Push to ban lab-grown meat fails in South Dakota Senate
A legislative effort to ban lab-grown meat in South Dakota failed Thursday at the Capitol in Pierre, after the success of earlier bills to require labeling and prohibit state spending in support of the product.
The ban's initial failure was Wednesday on a 17-17 vote in the Senate, with one member absent. That was Sen. Kevin Jensen, R-Canton, who had voted for the bill when it advanced out of the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee.
A supporter of the legislation, Sen. Mykala Voita, R-Bonesteel, made a motion Thursday to reconsider it.
'As we had one member of the body absent yesterday, I believe that we should reconsider this vote, and I'd appreciate your support,' Voita said.
Lab-grown meat labeling, fees for serving legal papers, stenography rule change signed into law
Two senators who voted for the bill on Wednesday — Ernie Otten, R-Tea, and Amber Hulse, R-Hot Springs — voted against the reconsideration motion, which rendered Jensen's support moot. The 19-16 vote against reconsideration dealt the bill its final defeat.
Hulse told South Dakota Searchlight afterward that she'd heard enough senators planned to change their vote that the bill was doomed, so she didn't think it was worth debating again. In other words, she said, even if the reconsideration motion had been approved, a later vote on the bill itself might have failed.
Coming from a district with many ranchers, Hulse said her initial vote for the legislation was a vote for some of those constituents. But she doubted whether the bill would stand up to constitutional challenges regarding the freedom of interstate commerce.
'I think the constitutionality of the bill, if I'm being quite honest, is questionable,' Hulse said.
Otten did not immediately return a message from South Dakota Searchlight.
Barring further procedural maneuvering — such as amending the ban into another piece of legislation — the push to prevent the manufacture, sale and distribution of lab-grown meat in South Dakota is likely over for this legislative session, which ends next month.
Meanwhile, Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden has already signed a bill that will require lab-grown meat products to be labeled. Another bill that would prohibit state government spending in support of research, production, promotion, sale or distribution of lab-grown meat has passed both chambers and is awaiting Rhoden's consideration. That bill includes an exception for public universities, but would prevent scenarios such as the state awarding economic development grants to lab-grown meat companies.
Republican Rep. John Sjaarda, a Valley Springs farmer, proposed the ban and said Thursday that he was disappointed. He said the labeling bill, which applies to carcasses, parts of carcasses and meat food products, may work in stores but will not effectively alert restaurant diners who might not know when their dish is prepared with lab-grown meat.
'It does help,' Sjaarda said. 'I don't knock it. It's better than nothing.'
The proposed ban divided agricultural groups, with some alleging that lab-grown meat has not been proven safe and that a ban would protect consumers and the state's livestock industry.
Others said the product has been cleared by federal safety regulators and should be available in the marketplace. They also said supporting a ban is a hypocritical stance for farmers and ranchers who've opposed restrictions imposed by other states and countries on livestock production practices and genetically modified crops.
Lab-grown meat, also called cell-cultured or cultivated meat, starts from a sample of animal cells that are fed the sugars, water, proteins and vitamins needed to grow into muscle and fat. Although the product is approved for sale, it's not yet widely available.
Some other states, including Florida and Alabama, have banned lab-grown meat, and the Florida ban has sparked litigation from the industry.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Karl Rove warns Ukraine defeat could be Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal
Republican strategist Karl Rove on Thursday underscored the stakes of the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, saying failure to come to a resolution could be the downfall of President Trump's presidency. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Rove outlined the three possible outcomes from Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine: a successful peace deal; a failure to reach a deal, resulting in continued conflict; and a Russian victory over Ukraine. Rove compared the third possibility — which Rove said would result from either no agreement or from an agreement that Russia breaks — to the Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021, when President Biden's poll numbers tanked and never recovered. 'In addition to being the worst possible outcome morally and geopolitically, this third possibility is the worst scenario for the president and the GOP,' Rove wrote in the op-ed. 'The disastrous U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and subsequent Taliban takeover broke President Biden's reputation with voters. He never recovered. Mr. Biden was at 50% approval in Gallup in July 2021; he dropped precipitously after Kabul fell the following month. He bottomed out at 36% in July 2024 before he withdrew from the presidential race,' Rove continued. 'The defeat of Ukraine by Russia would be similarly disastrous for Mr. Trump,' he added. Rove noted that Trump promised to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office. Since then, Rove said, Trump has 'put himself at center stage' with his approach to dealmaking and his engagements with foreign leaders. 'The president can't abandon his starring role even if he wants to,' Rove said. 'Public opinion in America and the rest of the civilized world would rightly blame Mr. Putin for the invasion itself—but Mr. Trump for allowing it to succeed.' Rove said that the first outcome—a successful deal—is within reach for the U.S. president, and he touted Trump's steps so far in defense of Ukraine. He also said Trump's pressure on NATO countries to spend more on defense 'is paying off.' Rove urged Trump to become 'as tough on Mr. Putin as he has been on' Zelensky, saying that approach could get the warring countries 'to arrive at a deal that results in a durable peace.' 'Mr. Trump can bring about a reasonably successful conclusion to this catastrophic war by doing what Mr. Putin fears most: rejecting the Russian dictator's flattery and demands and insisting he make a fair, enforceable deal with Mr. Zelensky. Or else,' Rove said. 'Anything less would be a stain on Mr. Trump and on his party, for which they'd rightly pay a high political price,' he continued.


Axios
14 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas says he'll bow out if redistricting stands
Longtime Austin Democratic congressman Lloyd Doggett said Thursday that he won't seek reelection if new congressional maps are not overturned by courts. Why it matters: Doggett's move prevents a potentially nasty Democratic primary in the wake of a Republican redistricting effort, allowing U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, D-Austin, a rising progressive, to remain in power. State of play: Casar and Doggett would have battled for a single Austin-based district under the new congressional map that the Texas House approved on Wednesday and which the Senate is expected to pass soon. Gov. Greg Abbott has said he'll sign the legislation. Doggett, who has been repeatedly targeted by Republicans in redistricting during his over 30 years in Congress, currently represents much of Austin and its suburbs. Casar, a former Austin city council member first elected to Congress in 2022, represents parts of southern and eastern Austin in a district that snakes down to San Antonio. Flashback: In a campaign email nearly two weeks ago, Doggett wrote that "seniority is an asset, not a liability." He urged Casar to "not abandon" his reconfigured district, arguing that Casar could "use his organizing skills and populist message to win over the disaffected, particularly disaffected Hispanic voters." What they're saying: Unless the new maps are overturned by courts, "I will not seek reelection," Doggett said in a statement Thursday. "I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump." "While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats." On X, Casar wrote: "Lloyd Doggett is an Austin institution. I've learned so much from him. I'm grateful to him. The fight for democracy continues." The big picture: The new map could give Republicans an additional five seats in Congress. Democrats say the map disenfranchises Black and Latino voters.


Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
California Advances Redistricting Plan in Texas Counter-Punch
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The California state legislature has passed a redistricting plan that favors Democrats on the same day that Texas looks to pass its own redistricting plan that would favor Republicans as the two parties keep an eye on the 2026 midterm elections and control of Congress. The redistricting plan, pushed by California Governor Gavin Newsom to counter what he called President Donald Trump's efforts to "rig" the next elections, adds five seats that favor Democrats in a direct counterweight to the five seats the Republicans could gain in Texas. The State Assembly passed the new map by 57 to 20, and the State Senate again approved the new map just hours later on a party-line vote with 30 to 8. "Open your eyes to what is going on in the United States of America in 2025," Newsom said at a press conference following the vote. "That's what this is about. We're responding [to] what occured in Texas. We're neutralizing what occurred, and we're giving the American people a fair chance, because when all things are equal, and we're all playing by the same rules, there's no question that the Republican party will be the minority party in the House of Representatives next year." The new map still requires California voters to approve it, which will occur at a special election. Newsom's plan has faced fierce backlash from Republicans in California, including former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who will campaign against the new map in what is set to be a bitter fight in the state. This is a breaking news story. Updates will follow.