UK re-establishes relations with Syria after 14 years
Foreign Secretary David Lammy was photographed shaking hands with the country's new leader Ahmed al-Sharaa in Damascus.
"The UK is re-establishing diplomatic relations because it is in our interests to support the new government to deliver their commitment to build a stable, more secure and prosperous future for all Syrians," Lammy said in a statement.
Photos released by Sharaa's office also showed Lammy meeting Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani.
The presidency said they discussed "bilateral ties... and ways of strengthening cooperation, as well as regional and international developments".
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Lammy said the UK wanted to back a stable Syria as a means of "reducing the risk of irregular migration, ensuring the destruction of chemical weapons" and "tackling the threat of terrorism".
The British Foreign Office said the UK had also committed an extra $129m to provide "urgent humanitarian aid" and support Syria's reconstruction and countries hosting Syrian refugees.
In December, after a brutal 14-year civil war, Sharaa's rebel forces, who had been in control of Idlib, toppled Damascus, ending the Assad dynasty.
Assad fled with his family to Moscow.
Sharaa was previously head of Syria's al-Qaeda affiliate and its successor organisation Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
HTS remains listed on the UK's proscribed organisations list as an "alternative name" for al-Qaeda, though the group was officially dissolved in January.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Palestinian man, apparently with US citizenship, 'beaten to death' by Israeli settlers
Israeli settlers beat a Palestinian man to death and injured 10 others in the occupied West Bank on Friday, the Wafa news agency reported. Several social media users said Saif Al Din Musallat, 23, was a US citizen. The US State Department did not directly confirm if this was the case. "We are aware of reports of the death of a US citizen in the West Bank," a department representative told The National. "Out of respect for the privacy of the family and loved ones during this difficult time, we have no further comment." Spokesman for the Palestinian Health Ministry, Annas Abu El Ezz, told AFP that Mr Musallat "died after being severely beaten all over his body by settlers in the town of Sinjil", about 15km north-east of Ramallah. Wafa said 10 Palestinians were wounded in the attack. The Washington Post interviewed relatives of Mr Musallat in Florida who confirmed that he had been killed in the incident. The Florida Palestine Network mourned his loss. "The young man was injured and remained so for four hours. The army prevented us from reaching him and did not allow us to take him away," Abdul Samad Abdul Aziz, from the nearby village of Al Mazraa Al Sharqiya told AFP. "When we finally managed to reach him, he was taking his last breath." The Israeli military said 'terrorists' had hurled rocks at Israeli civilians near Sinjil, lightly injuring two of them. 'We are aware of reports regarding a Palestinian civilian killed and a number of injured Palestinians as a result of the confrontation,' the military said. Violence between Israelis and Palestinians in the West Bank has risen in recent years, with settler attacks becoming more frequent after the start of the Gaza war in October 2023. Israeli killings of US citizens in the West Bank include those of Palestinian American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, Palestinian American teenager Omar Mohammad Rabea and Turkish American activist Aysenur Ezgi Eygi.
Gulf Today
7 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Starmer's migrant deal with Macron is a promising start
The prime minister has been criticised for the modesty of the agreement that he has secured with the French president on cross-Channel migration. He should instead be congratulated for having obtained a returns deal at all. It is more than his Conservative predecessors managed, and it is certainly more than Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform and peddler of "simple" solutions, could do, according to The Independent. The modesty of the arrangement is sensible. Returning undocumented migrants is a complex matter, legally and logistically. It is a good idea to show "proof of concept", as government sources put it, on a small scale, to show that it would be possible with larger numbers. The pilot scheme has already been attacked by the Conservatives on the grounds that it would not be a deterrent. If Britain is able to return 50 people a week to France, that would amount to a small fraction, about 5 per cent, of the numbers currently arriving by small boat. As Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, points out, this means that those attempting the crossing would know that they have a 95 per cent chance of staying in the UK as long as they make it halfway across the Channel, when they have to be picked up by the British authorities. But Mr Philp is missing at least two points. One is that, if the scheme works, it could be expanded. The other is that he argues that the Rwanda scheme would have acted as a deterrent, even though its total capacity of a few hundred would have taken even fewer migrants than this pilot scheme. Mr Farage is even further off beam. His policy is to return migrants to French beaches without permission and by violating French waters. It is hard to see how that can end well, let alone with many migrants being returned. He and Mr Philp would do better to congratulate Sir Keir Starmer for his negotiating skill and his success in landing the deal with Emmanuel Macron that Rishi Sunak tried and failed to secure. We will now be able to discover what is possible rather than listening to lectures about what would have happened if the Rwanda scheme, which the Conservatives had years to implement but which Mr Sunak chose to abandon by calling an election, had gone ahead. Sir Keir was right to cancel the cruel, expensive and ineffective scheme, and now offers the prospect of something better and potentially workable. The whole point of a pilot scheme is that we will be able to find out whether migrants will be able to frustrate the policy by appealing to the courts. The plan will probably require a new fast-track legal channel, so that new boat arrivals can be turned round quickly, in which case it would make sense to test that on a smaller scale. And the other half of the plan, to take an equivalent number of genuine refugees whose claim of a family connection to the UK has been accepted at a processing centre in France, is also fraught with difficulty. How will claims be ranked in order of priority? Again, starting with small numbers is the right approach. Obviously, the end point desired by Sir Keir and indeed by most of the British people, would be a larger scheme which would then quickly become a very small one. If migrants knew that they could not stay in the UK, they would stop trying to cross the Channel altogether. Sir Keir's critics are right about one thing: deterrence is key. French beach patrols may stop some crossings, especially if the dinghies are punctured, but they cannot stop the demand for a new life in Britain. This scheme offers the chance of humane deterrence. This is a nettle that must be grasped, not just by the UK and France, but by the whole of Europe. Sir Keir and Mr Macron have made a promising start.
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
UN conference for two-state solution rescheduled for end of July
Gaza water system has 'broken down' as Israel continues to deny fuel entry, IRC says Infant who had just uttered first words among dozens killed in Israeli strikes Lebanese President says no normalisation with Israel for now Nearly 800 aid-related deaths in Gaza since late May, UN says At least 57,762 Palestinians killed and 137,656 wounded since Gaza war began
