Let's stand up for our countryside and fight the march of the pylons
Scotland's most wild and beautiful spaces are being raped and we're too busy watching the latest episode of Love Island to care.
A friend recently criticised my objections to these massive pylons, saying: "I can't support the outrage of usually quite well-off people upset that their view may be spoiled". Quite apart from the fact that most of the people in the Borders hamlet of Yarrow Feus that Ms Goring refers to are not particularly well-off – locals include a nurse, a plumber, a rep for a roller blind firm and a retired teacher – it's not about individuals. It's about preserving the exquisite beauty of Scotland's landscape for future generations and about making sure we all have access to it.
There are countries with higher mountains and more dramatic waterfalls but few with the unique play of light and shade, the complex mix of the rugged and the peaceful that we have in Scotland.
Destroying the beauty of our countryside is like tearing our own lungs out, yet our governments have allowed this to happen all over the Highlands and Islands and the west of Scotland. Keir Starmer's so-called Labour Government intends to build on Green Belt land and actually included in its manifesto the commitment to force through planning consents over local opposition. Democracy is dead in this country – SPEN has not had its plans knocked back in 15 years.
Isn't it time we started protecting our country instead of sacrificing it for big business?
Jean Rafferty, Amble, Morpeth.
Read more letters
Will Scotland change tack?
Gerard Quinn's letter (June 25) is a reminder that the debate about assisted dying isn't over, despite legislation allowing it having been passed by the UK Parliament and progressing at the Scottish Parliament. The Westminster vote was close, with 314 votes for and 291 against, a majority of only 23. However, a closer look reveals that's not the full picture.
The legislation approved by the House of Commons applies to England and Wales only, not to Scotland and Northern Ireland. On that basis, the SNP and some Northern Ireland MPs didn't take part in the vote; other parties did. The votes of MPs from Scotland and Northern Ireland MPs were 18 for and 38 against, with one MP (Wendy Chamberlain, North East Fife) having voted both ways.
Subtracting those votes from the totals, MPs representing constituencies in England and Wales voted 296 for and 253 against, a much clearer majority of 43. The smaller majority actually recorded does raise the question of why MPs representing constituents who aren't affected by the legislation thought it appropriate to take part in the vote. What happened to "English votes for English laws"?
Among MPs representing Scottish constituencies, there were 17 for and 29 against. This differs markedly from the Stage One vote last month at Holyrood, which saw 70 MSPs back the bill and 56 oppose it. I wonder if that majority will hold up all the way to Stage Three.
Doug Maughan, Dunblane.
Politicians, have a drink
Stephen Smith (Letters, June 26) accuses the powers that be of conducting a dishonest war on alcohol. This must be the politicians or bureaucrats; certainly not the medical profession.
Having entered my ninth decade on this planet, I have benefited for a number of years from an annual "MOT" from our overworked, but wonderful, NHS. At each "inspection" I am asked how much alcohol I drink. With a mock shamefaced look on my face, I truthfully inform the doctor or nurse that I am exceeding the Government's target by 100%, averaging between 25 and 30 units per week. After all, that is only one large glass of red wine with my evening meal and one large malt whisky before bed.
I have to say that no medical professional has met this confession with any suggestion that my intake is excessive. Perhaps the politicians would benefit from sharing a drink or two (and some wisdom) with a group of practising clinicians.
Eric Begbie, Stirling.
What makes for excessive consumption of alcohol? (Image: PA)
On the wrong track?
Intriguing though it was to read about "safeguarding patrollers" being deployed to improve safety on the railway network in Scotland ("Patrollers being introduced at train stations across Scotland in safety move", The Herald, June 26), would it not be worthwhile to consider solving security and safety issues more simply by staffing all the railway stations?
AJ Clarence, Prestwick.
A pair of pears
"Go pear-shaped" is the answer to clue 12 across in this week's Radio Times crossword, the clue being "Fail to start looking fruity? ( 2, 4-6)".
Some two hours after solving the puzzle, I find myself watching an early edition of Midsomer Murders, and hearing a character talking about the local mill project going pear-shaped.
I wonder whether readers of a statistical bent can suggest the odds on reading or hearing little-used words and phrases repeated within such a short period of time.
David Miller, Milngavie.
A bee in my bonnet
I'm getting a bit worried about myself in these dotage years.
In the 100 years ago section of "From Our Archives" today (The Herald, June 25) I read that a swarm of bees had caused a bit of consternation in Greenock, until a beekeeper successfully 'skepped' them.
Instead of just accepting this, I had to investigate 'skepped' and your readers will have the benefit of my research to now know that a 'skep' is a type of beehive. I can rest easy now.
Eric Macdonald, Paisley.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
20 minutes ago
- The National
Labour's 'minor' U-turn will leave benefits system 'woefully inadequate'
Ian Greaves, who edits the Disability Rights Handbook containing in-depth information on the social security system across the UK, has hit out at Labour figures and the mainstream media for branding the climbdown 'massive' when the concessions are 'minor and technical'. After more than 100 Labour MPs threatened to rebel against the government on cuts to disability benefits, the Labour UK Government has performed a partial U-turn on its proposals. People who currently receive Personal Independence Payments (PIP), or the health element of Universal Credit, will continue to do so. READ MORE: We investigate the state of the welfare state – read our new series But planned cuts will still hit future claimants from November next year. It means anyone who does not score four or more points in one of the activities assessed for the PIP daily living component will not receive it if they apply after November 2026. Staggering statistics supplied by the DWP show this would leave almost half of claimants who suffer with multiple sclerosis ineligible. Greaves told The National he was expecting much more significant changes to be proposed and is surprised MPs like Meg Hillier (below) – whose amendment against the cuts was signed by almost 130 Labour MPs – are now suggesting the changes are a 'real breakthrough' and a 'good step forward'. (Image: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) 'I'm surprised that the concessions have been so limited, I was genuinely expecting something more substantial,' he said. 'I thought they'd move on the points. I thought the kind of concession they would make is to say if you get 10 or 12 points or more, that four-point rule doesn't apply to you anymore. 'It had been indicated to us they might be considering something like that and that would have been a significant concession.' Asked if he would urge Labour MPs to still reject the legislation next week, he said: 'Absolutely. I would urge them to look at the reasons they rejected it in the first place. 'These are not concessions of any significance. READ MORE: Will changes on disability benefit cuts affect Scotland? 'Fundamentally it is not fair and immoral to reduce the health-related support in Universal Credit by 50%. Already people with disabilities on Universal Credit are struggling to pay for their basic needs. 'Their debt is going to increase. How can you possibly justify doing that?' Greaves, who is based in Edinburgh, said it was 'laudable' the Scottish Government has pledged not to replicate the cuts to PIP in its own Adult Disability Payment. While the changes made by Labour will not affect ADP directly, they will impact on the Scottish Government budget and Scots will still be impacted by proposals to reduce the health-element of Universal Credit, which is reserved. Greaves said the latest changes by Labour will create a 'two-tier system' which will make it more difficult for disabled people to get into work – the opposite to what Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has been claiming. Greaves said: 'They [Labour] have fiddled around the edges. 'To say to someone who, let's say, in four years time has a stroke, and consequently has mobility problems, that a benefit that has been afforded to someone in their position before, has been pulled away, is completely unfair. 'For new claimants, the new system will be woefully inadequate.' He added: 'What Liz Kendall is saying about getting people back into work is disingenuous. Personal Independence Payments is not a benefit that's paid because you cannot work. 'Moreover, because of that, it's an extremely helpful benefit if you have a disability and you want to move into work. It's going to make it a lot more difficult for people to move into work.'
The National
30 minutes ago
- The National
Neil Oliver quietly dropped from Glasgow tour bus after backlash
Oliver provided English language commentary for tourists on board the City Sightseeing Glasgow buses, which featured a picture of his face on the side of the vehicles. Four years after calls were made to remove Oliver from the City Sightseeing services, it seems that he has finally been dropped. READ MORE: This is why an independent Scotland should stay well away from Nato The firm's website no longer contains any information regarding his English-language narration, and eagle-eyed Glaswegians noticed his portrait is not featured on the buses anymore. Though the same sentence has been removed from the City Sightseeing information page, Visit Scotland's website still says "our English recorded commentary is provided by renowned historian Neil Oliver", suggesting that this removal has been done quietly. City Sightseeing Glasgow was urged to drop Oliver, who has narrated the service since 2012, following his comments on GB News regarding pandemic-era lockdowns and vaccines, and his remarks on a potential second independence referendum. Conspiracy theorist and former TV host Neil Oliver (Image: GB News) Most recently, the GB News presenter has been criticised for indulging in conspiracy theories on his YouTube channel and had a video blocked by the platform over his use of antisemitic language. Otto English, author of Fake History, told The National: "Given Neil Oliver's long journey into conspiracy and irrelevance, I'm simply flabbergasted that it didn't happen years ago. "I hope Glasgow gets the commentator it deserves in his place." He left his previous role as president for the National Trust for Scotland (NTS) amid a row over his expression of admiration for race-row historian David Starkey, though he claimed the decision to step down was due to the end of his three-year tenure. He faced backlash during his time with NTS for his support of the Union and describing a second independence referendum as 'cancerous'. Oliver was blasted by former Glasgow Kelvin MSP Sandra White for his Covid jibes during the pandemic, calling lockdowns the 'biggest mistake in world history' and saying he'd happily risk catching the virus. READ MORE: Keir Starmer suggests he didn't read through 'island of strangers' speech White previously told The National that Oliver should 'absolutely not' be allowed to lead commentary on the tours and called for an end to any potential contract the firm had with him. Given his fierce pro-Union stance, his authority to narrate historic tours of Glasgow was also called into question, considering that Glasgow voted Yes to the 2014 referendum. West Coast Motors, the firm who operate the City Sightseeing Glasgow buses, has been approached for comment.
The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
East Ayrshire councillors reject ‘very British' daily flag raising
Conservative councillor Neill Watts had proposed flying the three flags every day at the London Road HQ in Kilmarnock, describing it as 'a very British way of expressing joy and pride' and 'a symbol of unity.' His motion suggested that these flags be flown daily except when a different flag is more appropriate for special occasions. However, the proposal was met with strong opposition, particularly from Labour group leader councillor Barry Douglas, who questioned both the practicality and its similarity to moves at Reform UK run councils in England. READ MORE: Neil Oliver quietly dropped from Glasgow tour buses after years of backlash He challenged the resource implications, asking whether flags would be installed at all council buildings, how much that would cost, and who would be tasked with raising and lowering the flags. 'There's a cost involved in all of that,' Douglas said. 'Raising and lowering flags takes staff. Are council officers to stop their duties to do this every day?' He also took issue with Watts' description of the Conservatives as 'Scotland's strongest unionist party,' suggesting the recent general election results told a different story. 'Are we really talking about community cohesion,' he asked, 'or making a political point around the flag?' Labour councillor Peter Mabon also opposed the move, stating that while flags were appropriate on special days, raising them daily would eat into officer time. He said: 'We're talking about 200-plus hours every year in all weathers to raise and lower flags. Our officers have enough to do.' Barry Douglas (Image: LDR) SNP council leader Douglas Reid also opposed the motion, expressing support for the current approach. 'We've got a policy that's lasted before my time as leader. Raising flags for special occasions, like Ukraine or Rainbow Flag (for Pride), makes it meaningful. Changing that sends the wrong message.' Conservative councillor John McFadzean argued the proposal was modest in scale. 'For all the time it would take to hook on one flag and wind it up, there's not a huge implication. Civic pride helps lift morale.' Douglas responded by drawing parallels with Reform UK-run councils in England, where flag-related motions have gained traction. He acknowledged Watts' claim that he had been approached by Reform but had declined. 'Maybe he wants to tell the chamber something today. It is a big issue for Reform, but why is it such a big issue for him?' Chief governance officer David Mitchell then intervened to clarify that there is no East Ayrshire Council flag. 'There has never been a council flag and we certainly don't have one at the moment.' Watts denied any political motive, explaining his motion was based on personal observation. 'I would be more than happy just to have a flag – it doesn't matter whether it's the Saltire, it doesn't matter whether it's the flag of the United Kingdom, 'I just think that we should have at least a flag at this building as a mark of respect to our communities.' He also reiterated his Conservative affiliation and rejected any association with Reform. 'I certainly am a Conservative and I am nowhere near Reform in that respect.' In the end, councillors voted overwhelmingly to maintain the current flag policy, with 24 voting in favour of an amendment to retain existing arrangements and just four supporting the motion.
