Linda McMahon flubs basic facts in Senate budget hearing
Education Secretary Linda McMahon's Senate budget hearing on Tuesday featured falsehoods that were either personally uttered by the secretary or went unchecked as a senator spread them.
McMahon, the former professional wrestling executive who was roundly mocked recently for referring to artificial intelligence — or 'AI' — as 'A1,' has struggled to slough off accusations that she's out of her depth and ill-informed about the department she's leading. And Tuesday didn't help her cause.
In one instance, McMahon and Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., appeared to flub a simple math equation while discussing funding for TRIO, a federal program that helps low-income students afford college. Kennedy asked McMahon about $1.58 billion he said was being spent annually on the program, which he then calculated as amounting to more than $1 trillion over 10 years. This glaring error — which Kennedy repeated several times in his line of questioning — went unchecked by McMahon.
But Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., didn't let either of them slide on the faulty math.
'I'm not a great mathematician, but I think you were talking about $1 trillion? I believe $1.5 billion times 10 is $15 billion. That's a little bit off from $1 trillion,' he said.
McMahon interrupted to say, 'I think the budget cut's $1.2 billion.' A seemingly unimpressed Reed responded by saying that would mean $12 billion had been spent over a decade — not $1 trillion.
'OK,' McMahon said.
In another instance, during questioning from Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., McMahon said that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which specifically bars discrimination on the basis of race, skin color or national origin, is the statute that's allowing the Trump administration to try to force Harvard University to hire more conservatives.
Murphy sounded taken aback by her attempt to elaborate.
'I don't understand any conception of civil rights law to give you the authorization to micromanage viewpoint diversity on campus,' he said.
The Trump administration has no shortage of individuals who seem to lack a basic understanding of the departments they lead, but McMahon — with her repeated public missteps — arguably tops the list. Certainly, this is not an ideal trait for an agency head, particularly when that person is tasked with ensuring the proper, fair and effective teaching of America's students.
If you're looking for an expert on pile drivers and 'Stone Cold Stunners,' Linda McMahon may be the one to call. But when it comes to knowledge of the U.S. education system, it seems abundantly clear she's lacking in that department.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Debt Could Lead to Dangerous Decline, Summers Says
Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers says President Donald Trump's tax and spending plan will add to the US debt load, undermining the nation's status as the preeminent global power. "It's a prescription for deadly, dangerous decline," said Summers, a Harvard University professor and paid contributor to Bloomberg TV. He speaks on Bloomberg Television's Wall Street Week with David Westin. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump bid to ban foreign Harvard students temporarily blocked by judge
A federal judge has temporarily blocked a proclamation by President Donald Trump that banned foreign students from entering the US to attend Harvard University. Mr Trump's proclamation, issued on Wednesday, was the latest attempt by his administration to prevent the nation's oldest and wealthiest college from enrolling a quarter of its students, who account for much of Harvard's research and scholarship. Harvard filed a legal challenge the next day, asking for a judge to block Mr Trump's order and calling it illegal retaliation for Harvard's rejection of White House demands. Harvard said the president was attempting an end-run around a previous court order. A few hours later, US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston issued a temporary restraining order against Mr Trump's Wednesday proclamation. Harvard, she said, had demonstrated it would sustain 'immediate and irreparable injury' before she would have an opportunity to hear from the parties in the lawsuit. Ms Burroughs also extended the temporary hold she placed on the administration's previous attempt to end Harvard's enrolment of international students. Last month, the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork to them for their visas, only to have Ms Burroughs block the action temporarily. Mr Trump's order this week invoked a different legal authority. If Mr Trump's measure were to survive this court challenge, it would block thousands of students who are scheduled to come to Harvard's campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for the summer and autumn terms. 'Harvard's more than 7,000 F-1 and J-1 visa holders — and their dependents — have become pawns in the government's escalating campaign of retaliation,' Harvard wrote in a court filing on Thursday. While the court case proceeds, Harvard is making contingency plans so students and visiting scholars can continue their work at the university, president Alan Garber said in a message to the campus and alumni. 'Each of us is part of a truly global university community,' Mr Garber said on Thursday. 'We know that the benefits of bringing talented people together from around the world are unique and irreplaceable.' Harvard has attracted a growing number of the brightest minds from around the world, with international enrolment growing from 11% of the student body three decades ago to 26% today. Rising international enrolment has made Harvard and other elite colleges uniquely vulnerable to Mr Trump's crackdown on foreign students. Republicans have been seeking to force overhauls of the nation's top colleges, which they see as hotbeds of 'woke' and antisemitic viewpoints. Mr Garber says the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles', even after receiving federal ultimatums. Mr Trump's administration has also taken steps to withhold federal funding from Harvard and other elite colleges that have rejected White House demands related to campus protests, admissions, hiring and more. Harvard's 53 billion dollar (£39 billion) endowment allows it to weather the loss of funding for a time, although Mr Garber has warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' to come.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Massive crack in the MAGA coalition': The Trump-Musk feud threatens the GOP's future
Elon Musk just launched a war against the GOP. Now the party's hopes of holding onto power are at stake. Musk has gone from helping Republicans take total control of Washington — spending nearly $300 million to become the single biggest known donor last year — to attacking the highest-ranking leaders of the party and daring the rank and file to cross him. 'Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years,' Musk said on X. The post was an unambiguous warning from the world's richest man, who has the power to single-handedly reshape elections with his wealth. It was not long ago that Republicans hoped Musk could pour cash into their efforts to help maintain control of Washington. Instead, he's becoming their public adversary. Musk spent Thursday online attacking President Donald Trump over Republicans' massive tax-and-spending bill, which Musk says does not cut enough government spending. He'd already threatened to challenge Republicans who support the megabill; on Thursday, he blasted House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, took credit for Republicans winning trifecta control in November, and floated the idea of launching a third party. 'This is a massive crack in the MAGA coalition,' said Matthew Bartlett, a Republican strategist and a former Trump administration appointee. 'This town is historically built on Republican versus Democrat, and this seems to be crazy versus crazy. It is asymmetric and it seems, for the first time, President Trump seems to be out-crazied.' Just a few weeks ago, Republicans were still praising Musk for his financial backing in the 2024 election as they hoped he'd make a graceful return to the private sector after overseeing the administration's program to slash federal spending. Less than one week ago, Musk was in the Oval Office with Trump commemorating his time in administration as a special government employee. But that polite departure, it quickly became evident, was not going to happen. "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave," Trump wrote on Truth Social, blaming Musk's anger on the megabill's removal of electric vehicle tax credits. 'He just went CRAZY!' As Musk's drama engulfed the party Thursday, Republicans in Congress mostly tried to avoid getting caught in the crossfire. Key GOP lawmakers in both chambers worked to downplay the potential effects on both the party's domestic policy package and on the GOP's midterms posture. Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), who leads the House GOP campaign arm, told reporters Thursday that he hopes the spat will 'blow over.' Before the breakup went nuclear, Hudson had said in a brief interview Wednesday evening that Musk has 'been a friend and he's just wrong about this bill.' Even fiscal hard-liners who have embraced some of Musk's talking points about the bill tried to avoid getting drawn into the fracas. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), who at one point threatened to tank the megabill for not being fiscally conservative enough, said, "Elon crossed the line today ... we'll let those guys go play it out." "I don't disagree with him about our need to find more spending cuts," Roy added, but Musk needs to "keep it in the lines." Another hard-liner, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), said he believes Musk is losing sway within MAGA. Musk is 'just another shiny object,' he said, 'and we'll deal with it.' But Musk appeared intent on turning his opposition to the legislation into a civil war for the party. He amplified two Kentucky Republicans, Rep. Thomas Massie and Sen. Rand Paul, who have been thorns in the side of Trump and GOP leaders trying to pass the bill. Even though Musk brought massive financial backing, he has also at times been an electoral problem for Republicans. His popularity has fallen below Trump's, and his biggest political effort this year — the Wisconsin Supreme Court race — ended with the conservative candidate losing by almost 10 points. 'Elon couldn't buy a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat. You really think that people are gonna be afraid of this money?' said a person close to the White House, granted anonymity to discuss the dynamics. As Musk's popularity faded, Republicans wondered how long his relationship with Trump could endure. On Thursday, Musk severed ties. He took shot after shot at Trump, accusing him of lying, replying 'yes' to a post suggesting he should be impeached, and accusing him of having a cozy relationship with the deceased Jeffrey Epstein, who had been accused of sex trafficking. "What a predictable shitshow," said a person who has been in the room with both Musk and Trump. "Trump is a liar, and it was obvious Elon would not be able to go along with his incessant lying forever." A nervous Republican Party is now scrambling to figure out what the electoral fallout will look like, starting with next year's midterms. Already, two of Trump's top campaign operatives, Chris LaCivita and Tony Fabrizio had signed up to work with Musk's Building America's Future PAC. But Musk's scorched-earth strategy could create dueling allegiances. Privately, some Republicans are arguing they had already been preparing for next year's elections without Musk's money, and complained that America PAC — the tech billionaire's super PAC — didn't spend its money effectively in House races last year. America PAC spent $19.2 million backing GOP candidates across 18 battleground House races last year, according to data from the Federal Election Commission. Republicans won 10 of those elections. But those were among the highest-profile and most expensive races in the country, and Musk's group accounted for only 12 percent of Republican outside spending in them. It wasn't even the biggest GOP spender — that was still the Congressional Leadership Fund, the primary super PAC affiliated with House Republicans. 'What Elon has is money, and if he's not going to put $100 million in the [midterms], that's a hole that has to be filled,' said Chris Mottola, a GOP media consultant. "On the other hand, there was a question about how effective the money was that he spent, because he spent it the way he wanted to." Over the last few months, Musk has floated the idea of getting involved in the midterms, but he's also claimed he would step back from political spending. If Musk is going to go all-in against the party, he's going to need more than money. 'Are there enough good Republican operatives out there to go achieve this mission for Elon Musk when it means going up against the president?" said a former RNC official, granted anonymity to discuss the situation candidly. 'Everybody's got a price, but I don't think they are rushing to go help Elon further divide the Republican Party ahead of the midterms.' Lisa Kashinsky, Jessica Piper, Holly Otterbein, Dasha Burns, Nicholas Wu, Sophia Cai, Jordain Carney and Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.
