Scotland's quickest-ever woman is back and ready to run fast
It was quite a contrast for the Scot who, just a few years earlier, had established herself as the fastest Scottish woman in history and was, it seemed, on her way to becoming a truly world class sprinter.
But just as she was peaking, the worst of luck struck Rees.
In the summer of 2023, only a few months after setting a new Scottish indoor 60m record (she was already Scottish 100m record holder), Rees tore her hamstring.
In itself, this would be a serious enough setback but more bad fortune was to follow, with Rees being diagnosed with arthritis in her pelvis which, it turned out, was the source of her crippling pain.
Given her physical issues, it's perhaps no surprise that the Edinburgh AC athlete began to accept that her career as an elite runner may have been halted just as she was hitting her peak.
'This time last year, I really wasn't sure if I would ever compete again because I couldn't even walk without pain,' the 26-year-old says.
'I would go to the track to do rehab and watch people running and I just couldn't ever imagine that being me again.
'It was a really tough time because I was still turning up to training, but I didn't feel like I was in the sport anymore.'
Rees admits that the prospect of hanging up her spikes for good was a 'constant thought' but it was watching the Paris Olympics last summer that persuaded her to give athletics one more shot.
'Last year, I became a 'normal person', not an athlete and I had a good time but when the Olympics was on television I thought, yes, I've had a fun summer but I want to give it another go because I still had a real drive to compete at major championships,' she says.
'Giving up would have been the easy option, and I think me a few years ago would have quit but I didn't want to reach the end of my career and feel like I hadn't given it everything.'
A change of medication kick-started a recovery that saw Rees tentatively return to training and turn of the year went encouragingly smoothly, to the point that she felt able to dip her toe back into the world of competitive sprinting.
Alisha Rees is Scottish women's 100m record holder (Image: Alex Livesey/ Getty Images)
In the past two months, Rees has raced six times and while she's not producing the sort of times she was at her very best - her fastest time this season is 11.78 seconds in comparison to her Scottish record of 11.30 seconds - when she takes a step back she's able to appreciate the distance she's travelled since this time last year.
'It's strange being back competing, because you forget what it's like. Before my first race back, I couldn't sleep the night before because I was so nervous,' she says.
'But it's so good to be back. I know it will take time to get close to where I was before, but it's very hard to be patient.
'I've got faster nearly every time I've raced, though, and I do believe that by the end of the season, I'll be in a position where I'm happy with how I'm running.'
There will, Rees hopes, be further improvement in her performance within the coming weeks, which will lay the foundations for a strong performance at the British Championships in August, which is where her injury issues began two years ago. She is, however, reluctant to set too many long-term goals - her injury issues make it impossible to know just how her body will cope with the stresses and strains of elite-level sprinting - and so her focus remains on appreciating her health and fitness and any success on the track will be a welcome, and well-deserved, bonus.
'I'm enjoying the sport again, which is so nice because last year it was a very unenjoyable time,' she says.
'I'm happy to be turning up at training and able to do the sessions, so I'm feeling good.
'There's the Commonwealth Games next year but this time, I'm in a very different position from where I was a year out from the 2022 Commonwealth Games.
'Obviously, I would love to target an individual spot in the team next year, but at the moment it's hard to know if that's realistic or not because I've still not raced much.
'There's also the chance to go for a relay spot, which would be amazing too, because a home Games will obviously be amazing.
'The goal for this year was to get back racing and I've already hit that target so it'll be nice to see where I can go from here.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Andy Robertson could face awkward Diego Simeone meeting after Atletico comments
Andy Robertson is being eyed by Atletico Madrid for a surprise transfer this summer, but back in 2020 the Liverpool full-back wasn't too enamoured with Diego Simeone's men Andy Robertson might feel the legendary wrath of Diego Simeone if the Atletico Madrid boss recalls the 2020 comments made by his new transfer target. Scottish left-back Robertson has emerged as a surprise target for Atletico this summer, with the 31-year-old having just one year left on his contract at Liverpool, who are closing in on the signing of Bournemouth's Milos Kerkez. Robertson has been a mainstay of the Liverpool defence since joining in 2017 and first breaking into the team on a sustained basis around five months later. But he now finds himself mulling over a potential move to the Spanish capital just days after long-term full-back partner Trent Alexander-Arnold completed his own switch to Real Madrid. Robertson is said to be open to the move in the knowledge that the arrival of Kerkez for around £45million could push him down the pecking order after making 342 appearances for the Reds ever since a bargain £8m move from Hull City eight years ago. And it was three years into his Anfield career that he first came face to face with Atletico, who were drawn against Liverpool in the last-16 of the Champions League in the 2019-20 season. The Reds went to the Wanda Metropolitano - where they had won the 2019 Champions League final - for the first leg and slipped to a 1-0 defeat courtesy of an early goal from Saul Niguez, who punished slack defending from a corner. Robertson was left frustrated with the manner of the goal and furious at Atletico's style of play on the night, with the Reds star accusing the home players of simulation and of trying to get Sadio Mane sent off. "The corner just ricocheted, it was tight but onside," said Robertson after the game. "We gave them the best possible start and that get the fans behind them and then they start falling over and getting under the skin a bit. "We put in a decent performance and we know we can be better. We've got a second leg to put it right. "They celebrated as if they won the tie after the game. They are coming to Anfield and we know our fans will be there." In the event, Liverpool would lose the second leg 3-2 after extra-time to exit the Champions League to Simeone's side in what would prove to be the last match played on British soil prior to football's shutdown due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Rangers' scathing response to Scottish FA complaint revealed
The former Ibrox player made the comment after the failure to award Rangers a second goal against Hibernian in a Scottish Premiership contest. Nico Raskin had appeared to net a second goal, to make it 2-0, before Rocky Bushiri cleared the ball. However, no goal was awarded as Hibs then counter-attacked and scored to equalise. VAR did not intervene in the matter as there was no conclusive angle to say the ball was definitively over the line. Furious at the call, Brown said on Rangers TV: "I would say it is corrupt." Commentator Tom Miller cautioned: "Well, I'm not sure we can actually say that," before Brown continued: "Well, I am saying it." A Scottish FA notice was issued to Rangers over the commentary under article 29.2 of the rules which read: "A club or recognised football body which publishes, distributes, issues, sells or authorises a third party to publish, distribute, issue or sell a match programme or any other publication or audio/visual material of any description in any media now existing or hereinafter invented, including but not limited to the Internet, social networking or micro-blogging sites, shall ensure that any such publications or audio/visual material does not contain any criticism of any match official calculated to indicate bias or incompetence on the part of such match official or to impinge upon his character." Now, Rangers have submitted a full response to the complaint citing the KMI panel verdict that the goal should have been awarded and referencing previous similar incidents which did not result in action from Hampden chiefs. A Rangers spokesperson said: 'Rangers FC has submitted a full response to the Scottish FA's Notice of Complaint concerning a remark made during commentary of the Hibernian v Rangers match at the end of last season. The club firmly denies any breach of Scottish FA rules. 'We are surprised that a complaint has been raised at all, given the context of the comment and the Scottish FA's prior treatment of similar incidents. 'Our response highlights that the Scottish FA's own Key Match Incident Panel judged that the referee's decision on the day was incorrect, with four out of five panel members agreeing that a goal should have been awarded to Rangers. That finding helps explain the nature of a spontaneous emotional comment, delivered during a highly charged moment and immediately challenged live on air. 'Our response also sets out serious concerns about the Scottish FA's selective enforcement and inconsistency. We have highlighted multiple examples of similar or stronger remarks made elsewhere in Scottish football that have led to no charges or sanctions. 'While we remain committed to maintaining high standards, we will continue to challenge any action we consider to be unfair or disproportionate. For many supporters, this charge only adds to the wider frustration surrounding regulatory oversight in recent months when there are more serious issues in the game to tackle, including improving officiating standards for the benefit of Scottish football.'
STV News
2 hours ago
- STV News
Rangers defend John Brown from 'selective' SFA charge over corruption claim
Rangers have criticised the Scottish FA and said they will fully defend former player John Brown from a disciplinary charge over his claim that a refereeing call was 'corrupt'. Brown has been called to account by the governing body over comments made on Rangers TV's coverage of the team's match away against Hibs in May. Rangers thought they had opened up a two-goal lead in the game, when Nico Raskin believed he had scored before a clearance from Rocky Bushiri. Referee Nick Walsh and his assistants didn't give the goal and Hibs went on to equalise moments later through Kieron Bowie. A lengthy VAR check by Andrew Dallas reached the conclusion there was no camera angle that proved the ball had fully crossed the line. Rangers later slammed the decision and called for the introduction of goal-line technology but Brown's disciplinary charge comes from his words in commentary at the time of the incident. 'I would say it is corrupt,' the former defender said, before commentator Tom Miller replied 'Well, I'm not sure we can actually say that.' Brown then doubled down, replying: 'Well, I am saying it'. The SFA charge, which would likely see Brown fined a four-figure sum if proven, has angered Rangers, who say the governing body are selective in action they take and are looking to punish a 'spontaneous emotional comment' about a decision that an independent panel has already said was incorrect. A Rangers spokesperson said: 'Rangers FC has submitted a full response to the Scottish FA's Notice of Complaint concerning a remark made during commentary of the Hibernian v Rangers match at the end of last season. The club firmly denies any breach of Scottish FA rules. 'We are surprised that a complaint has been raised at all, given the context of the comment and the Scottish FA's prior treatment of similar incidents. 'Our response highlights that the Scottish FA's own Key Match Incident Panel judged that the referee's decision on the day was incorrect, with four out of five panel members agreeing that a goal should have been awarded to Rangers. That finding helps explain the nature of a spontaneous emotional comment, delivered during a highly charged moment and immediately challenged live on air. 'Our response also sets out serious concerns about the Scottish FA's selective enforcement and inconsistency. We have highlighted multiple examples of similar or stronger remarks made elsewhere in Scottish football that have led to no charges or sanctions. 'While we remain committed to maintaining high standards, we will continue to challenge any action we consider to be unfair or disproportionate. For many supporters, this charge only adds to the wider frustration surrounding regulatory oversight in recent months when there are more serious issues in the game to tackle, including improving officiating standards for the benefit of Scottish football.' SNS Group Head of referees Willie Collum said there was no conclusive angle for officials to award a goal. While the SFA-convened Key Match Incident panel, which is made up of individuals with experience from across the game, believed a goal should have been given, Hampden head of referees Willie Collum backed the match officials. Speaking on his VAR Review Show on YouTube, he pointed to criticism officials got after ruling out a Daizen Maeda against Hibs earlier in the season, when the ball was judged to have gone out of play before Alistair Johnston crossed to set up Maeda's 'goal'. 'Let's go back to two incidents this season first – Hibs vs Celtic, possible ball over the line, and Dundee United vs Hibs, possible handball before it goes into the goal,' Collum said on his show. 'We were criticised for both of those decisions, and rightly so, because ultimately, there was no conclusive evidence. 'I know people who would look at this decision and say 'that camera angle, for me, is conclusive'. But the reality is, that camera angle is at an angle looking in the way, there's nothing directly in line there. 'I've quoted before, in a World Cup match, there was a similar angle shown in a Japan game [against Spain in 2022] where, if you'd used that angle, you would say the ball was over the line. 'Then when you line it up directly in line, it only needs a slight part of the ball to be touching that line. 'Can the VAR and the AVAR there categorically, 100 per cent, say the ball was over the line? Not for us. 'Do I think it crossed the line? I think there's a good chance it did. 'But can I be absolutely certain of that? No. 'We've been criticised previously, we've now moved to say we'll only give a decision like that if we've got 100% conclusive evidence, so the VAR and AVAR are correct to say there that they don't have that evidence.' Brown has been charged with breaching article 29.2 of the rules which reads: 'A club or recognised football body which publishes, distributes, issues, sells or authorises a third party to publish, distribute, issue or sell a match programme or any other publication or audio/visual material of any description in any media now existing or hereinafter invented, including but not limited to the Internet, social networking or micro-blogging sites, shall ensure that any such publications or audio/visual material does not contain any criticism of any match official calculated to indicate bias or incompetence on the part of such match official or to impinge upon his character.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
