Payments start for first claimants in First Nations child welfare case
OTTAWA — Some claimants are now receiving compensation payments through a $23-billion settlement for more than 300,000 First Nations children and their families.
The settlement is meant to compensate children and their families for Canada's chronic underfunding of on-reserve child welfare services.
Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak says the start of compensation payments marks an important milestone.
Woodhouse Nepinak says more than 40,000 claims have now been received but there are still many more eligible claimants who haven't yet submitted applications.
The settlement agreement, which recognizes nine distinct groups of claimants, was opened to the first two groups in March.
Individuals who were removed from their families on reserves or in Yukon between April 1, 1991 and March 31, 2022, as well as parents or grandparents of those individuals, are now eligible to apply for and receive payments.
With files from Alessia Passafiume.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 14, 2025.
Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
4 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Flight attendants' union rejects Air Canada's request for binding arbitration as strike deadline looms
The union representing Air Canada AC-T flight attendants has rejected the airline's proposal for binding arbitration, leaving bargaining suspended as time winds down toward an impending strike deadline early Saturday. The airline and the Air Canada Component of CUPE have been in contract negotiations for months over an agreement for more than 10,000 Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flight attendants. Both sides have blamed the other for stalled negotiations and misinformation about offers on the table. The main sticking points have been wages and time for hours worked. On Thursday, federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu said Air Canada had requested binding arbitration and that she had given the union until noon Friday to respond to the request. In a statement Friday afternoon, CUPE urged Ms. Hajdu to reject the proposal, accusing Air Canada of depending on government intervention to avoid an impending strike and grounding of a massive portion of its fleet. There were no talks ongoing as of Friday afternoon. 'Rather than continuing to negotiate in good faith, Air Canada appears to have anticipated government intervention and has opted to suspend meaningful discussions, contrary to its legal obligation to bargain in good faith,' the union said in the statement. On Wednesday, the union gave Air Canada notice of its intent to strike, which enables its flight attendants to walk off the job just before 1 a.m. Saturday morning. In response, Air Canada issued notice it will lock out those employees shortly after that deadline, and began winding down operations across the globe. About 1,000 flights are expected to be cancelled on Saturday, grounding about 130,000 customers, according to Air Canada. Flights had already begun to be cancelled on Thursday as Air Canada wound down operations. As of noon on Friday, just under 300 flights had been cancelled and about 56,000 customers affected, the airline said in a post on social media. Air Canada anticipated about 500 flight cancellations Friday, though it expects additional cancellations as about 300 flight attendants did not report for work, the airline also said in a social media post. The strike is not expected to impact flights operated by Air Canada Jazz or partner airlines. In a post late Thursday night, the airline said about 300 flight attendants did not report for work, which would lead to additional cancellations.
National Post
4 minutes ago
- National Post
Wife's ADHD cited by Federal Court in reasons for delaying deportation of man from India
A Federal Court judge has temporarily stopped the deportation of a man from India over Ottawa's handling of health concerns by his Canadian wife who has ADHD, and financial problems his departure would cause his sister. Article content Jagjit Singh, a citizen of India, came to Canada in 2021 on a temporary resident visa and made a refugee claim for asylum. While that claim was being processed, he met a Canadian woman, in November 2024, and married her the following January. Article content Article content Article content The woman, identified only by the initials L.B., in the court decision, submitted a spousal sponsorship for her new husband to become a permanent resident of Canada a couple of weeks later, after which he withdrew his refugee claim. Article content Article content While one arm of the immigration system was processing the spousal sponsorship, another arm was dealing with a man who was no longer seeking refugee protection and so had overstayed his original visa. Article content In May his wife was notified she met the eligibility requirements to sponsor Singh and, in July, Singh was given a removal date for August. He asked Canada Border Services Agency officials to delay his deportation until after his wife's application was adjudicated. Article content CBSA refused his request. Singh then sought intervention from the Federal Court to delay his removal. Article content His case was heard by Federal Court Justice Avvy Yao-Yao Go on Tuesday and her decision was released the same day. Article content Lawyers for Singh claimed five grounds for a delay, including various ways that the CBSA mishandled and misapplied evidence in the case to a degree suggesting they had not reviewed the submission Singh had made. Article content Article content The judge said not all of Singh's grounds were persuasive, but only one serious issue was needed for a stay to be granted, and she saw one. Article content Article content 'There is at least one serious issue with respect to the Officer's assessment of the evidence the Applicant submitted in support of his deferral request, and the Officer's interpretation of the scope of their discretion,' Go wrote in her decision. Article content She found the border officer did not properly consider the issue of irreparable harm. Article content 'Irreparable harm refers to harm which cannot be compensated in money; it is the nature rather than the magnitude of the harm,' her judgment says. It doesn't have to be the person being deported that is harmed, it can be 'specific harm that is demonstrated in regard to any persons directly affected by the removal, and who will be remaining in Canada.' Article content In this case, Go found that there was evidence of harm to Singh's wife, who has ADHD, and to Singh's sister, who will suffer financially because the couple pay to live in her house. The CBSA officer's dismissal of the concerns was not based on evidence before the court, Go said.
CBC
5 minutes ago
- CBC
Judge calls for stiffer sentences for femicide
A New Brunswick judge says Parliament should change the Criminal Code to strengthen sentences for men who kill women.
