Several of them went to Harvard Business School,' she said. 'Obviously, JD Vance proudly went to Yale. So it does seem particularly odd, but perhaps he's also trying to stuff it to them.'
In response, Michael Wolff, who has authored several books on Trump, including 'Fire and Fury, Siege: Trump Under Fire', and the latest 'All or Nothing', suggested there may be a more personal reason behind Trump's disdain for the Ivy League.
'It's important not to lend too much calculation and planning to anything he does,' Wolff said. 'But the other thing is that, by the way, he didn't get into Harvard. So one of the Trump things is always holding a grudge against the Ivy Leagues.'
A Harvard sign is seen at the Harvard University campus in Boston, Massachusetts, on May 27. AFP
While there's no official record confirming whether Trump ever applied to Harvard, let alone if he was rejected, Wolff's remark adds to the theory that the president's Ivy League animosity may be rooted in his own academic history.
Trump began his college education at Fordham University in 1964 after four years at the New York Military Academy. Two years later, he transferred to the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, where he earned a bachelor's degree in economics.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But Trump's academic credibility has long been under scrutiny. In 2020, The Washington Post revealed audio recordings made by Mary Trump, the president's niece, in which Trump's sister, the late federal judge Maryanne Trump Barry, made some startling claims.
'I drove him around New York City to try to get him into college,' Trump Barry said in the 2018–19 recordings. She added, 'He went to Fordham for one year and then he got into the University of Pennsylvania because he had somebody take the exams.'
The White House swiftly dismissed the claims at the time, saying it was 'false' that anyone else had taken Trump's SATs.
When asked by The Post to respond to the recordings, Trump simply said: 'Who cares?'
President Donald Trump speaks at the Bitcoin 2024 Conference in July 27, 2024 in Nashville. File image/AP
According to The New York Times reporters Ross Buettner and Susanne Craig, in their 2024 book 'Lucky Loser, Trump' was a mediocre student at Fordham. He didn't even make the dean's list in his first year, which only required a GPA of 3.5, equivalent to a B+.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
And while much speculation continues to swirl around his Harvard rejection, what is known, though, is that as a young man, Trump had dreams of going to film school at the University of Southern California (USC). Ironically, USC, too, has now become a target of his ire.
After the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights said USC failed to meet its Title VI obligations under the Civil Rights Act to protect Jewish students, Trump cut federal research funding, causing the institution to lose $17.5 million.
'The Trump show'
Wolff claimed that apart from 'holding the grudge', Trump's 'TV star instincts as a producer' play a key role in his legal battle against Ivy League universities, particularly Harvard. According to him, Trump 'needs an enemy'.
'That's what makes the show great, the Trump show. He picks fantastic enemies. And Harvard, for all it represents, fits right into the Trump show. The president loves the drama,' he told The Daily Beast.
'He's done what he set out to do - dominate the headline. What do you do? You go after Harvard in a way that is draconian, dramatic, and existential. It's threatening Harvard on that level,' he added_._
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
For Trump, Wolff added, Harvard becomes just another character in the unfolding drama that is the 'Trump show'.
People walk between buildings on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge. File image/AP
In recent weeks, that drama has escalated. The Trump-led administration moved to revoke Harvard University's ability to enrol new international students, a policy that has since been temporarily blocked by a US judge.
Before that, the White House had also placed a $2.2 billion freeze on federal funding to the university. Trump reportedly offered to lift the funding ban but only under certain conditions that Harvard refused to accept.
Throughout, Trump has doubled down on his criticism, accusing Harvard and other elite universities of promoting progressive ideologies and nurturing a so-called 'woke' campus culture.
The White House reacts to Wolff's claims
Unsurprisingly, the White House didn't take Wolff's latest remarks lightly.
Taylor Rogers, a spokesperson for the administration, pushed back hard against both Wolff and The Daily Beast, dismissing their reporting entirely.
'They both peddle fake news for clickbait in a hopeless attempt to amount to something more than lying losers,' Rogers said. 'The President didn't need to apply to an overrated, corrupt institution like Harvard to become a successful businessman and the most transformative President in history.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The White House has previously shot down another claim the author made that Melania Trump had 'separated' from her husband and that their marriage was no longer traditional. The White House fired back, calling Wolff 'a blithering idiot.'
With input from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Track: Wheeling in Circles
Inside Track: Wheeling in Circles

Indian Express

time11 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Inside Track: Wheeling in Circles

At the start of 2025 we were led to believe that we were Donald Trump's special friend and that India would probably be the first to conclude a trade tariff agreement with the US. Now we are not just back of the queue, but could be blackballed! A close observer of Trump-India relations has a different take from others for the mysterious fallout. It was not initially about Russian oil, Pakistani perfidy or thwarting Trump's Nobel Peace Prize ambitions. Trump was infuriated with India's dilatory tactics in signing a deal, which goes back to his first presidency. His joint appearance with Modi in Texas in 2019 was meant to help seal an agreement, but talks fell through a day later in New York. Time and again, as in Gujarat February 2020, like the traditional smooth-talking Indian trader, our officials assured that a deal was almost through, without confessing candidly that some portions of the deal concerning agriculture and dairy products were non-negotiable. Unfortunately, Trump is focused on just this sector, since his Republican supporters come from the farm belt. As US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick remarked angrily, 'You claim to be such a big country and you can't accept a bushel of American corn.' After being re-elected, President Trump was even willing to overlook past slights. (PM Modi did not call or even telephone Trump during his three visits to the US during the Biden presidency.) But in 2025, once again, despite the head-start in negotiations, the deal has not materialised! Retired IAS officer Subhash Chandra Garg's new book is titled No Minister. The former Finance Secretary does not hold back in recalling riveting encounters with his ministerial bosses, some of whom, in fact, refused to take no for an answer, despite bureaucrats citing the rules and the wishes of the incumbent PM. Garg names P Chidambaram among the naysayers who, as finance minister, threatened then PM Manmohan Singh with his resignation unless his proposal that 60-70 secretary level-posts were allotted to the Indian Revenue Service cadre. In Garg's view, this unbalanced the bureaucratic structure without improving tax collection. Similarly, Andhra CM Chandrababu Naidu, on whom the Vajpayee government was dependent for survival, cornered more than 40 % of the portfolios of Indian projects approved by the World Bank in 1999 and 2000. Despite objections from the government, Naidu forced them to agree to his audacious demand, in disregard of fair Central resource distribution. Similarly, Kamal Nath bullied his way so that 5% of the total pool of government houses in Delhi was part of his discretionary quota, which largely included newly constructed category type VII and VIII bungalows in Moti Bagh. Considering it is an intra-party contest to elect the fairly modest position of secretary (administration) of the Constitution Club, it is surprising that the poll has attracted intense national interest and media scrutiny. In contrast, Rajeev Shukla (Congress) has been elected unopposed as secretary (sports) and Tiruchi Siva (DMK) as secretary (culture) without any rancour. There seems more than meets the eye in the fierce tussle between the two ill-matched adversaries for the post of administrative secretary. The jocular, down-to-earth ex-MP and UP Jat leader Sanjeev Balyan, who only joined the club eight years ago, appears to have been pitch forked into the contest, while Rajiv Pratap Rudy, the suave Bihar MP who has been the guiding spirit behind the club for the last 25 years, is credited with upgrading its facilities, including gyms, saunas, lounges and sports facilities. Balyan's most vocal campaigner is controversial Bihar MP Nishikant Dubey, who is fighting with all the vehemence and caste calculations of a panchayat election and throwing names of powerful central politicians. Pratap, more discreet, is believed to be backed by an influential regional satrap, who has not shown his hand openly. Amidst constant reports of Air India's slipping standards, I am pleased to report my recent personal experience of the airlines, which demonstrates that the staff's spirit of service beyond the call of duty, the hallmark of JRD Tata's original Air India, has not vanished. While flying back from Kenya on an AI flight, the senior air hostess noticed my distress as I rummaged through my carry bag and under the seat for my missing iPad, which had obviously been left behind in Nairobi. I presumed resignedly that recovering my iPad was like looking for a needle in a haystack, but I had not reckoned with the resourcefulness of the very helpful air hostess and the AI Nairobi manager. The latter, with the assistance of his counterpart at the Nairobi airport lounge, located the missing iPad, got it identified through WhatsApp photos and arranged to have it returned to Delhi within a week.

European leaders urge more 'pressure' on Russia ahead of Trump-Putin summit
European leaders urge more 'pressure' on Russia ahead of Trump-Putin summit

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

European leaders urge more 'pressure' on Russia ahead of Trump-Putin summit

European leaders urged more "pressure" on Russia overnight Saturday, after the announcement of a Trump-Putin summit to end the war in Ukraine raised concern that an agreement would require Kyiv to cede swathes of territory. Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump will meet in the US state of Alaska this Friday to try to resolve the three-year conflict, despite warnings from Ukraine and Europe that Kyiv must be part of negotiations. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Announcing the summit last week, Trump said that "there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" sides, without elaborating. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo But President Volodymyr Zelensky warned Saturday that Ukraine won't surrender land to Russia to buy peace. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier," he said on social media. Live Events "Any decisions against us, any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace," he added. Zelensky urged Ukraine's allies to take "clear steps" towards achieving a sustainable peace during a call with Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer. European leaders issued a joint statement overnight Saturday to Sunday saying that "only an approach that combines active diplomacy, support to Ukraine and pressure on the Russian Federation to end their illegal war can succeed". They welcomed Trump's efforts, saying they were ready to help diplomatically -- by maintaining support to Ukraine, as well as by upholding and imposing restrictive measures against Russia. "The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations", said the statement, signed by leaders from France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain, Finland and EU Commission chief Ursula Von Der Leyen, without giving more details. They also said a resolution "must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests", including "the need for robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity". "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine," they said. National security advisors from Kyiv's allies -- including the United States, EU nations and the UK -- gathered in Britain Saturday to align their views ahead of the Putin-Trump summit. French President Emmanuel Macron, following phone calls with Zelensky, Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said "the future of Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukrainians" and that Europe also had to be involved in the negotiations. In his evening address Saturday, Zelensky stressed: "There must be an honest end to this war, and it is up to Russia to end the war it started." - A 'dignified peace' - Three rounds of talks between Russia and Ukraine this year have failed to bear fruit. Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes. Putin, a former KGB officer in power in Russia for over 25 years, has ruled out holding talks with Zelensky at this stage. Ukraine's leader has been pushing for a three-way summit and argues that meeting Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. The summit in Alaska, the far-north territory which Russia sold to the United States in 1867, would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. Nine months later, Moscow sent troops into Ukraine. Zelensky said of the location that it was "very far away from this war, which is raging on our land, against our people". The Kremlin said the choice was "logical" because the state close to the Arctic is on the border between the two countries, and this is where their "economic interests intersect". Moscow has also invited Trump to pay a reciprocal visit to Russia later. Trump and Putin last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since January, but Trump has failed to broker peace in Ukraine as he promised he could. - Fighting goes on - Russia and Ukraine continued pouring dozens of drones onto each other's positions in an exchange of attacks in the early hours of Saturday. A bus carrying civilians was hit in Ukraine's frontline city of Kherson, killing two people and wounding 16. The Russian army claimed to have taken Yablonovka, another village in the Donetsk region, the site of the most intense fighting in the east and one of the five regions Putin says is part of Russia. In 2022, the Kremlin announced the annexation of four Ukrainian regions -- Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson -- despite not having full control over them. As a prerequisite to any peace settlement, Moscow demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of the regions and commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store