After rebuttal from Ong Ye Kung on Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre, KF Seetoh invites him to ‘Kopi… so u get a fuller picture'
SINGAPORE: Health Minister Ong Ye Kung took to Facebook to respond to posts from food guru KF Seetoh about conditions for stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre. Mr Ong has been representing Sembawang Central in Parliament for the past 10 years, and the hawker centre is part of his ward.
On Aug 4, Mr Seetoh put up a social media post alleging that stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre were being charged S$70 each month for a space at the back of each stall for a blue supplier basket.
'$70 a mth just to use that space suppliers use to leave hawkers' orders for the day. Atrocious!
What part of which heaven gave Canopy Hawkers Group Ltd, the gall to charge willy nilly as a social enterprise hawker cte management to do this?' he asked.
Four days later, he put up another post that said stallholders were 'contractually obligated' to offer 60 free meals each month, as well as budget meals costing S$3 to S$3.50
'Hawkers seem to be the ones obliged to help the poor and disadvantaged. Some don't mind helping; they know what it's like to struggle, but it's not just for the poor, even Elon and Gates are entitled to it,' wrote the Makansutra founder.
On Tuesday (Aug 11), Mr Ong said that while he acknowledged Mr Seetoh's 'concern for our hawkers and shared his passion for keeping our hawker culture alive and thriving,' he sought to clarify both points.
He said there was 'no such practice' of charging $$70 a month for the use of the blue basket at the back of their stalls. Moreover, the allegation that hawkers need to provide 60 free meals per month 'does not present the full picture.'
Mr Ong explained that stallholders had initially agreed to provide 30 meals a month for low-income residents when the hawker centre first opened, which was later adjusted to 100 meals over the three-year duration of their lease.
'There are no penalties if they do not or are unable to provide the meals. This simple, well-intentioned initiative was meant to encourage our hawkers to 'Pay-It-Forward.' In any case, the initiative has yet to commence,' he added.
An hour later, Mr Seetoh put up another post, thanking Mr Ong for his response, but adding that he would 'Love to Kopi with you on this so u get a fuller picture.'
He noted that the 60 free meals the hawkers are being asked to give are in stallholders' contracts and that he had been told about the charge for the blue baskets by a smallholder at the hawker centre who had 'no reason to make this up. I have seen the invoice n receipt of payment for it. It's called a Backyard Cluster. I'll show it to you if need be.'
He also suggested that Mr Ong have a look at the stallholders' contracts to 'see if any of the points of contract contradict the roles a socially responsible hawker cte management team should practice and implement.'
'It is a proud and unique hawker food culture we have that even UNESCO recognizes. We can certainly do more for its sustainable future, its potentials and opportunities,' added Mr Seetoh. /TISG
Read also: 'Retailers, hawkers and restaurants need to survive' — KF Seetoh says Urban Hawker NYC costs less to run than Orchard Road, MBS food halls
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
6 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘This doesn't sound feasible at all': Netizens clash over Malaysia's push for cross-border e-hailing
JOHOR BAHRU: Malaysia's Transport Minister Anthony Loke told parliament that the country is ready to hold discussions with Singapore on legalising cross-border e-hailing between Johor and the city-state, but only if both sides agree. Loke's comments, reported by Bernama on Aug 18, came shortly after Malaysian authorities seized four private vehicles suspected of being used illegally for e-hailing. He noted that Singapore has also been enforcing its own rules against Johor drivers entering without proper permits, and stressed that Malaysia was reciprocating. The minister said that while Putrajaya is keen to explore a 'better long-term solution' to improve connectivity across the Causeway, the move cannot be unilateral. He added that he had previously raised the issue with Singapore's then-Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat, but Singapore had been unwilling to discuss it further at the time. Singapore's Land Transport Authority (LTA), in a statement cited by Mothership , confirmed that officials from both countries met on Aug 1 to discuss cross-border services, but reiterated that while they remain open to ideas to ease travel, they currently have 'no plan to fully liberalise cross-border point-to-point transport via ride-hail services.' See also M'sian Transport Minister Anthony Loke, "We stand by our position' At present, only the reciprocal Cross Border Taxi Scheme is allowed, which permits up to 200 taxis from each side to ferry passengers between Singapore and Johor, a scheme that remains underutilised. Read related: LTA clears the air on cross-border e-hailing: Only licensed taxis, not Grab-style services Frustrations spill online The announcement reignited a heated online debate, with netizens from both sides of the Causeway weighing in. For many Malaysians, the issue reflects the frustration of costly and limited options when crossing the border. Some believe Singapore is too protective of its own drivers, prioritising domestic taxi operators at the expense of smoother connectivity. One Facebook commenter bluntly argued that 'Just improve the SG-JB cross-border service. JB taxis can pick up anywhere in JB, but have a few pickup points in SG, and vice versa.' Others dismissed Singapore's reluctance as being driven by protectionism, saying that Singapore commuters already benefit from Johor's lower prices in other sectors. See also ADB praises Dr Mahathir for efficient use of public funds At the same time, some Malaysians also recognised the practical hurdles. 'This doesn't sound feasible at all,' one netizen said, pointing to the complexity of licensing, insurance, and taxation requirements for drivers who would be operating across two jurisdictions. Read related: 'If it's illegal, how can you start an association?': Netizens weigh in on Malaysian drivers' push for cross-border ride-hailing Singaporean concerns On the Singapore side, comments were sharper and often laced with sarcasm. Many joked about the potential chaos of liberalising cross-border Grab rides, warning of massive jams if thousands of e-hailing vehicles were allowed to flood the Causeway. 'Pay enough tax and we'll talk about it,' one commenter said, underscoring the sentiment that Malaysian drivers should not get access to Singapore's lucrative market without contributing equally to regulatory and tax obligations. Another Singaporean netizen quipped: 'Maybe they should pay $500 entry per day and buy local insurance, then we'll discuss.' The remark highlights not only the protectionist instinct but also the broader concern that the Singapore government would be forced to subsidise enforcement and insurance liabilities if foreign drivers were allowed free access. See also Indonesia, Malaysia banking on technological revolution A clash of perspectives The reactions reflect a deep divide: Malaysians see cross-border e-hailing as a way to improve convenience and affordability, while many Singaporeans view it as an impractical and potentially disruptive idea. This also highlights the issues of mobility and fairness across the Causeway, where differences in currency, wages, and regulations spark these disputes. For now, the Cross Border Taxi Scheme remains the only approved mechanism that allows these drivers to go back and forth across the Causeway. But with both sides under pressure from commuters and drivers alike, the conversation around cross-border ride-hailing is unlikely to fade anytime soon. Read also: 'No bus at all': Commuters endure long, miserable waits as public transport falls short
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
Netanyahu escalates attack on Australia's Albanese as Jewish group urges calm
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Last week, Mr Albanese said the Israeli prime minister was 'in denial' about the humanitarian situation in Gaza. SYDNEY - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Aug 21 stepped up his personal attacks on Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese over his government's decision to recognise a Palestinian state , saying Mr Albanese's political record had been damaged forever. Diplomatic ties between Australia and Israel have soured since Albanese's centre-left Labor government last week announced it would conditionally recognise Palestinian statehood, following similar moves by France, Britain and Canada. The decision prompted Mr Netanyahu to launch a personal attack on Mr Albanese and he doubled down on his condemnation in an interview to be broadcast on Sky News Australia. 'I think his record is forever tarnished by the weakness that he showed in the face of this Hamas terrorist monsters,' Mr Netanyahu said, after describing Albanese earlier this week as 'a weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews .' Sky News Australia released the comments ahead of the broadcast of the full interview on Aug 21 at 8pm (6pm Singapore time). Mr Albanese on Aug 20 played down Mr Netanyahu's criticisms , saying he did not 'take these things personally' and that he treated the leaders of other countries with respect. Last week, Mr Albanese said the Israeli prime minister was 'in denial' about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, where the UN has warned of the risk of widespread starvation and international pressure is growing for Israel to allow unrestricted aid into the territory. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore Parliament releases seating plan for 15th term: Find out who is sitting where Singapore 3 people taken to hospital after fire at Bukit Purmei flat Singapore 3 Sengkang Green Primary pupils suspended for bullying classmate, with 1 of them caned: MOE Singapore Police looking for car driver after hit-and-run incident with lorry in Kallang Singapore Alleged vape seller faces new charge after he was found with more than 190 Kpods Singapore Continuing to ensure credibility non-negotiable for Straits Times: Editor Jaime Ho Singapore There's no 'I' in team: What PM Wong's National Day Rally message means for Singapore Life Why should we bear the burden of budget meals and app discounts, some hawkers ask The Executive Council of Australian Jewry in separate letters sent on Aug 20 to both leaders urged them to discuss differences through diplomacy rather than public posturing. 'We write to express our deep dismay and concern at the recent 'war of words',' the letters said. 'If things need to be said publicly, they should be said using measured and seemly language befitting national leaders. Australia and Israel are mature democracies and their governments need to act accordingly,' the council said. Israel this week revoked the visas of Australian diplomats to the Palestinian Authority after Mr Albanese's government cancelled the visa of an Israeli lawmaker over remarks it considered controversial and inflammatory. Mr Netanyahu has been facing global pressure over Israel's military offensive in the Gaza Strip, which has killed at least 60,000 Palestinians according to the enclave's health ministry, and displaced most of the population. Israel's military announced the first steps of an operation to take control of Gaza City on Aug 20, calling up tens of thousands of reservists despite many of Israel's closest allies calling for it to reconsider. The offensive began after Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 more hostage. Israel is currently considering a new ceasefire proposal. REUTERS
Independent Singapore
8 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
80% of Singaporeans say nationality is the strongest marker of Singapore identity: IPS survey
Photo: Depositphotos/ Shadow_of_light (for illustration purposes only) SINGAPORE: Nationality continues to be the strongest marker of Singaporean identity, but religion has now risen to second place in importance, ahead of language and race, according to the latest survey by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS). The survey, conducted from April to August last year among 4,000 Singapore residents, found that nearly 80 per cent of respondents viewed nationality as the most important component of their identity. Close to 74 per cent considered religious belief to be important or very important, marking a significant jump from 69 per cent in 2013, when religion ranked fourth in priority. The study highlighted that religion carries particular weight among Muslims in Singapore. Nearly 60 per cent of Muslim respondents described religion as a very important part of their identity. This is a higher proportion compared to respondents from other faiths. The findings also indicate that there is a growing desire among Singaporeans to understand their own religious beliefs. See also Lawrence Wong urges people to heed quarantine, travel advisories In 2018, 70.6 per cent of respondents indicated this interest, rising to 73.1 per cent in the most recent survey. More respondents also said they derived a sense of belonging from their faith. () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
