Winston Peters ejected from House before Te Pāti Māori debate
Peters was removed at the request of the Speaker Gerry Brownlee after Peters asked the prime minister if "Māorification" would be him getting a tan on Thursday, in response to questions by Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer.
The Speaker made several warnings to MPs for outbursts and questions not considered on topic, before reaching his limit with Peters' comment.
The incident took place in the House during in Question Time, before the debate over the Te Pāti Māori MPs' punishments started about 3pm.
Photo:
RNZ / REECE BAKER
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Golden Bay residents call for investment to future-proof emergency phone line
Tasman was hit by heavy rain last month. Photo: RNZ/Mark Papalii A group of Golden Bay residents want to see government investment in the region's communications network, so residents have reliable access to the 111 line during emergencies. Project STRIM (strengthening telecommunications resilience in Mohua) was set up by a group of Golden Bay residents after damage to the fibre optic cable that runs along State Highway 60 in July, resulted in a day long outage where residents were unable to call 111. Founder Axel Downard-Wilke said it was after that outage he posted about his concerns on social media and said the community should do something to improve its resilience, which led to the group's formation. "It's really a life or death situation if you need to make a 111 call, it's no good driving to a community hub where there's a Starlink system, you need to be able to use your phone reliably so we need a backup system," Downard-Wilke said. "The other thing of course, is when the Alpine Fault goes no technician can drive their van over with all the specialist equipment that's needed to find faults and fix them." He said the group wanted to see a feasibility study done and Crown funding set aside to future-proof the communications network, as had been done on the West Coast. In 2023, the government spent $435.4 million on a connectivity package for Westland with 118km of fibre laid between Te Anau and Milford Sound to improve resilience and connectivity. At a Tasman District Council meeting on Thursday, Downard-Wilke asked the council to send letters in support of a scoping report and funding for a more resilient system to Government ministers, Chorus and Civil Defence. Golden Bay is currently serviced by a single fibre optic cable that runs between Motueka and Tākaka. During bad weather on 3 July, the fibreoptic cable at Uruwhenua Bridge on State Highway 60 was severed, knocking out connection to about 1100 households. The cable was thought to have been damaged by a slip, but it was later revealed that rats had chewed through it. Downard-Wilke said it wasn't the first time such an outage had affected the community. In September 2023, the cable was accidentally severed by contractors and in August 2022 a slip at Birds Hill took out the road connection and the fibre optic cable with it. While other parts of the country were reliant on a single fibre cable, Downard-Wilke said he thought Golden Bay was the biggest community in the country that relied on a single cable, and was vulnerable to failures. "Whoever thought that having a system with a single point of failure is a good idea. I don't know what they were thinking. "If that goes, nothing goes." A large washout across a highway during extensive flooding and heavy rain in the Nelson Tasman areas. Photo: Supplied/ Nick Smith Telecommunications Forum chief executive Paul Brislen has said the key was to have multiple different types of networks (fibre, mobile, fixed wireless connections and satellite) so there wasn't a single point of failure. He also said telecommunications network companies were doing work to ensure cities were connected by a loop, instead of a point-to-point connection, so if half the cable was knocked out, traffic could be connected via the other side of the cable. A Chorus spokesperson said a second fibre optic cable for the Tākaka and Golden Bay area was not feasible as there was only one point of entry, it would follow roughly the same route and be exposed to the same risks. It said a second cable laid on a different route would face challenges due to the geography and topography of the area and would require significant funding and considerable feasibility work. The spokesperson said Chorus was aware of several regions connected to the fibre network via a single cable, some with larger populations that Golden Bay, and that came with risks that were actively managed. "We have robust monitoring and assurance processes in place to respond swiftly to any service disruptions, particularly those caused by adverse weather or natural events." An example of some of the widespread damage to roads and infrastructure in the Nelson Tasman areas. Photo: Supplied/ Nick Smith Golden Bay Community Board deputy chair Grant Knowles said the July outage was concerning and the inability to call 111 took was a shock to many. "I think it was a surprise to people that they couldn't get hold of emergency services or the chemist, for instance, couldn't let people know that they had a prescription to pick up, it was quite a broad problem." Tākaka residents then received an emergency alert during heavy rain on July 11, warning them to expect flooding and to be prepared to evacuate and Knowles questioned how people would be informed of alerts if there was no mobile coverage. The town's population grew significantly over summer, which was often when it experienced heavy rain and slips which could knock out the cable as had happened in 2022. Knowles said the region remained vulnerable during weather events and natural disasters and there was an urgent need for a backup communications system. He hoped the government would take the community's concerns, seriously. "It needed to be there yesterday, I mean, it should never have got to this point." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Winston Peters hints at Solomon Islands' unilateral decision to block PIF donor partners
Winston Peters and Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele exchange gifts during a NZ delegation to Honiara. 12 May 2024. Photo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs / Supplied New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters fell just short of confirming that the Solomon Islands has made a unilateral decision to shut the door on Pacific Islands Forum donor countries to this year's annual leaders' summit. Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has proposed that the Forum defer the annual dialogue partner meeting when leaders meet in Honiara - a move that will essentially block about two doezen countries from participating at the key regional meeting. The issue has divided opinion among Pacific leaders, with the likes of Palau, Samoa and Cook Islands backing Honiara, while Fiji's prime minister saying shutting donors out can threaten regional unity. While wrapping up his whirlwind trip to the PIF Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Suva on Thursday afernoon, Peters told reporters, "At the moment, the answer is no, no visitors or other, shall I say, associates that we've tried to attract over the past times." When asked whether it was an independent decision by Honiara, he replied: "That's a conclusion you could arrive at, yes." He said the issue "will be resolved in the context of next year". The Foreign Minister said this is the second time in just over five years, the PIF "had a problem". "I remember the last one was the improper positioning of the [PIF] secretary-general's role, not to Micronesia, but to Polynesia. It was clear as daylight back then. I remember it, and we sorted out. "Here we got now one, not of our internal making, but of external influences. We've made it very clear today (Thursday) in our address what New Zealand thinks." When asked about his comments earlier on Thursday about "outsiders" creating tensions within the PIF and who specifically was he referring to, Peters said, "Those people who are saying to the Pacific Islands Forum countries, 'we don't want somebody to come'." "What I'm saying to the Pacific Islands Forum: How does this show respect for us when you got outsiders telling insiders what to do?" "If all sorts of countries want to interfere with the Blue Continent, our job is to critically make sure that it's central to all of our we mean business." China's embassy in New Zealand has rejected what it calls misinformation around partner participation at the Pacific leaders' summit. There have been accusations by regional political watchers and Pacific government officials that China has influenced Solomon Islands' decision to block PIF partners from the summit over Taiwan's participation. However, in a statement, a chinese embassy spokesperson said China is not an "outside" influence, rather a dialogue partner something Taiwan is not. They say Taiwan is a province of China not a country and never will be, something Palau, Marshal Islands and Tuvalu reject. Taiwan is recognised as a development partner of the PIF since 1992.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Greyhound racing industry takes court action
Racing Minister Winston Peters has ordered a halt to greyhound racing from August 2026. Photo: PHOTOSPORT Lawyers for the Greyhound Racing Association have told the High Court in Wellington that the ban on greyhound racing will have a devastating effect on the livelihoods of more than 1000 people. Last December, Racing Minister Winston Peters announced the sport would be banned from August 2026. On Thursday, the association argued in court that the work of a ministerial advisory committee tasked with implementing the ban should be stopped, until a judicial review of the legislation was heard. Lawyer Chris Finlayson said the government had erred in directing the industry to monitor and improve animal welfare standards, only to ignore the results in cabinet's decision-making process. The court was told the racing industry had engaged with three reviews of the sport in just over a decade and had consistently shown willingness to comply with directives to improve animal welfare, and controls surrounding injuries and deaths, as well as track standards and rehoming initiatives. He said the cabinet paper - on which the decision to ban the sport was based - was "misleading" and a "very selective characterisation" of the key issues facing cabinet, which he argued was the industry's animal welfare standards, not the erosion of public license - society's acceptance of the practices of the sport. Finlayson said the government - after directing the industry to undertake a statutory process and then "blandly ignore it" - contradicted its obligation to consider the expertise of the industry in legislating towards the sport. Lawyers for the Greyhound Racing Association (left to right) Chris Finlayson KC and Jonathan Kaye at the High Court in Wellington. Photo: RNZ/Bill Hickman "The standard of animal welfare of greyhound racing is high," Finlayson said. "It aligns with the standards in other jurisdictions and is applied with significantly more rigour than pet dogs." Finlayson said the uncertainty over the recommendations of the ministerial advisory committee's plan to wind down the sport was resulting in members of the industry leaving the country before the ban, a collapse in breeding numbers and serious mental-health issues in participants of the industry. He argued, after the ban, New Zealanders could still bet on Australian dog races, which had "equal or lesser" animal welfare standards than Aotearoa's racing industry. Counsel for the Attorney General - acting on behalf of the Minister of Racing - said interim relief application was "fundamentally premised on a need to stop the legislation". Lawyer Katherine Anderson said the action, if successful, "would frustrate the introduction of the bill to Parliament". She said it was "undeniably clear" the court could not make an order to prevent the introduction of a bill. "It's very clear that the applicant fundamentally [says] the decision is wrong and is attempting to draw you in." She said it was up to the Minister to decide "how and if" parties would be consulted before the bill was put to Parliament. Lawyers for the Attorney General - acting on behalf of the Minister of Racing - (left to right) Katherine Anderson and Emma Dowse at the High Court in Wellington. Photo: RNZ/Bill Hickman "There's no straight jacket on the minister to go to the racing industry saying, 'Is there a ban on greyhound racing that's required on welfare grounds?'. "They've been elected to make policy decisions and, if people don't like it, they can be un-elected," Anderson said. Throughout proceedings, Judge Dale La Hood pressed the Greyhound Racing Association's counsel to clarify how the action would benefit the industry, if it's success was not to prevent the ban. "You need to explain to me... what you're seeking to have... stopped, other than preventing a ban on greyhound racing. I don't know if I understand what the benefit of interim relief would be to your client, if it doesn't halt the ban. "That's crucial to my decision on whether you've got a case," La Hood said. Finlayson said he would undertake to clarify his client's intent in a memorandum to the judge after the day's proceedings. Judge La Hood reserved his decision. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
