US Army wants AI solutions to protect homeland munitions sites
In one instance, a local duck hunter got out of his boat, grabbed his shot gun and waded right into the protected area of a munition site, Brig. Gen. Ronnie Anderson, Joint Munitions Command commander, said Tuesday at the Association of the U.S. Army's Global Force Symposium in Huntsville, Alabama.
These 13 operating sites under the purview of Joint Munitions Command have also seen 42 drone incursions, Anderson said, without specifying the timeframe.
'What are they doing? We don't know. Is there anything nefarious or is it just someone who's curious? We don't know because we don't have the ability to interrogate the [unmanned aircraft system] or the person who's operating.'
The worst-case scenario, Anderson said, is a hobbyist could crash a drone into an operating site where there are explosives being moved between Point A and Point B.
Although installations have inner perimeters providing security, McAlister Army Ammunition Plant in Oklahoma, for example, which is larger than the District of Columbia, has an outer perimeter of three-strand barbed wire cattle fencing.
Fencing, however, can be costly. A recent estimate to construct fencing around Pine Bluff Arsenal in Arkansas was $80 million, according to Anderson.
'For less than $5 million, we can have an AI-enabled mobile trailer with sensors, cameras, radar and communicate back through an IT network, back to the control center, that senses, it alerts the [emergency operations center] of something that either is a threat or is not a threat,' Anderson said.
Solutions would also be able to properly address unmanned aircraft systems incursions. The AI capability would be able to learn, allowing it to identify an unmanned aircraft system, communicate the type of system back to the Army and then start to interrogate the system, Anderson said.
The Army has engaged three industry partners who are experimenting now at Bluegrass Army Depot in Kentucky with applying artificial intelligence-enabled wide-area security, he said, adding that the service is also initiating another experiment at Lake City Army Ammunition Plant in Missouri.
These security issues are critical to address now, Anderson said.
'In the next conflict, when the continental United States is a contested area, we have to be able to sense and we don't have these resources to put armed guards on patrol every corner of all of our thousands and thousands of acres.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
'We're behind': US soldier leading catch-up crash course says the Army has to aggressively close the drone gap
The US Army has a new crash course on drones. Right now, it's basic, fast, and aimed primarily at catching soldiers up on what they've been missing. It's an example of how the US military is embracing drones, navigating growing opportunities and threats. The inaugural Unmanned Advanced Lethality Course, launched by the Army Aviation Center of Excellence at Fort Rucker in Alabama, is a three-week class focused on building drone flight skills. Students use commercial off-the-shelf drones and simulation software to develop skills flying first-person view drones, according to a release. The course's director, Capt. Rachel Martin, built the program in just 90 days. "This course is a catch-up," she said. "We're behind globally, and this is our aggressive attempt to close that gap." There are currently 28 students, including infantry soldiers, cavalry scouts, and aviation personnel. As a pilot course, soldiers are primarily learning lessons from what Army units are currently struggling with in adopting drones. Flying FPV, or first-person view, drones is a major topic, as is manufacturing and repairing drones with 3D printing pieces. One of the course's objectives is to build a repository of printable parts that soldiers can take back to their units for further use. The learning curve, Martin said, has been substantial. "Most of my peers, including myself until 90 days ago, didn't know how to do this," she said. "Now we know what it takes, how many people, how much equipment, how much money, and we are sharing this information already with our partners out in the force." The class's future will expand into other topics, including one-way attacks using FPV drones, an area soldiers in Ukraine have been implementing for years. By February, the Army said, Martin expects students to be using low-cost drones for precision strikes. Drones have become increasingly prolific in Ukraine, with many quadcopters, octocopters, and more conducting surveillance flights and also bombing and strike missions. Millions of drones are supplementing more traditional weapons. Some experts caution against an overreliance on drones, but there is still a wide recognition that proficiency is important and that trained operators are force multipliers. Drone operators are high-value targets, and in Ukraine, research indicates, operator casualties are on the rise. There are lessons in that for the US Army. "We're creating operators who are not only lethal but also survivable," Martin said, explaining that "sUAS [small Uncrewed Aerial Systems] operators are the most sought-after high pay-off target on the battlefield right now." "I am very aware that my team has been entrusted with developing solutions for a critical need in emerging Army tactics," she said. The Army, much like the other US military service branches, has been openly grappling with the challenges of drone warfare and what it means for the force, which is still building experience in this space, with a lot of lessons still to be learned. Flooding units with drones and counter-drone systems is a top priority for US military leadership, and uncrewed systems have been deemed a necessary and vital capability to prepare for potential future conflict. There are growing investments in American drone tech, emerging drone and counter-drone schools, and field testing. In the Indo-Pacific, soldiers have been exploring how drones adapt to flying in hot, rainy climates. Training exercises, like a special operations forces drill simulating a conflict involving Taiwan, have evaluated scenarios where enemy drone swarms attack soldiers. Another exercise in Europe saw soldiers carry drones into simulated conflict and adapt when their system broke or encountered technical difficulties, like cut connections. Developing doctrine, tactics, and techniques is a work in progress, but a necessity for the Army considering the lessons from the Ukraine war, where both sides are continually advancing their drone capabilities in a real, fast-paced conflict. In Ukraine, drone operators have to contend daily with the headaches of electronic warfare and signal jamming. These have led to unjammable fiber-optic drones with hard connections between operators and their drones and AI-enabled systems, resulting in new challenges for defenders. The technological arms race is moving fast, and there's a lot Western militaries watching the conflict need to learn to ready for a future drone war.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy the Dip on BigBear.ai's Stock?
Key Points is having some problems with its U.S. Army contract. margin profile isn't set up for long-term success. 10 stocks we like better than › (NYSE: BBAI) stock had a rough time following earnings. The stock plummeted nearly 20% following earnings and hasn't rebounded since then. Given how popular an artificial intelligence (AI) stock was becoming, many investors are considering buying the dip. While this may seem like a smart idea, investors need to analyze the quarter and see if there was a solid reason for the stock to be down. If so, then it could be one to avoid, especially with so many other strong AI stock picks available. isn't growing revenue is focused on providing AI-powered solutions, primarily to the government, although it has other endeavors (like partnering with the United Arab Emirates) as well. If you look at Palantir, another government-focused AI company, you'll see its revenue is growing fast from both commercial and government clients, with commercial revenue rising 47% year over year and government revenue increasing even faster at 49%. is not seeing the same success. In Q1, revenue fell 18% year over year to $32.5 million. With the massive demand for AI products and several companies rapidly growing their revenue, this is an obvious red flag. Perhaps even bigger news is that there was a disruption in its U.S. Army contract, which accounts for a large chunk of its revenue. This caused management to decrease its full-year revenue outlook, raising another red flag. is not looking like a true winner in the AI space right now, and the struggles it's experiencing make it fairly obvious that competitors are providing much better products. It's not too late for to turn it around, but there are other issues investors should be aware of. margins are low compared to its peers' Most software companies produce gross margins in the 70% to 80% range, with the best even getting to 90%. However, despite being a software company, is nowhere near that level. BBAI Gross Profit Margin (Quarterly) data by YCharts The company has low gross profits because isn't offering a standardized software; it's tailoring each product it delivers to its customers. This is quite expensive, and limits the potential net income it could generate someday if it turns profitable. Additionally, due to its low gross margin, the rule of thumb that most software companies trade between 10 and 20 times sales is useless. That rule of thumb assumes that higher gross margins will lead to higher profit margins, thus the increased valuation levels. At 10 times sales, can be considered a very expensive stock, even after the fall following earnings. BBAI PS Ratio data by YCharts isn't a stock I'd recommend anyone invest in. It has falling revenue at a time when business is unlikely to improve, and it's seeing problems with its primary contract. The company's margin structure is poor, and the stock is already expensive. The bull case for stock is essentially that AI is a rising tide that will lift all ships. However, that's not happening with and there are far too many impressive AI companies to invest in right now for anyone to waste time with an underperformer. Should you invest $1,000 in right now? Before you buy stock in consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Keithen Drury has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy the Dip on Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Yes, You Read That Right. Palantir Just Won $10 Billion From the U.S. Army.
Key Points On July 31, the U.S. Army merged 75 smaller contracts into one big $10 billion award -- and handed it to Palantir. Spread over 10 years, the contract secures about $1 billion a year in revenue for the AI defense tech contractor. Palantir earns superior and growing profit margins on its revenue. 10 stocks we like better than Palantir Technologies › When you follow the U.S. Pentagon's daily digest of contract awards as regularly as I do, things sometimes tend to blend together. Don't get me wrong -- $1 billion here, $1 billion there, and it eventually becomes clear that the government is spending "real money" on military hardware. Still, most of the contracts described on the Pentagon's website tend to be much smaller in size -- $10 million here, a few tens of millions there. All of which I tell you by way of illustrating that when all of a sudden, the U.S. Army announced last month that it's awarding a $10 billion contract to defense contracting upstart Palantir (NASDAQ: PLTR), that made me sit up and take notice. Palantir's big payday This contract, announced on July 31, is the biggest single award I've ever seen handed to Palantir, and almost 10 times bigger than the Maven Smart System contract it won from the U.S. Army in May. And yet it's perhaps not quite as big as it seems. As described on the Pentagon website, the $10 billion award "transition[s] existing contracts in which Palantir is currently a prime or subcontractor to [a new] enterprise agreement" worth $10 billion. This means the award doesn't really give Palantir $10 billion worth of new work to do for the Army. Rather, a substantial amount of the award (and perhaps even all of it), comprises dozens of existing contracts, already won by the defense company, now bundled up into one megasized $10 billion deal to provide artificial intelligence (AI) software and data services to the U.S. Army. What's more, the $10 billion value is spread across 10 years. All of which is to say that Palantir's "$10 billion contract" is really worth only about $1 billion a year -- and much or all of that $1 billion was already destined for Palantir's wallet anyway. How much is $1 billion worth? Now, let's try to put these numbers in context for you. One billion dollars may not be as big a number as $10 billion, but it's still pretty big. Palantir generated $3.4 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. So a $1 billion Army contract amounts to about 29% of the revenue Palantir collected over the last 12 months -- a very big deal if this were additional incremental revenue added to the company's revenue stream. It's less of a big deal, however, if all the Army is doing here is gluing together 75 smaller, existing contracts into one super-big agreement. A second consideration is how valuable this revenue is to Palantir, which is to say, what kind of profit margin the company will earn on its $1 billion a year. The good news here is that Palantir's software-centric profit margins are robust, and getting even more so over time. In 2023 for example, Palantir earned a 5.4% operating profit margin on its revenue. In 2024, that number doubled to 10.8%. This year, it's grown even more, to about 23.3%. That's the good news. The better news is that the new $10 billion mega-contract "removes contract-related fees," according to the Army. And this logically implies that it's removing cost from the contract, potentially permitting Palantir's profit margin to expand even further. Is Palantir stock a buy? At least, Palantir investors had better hope this is the case. Palantir is generating giant revenue from the U.S. military; no one disputes that. Its revenue is also growing, roughly doubling in size since 2021, whether or not this particular $10 billion contract adds to that growth. However, none of this changes the fact that Palantir is a frighteningly expensive stock, and that it absolutely must continue to both grow its revenue and expand its profit margin in order to justify its valuation. Priced at an astounding 573 times trailing earnings, or an only slightly less alarming 255 times free cash flow, Palantir probably needs to be growing earnings somewhere in the low triple-digit percentage range to justify its current stock price -- yet according to S&P Global data, most analysts project no more than a 40% long-term earnings growth rate for the stock. Sad as it is to say, even with a $10 billion Army contract in hand, Palantir stock costs too much to buy. Should you buy stock in Palantir Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Palantir Technologies and S&P Global. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Yes, You Read That Right. Palantir Just Won $10 Billion From the U.S. Army. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
