The FCC's Dangerous EchoStar Mistake
The complexities of telecom regulation can bewilder even seasoned professionals. Thus, a headline like 'FCC to Investigate EchoStar's 5G' may seem too boring and technical to look into. This would be a mistake: this action by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has the potential to be seriously market-disruptive, and even to impair American national security.
Among the major national carriers, EchoStar is a technological leader in areas most relevant to competition with China and to national priorities in trade and advanced manufacturing. That makes it a national strategic asset. As a true fourth national network, it protects consumer choice and lower consumer prices. The FCC threatens such severe sanctions that they put EchoStar's financial viability in question and threaten to kill the company. This places every holder of a spectrum license in a riskier position and will raise consumer prices by forcing every licensee, not just EchoStar, to charge higher risk premiums. Here's how we got here.
On May 9th, the FCC was directed to open two proceedings on EchoStar: one on 5G buildout compliance, the other on the use of EchoStar's 2 GHz spectrum licenses. On May 10th, the FCC opened an additional proceeding into sharing 2 GHz between EchoStar's terrestrial uses and satellite services, something the FCC has repeatedly found to be impossible in prior proceedings.These proceedings have the cumulative effect of threatening EchoStar with numerous spectrum license revocations, which has severely affected EchoStar's ability to raise capital. EchoStar faces the heavy lift of building a capital-intensive national network, which will ultimately cost tens of billions. That makes these threats existential to the company.
Every holder of a spectrum license is taking note: threatening license revocations is the ultimate sanction because without licenses, you don't have a wireless business. This sanction is very rare in the cell phone business. The last time it happened was when NextWave lost licenses for non-payment after its 1998 bankruptcy, and those revocations were overturned at the Supreme Court in 2003. EchoStar committed to build its network, and to spend the billions of dollars required to do so, as part of the U.S. Government's commitment to four national networks when T-Mobile acquired Sprint in 2020. EchoStar claims to have met its commitments, so moving to threaten its licenses seems extremely market-disruptive out of proportion to any claimed offense.
But the concerns with these threats go farther. For years, we've heard that China is beating us in 5G. It's important to look under the hood and ask what this means in order to appreciate what's going on with EchoStar. For consumers, 5G was supposed to deliver fast streaming and new applications. But the more interesting part of 5G were always its applications to manufacturing, logistics, and public safety—all areas where China is realizing far greater gains than we are.
China has about 16,000 '5G private networks' while we have less than 400. These are the networks supporting advanced Chinese factories and ports. And China has about 77% of its population on '5G Stand-Alone,' versus only about 37% in the USA—meaning that Chinese cell phone networks are more capable than ours of supporting advanced security and performance features for public safety. The conclusion is inescapable: American 5G technology needs more radios, more advanced network cores, and more capital to keep pace with China. American 5G deployments risk checking the 5G box without delivering the innovation, under the hood, that would enable 5G's promise to be realized.
T-Mobile and EchoStar's Boost brand are the only American cell carriers that are 100% 5G Stand-Alone. What's more, in building its Boost network—one of only four national networks, now that US Cellular is winding down—EchoStar has built the only American OpenRAN network.
OpenRAN, which offers cheaper equipment and software-based management at the expense of the tight integration that a single stack vendor can provide. The jury is out on whether OpenRAN will predominate in 5G, but it's a significant factor overseas, with Japan's Rakuten as one notable success. In industrial and public safety deployments, OpenRAN may prove more suitable to non-consumer deployments than traditional consumer-facing systems. And perhaps most significantly, OpenRAN as used by EchoStar excludes Chinese suppliers accused of threatening national security.
Put it all together, and there's only one conclusion. One of the most innovative companies in American telecommunications is at risk of suffering an unprecedented and unpredictable punishment. We're all going to pay a price for it as the effects ramify through the markets, and it's going to hurt our international competitiveness. The FCC should reverse course. If not, China won't have to beat us—we'll have beaten ourselves.
Nathan Simington was nominated to serve as a Commissioner of the FCC by President Donald J. Trump. He was confirmed by the United States Senate in 2020 and served in his position until June 6, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Investing in LIMES Schlosskliniken (ETR:LIK) five years ago would have delivered you a 280% gain
When you buy shares in a company, it's worth keeping in mind the possibility that it could fail, and you could lose your money. But when you pick a company that is really flourishing, you can make more than 100%. For instance, the price of LIMES Schlosskliniken AG (ETR:LIK) stock is up an impressive 280% over the last five years. It's also up 29% in about a month. Let's take a look at the underlying fundamentals over the longer term, and see if they've been consistent with shareholders returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During the five years of share price growth, LIMES Schlosskliniken moved from a loss to profitability. Sometimes, the start of profitability is a major inflection point that can signal fast earnings growth to come, which in turn justifies very strong share price gains. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). This free interactive report on LIMES Schlosskliniken's earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further. While the broader market gained around 19% in the last year, LIMES Schlosskliniken shareholders lost 0.6%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 31%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. Before forming an opinion on LIMES Schlosskliniken you might want to consider these 3 valuation metrics. For those who like to find winning investments this free list of undervalued companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on German exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
A House Ways and Means Committee hearing took an unexpected turn Wednesday when Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) accused Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of interrupting her because of her gender—prompting audible groans from the room. The exchange occurred during a tense five-minute questioning session, where Sanchez challenged Bessent on the impact of tariffs enacted under President Trump's administration. "Prices are rising on many everyday goods," Sanchez said, citing increases in clothing, shoes, canned food, toys, and household tools. She added, "On average, Trump's tariffs are estimated to cost households $3,000 more for the same goods than they would have last year," though she did not cite the source of the figure when pressed. Trump Says 'Total Reset Negotiated' With China During Tariff Talks In Geneva When Bessent attempted to interject, Sanchez quickly cut him off: "Please don't interrupt me… I know I'm a woman, but please try to limit yourself to answering my questions." That remark prompted groans from the hearing room, with one attendee audibly reacting, "Oh, come on." Sanchez responded: "No, I'm sorry, but we get talked over all the time, and I don't want that to happen at this hearing." Read On The Fox News App Bessent, who is openly gay, did not address the accusation and instead focused on defending the administration's trade policies. When Sanchez challenged him on pricing impacts and China's trade behavior, Bessent responded, "That's incorrect," and said, "They met their agreements under President Trump in 2020, and President Biden did not enforce them." Wh Slams Dems' 'Partisan Games' After Trump-foe Schiff Calls For Insider Trading Investigation Over Tariffs Sanchez repeatedly claimed that American consumers are paying more due to tariffs and described recent negotiations with China as rushed and lacking transparency. "A poorly negotiated trade deal with China is probably not worth the paper that it is written on," she said. "I was alarmed to hear this morning that Trump said the U.S.–China deal was done after just two days of talks in London." Bessent defended the agreement as an initial step. "The deal struck was for a specific goal, and it will be a much longer process," he said, adding, "China has proven an unreliable partner." The clash between Sanchez and Bessent was repeatedly moderated by Chairman Adrian Smith (R-NE), who reminded members of time limits and decorum throughout the article source: Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Voyager soars 82% on first day of trading as defense tech booms
Defense tech company Voyager Technologies closed its first day of trading 82% higher than its initial public offering price. Voyager, which provides software for space and defense tech companies, priced its New York Stock Exchange debut at $31 per share on Tuesday. It offered 12.4 million shares and closed at $56.48 per share on Wednesday. Shares continued climbing after hours. Voyager plans to use the cash injection from the offering to fund investment in research and development programs and buy assets needed for growth, the company said in a statement on Tuesday. A portion of the proceeds may also be used to pursue mergers and acquisitions in Voyager's core business areas. The rest will be used for repaying debt and the business's day-to-day needs, the company said. Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan jointly led the offering. Early investors in Voyager include national security-focused venture firms Industrious Ventures, Marlinspike, and Scout Ventures. Voyager's IPO is an outlier because most venture-backed companies have preferred to stay private, especially after the pandemic. Like many tech companies that go public, Voyager is unprofitable. Founded in 2019, it's younger than peers like Palantir, which was founded in 2003 and went public in 2020, and Anduril, which was founded in 2017 and remains a private company. Voyager also relies largely on one client: the US government. The company posted $144 million in revenue last year, out of which 80% came from US government work. NASA alone made up 25% of its sales last year. Voyager reported a loss of $66 million in 2024, over double the prior year's loss, according to a regulatory filing. The IPO pop shows a renewed interest in defense and space tech companies from Silicon Valley and Washington alike. In an inaugural speech in January, President Donald Trump said that "We will pursue our manifest destiny into the stars, launching American astronauts to plant the Stars and Stripes on the planet Mars." Late last month at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has been bullish on battlefield tech, said that America's military will be equipped with the most advanced capabilities as part of the 2026 fiscal year budget. US military leaders have increasingly prioritized the development of AI capabilities in recent years, and want to build up America's arsenal in the technological arms race with China. They have argued that whichever country dominates this tech space will win future conflicts. Top VCs, including Founder's Fund and Andreessen Horowitz, have been pouring into defense tech darlings like Anduril and Shield AI. In March, Shield AI raised $240 million in a funding round, boosting its valuation to $5.3 billion. Last week, Anduril closed a new funding round of $2.5 billion, a deal that more than doubled the defense startup's valuation to $30.5 billion.