Couple ordered to tear down dream £500k home after ‘flagrant breach' of rules
Greater Cambridgeshire Council has ruled the property must be demolished by May 6, 2026
HOUSE ABOUT THAT Couple ordered to tear down dream £500k home after 'flagrant breach' of rules
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A COUPLE have been ordered to demolish their dream home worth more than £500,000 after they were found to have made a 'flagrant breach' of the rules.
Planning permission was originally granted to build a stallion semen laboratory but a house was built instead.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
7
The property has been valued at more than £500,000 but now has to be demolished
Credit: Bav Media
7
The plans originally submitted, which got approval, were to construct a stallion semen laboratory
Credit: Bav Media
7
A planning inspector has ruled that an unauthorised house was actually built
Credit: Bav Media
A planning inspector has ruled that the unauthorised house at Valentine Stables in Great Abington, Cambridgeshire, must be knocked down.
Planning permission was granted in 2014 by Greater Cambridge Shared Planning to build a replacement stable block and a specialist 'stallion semen' horse laboratory, with a small upstairs flat linked to the lab use.
The plans were approved on the basis that it would be for a countryside business use, with the residential flat only to be used in connection with the laboratory use.
The two-storey building was set to have a reception, office, kitchenette, 'analysis and lecture' lab, processing laboratory and staff changing room on the ground floor.
Whilst the first floor would be a staff living space with two bedrooms, each with an ensuite bathroom, and a combined living/kitchen space.
But, even though the outside of the building looked like the approved plans, the inside was very different.
A later investigation showed that the inside of the building looked nothing like the approved plans for the lab and business.
Instead, the planning inspector said it was built and used solely as a residential house from the start, with no evidence that the laboratory use was ever implemented.
The Council issued an enforcement notice in July 2023 requiring demolition of the property and the owner appealed against the notice.
But the Planning Inspector has now agreed with the Council that the building was constructed as a house from the start.
We're building our house out of polystyrene - we can slot it together like Lego & it'll cut our heating bill down by 70%
He said there was no lab or business running at the site, nor any evidence to show there ever was and that he house was a full home, not just a place for a worker to stay.
He also pointed out that the owner had sold their original house on the site and moved into this new home.
Inspector Chris Preston wrote: 'Photographs provided by the appellant in February 2022 in response to the Council's Planning Contravention Notice (PCN) show a complete absence of any laboratory space or research facility and that remained the case at the time of my accompanied site visit.
'The ground floor has a decidedly residential appearance, with a domestic kitchen, equipped with kitchen units, cooker, island breakfast bar, with domestic furnishings and appliances.
'A dining area is present next to the kitchen in the space which was shown to house a kitchenette/container storage and distribution on the approved plans.
'Next to that, where the plans depicted an office, is a domestic living room.
'What appears to be an office is present to the front in what was shown on the plans as a reception area.
'Throughout, the ground floor is decorated and equipped in a manner that belies a residential use.
'There is no obvious reception area that would indicate use by customers of a business.
'No laboratory has been installed, no research or stored equipment associated with the business is apparent, either on the photographs from 2022 or at the time of my visit.
7
An inspection discovered that no laboratory had actually been built
Credit: Bav Media
7
The inside of the building looked nothing like the approved plans for the lab and business
Credit: Bav Media
'Upstairs, where the staff accommodation was intended to be, there are two bedrooms, in the locations shown on the approved plans and a living area/ lounge, equipped with a sofa and television.
'However, no kitchen appears to have been constructed on the upper floor. In other words, the living space is clearly spread over the two floors, as would be the case in a typical house.'
He said the council had been told the flat would be used by an additional worker, but in fact the appellant and his wife had since sold their existing house and moved into the new property.
He added: 'The over-riding impression is that what has been constructed is a dwellinghouse, occupied by the appellant and his wife, as opposed to a stallion semen collection centre/laboratory on the ground floor with residential accommodation above which is what the approved plans depicted.'
He said there was also very little evidence that the stallion semen and collection business had 'ever got off the ground to any notable degree.'
He added: 'The lack of any clear record of the semen collection and analysis business, when added to the evidence that the laboratory and associated storage and analysis areas were never constructed raises serious doubts as to whether the 2014 permission was implemented.
'If the pandemic did cause issues with the business, the logical thing to do, if implementing the approved planning permission, would have been to construct the building as permitted, with accommodation at first floor level and space for the laboratories etc at ground floor level, even if that led to a delay in installation of those facilities.
'What actually appears to have happened is that the appellant constructed a dwelling from the off.
'The Inspector agreed that knocking the house down was a proportionate and necessary measure as the local planning policies had been clearly broken, and keeping the building but just stopping people from living there alone would not be enough.
Cllr Dr. Tumi Hawkins, Lead Cabinet Member for Planning at South Cambridgeshire District Council, said: "We welcome the Inspector's clear decision, which supports our commitment to upholding planning policies in our Local Plan and the Neighbourhood Plan designed to protect our countryside.
'This case shows the importance of adhering to the specific uses and conditions that justify development in rural areas.
'Planning rules are there for a reason – including protecting our countryside, and this decision demonstrates that we will act when those rules are broken."
The house must be knocked down and all waste material removed by May 6, 2026.
7
A Planning Inspector has agreed with the Council that the building was constructed as a house from the start
Credit: Bav Media
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
11 hours ago
- BBC News
Northampton driver caught by parking rule gets fine cancelled
A driver who managed to get a family member's fine for a parking infringement cancelled said more motorists could see their penalties £70 fine for parking more than 50cm (19.7in) from the kerb in Northampton was scrapped after Richard Smith noticed there was no measuring device in the council's photo of the a Freedom of Information (FOI) request, he was told by the council it had issued 350 tickets for the same offence in the last year, bringing in £10,000 in Northamptonshire Council has been asked for a response. Richard Smith said a family member received the penalty charge after parking in her own Smith said: "She woke up next morning to a ticket on her car and she said, 'What do I do?' And I said, 'I'll appeal it for you.'"So we appealed it and they turned us down."The penalty was £70, reduced to £35 if paid within 14 Smith then asked for pictures of the council's evidence of the car being 50cm from the kerb and the council sent some stills, which did not show any measuring Smith added: "If I was producing that evidence, I'd want a tape measure or whatever they use in the picture to prove the offence."Eventually, a letter came through from West Northamptonshire Council saying the ticket would be cancelled. Mr Smith made an FOI request to find out how many similar tickets were issued in the last year and how much revenue had been collected as a response from West Northamptonshire Council showed that 350 PCNs, or Penalty Charge Notices, were issued in the 12 months to April this year, and the council collected £10, Smith hoped his story would encourage some of those 350 drivers to challenge their said: "If there are other people that weren't brave enough to do it at the time and have now seen that somebody's got this information and got off the ticket, they might say, 'I'll appeal that.'"Richard Butler, West Northamptonshire Council's cabinet member for highways, said: "It is standard practice for officers to carry measuring devices to gather evidence where required. "If any motorist receives a PCN which they believe to be unfair or wish to challenge the issuance, then instructions on how to appeal are on the reverse of the PCN."Government guidance states that councils must "provide evidence of a contravention either from direct observation or from the record of an approved device". Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE 'My neighbours hate me... but I don't care!': Woman at war with whole village over her 'HS2 tunnel' house wins bitter planning battle
A farmer whose controversial new Teletubby-style eco home caused her own tight-knit village to ostracize her for 'bringing HS2' to their idyll has finally won her planning battle, saying: 'It's a bit like Putin and Ukraine - we should have just had a talk.' Defiant June Titterton-Fox has been granted retrospective permission to continue building her dream house in an idyllic village in Rutland which juts out of a hill in much the same way a piece of tunneling from the cursed infrastructure project does. However this has come with the fury of some neighbours who say the 'out of place' property looks 'absolutely horrible' and should never have been allowed. During a recent council meeting - where planners voted in favour of the scheme with one objection and one abstention - it was revealed that Mrs Titterton-Fox had breached rules and built it bigger than she had been granted permission for. But instead of launching 'enforcing action against her,' officers from Rutland County Council - where the rare breeds farmer was a former councillor - worked with her to seek a resolution. This month jubilant Mrs Titterton-Fox, 65, speaking from her smallholding in posh Whitwell in The Midlands, told MailOnline: 'I've got retrospective planning permission and I am really pleased. 'But it could have been so much better if people in the village, who objected to what I am doing, had spoken directly to me instead of holding secret meetings and not inviting me.' She said the long-running fight with some of her neighbours, whom she had previously counted as close friends and socialised with and branded 'just vicious, horrible people,' had taken its toll on her health and she has lost two stone in weight because of 'all the stress.' As she was nursing a poorly lamb and awaiting a vet's visit, she said: 'It's victory for me but it's a shame it's has taken so long and caused so much aggravation. 'I've won the war but it should have been finished a lot sooner. It's a bit like Putin and Ukraine, if we had just sat down and talked, me and those objecting neighbours, we could have found a solution a lot quicker. 'There's only 25 houses here and half are on the warpath!' Fellow residents in the tiny village - which is twinned with Paris and has two dozen homes - have been divided over the £800,000 three-bedroom home set into a hillside of a six-acre field she owns. She had applied for planning content in 2020 and claimed her unique property Field House would be one of the most energy-efficient properties in Britain. But the plans faced opposition from villagers who said the 'garish Hobbit house' looked 'more like something from Teletubby Land', and planners refused the application for the single-storey home in 2021. Council officers said the development was 'unacceptable' and would be 'visually intrusive and impact adversely on the form and character of the area'. But Mrs Titterton-Fox appealed, and Planning Inspector Dominic Young, clearly impressed by her plans, ruled: 'The state-of-the-art property has been carefully and sensitively designed to the most exacting environmental standards.' He added: 'Given the dwelling would be built into the hillside with no part of its structure protruding above the natural topography - it would have very little impact,' adding that the design had the 'wow factor.' Having cleared one hurdle Mrs Titterton-Fox then faced further obstacles as locals complained she had breach regulations, building the property 1.2 metres higher than approved, adding two extra rooms at each end to be used as an ensuite bathroom and a plant room, and changing the frosted widows size and design, Councillor Kiloran told the recent meeting: 'Residents contacted enforcement because the building did not look like the plans approved on appeal. 'It had an impact on locals living nearby and has impact on heritage.' She urged: 'This application should be rejected for Rutland and for the country. It certainly lacks the wow factor and is in breach of planning.' Retired publican Julie Healey, who has lived in the desirable village for decades, believes the eco house - which is yet to be screened and landscaped - 'looks out of place' and is 'absolutely horrible.' The great grandmother added: 'I cannot believe this has been allowed to happen in a village like this. 'I can only see the house from one bedroom and my paddock so it is not too bad for me but a few of my neighbours overlook it directly and the occupants will be able to look into their bedrooms.' Widowed Mrs Healey, 86, who used to run the next Noel pub with her late husband for 18 years until 1997, told how the eco home had 'spilt the village.' She said: 'People on my side are against it because it is right ion front of them but those on the other side of the road are not so concerned.' She said she and fellow villagers 'always used to socialise' with Mrs Titterton-Fox and her husband Andrew but don't now, saying: 'It has caused a rift and I rarely see her now.' Simon and Beverley Jackson, whose home overlooks the distinctive build likened to the famous pre-school children's TV show, claims the windows face directly into their bedroom and bathroom, destroying their privacy. Mrs Jackson, a semi-retired MD of a legal services firm, said: 'It is an eyesore and when people move in it will be even more so! 'But at the end of the day she's won and we have to live with it. I thought it would go that way, in her favour. 'She used to be a local councillor and she has a few friends there. 'We're not happy but we fought our case and she won. It is what it is and there's nothing we can really do. 'Getting retrospective planning permission is the final straw.' She said it was too early to say if residents would challenge the decision as they would need to spend 'lots more money' seeking a judicial review. Devastated Mrs Jackson, who now feels like selling up her beautiful £1.2 million home, a converted farm grain store, said: 'It is a massive intrusion. It was meant to be built into sunken hollow ground but it sticks out like a sore thumb, and it is farcical. 'I hate living here now. I wake up every morning and see that monstrosity staring back at me from my bed. 'I go to my ensuite to take a shower and I see it, I go to my dressing and make-up room to get ready for work and I see it. 'I go downstairs to my kitchen and lounge and I still see it. It is horrendous.' 'No one around here likes it.' She added: ''The building should be disguised by greenery, it should be covered, but most importantly it should be much lower in height. 'It makes a mockery of the planning system. 'There needs to be trees, evergreens, and landscaping put in pace, and the new gabion structure on the right side needs to mirror the other.' She said that the eco home owner, who like her has lived in the village for 20 years - a beauty spot near Oakhame village lies which boasts the first memorial statue to the late Queen, and historic Stamford in neighbouring Cambridgeshire - 'used to be a friend of mine but I don't speak to her now.' Her insurance broker husband Simon previously fumed: 'There is no getting away from it. When people are living there they will be able to see us in bed and see us in the shower. That is an invasion of our space and privacy, and is alarming. We feel sick.' Another neighbour, who declined to be named, said retrospective plans being given the green light was 'very sad. The woman, whose home overlooks it from a height, said: 'Is it an outstanding an innovative build, no, and it is certainly no Grand Designs building. 'It was a breach of planning law and she did not meet the criteria and there has since been seven rounds of consultation by planning officers who then recommend the council approved it. 'There were a lot of objections but locals have been ignored - our views have not been taken into account. 'It is not an attractive building and spoils the view in our pretty, historic village, which has some listed buildings. 'And now a tall black ugly chimney flue has gone up on the roof.' She added: 'But she got it, fair play, and what can we do apart from spending £30,000 on a judicial review.' The house, which is inhabitable, is still worked on and the owner hopes it will be completed and ready to move into by late summer. Mrs Titterton-Fox and her husband Andrew, 60, a civil engineer with Transport for London, are living in a caravan on site. She told our website: 'We've not done anything to it really because this planning row has dragged on, apart from putting flooring down and plastering and painting the walls. 'It still cannot be lived in, there's electricity but no water and not kitchen or bathrooms but they are no on order and we are hoping to move in by late August-September. 'The house is not any higher but a little bit wider and build into the wings. 'All this stress has been very traumatic and I've lost two stone in weight. 'There's been a lot of negativity and toxicity in the village and one resident has been harassing me, posting against me on social media and keeps videoing me because I'm building a new house.' 'There have been lots of negative posts by one individual and I have had to report it to police.' Mrs Titterton-Fox told how neighbours 'jealous of my dream home' had led her to halting her buildings work and has only made matters worse. But after working amicably with council officers to find a solution to meet planning rules, and make amendment, she assured fellow residents: 'Wait till you see the finished house! 'It will be all landscaped with trees and plants, and is even planted with wild flowed and white daisies on the roof, and you won't even know we're there! 'Complaints that our build is too high are ridiculous and in time it will be almost totally hidden from view, the house will disappear behind screening. 'I can the end of the light of the tunnel.' The couple own another £750,000 five-bed house in the village - their former family home - which they are renting out as an Airbnb and have recently sold. The twice-wed farmer said: 'We finally have a buyer but all the negativity about our new eco home has made it difficult to sell. 'Prospective buyers have said they've read all about me and the planning battle and commented: 'What terrible neighbours you have. 'I have lived in this beautiful village bedside Rutland Water for 24 years. I am a small holder with animals and livestock, and no one will speak to me anymore. I have done nothing wrong.' The Council's Development Manager Justin Johnson, who had previously taken members on a site visit of the property on land off Exton Road Whitwell Conservation Area, told the meeting: 'We investigated on behalf of out own enforcement team. 'The dwelling is larger that permitted with two additional rooms and a black flue has been erected to serve a wood burner. 'But there will be tree planting to provide further screening and the building will one earth covered and seeded.' He advised that the property did not impact in 'neighbours or amenities.' He said the retrospective amended plans included gabion walling, landscaping and excavation to the rear for car parking. 'It does not impact the setting of the Grade II listed Church of St Michael or the Home Farmhouse. 'Due to maintained separation distances, there will be no loss of privacy, or oppressive environment for neighbouring properties. 'It raises the design standards in the ares and has minimal visual impact, with only glimpsed views from nearby public roads and footpaths.' 'The development will not lead to increased flood risk in the area.
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Riverside Theatre: Coleraine venue set to close in August
A venue billed as Northern Ireland's oldest operating professional theatre outside of Belfast is set to close in August after almost 50 Riverside Theatre, which opened in the 1970s, has a capacity of about 350 people and is situated within Ulster University's Coleraine University (UU) said the building would require significant capital investment to remain in use – with refurbishment works estimated to cost in the region of £745,000, on top of annual running costs of £495,000."In the face of unprecedented financial challenges… it is more important than ever that we focus our resources on core academic activities," a university spokesperson said. Concerns were first raised over the long-term future of the theatre back in January, after UU, which owns the venue, confirmed it was reviewing the way it was March, the university proposed Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council consider entering into a lease agreement for the theatre and pay almost £750,000 to carry out what are deemed essential repairs, as well as taking on yearly running costs in the region of £500, council currently operates two smaller community art venues, Flowerfield Arts Centre in Portstewart and Roe Valley Arts And Cultural Centre in Limavady.A meeting between council officials and the university to discuss the Riverside Theatre is expected to take place in June. Why is Ulster University closing the Riverside Theatre? A spokesperson for the university said they have "supported and delivered this civic asset for fifty years" but "the building itself has now come to the end of its life".They said the university acknowledges the news "will come as a disappointment to many" but that they wanted to express "heartfelt gratitude to the artists, audiences, staff and supporters" who made it "such a special place for so many years".The spokesperson added that it "remains open to working with local partners and stakeholders to explore new ways to support arts and culture in the region, even as we navigate these constrained times". Steven Millar, a local actor in the north coast, has been campaigning against the theatre's closure and said it plays a vital role for the area. "This theatre belongs to the community— it was built with public money, on university grounds, and has served generations," he said."You cannot just close a building like this behind closed doors. "We've had no consultation, no transparency, and no effort to involve the community this affects most."Mr Millar said he believed there was "still time to find a creative solution"."We're calling on the university, the council, and the Department for Communities to meet with us and explore viable alternatives like a charitable trust or shared lease, and work with—not against—the public interest," Mr Millar said. "The fight is not over," he added
