logo
Public health boss wants crackdown on gambling ads

Public health boss wants crackdown on gambling ads

Yahoo24-03-2025

A director of public health has said there should be a crackdown on gambling adverts similar to tobacco.
City of York Council's public health chief Peter Roderick said figures showing more than one in 10 young people in the city had gambled were the "tip of the iceberg".
Mr Roderick's comments follow the publication of his annual report on the health and wellbeing of young people aged between 10 and 19 in the city.
"We need to educate and support young people and get in really early by talking about gambling with them," he said.
Mr Roderick told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: "As a council we have some powers over granting gambling licences to premises but we haven't talked about this issue enough and there needs to be a space to call it out.
"We also need to crack down on advertising in the same way we have done with tobacco and we're going to do with fast food."
Tobacco adverts were banned in the UK in 2002.
Mr Roderick's report said gambling was emerging as a real and substantial threat to the physical and mental health of young people.
It found 16% of young people in York had gambled and a quarter of those who did had taken money without permission to pay for it.
Almost 15% had encountered conflicts with friends and family over gambling.
Mr Roderick said the rise in gambling among young people had followed the relaxation of regulations in the 2000s under the then Labour government.
"The government at the time didn't anticipate the advent of the smartphone and that we'd all essentially be able to have a super casino in our pocket," he added.
"The number of gambling adverts you see is really noticeable and that's affecting children. The effects on young people we can measure are the tip of the iceberg."
A Department for Culture, Media & Sport spokesperson said: "We recognise the impact harmful gambling can have on individuals and their families and we are absolutely committed to strengthening protections for those at risk, including children and young people.
"The government has already announced plans to bring in a statutory levy on gambling profits to generate £100m for the research, prevention and treatment of gambling harms.
"There are already a range of robust rules in place on gambling adverts, wherever they appear, but ministers continue to consider the best available evidence in this area to inform effective action as needed."
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Local Democracy Reporting Service

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Convicted nurse faces wait for appeal ruling
Convicted nurse faces wait for appeal ruling

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Convicted nurse faces wait for appeal ruling

A nurse jailed for murdering four elderly patients has been told he faces a wait to find out the outcome of his appeal against his convictions. Colin Campbell, previously known as Colin Norris, was found guilty in 2008 of killing four women and attempting to kill a fifth by injecting them with insulin. Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and Ethel Hall, 86, were inpatients on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked in Leeds in 2002 and developed unexplained hypoglycaemia. Campbell denied any wrongdoing and over the past 14 days, the Court of Appeal has heard from both his lawyers and also the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), who opposed the appeal. He unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in 2011, who said previously that the prosecution had relied on "wholly circumstantial" evidence. The CCRC referred the case to the Court of Appeal in London four years ago. The appeal hearing finished on Friday after closing statements from Michael Mansfield KC, for Campbell, and James Curtis KC, for the CPS. Mr Mansfield previously told the court that Campbell's appeal was a "straightforward case" and that the judges "must conclude that these convictions are unsafe". However, Mr Curtis said the court must uphold the convictions, adding that the jury in Campbell's trial were "provided with the necessary relevant facts and issues, from a plethora of highly qualified and clinically experienced witnesses". Lady Justice Macur, sitting with Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken, said after closing submissions: "It will come as no surprise that we are going to reserve judgment." She added: "There may be ancillary matters for which we will call you back. We will know once you have the draft judgment." A judgment is expected in writing at a later date. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North. Convicted nurse appeal 'straightforward', court told New evidence may prove nurse's conviction 'unsafe' HM Courts and Tribunals Service

Charity 'deeply concerned' about hospital's stroke advice
Charity 'deeply concerned' about hospital's stroke advice

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Charity 'deeply concerned' about hospital's stroke advice

A charity said it was "deeply concerned" after a hospital advised patients presenting with a suspected stroke not to attend its emergency department. Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust said its Diana, Princess of Wales Hospital was "not the most appropriate place" for those experiencing symptoms because it did not have a specialist stroke unit. The trust advised patients to call 999 for an ambulance to take them to Scunthorpe General Hospital instead. However, concerns have been raised by patients on ambulance waiting times. A spokesperson for the Stroke Association said any lengthy wait for an ambulance was "unacceptable" as every minute could shorten the chance of survival. In a social media post on Thursday, the trust said it had seen "a lot of instances recently" of patients arriving at the hospital. The trust said: "This is not the most appropriate place to be seen, as we don't have a hyper-acute stroke unit at Diana, Princess of Wales Hospital. "You should instead ring 999 if you've got symptoms and you'll be taken via ambulance to Scunthorpe General Hospital, which has the necessary facilities. "If you do attend at Grimsby ED, you'll be sent to Scunthorpe via ambulance." The post received criticism from some social media users with a number of individuals questioning what could happen to them if they were taken ill. One person wrote: "Why as a member of the public in a state of emergency should we have to ensure we are heading to the right place?" Others questioned the time taken and distance they would travel to reach the hospital by ambulance. A user wrote: "The trip to Scunthorpe could add an extra 30-40 [minutes] on the journey." Another wrote: "If you live closer to Grimsby then maybe that's the natural place you'd automatically think you should go!" Samantha Jones, associate director at Stroke Association, said they were "hugely grateful" to medical practitioners who were working tirelessly under extreme pressure. She said: "Despite their best efforts, systemic challenges are severely compromising ambulance response and hospital treatment times. "If you spot any of the signs of a stroke in you or someone else, it's vital to call 999 straight away," she said. A spokesperson for East Midlands Ambulance Service said: "Every 999 call is assessed based on the information provided by the caller and people experiencing a life-threatening emergency are responded to as a priority." The NHS Humber Health Partnership said a hyper-acute stroke unit at Scunthorpe General Hospital provides "immediate specialist treatment and high quality care for all stroke patients in our area". The unit at Scunthorpe was opened in 2013 after an NHS report described stroke services in Grimsby as "inadequate", which led to health bosses consolidating treatment onto one site. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Video calls will help treatment for stroke patients Stroke services to shut at hospital Stroke Association NHS

The NHS truths the Left don't want you to hear
The NHS truths the Left don't want you to hear

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

The NHS truths the Left don't want you to hear

Until very recently, Health Secretary Wes Streeting tried to market himself as a radical health reformer, who is not afraid to poke sacred cows. While his reform-minded rhetoric always remained at a highly-abstract and general level, Streeting deserved some credit for it, because he did not have to do this. He had the courage to say things which he knew would rub some people up the wrong way, not least the Corbynite wing of his own party. Sadly, that brief period of NHS candour is now officially over. Streeting, the self-styled reformer, is no more. He and his colleagues have fully retreated into their comfort zone. During the recent local election campaign, Labour distributed a leaflet that showed a mock medical bill, and a doctor holding up a credit card reader. The message was clear: vote for us, because this is what the other lot want to do to you. On Twitter/X, Labour are now frequently posting dire warnings about the alleged evils of insurance-based healthcare systems. This is exactly that old-school NHS cultism which Streeting used to disavow until five minutes ago. It may work for him. The NHS may be falling apart, but the cult around is still going strong. In the eyes of its keenest defenders, the NHS can do no wrong. They have quietly dropped the old cliché about the NHS being 'the envy of the word', and replaced it with a slightly more subtle version, which goes something like this: Once upon a time, the NHS used to be the best healthcare system in the world. But then, from 2010 on, it was systematically defunded. It was deliberately run into the ground, so that it can be privatised more easily. A privatised system would mean luxury healthcare for the rich, and Wild West medicine for the poor. None of these claims are true. Let's have a look at each of them in turn. The NHS was never the best healthcare system in the world. The idea that it ever was can be traced back to a ranking compiled by the Commonwealth Fund, an American healthcare think tank, which relies on a very unusual methodology, in which medical outcomes only account for a fifth of the total score. This matters, because on medical outcomes, the NHS has always been one of the worst-performing healthcare systems in the developed world – as even the Commonwealth Fund study shows. There is no turning point after which the NHS's performance suddenly deteriorated. It was just never good in the first place. At the end of the 2010s, age-adjusted real NHS spending per capita was only marginally higher than it had been in the beginning of the decade. Put differently, the NHS budget only just about kept pace with population growth, population ageing, and inflation. This clearly constituted a slowdown in spending increases compared to the previous decade. But it does not constitute a 'defunding'. In any case: that period of relative spending restraint is already over again. The NHS budget was given a massive boost during the pandemic, which has only been partially reversed. Public healthcare spending in the UK stands at just under 9% of GDP: one of the highest levels in the world. Conspiracy theories about secret plans to privatise the NHS have been around for decades. I wrote a report on this three years ago, for which I went through the news archives, and I found warnings about the NHS's imminent demise from every year since 1980. But somehow, it never happens. The NHS remains an unusually state-centred system. Most healthcare systems, including tax-funded ones, use a mix of public, private for-profit and private non-profit providers. There are no plans – secret or otherwise – to privatise the NHS. More's the pity. Because there is nothing wrong with private healthcare systems. There are good examples of private, insurance-based healthcare systems, most notably in the Netherlands and Switzerland, which are nothing like the dreaded system of the US. These systems cover everybody: poor people are exempt from health insurance premiums and co-payments. Under these systems, rich and poor alike get faster access to medical treatment, and better medical outcomes, than they would on the NHS. The only thing these people don't get is a naff feel-good mythology around their health systems. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store