
A nation struggling with violence and silence
In Pakistan today, being a woman or a child often means navigating a life shadowed by fear — fear of being harassed, assaulted, silenced, or even killed. While legal protections exist, the troubling gap between law and implementation persists. The first half of 2025 serves as a grim reminder of how much remains to be done.
In Punjab, reports surfaced of a young woman who was repeatedly assaulted by members of her extended family. Forced to undergo an abortion and later poisoned to death, her story only came to light through social media outrage. In other incidents, two young girls — one just three years old — were sexually assaulted and murdered. In another case, two women killed a man who had blackmailed and harassed them for years — an act of desperation, highlighting systemic failures to protect them.
In Sindh, a schoolteacher was reportedly shot while returning home, allegedly by a man whose marriage proposal she had rejected. In separate incidents, two women were murdered by their husbands — one over suspicion, the other under the guise of honour. Another tragic case involved a woman abducted and killed after ransom demands went unmet. Arrests were made, but not before her life was taken.
In Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, a man killed his wife and infant daughter in the name of honour. In other distressing incidents, a four-year-old girl was raped and murdered by a teenager, while a seven-year-old boy was sexually assaulted and fatally injured.
In Balochistan, a father reportedly killed his teenage daughter for posting videos online — yet another example of how control, cloaked as honour, continues to claim young lives.
In early June 2025, the murder of a 17-year-old TikToker from Islamabad, known for promoting girls' education and Chitrali culture, sent shockwaves across the country. With over 740,000 followers, she was shot in her own home on her birthday — reportedly by a cousin unable to handle rejection.
One legal milestone in May 2025 came when the SHC delivered a landmark ruling in an honour killing case. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro, dismissing the appeal of a man convicted of murdering his wife in Kashmore, declared honour killing an "uncivilised, barbaric and abominable" crime, likening it to Fasad Fil Arz (mischief on earth) — a grave offense under Islamic law.
The Court ruled that both the life sentence for murder and the additional 14-year sentence for karo-kari must be served consecutively — underscoring the severity of the crime.
"The honour killing has stained the society where the woman is even not given the right of defence to prove her innocence against the false charges of developing illicit relations," the judgment noted.
The message was clear: no one may take the law into their own hands. The ruling reaffirmed the state's duty to protect all citizens and to punish perpetrators acting under the guise of honour.
But these are not isolated incidents. They reflect systemic and societal failures. Such crimes often occur within families or communities — committed by people known to the victims. Survivors and their families are often left isolated or silenced.
This is not only a legal issue, it is a societal one. Real protection requires timely investigations, efficient trials, survivor-centred justice and, most importantly, a cultural shift.
Laws alone are not enough. A whole-of-society approach is needed, involving civil society, legal institutions, educators, law enforcement, media and communities working together to change both systems and mindsets.
We must ask ourselves: why, even today, do lives continue to be lost over suspicion or rejection? Why must women returning from work or children playing outside still live in fear?
Ending sexual violence, child abuse and honour killings demands more than policing; it requires participation. Justice Bhanbhro's ruling provides one example of how courts can lead, but it is up to the rest of us to ensure that such judgments become lived realities.
This is no longer simply a matter of advocacy, it is one of survival. It is time to ensure that every woman and child in Pakistan can live in dignity — free from fear.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
SHC suspends ombudsman's order against KE CEO
The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Tuesday suspended the provincial ombudsman's order to remove K-Electric Chief Executive Officer Moonis Alvi and impose a Rs2.5 million fine in a workplace harassment case filed by a former company executive. A two-judge bench comprising Justice Faisal Kamal Alam and Justice Hassan Akbar gave the order while hearing a petition filed by Moonis Alvi, who challenged the ombudsman's ruling on grounds of jurisdiction and procedural flaws. The petitioner appeared in court with his counsel, Barrister Abid Zuberi, who argued that the provincial ombudsman had no legal authority to decide the case as K-Electric is an inter-provincial organisation, supplying electricity beyond Sindh to areas including Lasbela, Hub, and Winder. Barrister Zuberi further argued that such cases fall under the jurisdiction of the federal ombudsman, not the provincial one. He also questioned the legal soundness of the ombudsman's findings, citing previous precedents where jurisdictional conflicts arose in similar cases involving the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC) and labour courts. Barrister Zuberi pointed out that the complaint relied heavily on WhatsApp messages and that the proceedings lacked due process. Justice Alam inquired about the legal grounds of the provincial ombudsman's decision, to which the petitioner's counsel responded that both the removal order and the monetary penalty were unlawful. He prayed the court annul the decision and grant interim relief. The bench suspended the implementation of the ombudsman's decision and directed the petitioner to deposit the Rs2.5 million in fine with the SHC registrar. The court did not grant the petitioner's plea for a reduction in the amount. It also issued notices to the provincial ombudsman and the complainant, Mehreen Zehra - former chief marketing officer at KE - for August 8. Later in the day, the SHC issued a written order, noting that the provincial ombudsman lacks jurisdiction over complaints involving inter-provincial institutions and that such matters fall within the federal ombudsman's purview. The written order directed the deputy attorney general, the advocate general Sindh, and other relevant parties to submit their replies before the next hearing. The court also warned that failure to deposit the Rs2.5 million by the petitioner would result in the revocation of the interim relief. On Thursday, the provincial ombudsman found Moonis Alvi guilty of harassment and ordered his removal from office, along with the imposition of the penalty. The court will take up the case again on August 8.


Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
SHC suspends Moonis Alvi's removal in harassment case
Listen to article The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Friday suspended the decision of the Provincial Ombudsperson that had ordered the removal of K-Electric Chief Executive Officer Moonis Alvi over allegations of workplace harassment. The interim relief came during a hearing before a two-member bench headed by Justice Faisal Kamal Alam and comprising Justice Hassan Akbar. The court was hearing a petition filed by Alvi, challenging the ombudsperson's verdict delivered a day earlier. Barrister Abid Zuberi, counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the provincial ombudsperson lacked jurisdiction in the matter, arguing that KE is an interprovincial entity and, therefore, falls under the purview of federal legislation. Also Read: Senior lawyer Khawaja Shamsul Islam shot dead in Karachi The court inquired about the legal flaws in the ombudsperson's ruling. Zuberi contended that the order to remove Alvi and impose a penalty of Rs2.5 million was issued without jurisdiction and in contravention of the relevant laws. 'The ombudsperson's office is not authorised to adjudicate such matters. In similar cases, jurisdiction has been found with the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC) or labour courts,' he argued. He further pointed out that KE supplies electricity to areas beyond Sindh, including Lasbela and Hub, which categorises it as an interprovincial company. Therefore, the case should be dealt with by the Federal Ombudsperson. The court, after hearing the arguments, suspended the removal order until the next hearing, scheduled for August 8. It directed Alvi to deposit the Rs2.5 million fine with the Nazir of the SHC. A request by the petitioner's counsel to reduce the amount was declined by the bench. Read: Pakistan hit with 19pc tariff as Trump targets dozens of countries with new duties Mahreen Aziz Khan, a former consultant at KE and the company's first female CxO, had filed a complaint under the Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010, accusing CEO Moonis Alvi of harassment and creating a hostile work environment. In his verdict, Sindh Ombudsman Justice (retd) Shahnawaz Tariq stated that Alvi had committed harassment, created a hostile environment, and caused mental agony at the workplace to the complainant and her team. The ombudsman had ordered Alvi's removal from service under Section 4(ii)(d) of the Act and directed him to pay a fine of Rs2.5 million within one month.


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
SHC suspends ombudsman's order to remove KE CEO Moonis Alvi
The Sindh High Court (SHC) has suspended provincial ombudsman's decision to remove K-Electric Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Moonis Alvi from his office. The KE through a disclosure form apprised the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) in this regard, saying that the KE CEO has filed a petition in the SHC 'which has suspended the operation of Provincial Ombudsman's Order dated July 31, 2025'. A day ago, the Sindh ombudsman had ordered to remove Alvi from his position of K-Electric's CEO, over his alleged involvement in a case pertaining to 'workplace harassment'. Sindh Ombudsman for the Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Justice (retired) Shah Nawaz Tariq also imposed a fine of Rs2.5 million on Alvi in the same case. 'Moonis Abdullah Alvi is penalised under section 4(4)(ii)(c) of the Act, 2010, and is removed from his service instantly,' read the order issued by the ombudsperson. Sindh ombudsman orders to remove KE CEO Moonis Alvi for 'workplace harassment' Justice (retired) Tariq said in his decision that the KE CEO Alvi harassed and mentally tortured the complainant. 'If Moonis Alvi fails to pay the fine, his movable and immovable property should be confiscated and his CNIC and passport should also be blocked,' he ordered. Meanwhile, Alvi has termed the ombudsman's decision 'deeply distressing' for him, saying the findings did not reflect the truth of the situation as he experienced it. The KE chief executive said he always upheld the values of integrity and dignity in professional interactions, and he deeply believed in fostering safe and inclusive workplaces for all. In its disclosure form submitted to the PSX today, KE said the employee had lodged the complaint against the CEO and three other officials in November 2020 before the ombudsman, after she was terminated from services by the company 'on October 14, 2020, on performance reasons'. Following the complaint, the provincial ombudsman issued a show cause notice on November 24, 2020, to the accused persons. The show cause notice was challenged by the accused persons before the SHC for being without jurisdiction inter alia on the grounds that (i) an ex-employee could not file a complaint under the Act of 2010 after termination from employment (ii) the nature of allegations do not fall within the confines of the Act of 2010 and (iii) KE being a trans-provincial organisation, the complaint was not maintainable before the provincial ombudsman. The KE said the SHC on December 1, 2020, directed that no final order shall be passed by the provincial ombudsman, however, the court later observed that the ombudsman can continue the proceedings of the complaint. Being aggrieved by the observation of the SHC, the accused persons challenged the same before the Supreme Court, which is currently pending adjudication, it added. An appeal was also filed in the relevant office of the Sindh governor, the KE maintained.