
The US commemorates 250th anniversary of the 'great American battle,' the Battle of Bunker Hill
Start with the very name.
'There's something percussive about it: Battle of Bunker Hill,' says prize-winning historian Nathaniel Philbrick, whose 'Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution' was published in 2013. 'What actually happened probably gets hazy for people outside of the Boston area, but it's part of our collective memory and imagination.'
'Few 'ordinary' Americans could tell you that Freeman's Farm, or Germantown, or Guilford Court House were battles,' says Paul Lockhart, a professor of history at Wright University and author of a Bunker Hill book, 'The Whites of Their Eyes," which came out in 2011. "But they can say that Gettysburg,D-Day, and Bunker Hill were battles.'
Bunker Hill, Lockhart adds, 'is the great American battle, if there is such a thing.'
Much of the world looks to the Battles of Lexington and Concord, fought in Massachusetts on April 19, 1775, as the start of the American Revolution. But Philbrick, Lockhart and others cite Bunker Hill and June 17 as the real beginning, the first time British and rebel forces faced off in sustained conflict over a specific piece of territory.
Bunker Hill was an early showcase for two long-running themes in American history — improvisation and how an inspired band of militias could hold their own against an army of professionals.
'It was a horrific bloodletting, and provided the British high command with proof that the Americans were going to be a lot more difficult to subdue than had been hoped,' says the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Rick Atkinson, whose second volume of a planned trilogy on the Revolution, 'The Fate of the Day,' was published in April.
The battle was born in part out of error; rebels were seeking to hold off a possible British attack by fortifying Bunker Hill, a 110-foot-high (34-meter-high) peak in Charlestown across the Charles River from British-occupied Boston. But for reasons still unclear, they instead armed a smaller and more vulnerable ridge known as Breed's Hill, 'within cannon shot of Boston,' Philbrick says. "The British felt they had no choice but to attack and seize the American fort.'
Abigail Adams, wife of future President John Adams, and son John Quincy Adams, also a future president, were among thousands in the Boston area who looked on from rooftops, steeples and trees as the two sides fought with primal rage. A British officer would write home about the 'shocking carnage' left behind, a sight 'that never will be erased out of my mind 'till the day of my death.'
The rebels were often undisciplined and disorganized and they were running out of gunpowder. The battle ended with them in retreat, but not before the British had lost more than 200 soldiers and sustained more than 1,000 casualties, compared to some 450 colonial casualties and the destruction of hundreds of homes, businesses and other buildings in Charlestown. Bunker Hill would become characteristic of so much of the Revolutionary War: a technical defeat that was a victory because the British needed to win decisively and the rebels needed only not to lose decisively.
'Nobody now entertains a doubt but that we are able to cope with the whole force of Great Britain, if we are but willing to exert ourselves,' Thomas Jefferson wrote to a friend in early July. 'As our enemies have found we can reason like men, now let us show them we can fight like men also.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Far-right Israeli minister confronts long-imprisoned Palestinian leader face to face
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — A video widely circulated on Friday shows Israel's far-right national security minister berating a Palestinian leader face-to-face inside a prison, saying anyone who acts against the country will be 'wiped out.' Marwan Barghouti is serving five life sentences after being convicted of involvement in attacks at the height of the Palestinian uprising, or intifada, in the early 2000s. Polls consistently show he is the most popular Palestinian leader. He has rarely been seen since his arrest more than two decades ago. It was unclear when the video was taken, but it shows National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, known for staging provocative encounters with Palestinians, telling Barghouti that he will 'not win.' 'Anyone who murders children, who murders women, we will wipe them out,' Ben-Gvir said. Ben-Gvir's spokesman confirmed the visit and the video's authenticity, but denied that the minister was threatening Barghouti. Barghouti, now in his mid-60s, was a senior leader in President Mahmoud Abbas' secular Fatah movement during the intifada. Many Palestinians see him as a natural successor to the aging and unpopular leader of the Palestinian Authority, which administers parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Israel considers him a terrorist and has shown no sign it would release him. Hamas has demanded his release in exchange for hostages taken in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that triggered the war in the Gaza Strip. In a Facebook post, Barghouti's wife said she couldn't recognize her husband, who appeared frail in the video. Still, she said after watching the video, he remained connected to the Palestinian people. 'Perhaps a part of me does not want to acknowledge everything that your face and body shows, and what you and the prisoners have been through,' wrote Fadwa Al Barghouthi, who spells their last name differently in English. Israeli officials say they have reduced the conditions under which Palestinians are held to the bare minimum allowed under Israeli and international law. Many detainees released as part of a ceasefire in Gaza earlier this year appeared gaunt and ill, and some were taken for immediate medical treatment.


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's assault on universities is a war on thinking
President Trump's assault on liberal ideals in the world's greatest institutions of learning reveals a vacuous anti-intellectual conservatism. His strategy speaks to his MAGA supporters culturally and politically in pushing back against what he calls the 'radical' or 'woke' left. In doing so, he threatens the academic freedoms underpinning the strengths of liberal arts, science and intellectual achievement in America. It is important for me to state upfront that I have built a career defending markets and innovation, and providing evidence against discriminatory preferences rooted in beliefs that benefit one cultural group over the greater good of many. The birth of the modern world lies in a simple idea: Virtue is acquired and not bestowed as fortune to people of rank. This was not easy for conservative people of rank to digest, and fierce battles were fought along the way against institutions supporting colonialism, aristocracy, patriarchy, sexism and homophobia. Acquisition of virtue underscores Machiavelli's advice to a prince in the 15th century questioning class privilege. The notion of virtue was once only available to conservative white men who were propertied and often aristocratic. Being of leisure, they were at liberty to think with a free mind. This was the foundation of the liberal arts in the 17th century. Concerted struggle brought new groups to universities — men from middle and working classes in the 19th century, women in the early 20th century and minorities in the late 20th. However, it was their virtue that elevated the ranks of American academics and their students, leading to great scientific discoveries and human achievement. At the mundane level, their struggles were difficult. Women and minorities in academia faced —and continue to face — sexism, homophobia and racism. Court records on these issues laid out page to page would extend from Maine to California and beyond. For any one case someone might find of a minority being favored, one can find a hundred others who faced discrimination. Many of them were immigrants. Over one-third of the Nobel laureates in economics, chemistry, medicine and physics are immigrants to the U.S. There are nearly 400,000 immigrant professors in the country. American tech leadership, whether in Silicon Valley or in its engineering schools, rests on the hard work (dare I say, Protestant ethic) of immigrants. Given the rampant discrimination that immigrants, women and minorities have faced in higher education, Trump's claim that white Christians are being discriminated against is laughable, manipulative and political. In equating liberal arts with 'radical communism' and other such nonsense, Trump pulls off a masterful deceit. But his lies will never make American great again. Most knowledge is built on principles of science and refinements based on successive waves of evidence. But science is neither easy nor linear in its progress. Galileo, Newton and Darwin debunked extant religious beliefs about the centricity of the Earth and human beings. But the path was convoluted. For example, Darwin's ideas also encouraged beliefs about women and racial minorities being inferior. These ideas eventually lost out, but we kept the best of Darwin. Science is and will always be biased, but its ideas win through evidence and debate, not sanctions or prohibitions on free speech. Trump would have cut off Darwin's science funding, deported Newton and put Galileo on trial for heresy. Paranoid politicians like Trump cannot recognize that science is not about who votes in elections. The Western world has survived such political assaults in the past. Most of us now believe that the Earth is relatively round and that homo sapiens are descended from apes. Since Socrates, ideas have won through the strength of their innovation and debate, to make us see things we had not seen before, or to make the world a better place. Trump, who claims to be supporting abstract ideals such as merit, brings a poisoned chalice to the nation's thinkers. He sanctions us with punitive measures, cuts off our funding, drowns us in lawsuits and floods the academy with his meddlesome government coercions. Debating ideas using evidence or upholding free speech are not Trump's strengths. Bullying and suing people for money are. Trump's actions are those that the world of knowledge has fought from the time of Socrates to that of McCarthyism. One of my German colleagues often tells me that the mistake we make is in assuming that Nazis were dumb. It breaks a professor's heart to see intellectually gifted people such as Ted Cruz (Princeton, Harvard Law School) JD Vance (Ohio State, Yale Law School) or Josh Hawley (Stanford, Yale Law School) lay aside their intellectual capital for the illiberal purposes of undermining our knowledge producers. Liberal arts, science and ideas in general will always threaten those in power. The Trump administration's legal mumbo-jumbo — about Title VI and antisemitism investigations that it employs to shut down knowledge production — has been rightly called out as a war on liberalism, but it is more fundamentally a war on intellectual pursuit. Regulating our universities into safe spaces for MAGA-type conservatism will not make American academia great again. Punishing the gifted to make the vindictive better off is not the same as robbing the rich to pay the poor, as it leaves everyone worse off. This Western liberalism-loving libertarian professor provides the following grades to Trump: A+ for serving hemlock, F- for virtue.


San Francisco Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Far-right Israeli minister confronts long-imprisoned Palestinian leader face to face
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — A video widely circulated on Friday shows Israel's far-right national security minister berating a Palestinian leader face-to-face inside a prison, saying anyone who acts against the country will be 'wiped out.' Marwan Barghouti is serving five life sentences after being convicted of involvement in attacks at the height of the Palestinian uprising, or intifada, in the early 2000s. Polls consistently show he is the most popular Palestinian leader. He has rarely been seen since his arrest more than two decades ago. It was unclear when the video was taken, but it shows National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, known for staging provocative encounters with Palestinians, telling Barghouti that he will 'not win." "Anyone who murders children, who murders women, we will wipe them out," Ben-Gvir said. Ben-Gvir's spokesman confirmed the visit and the video's authenticity, but denied that the minister was threatening Barghouti. Barghouti, now in his mid-60s, was a senior leader in President Mahmoud Abbas' secular Fatah movement during the intifada. Many Palestinians see him as a natural successor to the aging and unpopular leader of the Palestinian Authority, which administers parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Israel considers him a terrorist and has shown no sign it would release him. Hamas has demanded his release in exchange for hostages taken in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that triggered the war in the Gaza Strip. In a Facebook post, Barghouti's wife said she couldn't recognize her husband, who appeared frail in the video. Still, she said after watching the video, he remained connected to the Palestinian people. 'Perhaps a part of me does not want to acknowledge everything that your face and body shows, and what you and the prisoners have been through,' wrote Fadwa Al Barghouthi, who spells their last name differently in English. Israeli officials say they have reduced the conditions under which Palestinians are held to the bare minimum allowed under Israeli and international law. Many detainees released as part of a ceasefire in Gaza earlier this year appeared gaunt and ill, and some were taken for immediate medical treatment.