Chicago Tribune gives NYC stark warning on electing a socialist mayor like Zohran Mamdani: ‘The ending isn't pretty'
The Chicago Tribune issued a grim warning to New Yorkers about electing a socialist mayoral candidate like Zohran Mamdani in a bombshell op-ed Monday, the day before the Empire State's primary elections.
The paper's editorial board paints a bleak image of Mamdani, the 33-year-old Democratic socialist Queens assemblyman who leapfrogged longtime frontrunner, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, in a stunning new poll released earlier in the day.
'A familiar dilemma: a moderate, business-friendly Democrat versus a democratic socialist. New Yorkers, take it from Chicago — we've seen this movie before, and the ending isn't pretty,' the board of one of the last remaining big-city daily newspapers cautioned.
5 The paper's editorial board paints a bleak image of Mamdani, the 33-year-old Democratic socialist Queens assemblyman.
Paul Martinka
The Tribune likened Mamdani's buzz-worthy campaign, which has garnered a historic amount of grassroots support, to that of embattled progressive Windy City Mayor Brandon Johnson, whose took office in 2023.
'Johnson's approval rating cratered in his second year — a reflection of how quickly progressive promises collapsed under the weight of governance and Chicago's financial reality,' the paper wrote. 'What sounded good in theory has translated into dysfunction, driven by fiscal missteps and political inexperience.
5 The Tribune likened Mamdani's buzz-worthy campaign, which has garnered a historic amount of grassroots support.
NurPhoto via Getty Images
'Johnson is one of the most progressive mayors in the U.S., but Mamdani, inarguably, is yet more radical,' it continued.
The outlet pointed out that many of Mamdani's ideas — such as rent freezes, city-operated supermarkets and free transit — are 'shared (at least in principle) by Mayor Brandon Johnson, and many of them are popular in blue cities.'
5 'Johnson is one of the most progressive mayors in the U.S., but Mamdani, inarguably, is yet more radical,' it continued.
LP Media
But was quick to argue that 'experience has taught us here that far-left candidates do not make for effective or popular municipal executives in today's stressful economy.'
The ed-board drew parallels between Mamdani's freebie-filled platform, which he plans to fund with tax hikes to bring in roughly $10 billion annually, to that of Johnson's similarly overzealous tax proposal.
'Johnson tried to float a $300 million tax hike — and failed. He tried to pass a 'mansion tax' that would've hiked the real estate transfer tax — and failed,' the Tribune highlighted.
5 The ed-board drew parallels between Mamdani's freebie-filled platform to that of Johnson's similarly overzealous tax proposal.
Chicago Tribune
The Tribune was the latest to pile on to the recent wave of news outlets denouncing the Queens pol's ambitious run.
Follow The Post's coverage of the NYC mayoral race
The paper echoed sentiments shared by myriad New York publications, including The Post, Daily News and New York Times — who have discouraged voters from ranking the socialist candidate, whose too-good-to-be-true platform is just that, they say.
A through line in the anti-endorsements of the two-term Assemblyman is his lack of experience and the unrealistic nature of his policies.
5 The Tribune was the latest to pile on to the recent wave of news outlets denouncing the Queens pol's ambitious run.
LP Media
'If New Yorkers are frustrated with Mayor Eric Adams, they should be careful not to trade him for someone who might preside over a city that is less competitive and less financially secure.
'Trust us — we're living that reality.'
The Tribune's ominous warning comes just one day before Tuesday's primary election.
Polls across the five boroughs will be open from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
14 minutes ago
- New York Post
Person close to Long Island town supervisor stalked and menaced political challenger days before GOP primary: police
A low-profile Republican primary on Long Island erupted in scandal less than 24 hours before polls opened when the boyfriend of the incumbent's daughter was arrested for terrorizing his political rival in a string of bizarre midnight visits, according to police. Joshua Smith — the 47-year-old boyfriend of Smithtown Supervisor Ed Wehrheim's daughter Kellie Ann, according to his Facebook — was arrested Monday night and charged with stalking Wehrheim's challenger in the election, Suffolk Legislator Rob Trotta. For three straight nights beginning on June 16, Smith allegedly pulled into Trotta's driveway late at night, blasting his brights and loudly revving his engine in a string of back-to-back incidents, Suffolk County police and the legislator said. 3 Rob Trotta's stalker Joshua Smith. 'One night I'm in bed and all of a sudden I hear this loud revving, almost like thunder,' Trotta told The Post about the first night. 'I go to the window, and I can barely see anything until they drove away.' He said Smith would pull up to his driveway late at night in an '89 Chevrolet pick-up truck — which cops confirmed is his vehicle — and on some occasions, got out of his car to deface his political signs, cutting them up and spray painting others. Trotta said the harassment started just days after the killing of two state legislators in Minnesota — leaving the county lawmaker fearing this could lead to a similar situation. 'I was more worried about the safety of my wife and family more than anything,' Trotta told The Post about the harassment campaign. After a second consecutive night of disturbances, Trotta contacted Suffolk police, who installed a discreet license plate reader in his driveway. 3 Smithtown Supervisor Ed Wehrheim. City of Smithtown The very next night, Smith allegedly returned — and the reader flagged his plate, leading to officers tracking him down shortly afterward, according to the local legislator. However, Smith wasn't arrested and charged until the following Monday, after police conducted a full investigation. His arrest comes just one day before the polls were set to open in a primary that would decide the Republican candidate on the ballot for Smithtown Supervisor. Trotta is challenging Wehrheim for the seat he's held for over seven years. 3 A vandalized sign for Suffolk County Legislator Rob Trotta. Suffolk County Legislature Before the arrest, Wehrheim's camp denied any allegations that Smith was involved in any wrongdoing and denounced political harassment, but said the campaign was focused on highlighting the supervisor's record — not engaging in 'distractions.' 'Ed Wehrheim's campaign has been focused on his outstanding record of delivering on promises made over his last 7 and a half years in office as Supervisor,' a spokesperson said. Wehrheim's campaign did not respond to a request for an updated comment after Smith's arrest.
Hamilton Spectator
17 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump heads to the NATO summit on the heels of a possible Israel-Iran ceasefire
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's first appearance at NATO since returning to the White House was supposed to center on how the U.S. secured a historic military spending pledge from others in the defensive alliance — effectively bending it to its will. But in the spotlight instead now is Trump's decision to strike three nuclear enrichment facilities in Iran that the administration says eroded Tehran's nuclear ambitions as well as the president's sudden announcement that Israel and Iran had reached a 'complete and total ceasefire.' The sharp U-turn in hostilities just hours before he was set to depart for the summit is sure to dominate the discussions in The Hague, Netherlands. The impact of the strikes had already begun to shape the summit, with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte dancing around the issue even as hundreds of people showed up in The Hague on Sunday to denounce the conflict in a protest that was supposed to be focused on defense spending. Still, other NATO countries have become accustomed to the unpredictable when it comes to Trump, who has made no secret of his disdain for the alliance, which was created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union. Trump's debut on the NATO stage at the 2017 summit was perhaps most remembered by his shove of Dusko Markovic , the prime minister of Montenegro, as the U.S. president jostled toward the front of the pack of world leaders during a NATO headquarters tour. And he began the 2018 summit by questioning the value of the decades-old military alliance and accusing its members of not contributing enough money for their defense — themes he has echoed since. In Brussels, Trump floated a 4% target of defense spending as a percentage of a country's gross domestic product, a figure that seemed unthinkable at the time. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will also attend the NATO summit this week. She said if Trump does anything to sow division within the alliance, it would benefit Xi Jinping of China, which NATO countries have accused of enabling Russia as it invades Ukraine. 'That does not help America, does not help our national security,' Shaheen said in an interview. 'What it does is hand a victory to our adversaries, and for an administration that claims to be so concerned about the threat from (China), to behave in that way is hard to understand.' Trump heavily telegraphed his attitude toward global alliances during his presidential campaigns. As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that he as president would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defense guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the NATO treaty. And during a campaign rally in 2024, Trump recounted a conversation with another NATO leader during which Trump said he would 'encourage' Russia 'to do whatever the hell they want' to members who weren't meeting the alliance's military spending targets. In The Hague, Trump will want to tout — and take credit for — the pledge to hike military spending, which requires other NATO countries to invest in their defense at an unprecedented scale . The president went as far as to argue that the U.S. should not have to abide by the 5% spending pledge he wants imposed on the other NATO countries. That 5% is effectively divided into two parts. The first, 3.5%, is meant to be made up of traditional military spending such as tanks, warplanes and air defense. What can comprise the remaining 1.5% is a bit fuzzier, but it can include things like roads and bridges that troops could use to travel. According to NATO, the U.S. was spending about 3.4% of its gross domestic product on defense as of 2024. Most NATO countries — with Spain as the key holdout — are preparing to endorse the pledge , motivated not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine to bolster their own defenses but also perhaps appease the United States and its tempestuous leader. 'He hasn't said this in a while, but there are still a lot of worries in Europe that maybe the United States will pull out of NATO, maybe the United States won't honor Article 5,' said Matthew Kroenig, vice president and senior director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security and a former Pentagon official. 'I think there is a real fear among Europeans that we need to deliver for Trump in order to keep the United States engaged in NATO.' Kroenig added: 'Like it or not, I do think Trump's tougher style does get more results.' European allies have taken note of potential signs of a broader U.S. retreat. France and other NATO countries have been concerned that the Trump administration is considering reducing troop levels in Europe and shift them over to the Indo-Pacific, which Cabinet officials have signaled is a higher priority. Still, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker have underscored the U.S.' commitment and have said the Trump administration is only seeking a stronger alliance. 'There's sort of — in some ways — not a coherent view coming from this administration, the Trump administration, about how it sees NATO,' said Max Bergmann, the director of the Europe, Russia and Eurasia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'And right now, Europeans can kind of see what they want from the United States.' The White House has not said which world leaders Trump will meet with at the World Forum in The Hague. It's unclear whether Trump's path will cross with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's; the two leaders were scheduled to meet at the Group of 7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, earlier this month before Trump abruptly cut his trip short and returned to Washington. Rutte has stressed before that Trump's tariff war has no impact on NATO since the alliance doesn't deal with trade. But it will be hard to ignore the issue as the U.S. and the European Union continue to negotiate a trade deal after the U.S. president threatened 50% import taxes on all European goods. Trump has set a July 9 deadline for the U.S. and the 27-country EU to strike a trade deal. But in recent days, he's said the EU had not offered a fair deal as he reiterated his threat to force Europe to 'just pay whatever we say they have to pay.' ___ Associated Press writer Mike Corder in The Hague, Netherlands, contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump heads to the NATO summit on the heels of a possible Israel-Iran ceasefire
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Still, other NATO countries have become accustomed to the unpredictable when it comes to Trump, who has made no secret of his disdain for the alliance, which was created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union. Advertisement Trump's debut on the NATO stage at the 2017 summit was perhaps most remembered by his shove of Dusko Markovic, the prime minister of Montenegro, as the U.S. president jostled toward the front of the pack of world leaders during a NATO headquarters tour. And he began the 2018 summit by questioning the value of the decades-old military alliance and accusing its members of not contributing enough money for their defense — themes he has echoed since. In Brussels, Trump floated a 4% target of defense spending as a percentage of a country's gross domestic product, a figure that seemed unthinkable at the time. Advertisement Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will also attend the NATO summit this week. She said if Trump does anything to sow division within the alliance, it would benefit Xi Jinping of China, which NATO countries have accused of enabling Russia as it invades Ukraine. 'That does not help America, does not help our national security,' Shaheen said in an interview. 'What it does is hand a victory to our adversaries, and for an administration that claims to be so concerned about the threat from (China), to behave in that way is hard to understand.' Trump heavily telegraphed his attitude toward global alliances during his presidential campaigns. As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that he as president would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defense guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the NATO treaty. And during a campaign rally in 2024, Trump recounted a conversation with another NATO leader during which Trump said he would 'encourage' Russia 'to do whatever the hell they want' to members who weren't meeting the alliance's military spending targets. In The Hague, Trump will want to tout — and take credit for — the pledge to hike military spending, which requires other NATO countries to invest in their defense at an unprecedented scale. The president went as far as to argue that the U.S. should not have to abide by the 5% spending pledge he wants imposed on the other NATO countries. Advertisement That 5% is effectively divided into two parts. The first, 3.5%, is meant to be made up of traditional military spending such as tanks, warplanes and air defense. What can comprise the remaining 1.5% is a bit fuzzier, but it can include things like roads and bridges that troops could use to travel. According to NATO, the U.S. was spending about 3.4% of its gross domestic product on defense as of 2024. Most NATO countries — with Spain as the key holdout — are preparing to endorse the pledge, motivated not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine to bolster their own defenses but also perhaps appease the United States and its tempestuous leader. 'He hasn't said this in a while, but there are still a lot of worries in Europe that maybe the United States will pull out of NATO, maybe the United States won't honor Article 5,' said Matthew Kroenig, vice president and senior director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security and a former Pentagon official. 'I think there is a real fear among Europeans that we need to deliver for Trump in order to keep the United States engaged in NATO.' Kroenig added: 'Like it or not, I do think Trump's tougher style does get more results.' European allies have taken note of potential signs of a broader U.S. retreat. France and other NATO countries have been concerned that the Trump administration is considering reducing troop levels in Europe and shift them over to the Indo-Pacific, which Cabinet officials have signaled is a higher priority. Still, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker have underscored the U.S.' commitment and have said the Trump administration is only seeking a stronger alliance. Advertisement 'There's sort of — in some ways — not a coherent view coming from this administration, the Trump administration, about how it sees NATO,' said Max Bergmann, the director of the Europe, Russia and Eurasia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'And right now, Europeans can kind of see what they want from the United States.' The White House has not said which world leaders Trump will meet with at the World Forum in The Hague. It's unclear whether Trump's path will cross with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's; the two leaders were scheduled to meet at the Group of 7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, earlier this month before Trump abruptly cut his trip short and returned to Washington. Rutte has stressed before that Trump's tariff war has no impact on NATO since the alliance doesn't deal with trade. But it will be hard to ignore the issue as the U.S. and the European Union continue to negotiate a trade deal after the U.S. president threatened 50% import taxes on all European goods. Trump has set a July 9 deadline for the U.S. and the 27-country EU to strike a trade deal. But in recent days, he's said the EU had not offered a fair deal as he reiterated his threat to force Europe to 'just pay whatever we say they have to pay.' ___ Associated Press writer Mike Corder in The Hague, Netherlands, contributed to this report.
