
Quintessential summer drink shockingly linked to aggressive skin cancer
Summer's here, which means millions will be enjoying a glass of wine on a warm evening.
But scientists warn that the type of wine you drink could be raising your risk of skin cancer.
A new study found that drinking white wine was associated with a 22 percent higher risk of melanomas and other forms of skin cancers compared to drinking red wine.
One of the theories is that white wine is often consumed in the sun, which itself is a risk factor for skin cancer.
Red wine also contains chemicals that have anti-inflammatory properties which some studies suggest could have a protective effect on cells.
Eunyoung Cho, co-lead author of the study and associate professor of epidemiology and of dermatology at Brown University, said: 'We did observe a distinction when it came to skin cancer risk.
'Specifically, the consumption of white wine, but not red wine, was associated with an increased risk of skin cancer.'
The American Cancer Society notes all alcohol consumption can lead to cancer and recommends limiting to one drink per day for women and two drinks per day for men.
The group of researchers analyzed 42 studies with nearly 96,000 participants to compare the cancer risk caused by both red and white wine.
Among the participants, the scientists identified those who drank the most and least white and red wine, respectively, and how much they consumed.
Since the analysis pooled data from multiple research papers from across the world, each with its own definitions of consumption levels, it remains unclear how many glasses of wine each participant was drinking.
While 'high' consumption usually means around one glass per day, this can vary from country to country.
However, the data that was collected by the Brown University researchers was then measured using multiple statistical models to find a link between drinking wine and the probability of developing cancer.
Results showed that women who drank white wine were at a greater risk of developing any kind cancer in their body as compared to men who drank white wine.
The researchers did not find any link between red wine and skin cancer.
It also remains unclear how many glasses of white wine can raise the risk of skin cancer.
DailyMail.com has reached to Dr Cho for more information.
While Dr Cho and her team did not identify a clear reason on how white wine can increase the risk of cancer, they theorized that it was possible that women do not take protective measures against skin cancer when under the influence of alcohol.
Skin cancer is usually caused due to a toxic growth of skin cells and can quickly spread across the skin.
Normally, as skin cells grow old and die, new cells form to replace them. When this process stops to work as it should due to exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light from the sun, cells grow more quickly and become toxic.
The most common form of skin cancer is basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma - both of which can often be cured.
Basal cell carcinoma is defined as the cancer that forms in your basal cells in the lower part of the outside layer of the skin while squamous cell carcinoma forms in the squamous cells in the outside layer of the skin.
The most dangerous form of skin cancer is melanoma. It is more likely to spread, making it harder to cure.
This type of skin cancer forms in cells called melanocytes. Melanocytes produce melanin, a brown pigment that gives your skin its color and protects against some of the sun's damaging UV rays.
However, without proper protection such as using sunscreen, UV rays can damage melanocytes and pave the way for the development of melanoma.
Previous studies have shown a statistically significant association between alcohol consumption and an increased risk of melanoma.
According to Harvard Health, one study found that the risk of basal cell carcinoma increased by seven percent and squamous cell carcinoma increased by 11 percent for every 10-gram increase in intake of alcohol in distilled spirit form (or one standard beer or small glass of wine) each day.
Another study also found a 20 percent increase in melanoma in drinkers (compared to those who don't drink alcohol or only drink occasionally)
Additionally, it also found that those who drink 50-grams of alcohol (or five beers) per day had a 55 percent increase in risk for melanoma.
Numerous researchers believe that drinking alcohol while basking in the sunlight can increase a person's risk of developing cancer.
As you drink, the body begins to process and metabolize alcohol which leads to the formation of Acetaldehyde.
Acetaldehyde is a known carcinogen - cancer causing substance - that is known to damage cell DNA and can increase a person's chances of having cancer.
Coupled with the sun's UV rays that continue to damage the skin, the likelihood to develop the deadly illness increase.
The American Cancer Society recommends limiting alcohol consumption to one drink per day for women and two drinks per day for men.
But experts say that it is important to consider your underlying risk for developing skin cancer based on sun exposure and ethnicity and then alter your lifestyle.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Popular supplements everyone takes that raise the risk of Alzheimer's
One in two Americans are now expected to develop dementia in their lifetime, with the number of new cases soaring at an alarming rate. Many of us already know that making simple healthy choices such as eating well and staying active can help stave off the disease. Your browser does not support iframes.


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
'Gas station heroin' is technically illegal and widely available. Here are the facts
Health officials want you to think twice before buying one of those brightly colored little bottles often sold at gas stations, convenience stores and smoke shops. Sometimes called 'gas station heroin,' the products are usually marketed as energy shots or cognitive supplements but actually contain tianeptine, an unapproved drug that can be addictive and carries risks of serious side effects. U.S. poison control centers have reported a steady rise in calls linked to the drug for more than a decade. And last month the Food and Drug Administration sent a warning to health professionals about 'the magnitude of the underlying danger or these products.' Here's what to know about gas station heroin. How are these products sold in the U.S.? Tianeptine is approved in a number foreign countries as an antidepressant, usually as a low-dose pill taken three times a day. But it has never been approved by the FDA for any medical condition in the U.S. Additionally, the drug cannot legally be added to foods and beverages or sold as a dietary supplement — something the FDA has repeatedly warned U.S. companies about. Still, under-the-radar firms sell tianeptine in various formulas, often with brand names like Zaza, Tianaa, Pegasus and TD Red. Although that is technically illegal, the FDA does not preapprove ingredients added to supplements and beverages. 'It's kind of this grey area of consumer products, or supplements, where the contents are not regulated or tested the way they would be with a medication,' said Dr. Diane Calello of the New Jersey Poison Information and Education System. Last year, Calello and her colleagues published a study documenting a cluster of emergency calls in New Jersey tied to a flavored elixir called Neptune's Fix. People experienced distress, rapid heartbeat, low blood pressure and seizures after drinking it. More than a dozen of the 20 patients had to be admitted for intensive care. Why use these products? Many tianeptine products claim— without evidence or FDA approval— to help users treat medical conditions, including addiction, pain and depression. In 2018, the FDA issued a warning letter to the maker of a product called Tianna, which claimed to provide 'an unparalleled solution to cravings for opiates.' While tianeptine is not an opioid, the drug binds to some of the same receptors in the brain, which can temporarily produce effects akin to oxycodone and other opioids. Tianeptine also carries some of the same physiological risks of opioids, including the potential to dangerously depress breathing. 'That's what tends to get people into trouble,' said Dr. Hannah Hays of Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. 'They use it for opioid-like effects or to self-treat opioid withdrawal and that can lead to slow breathing and problems like that." People dealing with opioid addiction, pain, depression, anxiety and other conditions should see a health professional to get a prescription for FDA-approved treatments, Hays said. Is tianeptine use going up? Experts aren't sure but national figures show a big rise in emergency calls involving the drug. Calls to poison control centers increased 525% between 2018 and 2023, according to a data analysis published earlier this year. In about 40% of cases, the person had to seek medical care, with more than half of them needing critical care. One explanation for the rise in calls is simply that more Americans are using the products. But experts also say that the products are triggering more emergencies as they become more potent and dangerous. And the researchers in New Jersey who analyzed Neptune's Fix found that the liquid also contained synthetic cannabis and other drugs. 'You never quite know what's in that bottle," Calello said. 'It's important for people to know that even if they have used a product before, they could get a bottle that contains something very different from what they're looking for.' Are there policies that could reduce tianeptine use? Tianeptine is not included in the federal Controlled Substances Act, which bans or restricts drugs that have no medical use or have a high potential for abuse, such as heroin, LSD and PCP. But about a dozen states have passed laws prohibiting or restricting tianeptine, including Alabama, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Tennessee. In some cases, those laws have led to more cases of withdrawal among users of tianeptine, which can be chemically addictive. But state data also shows some success in reducing harm tied to the drug. Until recently, Alabama had the highest rate of tianeptine-related calls in the southern U.S., which increased more than 1,400% between 2018 to 2021. But after the state restricted tianeptine in 2021 calls began modestly decreasing while calls across other southern states continued to climb. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Scientists invent way to make farmed salmon healthier and better for you
Scientists have invented a way to make farmed salmon healthier. Feeding fish with a new type of rapeseed oil, which includes a natural red pigment, makes pink seafood richer in omega-3 oils and filled with more antioxidants, a study has found. The pinkness of a fish, whether shrimp, trout or salmon, comes from consumption of a chemical called astaxanthin, which is produced by some algae in the wild. Wild fish eat this in their diet and become pink as a result, but farmed fish do not and as a result have naturally grey flesh. These fish are therefore fed synthetic versions of this chemical to make the aesthetically pleasing hue consumers desire. But a genetically modified variant of the crop, which is spliced with genes from the scarlet flax flower, creates a plant that naturally produces seeds rich in astaxanthin. DNA, which powers the pigment-making pathway, was injected into the crop's own genome and small batches were grown at trial sites in the US and UK. Published in the Plant Biotechnology journal, data show that in each gram of seed from this new crop, there are 136 micrograms of colourful pigments. More than a third (47 micrograms) is astaxanthin. Giving this to fish in their diet to make them pink, instead of the current synthetic astaxanthin, would make the salmon healthier and better to eat, scientists say. In another experiment by the same scientists at Rothamsted University, oil made from these plants was given to 120 rainbow trout in four tanks. The study was later published in the journal Aquaculture. These animals grew just as big and were richer in health chemicals such as omega-3, the study found. Prof Johnathan Napier, a plant biotechnology pioneer who led the work at Rothamsted, told The Telegraph: 'The plant-based source of the pigment is accumulated and delivers benefits to the fish. 'In particular, it can help reduce the build-up of pro-inflammatory molecules. 'We are also hoping to see if having diets in which the plant-derived astaxanthin is present makes them more resistant to disease (especially lice) and stress – that work is ongoing.' The fish which eat the new oil are healthier, he said, and the humans that eat the fish are also set to benefit from the change. Prof Napier said: 'One would hope that fish being fed this diet would be more healthy [sic],' 'Astaxanthin helps to reduce oxidation, and therefore protects the fish's metabolic state as well as protecting the healthy omega-3s and then we consume and get health benefits for ourselves. 'And there is also an additional potential benefit from having the astaxanthin in your diet, as an antioxidant.' The scientists who invented the new plant used genetic modification techniques to create the astaxanthin-rich rapeseed oil. It is not possible to grow this crop commercially in the UK because the UK still uses the EU legislation prohibiting genetically modified (GM) foods. GM foods are allowed in the US and Prof Napier believes fish and farmers over there will be able to benefit from this new product in less than ten years. Red tape around the use of GM foods in UK agriculture, he believes, is stifling the market and also preventing foods which Prof Napier said: 'Tax revenue is being used to fund millions of pounds' worth of fundamental research in UK universities and institutes. 'But the potential arising from any useful discoveries is not correctly captured or exploited because of regulatory burdens. 'In the specific example of GM crops, we are still lumbered with the EU regulations, so we are double-whammied.'