logo
Someone must have grabbed him, Zayn Rayyan's mother tells court

Someone must have grabbed him, Zayn Rayyan's mother tells court

The Star22-07-2025
PETALING JAYA: The mother of Zayn Rayyan Abdul Matin told the Sessions Court here on Tuesday (July 22) that she suspected the autistic child had been grabbed or abducted by someone on Dec 5, 2023.
Ismanira Abdul Manaf made the statement while testifying on the second day of her defence trial for a charge of neglecting Zayn Rayyan in a manner likely to cause physical injury.
She gave evidence before Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh, according to a report by Sinar Harian.
During cross-examination by Deputy Public Prosecutor Raja Zaizul Faridah Raja Zaharudin, the 30-year-old said she believed this to be the case because she did not hear the footsteps of the late Zayn while he was supposedly walking up to the second floor of Block R, Pangsapuri Idaman, in Damansara Damai.
The first defence witness agreed with the prosecution's suggestion that, logically, one would have heard running footsteps if the special needs child had been grabbed or taken.
Prosecutor: I put it to you that during the incident, in fact, no one was grabbed or abducted. Agree?
Ismanira: Disagree.
Prosecutor: Logically, you would have seen Zayn Rayyan behind you or seen him being grabbed – but you told the court you kept looking back at him.
Ismanira: I did look back at Zayn Rayyan, but not at all times, as I was using my senses to monitor him.
Prosecutor: Wouldn't it be clearer if you had used your sight rather than hearing?
Ismanira: Agree.
Prosecutor: Do you agree that relying on hearing is not an accurate method of supervision, especially when monitoring a special needs child like Zayn Rayyan?
The mother of two responded that she did not agree.
Ismanira, who works as an accounts clerk, also denied a prosecution suggestion that she had left Zayn alone at the playground and returned home by herself.
Her lawyer Haresh Mahadevan objected to the line of questioning, arguing that the narrative of Zayn being left alone at the playground had never been raised by prosecution witnesses.
Raja Zaizul Faridah responded that the fourth prosecution witness, former investigating officer Inspector Nina Syamimi Syamsuddin from Petaling Jaya District Police Headquarters, had stated this in a previous hearing.
'She was their witness, so the defence may re-examine her. At this point, I am fulfilling my duty as the prosecution during cross-examination,' she said.
After hearing submissions from both sides, Judge Syahliza recorded all objections but allowed the prosecution to proceed with the question.
The trial will continue on Wednesday.
According to the amended charge, Ismanira is accused of having custody of six-year-old Zayn Rayyan and neglecting him in a manner likely to cause physical injury.
The offence was allegedly committed in the area of Block R, Pangsapuri Idaman, Damansara Damai, up to a nearby river, between noon on Dec 5, 2023 and 9.55pm the following day.
She is charged under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001 and faces a penalty under Section 31(1) of the same Act, which provides for a fine of up to RM50,000, imprisonment of up to 20 years, or both, upon conviction.
On Dec 6, 2023, Zayn Rayyan was found dead in a stream near Pangsapuri Idaman at around 10pm.
He had earlier been reported missing and was discovered lying approximately 200 metres from his residential block.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homeless man fed chicken bones: ‘influencer' sorry for PR stunt
Homeless man fed chicken bones: ‘influencer' sorry for PR stunt

Free Malaysia Today

time3 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Homeless man fed chicken bones: ‘influencer' sorry for PR stunt

Instagram user @aluk_77 asked Malaysians to forgive him and his two friends who were also in the video. PETALING JAYA : A social media user has apologised for a publicity stunt in which he and two others purportedly gave a homeless man a packet of rice with chicken bones. The apparent social media influencer said the homeless man had agreed to help them with the video and that he already knew he would be given rice with chicken bones purely for the video. In a video, Instagram user @aluk_77 maintained that they did not actually give the man just chicken bones but had bought him a full meal with two pieces of fried chicken. He said their intention was to post content on being more charitable, adding that this was supposed to be the first of several videos. 'But we did not expect the video to cause such a huge uproar, and this is our mistake. We are sorry. 'We had packed the complete meal from the start, which we gave him later. He knew about it from the beginning. 'We are sorry. We will be more sincere in giving back to society and produce more meaningful videos. We hope everyone will forgive us, we're sorry,' he said. The initial video, which has since been deleted, sparked backlash from netizens, with some even calling for an investigation to be launched against them. At the time of writing, he had about 140,000 followers on Instagram.

Trio get picked to pieces online for ‘feeding leftovers' stunt
Trio get picked to pieces online for ‘feeding leftovers' stunt

The Star

time4 hours ago

  • The Star

Trio get picked to pieces online for ‘feeding leftovers' stunt

PETALING JAYA: Several influencers have sparked public outrage after uploading a video that appeared to show them feeding "leftovers" to a homeless man. In the video, the trio were seen dining at a restaurant before packing their leftover chicken bones together with a packet of rice. They then handed the parcel to a homeless man who was sleeping on the sidewalk. The man appeared shocked upon opening the packet, but responded with a simple gesture of thanks. Following a wave of backlash from netizens, the trio issued an apology in a separate video. They claimed the man had been informed about the filming beforehand and had consented to it. They also clarified that the chicken bones and rice were not intended as his actual meal. 'We had already given him a proper meal, including rice and two pieces of chicken, before filming,' they said. 'We hope Malaysians can forgive us. We are truly sorry.' The controversial video has since been removed from their social media platforms.

Electricity thief fined RM21,000
Electricity thief fined RM21,000

Borneo Post

time4 hours ago

  • Borneo Post

Electricity thief fined RM21,000

KOTA KINABALU (Aug 4): A 58-year-old man was fined a total of RM21,000 by a Sessions Court here today for illegally using electricity by bypassing terminal meters with cables. Tonny Voo pleaded guilty before judge Amir Shah Amir Hassan to two charges under Sub-Section 61(3)(c) of the Electricity Supply Enactment 2024, punishable under Sub-Section 61(3)(ii) of the same law. The provision carries a penalty of between RM20,000 and RM1 million, or a jail term of up to five years, or both, upon conviction. For the first and second counts, Voo was fined RM1,000 (in default, 14 days' imprisonment) and RM20,000 (in default, five months' imprisonment) respectively for committing the offences in Tamparuli on February 24. In mitigation, Voo's counsel Jeremy Ho appealed for a lenient sentence, citing it was his client's first offence. However, the prosecution pressed for a deterrent sentence, highlighting the seriousness of the offence and the financial loss suffered by Sabah Electricity. A heavier sentence, the prosecution argued, would serve as a warning to Voo and others against similar violations in the future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store