Aaditya Thackeray To News18: Can't Tolerate Hindi Being Made Compulsory In Maharashtra
Last Updated:
Aaditya Thackeray: "I am not against learning any language but making Hindi as compulsory third language can't be tolerated.'
Amid the joint rally announced by Uddhav and Raj Thackeray on July 5 to protest against the imposition of Hindi in Maharashtra schools, Uddhav's son and Sena UBT leader Aaditya said they are not against learning other languages.
'There is no opposition to learning other languages. But making Hindi compulsory is not acceptable. Look at Singapore, it progressed because they chose English as a medium of learning. Our former PM Narasimha Rao knew 14-16 languages. The Thackeray family itself studied in English schools, but we always spoke Marathi at home and with people. I brought the same approach to BMC schools, where we got an overwhelming response," said Aaditya at the News18 Lokmat conclave in Mumbai on Thursday.
Speaking about the tri-language policy, Aaditya said, 'Although I have studied in an English school, I was always taught to speak in Marathi and which I did while interacting with my party workers and at home too. I am not against learning any language but making Hindi as compulsory third language can't be tolerated."
Reiterating the need for regional unity, Thackeray appealed to Marathi-speaking citizens to stand together to protect Mumbai's identity. 'Those who want to save Mumbai must come together. On July 5, all Marathi lovers will be seen together. Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray will be together on the road for this cause," he said, confirming the much-talked-about reunion of the Thackeray cousins at the rally.
Slamming the current state government for alleged widespread corruption and contractor-friendly policies, Aaditya said the administration has failed to deliver in the last 100-150 days and accused it of ignoring the Opposition in the Assembly.
'You name the department — there is corruption everywhere. This government gives preferential treatment to its own departments and looks more contractor-friendly than people-friendly. They don't even listen to us in the Assembly."
Highlighting the Sena's performance in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), Aaditya said, 'People chose us because they trusted us. When we came to power in BMC, its finances were in a poor state. We turned it into a surplus body. People have seen our work in primary healthcare, education, transportation, and even electricity supply. But now BJP wants to shut all this down."
With civic elections around the corner, Aaditya's sharp attack signals a renewed attempt to reclaim Mumbai's political narrative.
First Published:
June 27, 2025, 18:27 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
The case for English in India
Language is politics by other means in India. Which is why Union home minister Amit Shah's clarification that the Centre is not opposed to any foreign language is significant. In the same vein, he added that 'there should be an urge to glorify one's own language'. A few days earlier, Shah had lit a small political fire with his remarks that 'those who speak English will soon be ashamed'. This remark was interpreted by Opposition leaders as a backdoor attempt to impose Hindi on non-Hindi speakers. The BJP has always been in favour of making Hindi the official language of the country and eliminating the use of English, a potentially explosive issue in the non-Hindi-speaking states of southern India. Now, Maharashtra, again a state that has a history of strong linguistic identity, has become restive over the BJP-led government's move to introduce Hindi as a language from primary classes. India's founding fathers saw the opportunity in English proficiency and encouraged its use, without discriminating against local languages. (HT Photo) The case for English in India is simple. First, it is the language of opportunity and economic mobility. Second, it is also the language of aspiration, a secular means to become urban and modern, and possibly, transcend the chains of caste and class. And, third, it is the word of the world, and the passport to the world of ideas. In the case of India, it has been a convenient link language immune to the legacies of local dominance. This is the reason the founding fathers of the republic, who fought the British, found no reason to outlaw the language in independent India. In fact, they saw the opportunity in English proficiency and encouraged its use, without discriminating against local languages. In the process, English has been well assimilated within Indian society to the extent that it may have lost its foreignness. It is no longer perceived as the language of economic and cultural imperialism, but as a vehicle that has enabled India's rise as a knowledge power. That's why China is encouraging English learning. Does this mean a rejection of Indian languages? Certainly not. Much of India is bilingual, if not trilingual, and is likely to remain so. As per Census 2011, only 259,000 people reported English as their mother tongue or first language, but 83 million said it was their second language. In comparison, over 520 million called Hindi their first language as compared to 55 million for Gujarati. These numbers hardly suggest a threat from English to Hindi or any Indian language. As for Indian languages, state governments could promote local languages. In fact, the Centre should call off its push to promote Hindi nationally and disperse the funds to states to promote local languages. This is important as local languages are repositories of cultural inheritance. However, the choice of learning a language should be left to citizens. It should also be kept in mind that the growth of English in India has happened without too much State patronage: People embrace it because of its economic utility. Languages that cease to be of transactional value face the threat of losing their prominence even in their motherland; no amount of polemics or policy imposition can rescue them. For instance, a report in this newspaper last week showed that the government spent ₹ 2,532.59 crore on the promotion of Sanskrit between 2014-15 and 2024-25 — 17 times the combined spending of ₹ 147.56 crore on the other five classical Indian languages, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam and Odia. But there's little to show for this. A nuanced policy that does not privilege or discriminate against, any language is the sensible option for India.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Rights of Indian fishermen given away during Emergency, says Jaishankar alluding to 1976 Katchatheevu pact
Effects of the Emergency (June 25, 1975 — March 21, 1977) can still be felt in Tamil Nadu and in India-Sri Lanka relations as the Government of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi did not protect the interests of Indian fishermen to fish in the Palk Strait while concluding a pact with Sri Lanka during that period, said External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Friday (June 27, 2025), apparently alluding to the Katchatheevu pact of 1976. Speaking about the Emergency at an event here, Mr. Jaishankar recollected his personal experience from that era and said the Emergency proved that democracy and freedom were in the 'blood' of the Indian people. 'During the Emergency, big decisions used to be taken without discussion. These days, you know when our fishermen venture near Sri Lanka, there they are arrested. You know the reason? The reason is that during the Emergency, an agreement was signed with Sri Lanka in which the rights of our fishermen that they had earlier to fish in the waters near Sri Lanka, was something that we gave up. If the Emergency was not there and if we had a genuine Parliament at that time, I don't think such an agreement would have been approved by the Parliament,' said the External Affairs Minister, speaking in Hindi. Indian fishermen frequently face arrests by the Sri Lankan Navy for trespassing into Sri Lankan waters — they are often arrested near the northern coast of the island, well past Katchatheevu — and fishing using the bottom trawling method, that is banned in Sri Lanka. 'The consequence of that period can be felt even today in Tamil Nadu,' said Mr. Jaishankar. The issue was earlier raised by Prime Minister Narendra Modi who on March 31 had blamed the Congress for 'callously' giving away the Katchatheevu island to Sri Lanka. The External Affairs Minister said the Emergency caused setback to India's global image and senior diplomats at that time used to face difficulties in justifying the Emergency rule in India that had done away with democratic governance. 'Several lessons' 'In 1977 I joined Indian Foreign Service after clearing UPSC examination. We used to hear from senior diplomats of that time, how difficult it was to defend the Emergency in the world and how India was criticised because of the Emergency rule,' said Mr. Jaishankar, recollecting that the world perceived India as the largest and oldest democracy and it was difficult for Indian diplomats to defend the authoritarian rule of Emergency era before the world. He said the Emergency had several enduring lessons of that period asserting that: 'Never take freedom for granted. Democracy is in our blood and DNA.' The External Affairs Minister recollected how the Jawaharlal Nehru University's Students Union faced police crackdown for opposing the Emergency. 'The 30th Amendment stated that people cannot approach courts against the declaration of the Emergency. The 39th Amendment stated that people cannot go to court against the election of the Prime Minister and the 42nd Amendment stated that the Fundamental Rights of people would be diluted and the power of judiciary in the country would be reduced,' said Mr. Jaishankar, recollecting that during the Emergency, five Constitutional Amendments and 48 Ordinances were passed.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Rahul Gandhi accuses RSS of favouring Manusmriti over Constitution – ‘mask has come off again'
Senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on June 27 said the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's (RSS) mask has come off again as it wants "Manusmriti" and not the Constitution to run the country. Gandhi's remarks came after RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale sought a review of the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble to the Constitution. "The mask of RSS has come off again. The Constitution irks them because it speaks of equality, secularism and justice," Gandhi said in a post in Hindi on X. The Manusmriti is a Hindu scripture authored by a medieval ascetic named Manu. It has been widely criticised for its gender and caste-based provisions. "The RSS, BJP do not want the Constitution; they want 'Manusmriti'. They aim to strip the marginalised and poor of their rights and enslave them again. Snatching a powerful weapon like the Constitution from them is their real agenda," the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha alleged. "The RSS should stop dreaming this dream -- we will never let it succeed. Every patriotic Indian will defend the Constitution until their last breath," Gandhi asserted. Hosabale on Thursday called for reviewing the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Constitution's Preamble. He said these words were added during the Emergency and were never part of the Constitution drafted by BR Ambedkar. "The Preamble to the Constitution Baba Saheb Ambedkar never had these words. During the Emergency, when fundamental rights were suspended, Parliament did not work, the judiciary became lame, then these words were added," he said, speaking at an event in the national capital. Hosabale said discussions were held on this issue later, but no effort was made to remove those words from the Preamble. Therefore, he added, whether those words should remain in the Preamble should be considered. "The Preamble is eternal. Are the thoughts of socialism as an ideology eternal for India?" Hosabale asked. June 25 marked 50 years of Emergency –- a 21-month period from 1975 to 1977 when Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a state of emergency across the country by citing internal and external threats to the country. The mask of RSS has come off again. The Constitution irks them because it speaks of equality, secularism and justice. Last year, Modi government decided to observe June 25, the day the Emergency was declared in 1975, as 'Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas' to commemorate the 'massive contributions' of those who endured 'inhuman pains of the period', Key Takeaways The RSS's call to review the Preamble highlights ongoing tensions around India's constitutional values. Rahul Gandhi's opposition emphasizes the importance of defending the Constitution against perceived authoritarian shifts. The discussions around the Preamble reflect broader societal debates on equality, secularism, and justice in India.
