Israeli strikes on south kill two, including child
Israel launched a series of air strikes on southern Lebanon on Wednesday night, killing two people including a child.
The strikes wounded at least three people according to the health ministry.
An Israeli strike on the southern town of Toulin killed one person and wounded another, the health ministry said, adding later that another person of Syrian nationality was killed and two were wounded in a separate strike on Deir Seryan.
The Israeli military said it struck "weapons storage facilities, a missile launcher and Hezbollah terrorist infrastructure which stored engineering tools that allowed for the re-establishment of terrorist infrastructure in the area".
Hezbollah said Israel must halt the attacks before any domestic debate about its weapons and a new defense strategy could begin.
The strikes come ahead of a cabinet meeting scheduled for Thursday to continue talks on Hezbollah disarmament.
The government had tasked the army in an earlier session Tuesday with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by year end. The plan is to be presented to the government by the end of August for discussion and approval.
Hezbollah said it would treat the decision "as if it did not exist", accusing the cabinet of committing a "grave sin". It "fully serves Israel's interests and leaves Lebanon exposed to the Israeli enemy without any deterrence", the group said.
The Amal movement, headed by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, accused the government of "rushing to offer more gratuitous concessions" to Israel when it should have sought to end the ongoing attacks.
It called Thursday's cabinet meeting "an opportunity for correction".
Hezbollah opponent the Lebanese Forces, one of the country's two main Christian parties, said the cabinet's decision to disarm the militant group was "a pivotal moment in Lebanon's modern history -- a long-overdue step toward restoring full state authority and sovereignty".
The Free Patriotic Movement, the other major Christian party and a former ally of Hezbollah, said it was in favor of the army receiving the group's weapons "to strengthen Lebanon's defensive power".
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a televised interview that any decision on disarmament "will ultimately rest with Hezbollah itself".
"We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions," he added, noting that the group had "rebuilt itself" following setbacks during its war with Israel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
2 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Interfaith meeting in Aley brings together district's diverse religious leaders
BEIRUT — A significant multi-confessional meeting was held in Aley district's Bater village on Friday at the invitation of sheikh Kamel Daher of the Zreigate Arab tribe, in an occasion meant to mark the strength of the relationships between the region's diverse residents. Attendees included Mount Lebanon Governor Mohammed Mekkaoui, Druze Sheikh Aql Sami Abi al-Mona; Druze leaders Teymour Joumblatt and Talal Arslan; as well as representatives from the Lebanese Forces; representative Youssef Deaibes from the Interior Ministry; a representative of the mufti of the Republic, Abdellatif Deriane; as well as mayors from various Aley municipalities; and local, security and religious figures. Daher emphasized unity between the region's residents, particularly among members of the Arab tribes, Druze, Sunnis and Christians. "We were and will remain one and the same family, whatever the difficulties," he said during the meeting. "And our homes will remain open to all Lebanese." In light of last month's deadly clashes between Druze and Bedouin fighters, and then later Syrian state forces, in southern Syria, Daher praised the "wisdom of political and religious dignitaries, especially Druze leader Walid Joumblatt, Dar al-Fatwa [the highest Sunni authority], and Druze Sheikh Aql, in facing the painful events in Sweida, Syria." Sunni and Druze authorities in Lebanon have ardently emphasized cooperation and unity, nervous that the sectarian violence — in which more than 1,300 people were killed — might spill over into Lebanon. But on the ground, the community's positions with regards to the brutal fighting in Sweida are much more complicated. Within the Lebanese Druze community, the political rivalry between the two Druze leaders Walid Joumblatt and Talal Arslan — enemy cousins whose family names are steeped in history —h as worsened since the May 2018 parliamentary elections, after which Emir Arslan, allied with the Free Patriotic Movement and Hezbollah, received a ministerial portfolio, much to the dismay of the PSP leader, who hoped to appoint all three Druze ministers in the government himself. These tensions were compounded in 2021 by those between the Arab tribes, known for their closeness to former Sunni leader Saad Hariri, and Hezbollah.
L'Orient-Le Jour
2 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
NGO denounces human rights violations against repatriated Syrian refugees
The Access Center for Human Rights (ACHR) an NGO dedicated to human rights advocacy, released a report on Friday detailing its findings on four cases of human rights violations against Syrian refugees who were recently voluntarily repatriated, highlighting, it warned, "that Syria is still not safe." Having followed four cases of Syrians who had recently returned to their country after the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024, ACHR found that some had been killed and others had died in detention and were later found with signs of torture. Others still were victims of enforced disappearances or arbitrarily detained upon their return to Syria, with no further contact with their families, the report explains. The NGO also highlighted various other risks and dangers that "continue to shape the country's security landscape," even after the Assad family's removal from power. These security threats have a "profound impact on the daily lives of Syrians," the report reads, and "influence how refugees assess their willingness to return to their country." Included in the report are the massacres and sectarian violence that has broken out since December, specifically targeting Alawites and Druze. These episodes of bloody violence have marked a fragile transition period in which the new authorities' most urgent and challenging task has been to establish security in the country. In the largely Alawite region along the Syrian coast, about 1,700 people were killed in sectarian violence last March, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). Fighting between Druze and Bedouin tribes also spread in July in Sweida and was compounded by attempts from state security forces who intervened in the fighting but ended up locked in battle with Druze fighters themselves. These clashes resulted in more than 1,400 deaths, according to SOHR. Since December 2024, Syrians have been "optimistic" about their return to the country, but many remain "concerned about the prevailing uncertainty, especially regarding security," the report notes, citing a study of a sample of 214 refugees in Lebanon. The document "clarifies the return intentions of Syrian refugees in Lebanon, indicating that only 12 percent of respondents planned to return to Syria and 50 percent said they did not wish to return." The NGO also cites another study on intentions to return conducted by the International Rescue Committee (IRC) among more than 3,000 Syrian households (representing more than 17,000 Syrian refugees in Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey), which reached similar conclusions. According to that study, 29 percent currently intend to return to their country and the majority remain undecided (37 percent) or have no intention to return at all (34 percent). The report concludes with a quote from the United Nations Deputy Special Representative, Najat Rochdi: "The risks of a renewed escalation in the region are not hypothetical; they are immediate, serious, and risk undermining fragile progress toward peace and reconstruction in Syria."
L'Orient-Le Jour
2 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
'Coup d'etat' claims and Shiite ministers' criticism: Lebanese press reacts to adoption of the 'Barrack Plan'
Thursday's Cabinet meeting — during which Prime Minister Nawaf Salam's cabinet adopted the 'goals' of a roadmap proposed by U.S. envoy Tom Barrack to restore calm between Lebanon and Israel — divided the Lebanese press. Some outlets welcomed the move, while others harshly criticized the authorities. To signal their disapproval, all Shiite ministers withdrew from the meeting before the vote, including Amal and Hezbollah ministers, as well as Fadi Makki, who is neither affiliated with Hezbollah nor the Amal Movement. The U.S. roadmap calls for 'gradually ending the armed presence of all non-state factions, including Hezbollah, throughout Lebanese territory, both south and north of the Litani,' among 11 measures intended to ensure proper implementation of cease-fire modalities in effect since November 2024. On Friday morning, Nidaa al-Watan, close to the Lebanese Forces (LF), ran a photo of the Shiite ministers who left the Cabinet meeting, with a headline accusing them of 'breaking with the national consensus.' The newspaper claimed the Shiite ministers were receiving instructions via WhatsApp during the session: 'It appeared they were torn between participating in the discussion and consulting instructions received on WhatsApp.' The daily An-Nahar also welcomed the government's decision, headlining: 'The decisive resolution progresses, and the Barrack plan overcomes obstacles.' The newspaper noted that despite their opposition, Hezbollah and Amal did not, this time, resign and withdraw from government, as they did in 2006 following failed talks on forming a national unity government under then-Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. Meanwhile, the moderate daily al-Joumhouriya took a more nuanced tone, noting that the withdrawal of Shiite ministers from Cabinet for the second time exposed the government to a 'disruption of the balance of the National Pact.' 'Bin Farhan government' and American diktats On the other side of the political spectrum, criticism of the government was particularly harsh. Al-Akhbar, close to Hezbollah, described the session as a 'coup d'état,' a term the publication had already used earlier in the week. 'Barrack congratulated Aoun and Salam on the coup d'état,' the newspaper wrote, dubbing the Cabinet the 'Bin Farhan government,' referring to Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud. 'Lebanon remains under the grip of the coup d'état led by Presidents Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam during the ministerial session on Aug. 5,' the newspaper said, adding it was a 'complete capitulation to American-Saudi diktats.' Similarly, Addiyar, once considered close to ousted Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's regime, said the principles of the 'National Pact' had fallen for the first time under the current presidential term's first government. 'This is an early warning that will have consequences if the country sinks further into divisions because of submission to American diktats, with Washington having succeeded in transferring the problem onto the Lebanese domestic scene,' Addiyar wrote. As for the publication al-Bina, affiliated with the Syrian Social Nationalist Party (SSNP), an ally of Hezbollah, it denounced the adoption of the roadmap, saying it proved that 'talk of sovereignty in government rhetoric is merely a slogan used for marketing, promotion, and diversion purposes.'
