Millennial Spent the Summer Gardening in Yard, Then Came Shocking Diagnosis
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
"I know exactly how I got skin cancer. And I promise it could happen to you as well."
That is the warning from 37-year-old April Catudal, who was recently diagnosed with Stage IA melanoma earlier this summer.
The mom who lives in Roswell, Georgia, had never had any issues in previous exams. But, this year, her dermatologist noticed something different.
"I was diagnosed earlier this summer after going in for my yearly skin exam in early June," Catudal told Newsweek. "My dermatologist immediately saw the mole and biopsied it, though he didn't expect it to be melanoma since it was an old mole that had grown in size. The biopsy came back as Stage IA melanoma."
The diagnosis came as a shock—not because of any visible warning signs, but because of what she now realizes was a blind spot in her approach to sun safety.
"The reason I decided to share is because I had been really naive about how important it is to protect my skin," Catudal said. "I thought I needed to absorb vitamin D, and also I had never had even one annual skin test come back as abnormal, so I had developed a lot of false confidence."
Catudal said she hadn't considered herself high risk. She didn't use tanning beds, never had a bad burn in adulthood, and assumed that brief time in the sun wasn't dangerous. She also hadn't been aware of how prevalent skin cancer is, or how serious even early-stage melanoma can be.
"I didn't know the skin cancer stats in the U.S., and I also wasn't aware of the emotional and physical toll the diagnosis would have on me, and I truly was as lucky as can be," Catudal added.
A picture from the viral video where April shared her skin-cancer story.
A picture from the viral video where April shared her skin-cancer story.
@naturallyapril/Instagram
Skin-Cancer Risk Factors
The American Cancer Society's 2025 Cancer Statistics report an estimated 104,960 new cases of invasive melanoma are expected to be diagnosed in the United States this year, including 60,550 in men and 44,410 in women. Around 8,430 Americans (5,470 men and 2,960 women) are projected to die from the disease.
The American Cancer Society says that exposure to ultraviolet rays is the biggest major risk factor for most melanomas. UV rays damage the DNA inside skin cells, and skin cancers can begin when this damage affects the genes that control skin cell growth.
Around 1 in 10 people with melanoma have a family history of the disease, while there is also evidence that people with lighter skin colors and hair are more at risk.
Catudal said she now believes she knows exactly how she got skin cancer, and it wasn't from tanning beds or sunbathing. It was gardening.
"I was planting away all spring, removing old pine straw and planting new flower beds, bent with my neck directly exposed to the hot sun for hours at a time," Catudal said. "Dumb."
While her dermatologist couldn't say definitively, he told her it could have been caused by either years of accumulated DNA damage or from a single repeated action, like that intense spring spent outdoors. "To be honest, my dermatologist said there's no way of knowing if it's years of accumulated skin DNA damage or way too much exposure from one repeated action (gardening)," Catudal said.
What felt like harmless time in the sun—without sunscreen on just one spot—may have been all it took.
Catudal's neck, left uncovered during hours in the yard, was where the melanoma appeared. And it is a mistake that many people make without realizing the potential cost.
Catudal had the mole removed and is now cancer-free, but the diagnosis left a lasting impact and prompted her to share her story with others.
"Either way, I'm just so relieved that I had stayed on top of my yearly exam, even though life was crazy," she said. "And now I'm so very grateful that I get to share my story, help other women in their relative prime stay safe and take care of their skin."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
I'm a microplastics expert — 3 ways I reduce exposure, including only buying these types of clothes
Wash — and learn. 'The next time you're using a tumble dryer, take a look at the lint catcher,' materials scientist Joshua Grolman told The Post. 'All of this debris is what we breathe in on a daily basis.' Microplastics are ubiquitous, found in everything from toys and cosmetics to cleaning products and clothing. They're in the air we breathe, the food we eat and the water we drink and swim in. 5 Materials scientist Joshua Grolman reveals three ways that he limits exposure to microplastics. Israel Institute of Technology These particles, which slough off larger plastic, are suspected to harm reproductive, digestive and respiratory health, potentially leading to infertility, colon cancer and lung problems. Scientists are still determining the effects that these shreds, smaller than a grain of rice, have on the environment and our bodies. That's why minimizing exposure is so important. Grolman reveals three ways that he limits contact with microplastics at home and work. Choose clothing wisely Synthetic clothing — made from materials like polyester, nylon and acrylic — is a significant source of microplastic pollution. Fibers are shed during manufacturing, wear and especially during washing. 5 Natural fibers, such as cotton, wool, linen and hemp, are derived from plants or animals and are biodegradable. The clothes seen here are made from vegetable ingredients. uladzimirzuyeu – 'I only buy wool, linen and hemp clothing for my family because they perform better than synthetic fibers to wick away sweat in the heat,' shared Grolman, an assistant professor of materials science and engineering at the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. 'While they are often more expensive than their synthetic counterparts, it's important to focus on quality over quantity when purchasing the clothes you wear every day.' Natural fibers, such as cotton, wool, linen and hemp, are derived from plants or animals and are biodegradable. That means they naturally break down at the end of their life cycle and return to the earth. Whichever fabric you select, Grolman recommends hanging clothes to dry to increase their durability. Avoid disposable plastic products Americans order takeout or delivery an average of 4.5 times a month, according to 2023 survey data from US Foods. 5 Disposable cutlery is a major source of microplastic contamination. Tatiana Atamaniuk – Unfortunately, carryout containers can release microplastics into food, especially when microwaved or reused several times. And beware the disposable cutlery that often accompanies a takeout meal. Grolman eschews these utensils since they are often made from low-quality plastics that break or chip easily. 'It doesn't take up much room in your backpack or briefcase to carry a titanium or stainless steel utensil set packed away in a sleeve,' he said. 'I simply wipe the utensils with a napkin after eating and then wash them each night when I get home.' He also suggests carrying a stainless steel water bottle that can be filled at cafés instead of getting a to-go cup. 'Most disposable coffee cups are made of paper coated with a thin film of plastic on the inside,' he explained. 'As you've probably noticed, this film can come off with little abrasion, especially if you have hot liquid sitting in there for a long time.' 5 Stainless steel doesn't typically leach microplastics. It's a top choice for reusable water bottles. Dmytro – Grolman also avoids canned beverages, which contain a thin plastic or polymer liner on the inside to prevent the drink from reacting with the aluminum. This lining can break down and release microplastics, especially if the liquid is acidic. Drive less Car tires, especially those on heavier vehicles, produce a lot of microplastics as they wear down from everyday use. Grolman prefers to commute by bike. 'A common misconception is that biking outside exposes you to more pollution than driving in a car,' he said. 'However, when you're in bumper-to-bumper traffic, the air intake of your car is right next to the tail pipe of the car in front of you, and it's usually low to the road where tire abrasion occurs.' 5 Cycling instead of driving to work can reduce your microplastics exposure and your carbon footprint. Halfpoint – Other advantages of cycling include increased physical activity, fuel savings and a lower carbon footprint. Over 705,000 Americans primarily bike to work, according to US Census estimates. That number is on an upswing but still below the 2014 peak of 904,000 bike commuters. While it may not be practical to bike all the time, Grolman advises 'keeping an open mind' about alternatives to cars. And if you must get behind the wheel, try to curb drive time. 'If I have to drive somewhere,' Grolman said, 'I always make an effort to limit the amount of time I spend on roads with heavy car traffic.'
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Organ donors should be dead first
Many Americans are dying while waiting for a new heart, lung or liver. In all three cases, demand exceeds supply. It's hard to imagine the desperation of living with a ticking clock and not knowing whether your number will get pulled for a transplant. We recognize the anguish of the families living this horrible reality. But the quest to solve this problem may create perverse incentives. Several days after a drug overdose, Kentuckian TJ Hoover was declared brain dead. Doctors prepared him for organ removal surgery, and as the procedure was about to begin, Hoover woke up. Reports indicate that hospital professionals allegedly disregarded signs that Hoover was still alert, and opted to move forward with harvesting anyway until it was undeniable that their patient was not dead. As outlying as it may be, this 2021 incident is the stuff of nightmares. Such stories are among the main reasons people hesitate to sign consent forms at the DMV. Still, the problem of organ shortages persists for people with organ failure. There are some who are advocating a radical notion to solve the organ shortage: Broadening our definition of 'death.' That's the crux of a recent commentary that appeared in The New York Times, authored by Dr. Sandeep Jauhar, a cardiologist, and Snehal Patel and Deane Smith, directors of the Center for Heart Failure, Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support. In some corners of the internet, this commentary is being shared with curiosity; in others, with revulsion. The authors are thoughtful experts, and they back up their thesis with compelling statistics, noting that 'an estimated 15 people die in this country every day waiting for a transplant,' which means we need to find more healthy donor organs. But what they propose next crosses over into unsettling territory. They suggest that our definition of death should also include irreversibly comatose patients on life support. Even if a machine could restore the beating of their heart. 'The brain functions that matter most to life are those such as consciousness, memory, intention and desire,' they write. 'Once those higher brain functions are irreversibly gone, is it not fair to say that a person (as opposed to a body) has ceased to exist?' Although none of this is a laughing matter, we can't help but be reminded of 'The Princess Bride's' Wesley, who after barbaric torture is left 'mostly dead,' a term that just as easily could be applied to 'irreversibly comatose patients on life support.' And, remember, Wesley is revived before the end of that film. In all seriousness, we can appreciate the authors' position and their genuine real-life concern for those waiting on lifesaving organs. But as Hoover's story proves, miraculous recoveries, while rare, can occur even when a person has been on life support for days. Health Resources and Services Administration reviews found more cases where donation protocols may not have been appropriate — 28 of which may have involved patients not legally dead at the time procurement began. If the goal is to keep as many people alive as possible, we should first exhaust all other avenues of scientific advancement and preventive treatment before redefining what it means to be alive. This editorial board likes exploring new ideas. That said, some suggestions are so wrong that they need to be extinguished before they get off the ground. This is one of them. We stand with the living.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
At UMass Memorial Health, a worrisome diagnosis on the future of health care
With more than half of the hospitals in Massachusetts currently in the red, Alan Sager, a Boston University professor of health law, policy, and management, said the Medicaid cuts will only compound the difficult financial decisions many are already facing. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'There will be program closures,' Sager said. 'There will be individual patients who don't get care because they lost coverage or because the program that served them was eliminated.' Advertisement The dominant provider of medical care in Central Massachusetts, UMass Memorial treats some 500,000 patients a year, more than a quarter of them covered by Medicaid, the government health insurance for the poor and disabled. About one in 20 UMass Memorial patients are uninsured, which means the health system often has to absorb the costs of treatment, adding to the financial strain. Dr. Eric Dickson, the UMass Memorial chief executive, said the recent program closures were made in part to offset recent financial shortfalls, but also were driven by the impending cuts to Medicaid. Advertisement President Trump's signature legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, will slash nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next 10 years, tossing up to 16 million Americans from health insurance program, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. UMass Memorial estimates that 100,000 of its patients are at risk of losing Medicaid coverage because of new eligibility and work requirements. President Trump signed his signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts at the White House on July 4. Evan Vucci/Associated Press Prior to enactment of the law, Dickson said he believed he could manage the operating losses and return to profitability 'in a slow, thoughtful manner.' But the massive cuts to Medicaid mean UMass Memorial could no longer take a gradual approach. 'I went back to my board' of directors, Dickson recalled, 'and said. 'I've got to move hard and fast.'' The financial outlook has undoubtedly become darker for hospital systems such as UMass Memorial that care for high numbers of low-income and uninsured patients, said Karen Errichetti, an assistant professor of public health and community medicine at Tufts School of Medicine. But Medicaid cuts are only one source of the instability. Costs of labor, drugs, and medical supplies are up, while hospitals serving large low-income populations tend to operate on razor-thin margins. Total expenses for hospitals in 2024 grew by 5.1 percent, well above outpacing the overall rate of inflation of 2.9 percent , according to the American Hospital Association's Advertisement 'UMass is a very important safety net hospital system within our state and has an important role to play in that larger community that needs a safety net,' said Errichetti. 'The things going on right now are a sign of broad pressures on safety net hospitals in general.' Across the state, health systems have shuttered clinics offering mental health services, obstetrics, and primary care as they attempted to balance their budgets. Between 2014 and 2023, Protesters rallied against the planned closure of the labor and delivery unit at the UMass Memorial HealthAlliance-Clinton Hospital in Leominster on May 30, 2023. Nathan Klima for The Boston Globe Dickson said UMass Memorial as a whole is 'too big to fail,' because it treats so many people in Central Massachusetts. But non-emergency services, such as primary care or mental health programs, could be at risk if its finances worsen. Most recently, UMass Memorial said it will shut down a psychiatric day program for adults in Fitchburg as of Oct. 23. The program, call BUDD, for Builds Understanding and Develops Direction, serves about 30 patients, treating them for psychosocial, emotional, or behavioral issues and connecting them with social workers, psychiatrists, and rehabilitation counselors. The BUDD program is operated by UMass Memorial affiliate Community Healthlink, which provides a range of services addressing mental health, substance abuse, and homelessness. CHL has served more than 14,000 people since since January 2024. It also lost $10.4 million between October and March. If losses continue to grow, Dickson said, he might be forced to shutter Community Healthlink outright. It is among the most comprehensive providers of community-based mental health and substance use treatment in Worcester County, and its closure would ripple across the health care system. Advertisement 'What happens when you stop seeing behavioral health patients at CHL, you stop doing detox, you stop housing people with substance use disorder or working with families in crisis? Where do they end up going for care? The emergency department,' Dickson said. 'And my emergency departments are completely overwhelmed right now.' Marin Wolf can be reached at
