Lone wolf threats loom for July 4 celebrations: Agencies warn of potential attacks nationwide – what we know so far
In a joint bulletin issued in late June, the FBI, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and other agencies noted that individuals acting alone or in small groups are most likely to attempt attacks at high-profile events such as the Macy's 4th of July Fireworks. Officials said these attackers are driven by a wide range of racial, ethnic, political, religious, anti-government, societal, or personal grievances.
However, the agencies warned that the threat is not limited to New York.
Other large gatherings nationwide could also become targets. The assessment stated that special events with high attendance and extensive media coverage remain attractive to domestic and foreign terrorists and violent extremists seeking to cause mass casualties or draw attention to their causes.
Authorities clarified that they had not received any specific threats against the fireworks show or related events.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
Nonetheless, they cautioned that such high-profile occasions often attract malicious actors looking for opportunities to perpetrate criminal schemes.
The bulletin's release follows similar warnings issued before other major events, including the recent New Year's Day attack in New Orleans. Officials expressed concern that copycat attacks inspired by the January 1 vehicle-ramming in the French Quarter could occur.
That attack killed 14 people when a Texas-born Army veteran drove a 6,000-pound truck into a crowd of revellers. The assailant, who was killed in a shootout with police, had recorded videos mentioning his divorce and claiming allegiance to ISIS.
Authorities also linked the current threat environment to tensions over the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza. They observed that recent attacks motivated partly by this conflict have targeted locations with symbolic links to Israel, including houses of worship.
Officials warned that individuals with grievances related to the war might view large gatherings like Independence Day celebrations as symbols of the West and therefore as potential targets.
The assessment cited last month's firebomb attack in Boulder, Colorado, which targeted demonstrators supporting Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Dozens were injured, and an 82-year-old woman died. Officials described this as the most recent act of terrorist violence in the US motivated by the Israel-Hamas conflict, following the May attack that killed two Israeli embassy staff in Washington, DC.
Additionally, the agencies highlighted the potential risk posed by drones. While there was no credible or specific intelligence indicating plans to use unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to target the Macy's fireworks, officials said unauthorized drone operations could increase public safety risks, delay events, and disrupt law enforcement operations.
They noted that although most drones are flown legally by hobbyists, they have also been used for terrorist and criminal acts abroad. State and nonstate actors have modified short-range drones to conduct surveillance, drop small munitions, or carry explosives to targets in conflict zones. The agencies warned that such malicious use of drones poses potential risks to spectators, volunteers, security personnel, and first responders at major public events.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US millionaire hunter gored to death: Social media hails buffalo as hero
In a dramatic twist of fate that has reignited fierce debate on the ethics of big-game hunting, American trophy hunter Asher Watkins, 52, was fatally gored by a Cape buffalo—often dubbed the 'Black Death'—during a licensed safari in Limpopo, South Africa, on August 3, 2025. Watkins, a Texas-based millionaire and self-proclaimed 'adventure conservationist,' had built a prominent online presence showcasing his trophy kills from across the globe. But this time, nature struck back. The buffalo, one of Africa's most formidable and unpredictable animals, charged while being tracked and instantly killed him—a rare reversal that quickly turned into a viral morality tale. Public voices split, but the internet takes the buffalo's side Within hours, news of Watkins' death exploded across social media platforms, where reactions ranged from sympathy to savage criticism. While some viewed his death as a tragic accident, many celebrated it as karmic justice. 'He deserved his fate. He travelled the planet killing for fun. Hope the buffalo wasn't harmed,' one user commented. 'Karma at its finest. The hunted finally fought back,' another quipped. The phrase 'when the hunter becomes the hunted' trended widely, with users across platforms framing the incident as a reckoning moment for those who glorify killing animals for sport. The wall at the buffaloes house — Chloe Of Now (@ChloeOfNow) August 6, 2025 Online sentiment: The buffalo as a symbol of justice A clear shift in public sentiment emerged—sympathy poured not for the fallen millionaire, but for the buffalo. On Reddit and Facebook, users dubbed the animal a symbol of wild justice and resistance. One Redditor wrote: 'Sounds like perfectly justifiable self-defence on the buffalo's part.' 'To kill for sport is despicable. Love this buffalo for taking out the trash.' 'He came to my territory uninvited' — Pfarelo (@PfareloMulondo) August 7, 2025 Viral memes, commentary threads, and wildlife advocacy pages echoed the same sentiment: it was nature's turn to win. From blood sport to backlash: the ethics of hunting under fire While defenders of trophy hunting pointed to the economic benefits such safaris bring to local communities and conservation efforts, critics were quick to dismiss those arguments, calling them smokescreens for cruelty. The tragic end of a man who once boasted about taking down lions and elephants became a catalyst for reflection on the legitimacy of these 'hunts' in the modern age. Posts questioned why such practices still receive legal sanction and tourist support. One wildlife conservation page remarked: 'It's telling that the world mourns the buffalo, not the man. That says everything about where we are in 2025.' Digital-age morality tale The social media narrative following the incident has evolved into more than just a viral news cycle—it's a morality play for the digital age. It reveals changing global attitudes toward wildlife, colonial legacies in safari culture, and the growing consensus that the right to life doesn't end at the species line. In the end, this was not just a story about a man's tragic death—it became a symbol of resistance. And on that front, the internet has spoken loudly and clearly: it stands with the buffalo.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
#ByInvitation: When hooliganism masquerades as culture, our silence is complicity
When hooliganism masquerades as culture, our silence is complicity It starts with a few isolated, sporadic incidents, which may even go unnoticed. By the time citizens wake up to them, the fanaticism and bigotry takes on gigantic proportions. I am referring to the recent spate of intolerance for food habits and languages and the verbal and physical violence perpetrated by miscreants in different parts of India. In different states, whenever reported or caught on camera, criminal cases have been registered by the police against such culprits. But a large number of incidents still seem to go unreported. Such miscreants are aware of the slow criminal justice system in our country and exploit the fact that trials would be conducted many years after a brutal incident – and that the chances of acquittal are high. Latest data from the National Crime Records Bureau (2022) shows that promoting enmity between different groups has a conviction rate of only around 37%. Wrongful restraint/confinement and causing hurt have conviction rates of 27% and 30%, respectively. Many victims do not want to pursue their complaints, fearing retaliation. Witness protection programmes are not well developed in India. The Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita has introduced Section 103 (2) for mob lynching and expanded the definition of Section 153(A) of the old IPC as Section 196 of the BNS. The Act has enhanced punishment from three years to five years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Remarkable Pictures from the Moments That Made History Undo Unfortunately, legislation is in stark contrast to the ground reality — and most culprits tend to get away. Law enforcement agencies like the police are ineffective till citizens join them against disruptive ruffians. The Constitution of India prohibits discrimination based on 'religion, caste, sex or place of birth'. It defends the right of citizens to preserve their culture and does not permit any one to impose their particular values on others. Article 21 of the Constitution as interpreted by the judiciary not only means right to life but to 'life with dignity.' But in many parts of the country, exactly the opposite is taking place. If a particular section of the society does not eat non-vegetarian food during the month of Shravan, it gives them no authority to stop others from eating the same. Mobsters have started checking shops, restaurants, delivery services and are also imposing their language preferences on others. One wonders if there are self-seeking political actors who encourage them and promise a 'good return' for violent shows of religious, linguistic and cultural dominance. As a civil society, if we do not raise our voices now, such shows of dominance on the streets may soon reach our own doors. These law-breakers have no sensitivity towards the privacy of citizens. For them, the Constitution that sanctifies equality and diversity is itself a scurrilous document. They do not believe in the values that have sustained us; cultural richness and inclusion are 'elitist' phrases for them, while they brand their hooliganism as 'earthy'. Most Indians are open-minded by nature; we appreciate our diversity. They are busy earning their livelihood and any kind of violence and vandalism that disrupts their normal life is abhorred. It is the responsibility of those who are comfortably placed to build a strong public opinion against cruelty in the name of religion, language and culture. The frequency of such incidents is a wake-up call to all right-thinking people. If we do not want India to become a banana republic and if we respect the rights of diverse communities, we need to raise our collective voice against the unconstitutional acts of the raucous rowdy. Or as Niemoller said: '…Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me' Agree? Disagree? Write to us at: byinvitation@timesofi The views expressed by the author are personal
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Palestinian ex-footballer killed by Israeli forces in Gaza
Former Palestine national team player Suleiman al-Obeid, known as the "Palestinian Pele", has been killed by Israeli gunfire in the Gaza Strip, the sport's local governing body said. Obeid, 41, was killed Wednesday when Israeli forces "targeted people waiting for humanitarian aid in the southern Gaza Strip", the Palestinian Football Association (PFA) said in a statement. With Gaza in the throes of a hunger crisis, the UN rights office said last month that Israeli forces had killed more than 1,300 Palestinians trying to get food aid in the territory since late May. An ex-star of the Khadamat Al-Shati club in Gaza, Obeid played 24 international matches for team Palestine, the PFA said. "During his long career, Al-Obeid scored more than 100 goals, making him one of the brightest stars of Palestinian football," it added. The midfielder also played for the Al-Amari Youth Center Club in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967. While living there in 2010, Obeid was among six players on the national team from Gaza who were turned back at the Jordanian border for "security reasons" on their way to a friendly in Mauritania. An Israeli security official said at the time that the players had failed to renew special permits allowing them to play in the West Bank. "When I heard that we would be forbidden from travelling I was very upset, because any athlete dreams of wearing his national jersey in international forums," Obeid told AFP in 2010.
