MOH and police intensify crackdown on drug-laced vape sales in Malaysia
Deputy Health Minister Datuk Lukanisman Awang Sauni said 96 investigation papers involving drug-laced vape liquids were recorded between early last year and March, with over 70 per cent testing positive for synthetic cannabinoids and amphetamines.
'We are collaborating more closely with the police while stepping up laboratory inspections to test suspicious samples,' he said after officiating a joint event for World No Tobacco Day and World Tuberculosis Day at IOI Mall here today.
The ministry also plans to tighten oversight at the manufacturing and production stages to detect illegal substances at the source, he added.
Present at the event were Johor Health and Environment Committee chairman Ling Tian Soon and Johor Health Department director Dr Mohtar Pungut @ Ahmad.
Lukanisman said authorities are still identifying those responsible for producing drug-laced vape products.
'We haven't determined the source or manufacturers involved. Investigations are ongoing before any enforcement action is taken under existing laws, including those under police jurisdiction,' he said.
In May, the ministry set up a special committee to monitor the issue, with Deputy Director-General of Health (Public Health) Dr Ismuni Bohari noting a review of existing laws is underway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
a minute ago
- Daily Express
Warisan: Why 650 medical officers are staying away?
Published on: Thursday, July 31, 2025 Published on: Thu, Jul 31, 2025 Text Size: Junz warned that failure to act swiftly could cripple the state's already overstretched healthcare system, particularly in rural and interior districts where access to services remains limited. Kota Kinabalu: Warisan Vice President Datuk Junz Wong has sounded the alarm over what he describes as a worsening healthcare crisis in Sabah, following the revelation that nearly 600 medical officers had appealed to opt out of postings to Sabah and Sarawak. He was responding to Deputy Health Minister Datuk Lukanisman Awang Sauni, who last week disclosed that although 650 permanent positions were offered, the majority of doctors had applied to be released from their assignments to East Malaysia. 'This is no longer just about staffing. It's a matter of life and death for Sabahans,' he said in a statement on Tuesday. He questioned why so many medical officers were refusing to serve in Sabah, pointing to possible causes such as poor hospital conditions, lack of medical equipment, overwhelming workloads and logistical difficulties in rural postings. 'The Ministry of Health must come clean and provide a full report. Sabahans deserve to know the truth and more importantly, they deserve urgent action,' he said. Junz warned that failure to act swiftly could cripple the state's already overstretched healthcare system, particularly in rural and interior districts where access to services remains limited. 'Sabah has long been left behind in terms of healthcare development. 'Many of our hospitals and clinics are lacking in infrastructure, equipment and specialists. 'Meanwhile, facilities in the Klang Valley are fully equipped and staffed,' he said. He emphasised that during Warisan's time in government, the State had created its own Ministry of Health to address these issues directly, a move he said was aimed at building homegrown talent and improving access across Sabah. 'That ministry was scrapped by the GRS-PH government, a short-sighted and irresponsible decision,' he said. Junz pledged that Warisan would reinstate the Sabah Health Ministry if it returns to power, adding that the state must take back control of its healthcare future. 'Sabahans are Malaysians too. If Putrajaya can't fix this crisis, Warisan is ready to step in and do the job,' he said. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Want to get Botox injections, liposuction, laser treatments in Malaysia? Here's the list of beauty procedures needing an MOH-qualified doctor
KUALA LUMPUR, July 31 — Thinking of visiting a 'beauty clinic' in Malaysia to get an aesthetic treatment such as Botox injections or breast filler injections. Perhaps you're considering cosmetic surgery such as liposuction or work done on your eyes, nose or face? Wait. Don't say 'yes' to those procedures, until you check if a qualified doctor or specialist will be doing it. Here are three simple and basic steps you should do: Step one: Check if the doctor has a current and valid practising certificate, which must be renewed every year for them to continue to practise in Malaysia. Step two: Check if the doctor has a valid Letter of Credentialing and Privileging (LCP). Without an LCP, they cannot carry out any aesthetic procedure on you. Step three: Even if the doctor has an LCP, check if the LCP allows them to carry out the procedure on you. Also check if the 'beauty clinic' is a licensed healthcare facility. Why should you check? (Hint: To keep you safe) Malaysia's Health Ministry (MOH) in 2013 issued its guidelines on aesthetic medical practice for registered doctors, and in 2020 issued the second edition of the guidelines to regulate this. In the guidelines, MOH noted that there have been reports of adverse outcomes (including patients becoming disfigured or dying) due to incompetent medical and non-medical practitioners carrying out these aesthetic procedures. MOH noted that 'all aesthetic procedures are not completely safe'. MOH said some of the common complications from these beauty or cosmetic treatments include reactions to anaesthesia; bleeding; infections; scarring; pigmentary changes (hypo-pigmentation or hyper-pigmentation) and even death. Not all doctors with LCP can do cosmetic surgery on you There are three categories of doctors who can get the LCP qualification to do aesthetic treatments: General practitioners (they are non-specialists) Medical specialists (dermatologists and non-dermatologists) Surgical specialists (plastic surgeons and surgeons whose core specialties are not plastic surgery) Doctors who are general practitioners cannot do invasive procedures on you. Only plastic surgeons can do the full-range of invasive procedures and cosmetic surgeries on you, including for eyelids, noses, faces or tummy tucks; as well as breast implants, breast enhancements, breast reductions, and fat grafting. The Health Ministry's website lists these three as illegal procedures in Malaysia, namely breast fillers, buttock fillers, and 'IV drip Vitamin C'. What is an LCP? Registered doctors or specialists have to apply for the LCP, which will be issued by the Health Ministry's Medical Practice Division if all requirements are met (including training or assessment requirements). LCPs issued to general practitioners are valid for three years and can be renewed; while LCPs for specialists are valid for five years and also renewable. A doctor or specialist with an LCP can then be registered in a national registry, known as the National Registry of Registered Medical Practitioners Practising Aesthetic Medical Practice. If there are complaints on aesthetic medical procedures carried out by a registered doctor and the procedure's outcome, this may lead to an inquiry by bodies such as the Health Ministry or the Malaysian Medical Council. This could lead to the LCP being reviewed and the doctor being removed from the national registry. Complaints of unsafe practice or professional misconduct could also lead to such LCP reviews and potential removal from the national registry. Check here to see if a person is a doctor registered with the Malaysian Medical Council, by just typing their name. Check here to see if the doctor is still on the National Registry of Registered Medical Practitioners Practising Aesthetic Medical Practice. What are the doctors' responsibilities? In the MOH guidelines, doctors and specialists must inform the patient of the potential risks and possible outcome, and get consent for the planned aesthetic medical procedure. They must also place the patient's safety as their primary concern, and carry out the services in a healthcare facility licensed or registered under these laws and regulations: Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998 Private Healthcare Facilities and Services (Private Hospitals and Other Private Healthcare Facilities, Private Medical Clinics or Private Dental Clinics) Regulations 2006. Check here to see if the 'beauty clinic' you visit is registered with the Health Ministry and if it can provide aesthetic services or not. Recommended reading:
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
From crisis to collaboration: Why harm reduction is Malaysia's public health opportunity — Bakhtiar Talhah
JULY 31 — Almost two decades ago, I stood at the frontlines of Malaysia's HIV epidemic — a time when fear, stigma and silence ruled the discourse around drug use and HIV. The data was grim: some 70 per cent of new HIV infections were among people who inject drugs (PWIDs). We were losing lives, and our response was fragmented at best. We knew something had to change. What followed was bold and unprecedented. With the support of allies across the Ministry of Health, civil society, law enforcement and religious leadership, we launched the Needle and Syringe Exchange Programme (NSEP) in 2006. At the time, it was politically unpopular. Critics worried it would condone drug use. But we persisted, because science and humanity demanded it. Today, the success is undeniable: HIV transmission among PWIDs and their partners has dropped dramatically. The NSEP saved lives — and transformed mindsets. Yet despite this progress, the underlying policy framework that criminalises and marginalises people who use drugs remains largely intact. Malaysia's drug laws continue to emphasise punishment over rehabilitation, incarceration over care. We cannot meaningfully implement harm reduction while treating drug dependence as a moral failing or criminal offence. This is the core argument: drug policy reform is not just complementary to harm reduction — it is foundational to it. Without reforming our approach to drugs — legally, institutionally, and socially — our harm reduction efforts will always be constrained. We need a national paradigm shift from punitive drug control to public health-based policies. This means decriminalising personal drug use, investing in treatment and prevention services, and empowering community-led initiatives. Other countries have taken this step — and seen measurable public health and economic benefits. Portugal, for instance, decriminalised all drugs in 2001, and instead focused on harm reduction, treatment, and reintegration. As a result, drug-related deaths and HIV infections plummeted. Malaysia must take inspiration and adapt such evidence-based models to our context. And reform doesn't stop with laws. It requires strong political will, inter-agency collaboration, and courage to lead with compassion. When we launched NSEP, success was only possible because of multisectoral alignment — from the Ministry of Health to the Royal Malaysian Police, from NGOs to the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (JAKIM). This is the same spirit we must reignite for wider drug policy reform. Regulation, too, is essential. Harm reduction does not mean lack of control — it demands smart, risk-proportionate governance. Whether it's opioid substitution therapy or access to safer nicotine products, clear and evidence-based regulation ensures both public safety and access to lifesaving tools. This applies directly to Malaysia's fast-evolving tobacco and vape landscape. Overregulation can drive people to unregulated markets; underregulation risks misuse and public backlash. The middle path — firmly regulated but widely accessible harm reduction tools — is where real progress lies. This includes decisive measures such as banning high-risk open-system vape devices prone to adulteration, while maintaining strict controls on other products. Regulation should target illicit and poorly regulated outlets through enhanced enforcement — without punishing law-abiding players who operate within compliance. Bakhtiar Talhah (second left) speaking on a HIV/AIDS advocacy programme. — Picture courtesy of Malaysian AIDS Foundation Enforcement initiatives like Ops Selamat Paru-Paru (Ops Selamat Papa), recently launched by the Ministry of Health, are an encouraging sign that the government recognises the urgency of the issue. However, enforcement has always been the Achilles' heel of public health in Malaysia. Raids, confiscations, and press conferences make headlines, but without sustained follow-through, the illicit market adapts and continues to thrive. For enforcement to succeed, it must be systematic, consistent, and paired with structural reforms: closing loopholes in licensing, disrupting illicit supply chains, and ensuring penalties are applied evenly. Otherwise, Ops Selamat Papa risks becoming another short-lived operation rather than a lasting pillar of harm reduction. Fiscal policy has a role too. In line with public health objectives, tax rates on vape products should be increased relative to cigarettes and heated tobacco sticks. A balanced tax framework can discourage uptake among youth, align with harm reduction goals for smokers, and generate revenue for health programmes. Equally important is the role of the private sector. I have seen firsthand how partnerships with foundations like Yayasan Sime Darby and corporate leaders such as Sunway Group have amplified impact in the HIV and health space. With strategic backing from the Ministry of Finance, the private sector can support innovation, financing, and delivery of sustainable harm reduction programmes. Religious authorities, particularly in Malaysia's Islamic context, have been instrumental in reframing harm reduction as a moral obligation to protect life. Fatwas and views that support methadone programmes and needle exchanges helped legitimise these interventions within the Muslim community. This synergy between faith and evidence is uniquely Malaysian — and powerful. This is why I founded Humanize Malaysia. We are a bridge — linking corporate actors, policymakers, civil society, and communities to drive sustainable change. Our mission is to humanise health, to put people — not ideology — at the centre of policy. The broader opportunity is this: harm reduction must evolve into a cornerstone of Malaysia's public health strategy — not just for HIV, but also for challenges like alcohol abuse, tobacco dependence, rising sugar consumption, and synthetic drug use. Every one of these issues shares a common truth: punitive responses fail. People do not need punishment — they need options, support, and dignity. Across the globe, countries that embraced harm reduction and reformed outdated drug laws are saving lives, reducing crime, and cutting costs. Japan's shift to heated tobacco products has already shown public health benefits and cost savings. In New Zealand, support for safer nicotine products helped halve adult smoking rates in just five years. Malaysia can, and must, be a leader in this space. We already know what works. Data-led policy. Bold political leadership. Corporate partnership. Community empowerment. Religious engagement. These are not new ideas — they are proven ingredients. But they require one thing above all: the courage to shift from criminalising to caring. Let us not wait for another epidemic to force our hand. Let's build on our past successes. Let's expand harm reduction and truly put health and humanity first. Let's humanise policy. Let's humanise health. * Bakhtiar Talhah is the CEO of Humanize Malaysia, trustee of the Malaysian AIDS Foundation, and former president of the Malaysian AIDS Council. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
