How big bucks from big tobacco prevented N.L.'s deficit from doubling
The Newfoundland and Labrador government included in this year's pre-election budget decades worth of revenues from the pending settlement of a lawsuit against tobacco companies, helping stem a flow of red ink that could have doubled the current projected deficit.
At this point, it is the only province that has decided to apply all of the cash — in Newfoundland and Labrador's case, more than half a billion dollars — to the financial ledger now.
And that has experts raising eyebrows.
"Given that it's exactly the same transaction, I don't know why there would be different recognition criteria and practices and that the provinces would account for this differently," Azfar Ali Khan, director of performance at the University of Ottawa's Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy, said in a recent interview with CBC/Radio-Canada.
"That would strike me as a bit puzzling."
His colleague — former Parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page, who is now CEO of the non-profit think tank — said that, in the final analysis, it will be Newfoundland and Labrador's auditor general who will opine on the implementation of accounting rules.
Former federal comptroller general Charles-Antoine St-Jean said Page's assessment is in line with his.
"If the minister of finance can satisfy herself — and make the case to the AG — that the payment stream is secured, there is a legitimate basis to record the full amount at this time," St-Jean wrote in an email to CBC/Radio-Canada.
"The real issue is the first word, i.e. 'if.'"
But the AG does not appear to have been brought into the loop.
Auditor General Denise Hanrahan confirmed to CBC/Radio-Canada that her office had not been consulted in advance of the decision.
The Department of Finance did not make anyone available for an interview, but in a statement said "it is not surprising to see other jurisdictions differ as to how to account for the legal settlement" as the process has been evolving over a number of years, and continues to evolve.
The government says it got an update from its external legal team on when proceedings are anticipated to wrap up.
"Based on this status update, it appeared reasonable to assume that an agreement on the payment terms of the legal settlement would be reached during the 2025-26 fiscal year," spokesperson Janelle Simms wrote in an emailed statement sent on behalf of the department.
"At which point, the basis for recognizing all revenue from the legal settlement will have been met in accordance with public sector accounting standards."
According to the department, the final accounting of the legal settlement will ultimately be determined during the public accounts process, which is subject to an audit by the auditor general.
The public accounts for this fiscal year won't be published until the fall of 2026.
Most provinces have settlement windfall under review
In contrast to Newfoundland and Labrador, most other provinces are still pondering how to account for the tobacco lawsuit windfall.
British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island all indicated the matter is still under review.
P.E.I. has only included this year's expected payment in this year's revenue estimates.
Nova Scotia stressed that it would like to speak with that province's auditor general on the best approach.
Manitoba, meanwhile, didn't book any tobacco lawsuit settlement cash in its 2025-26 fiscal plan at all.
"As the exact timing and quantum of payments are not certain enough, this settlement has not been included in the budget," the province's budget documents note.
Quebec applied a big, $1.7-billion upfront payment to last year's financial framework, with smaller year-by-year amounts ranging from $97 million to $253 million coming between now and 2030. Its overall settlement is expected to total $6.7 billion.
Ontario — which tables its budget later this week — did not respond to CBC/Radio-Canada inquiries.
Université de Moncton professor Pierre-Marcel Desjardins questions why Newfoundland and Labrador stands alone in its handling of the settlement cash right now.
"Why is it that Newfoundland and Labrador seems to be the only province accounting for all anticipated revenues this year, while the others seem to want to be more cautious?" Desjardins said.
"Without being too cynical, there may be an election deadline at play."
Voters in Newfoundland and Labrador will go to the polls within months. A provincial election must be held by October.
In March, Ontario Superior Court Chief Justice Geoffrey Morawetz approved a $32.5-billion compensation plan to be paid by three tobacco companies.
A portion of the cash will go to some smokers who were diagnosed with cancer.
Provincial and territorial governments will split about three-quarters of the overall amount — just over $24.7 billion.
Nearly 40 per cent of the compensation will be paid up front. The remainder will flow over the next couple of decades, with the companies forking over the majority of their net after-tax income until the $32.5 billion is paid in full.
Resolution has been a long time coming. The litigation dates back to the 1990s.
Newfoundland and Labrador is projecting a $372-million deficit in the 2025-26 fiscal year.
Finance Minister Siobhan Coady has downplayed any concerns about that deficit, stressing that it only represents about three per cent of the province's revenues.
At a legislative committee meeting last month, deputy minister Michelle Jewer said the province is in line to receive $520 million over 30 years from the tobacco settlement, with the full amount accruing in this year's budget.
Jewer said legal fees of around $125 million will also hit the books this year.
That results in a net benefit of almost $400 million.
The province's projected deficit could have roughly doubled without the windfall tobacco cash.
The impact of the lawsuit settlement on this year's financial picture was not mentioned in Coady's 82-minute budget speech on April 9.
Government officials revealed the revenue boost in a budget day technical briefing, when a CBC News reporter asked about a massive increase in projected fees and fines.
The province has booked decades of payments in advance before.
In 2019, money from Ottawa for a new Atlantic Accord arrangement — a deal that runs until 2056 — hit the financial statements in the initial year the deal was signed.
At the time, government officials said that was the appropriate accounting treatment, because annual payments were guaranteed at set amounts going forward.
Ian Lee, associate professor at Carleton University's Sprott School of Business, said there is risk associated with the future viability of the tobacco industry.
"If there's any industry that's a very high-risk industry of not being around in 20 years, it would be, I think it's fair to say, this would be near the top of the list, if not at the top of the list," Lee said.
"So whether or not they'll be around to pay this money is very, very uncertain."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
Are you eligible for the new Canada Disability Benefit?
Bank of Canada notes are displayed at the Bank of Canada museum in Ottawa on Wednesday, July 12, 2023. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick) Eligible Canadians can begin applying for the Canada Disability Benefit (CDB) as of June 20. The new benefit, part of the federal government's Disability Inclusion Action Plan, aims to provide financial support to Canadians living with disabilities. Who is eligible? The benefit is available to persons with disabilities between the ages of 18 and 64 who meet several requirements. Some of these requirements include qualifying for the disability tax credit (DTC), filing a 2024 income tax return with the Canada Revenue Agency, or having a spouse or common-law partner who has also filed their 2024 income tax return, if applicable. The federal government will also send letters in June to eligible Canadians to apply. The letters will include a unique application code and instructions on how to apply. According to the program's website, Canadians who do not receive a letter but believe they are eligible can still apply. To do so, they must provide a mailing address and their net income (line 23600) from their 2024 notice of assessment. How to apply Eligible Canadians can apply starting June 20 online, by phone or in person at a Service Canada office. Applicants will need a social insurance number (SIN) and direct deposit information. According to the program's website, Service Canada uses direct deposit because it is more efficient and reliable. A number of community-based organizations across Canada will also provide support throughout the CDB application process, including assistance with applying for the DTC. Canadians whose applications are received and approved by June 30 can expect first payment in July. How much is the benefit? The benefit is calculated based on various factors, including adjusted family net income. The maximum amount is $2,400 annually ($200 per month), from July 2025 to June 2026. The benefit will be adjusted for inflation each year to reflect changes in the cost of living, but the benefit will not decrease if the cost of living goes down. Eligible Canadians may also receive retroactive payments for up to 24 months prior to the date their application is received—but not for any months before July 2025.

Globe and Mail
35 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Buy Canadian movement sours sales at one Edmonton candy store
The business model for Laurie Radostits's Edmonton candy store made sense when it opened a little more than a decade ago: bring the city products that were rarely seen in Canada. It is also part of the reason that, in March, she nearly had to close down. Sweet Convenience's shelves are a colourful garden of treats, cereals and sodas: PayDay candy bars, chocolate chip pancake Pop-Tarts, vanilla Coke. The common denominator? They're American. Before President Donald Trump initiated a trade war with Canada, Sweet Convenience fed a craving for American products that were difficult to find elsewhere. Since Mr. Trump introduced the tariffs that have targeted Canadian products, those cravings have been overtaken by a patriotic desire to spend money on more Canadian-produced goods. But Ms. Radostits soon learned that, to some, 'Buy Canadian' did not necessarily mean support Canadian businesses, particularly if their products didn't bear a Canadian flag. When the one-two punch of tariffs and 'Buy Canadian' landed against Sweet Convenience in February and March, Ms. Radostits said she felt 'lots of panic.' She had only felt that worried during the COVID-19 pandemic, she said, when she faced problems sourcing cross-border products. 'We've been through COVID. Okay. Can we get through Trump?' In the past, customers had requested Ms. Radostits special order their favourite American treats. But in late February and March, some were asking her to remove U.S. products from her store shelves. If she did cut her American products, she estimated 90 per cent of her stock would be eliminated. Trying to get a step ahead of tariffs, Ms. Radostits stockpiled inventory to maintain pretariff prices for as long as possible. In hindsight, it was a bad business move. She was met with an unexpected 'Buy Canadian' boom. Her sales dwindled and she could not pay the rent, although she was able to make a deal with the landlord to keep the store open. The small Canadian business was, ironically, suffering from an unofficial campaign to support Canadian businesses. 'Support Canadian and Buy Canadian are very different,' she argues. At her most dire moment, Ms. Radostits made an online plea for customers to buy from the shop in April, suggesting the store would otherwise have to close. The candy shop's fan base and former patrons returned and carried the business through Easter. While that wave has since ebbed, it hasn't disappeared. She's not as worried about having to close, but the fear remains. Sweet Convenience is enduring a 'double squeeze,' said Melise Panetta, a marketing lecturer at the Lazaridis School of Business at Wilfrid Laurier University who has also held senior positions at large consumer companies like PepsiCo. and S.C. Johnson. The candy store is dealing with the rising cost of operations and goods that other retailers are facing, but is also losing out to the Buy Canadian consumer sentiment that other Canadian retailers are seeing as a benefit. 'Even if it's a local business owned by local individuals – and even if it's cherished – they could still be at risk of having the negative perception of the products that they carry over to their overall retail image,' Ms. Panetta said. There are other stores dotted across Canada that, like Sweet Convenience, carry American treats. At Snack Passport, in Barrie, Ont., owner Jenna MacIsaac said U.S. products made up about 80 per cent of the store's revenue. That has since dropped to less than 20 per cent, she said. Ms. MacIsaac said the store rarely brings in American products now. An analysis from the Angus Reid Institute in February found 48 per cent of Canadians had already replaced, or planned to replace, U.S. products with Canadian alternatives. Sweet Convenience's unique situation is also a test of consumers' tolerance for American products though, Ms. Panetta warned, that shunning a domestic retailer has negative effects on the Canadian economy. 'That's still people that are working in our local economy. They are contributing to the local economy, and they're Canadians.' Ms. Radostits defends stocking American products by saying her profits stay in Canada because most of her orders come through Canadian third-party importers. The prices for some of her products have risen, but she has also tried a new strategy to make the price changes seem more subtle. Instead of raising prices on familiar items, where customers may visibly notice a price spike, she has chosen to order products she hasn't stocked before. That way, customers won't feel inclined to compare prices even if the new items are also subject to tariffs. It's a more subtle sticker shock. Ms. Radostits has also started labelling U.S.-licensed items to show if they had been made elsewhere, like Mexico or the Netherlands. She is also considering ordering a wider variety of foreign items, including from places in Europe. 'I don't want to go that route, so I'm kind of hoping something will change soon,' Ms. Radostits said. European products are a niche, she said, that has already been taken. Ms. Panetta, however, said choosing other countries might be the safer option and recommends the store could also start marking tariffed items with a 'T' like grocery retailer Loblaws has done.


CTV News
41 minutes ago
- CTV News
Eastern Canadian premiers, U.S. governors to meet in Boston Monday
The flags of Canada and the United States fly outside a hotel in downtown Ottawa, on Saturday, Feb. 1, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang Eastern Canadian premiers and U.S. state governors will gather in Boston Monday to discuss trade and tariffs. The meeting, announced last month, is expected to focus on energy, manufacturing, and tourism in face of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. Attending the meeting from Canada will be Newfoundland and Labrador Premier John Hogan, Prince Edward Island Premier Rob Lantz, Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston, New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt, Quebec economic minister Christine Fréchette, and Ontario Premier Doug Ford. The premiers were invited to the meeting by Maine Gov. Janet Mills, Vermont Gov. Phil Scott, Rhode Island Gov. Daniel McKee, Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul. Canada is the largest single trading partner for Massachusetts and Maine. Mills said Trump's tariffs have damaged her state's economy and relationship with Canada. 'I understand, their feelings are hurt,' said Mills about Canadians, in an interview with CTV News Atlantic's Todd Battis Friday. 'My feelings are hurt too. The people who have a deep seeded relationship with Canada are all hurt by this. We share that feeling.' Mills and Holt have held multiple discussions about trade over the past several months. Holt, along with Lantz, travelled to Boston in March to meet with Healey. Holt said she planned to focus on energy development at Monday's meeting. 'New Brunswick supplies a lot of energy products to New England,' Holt said to reporters Thursday. 'I think 90 per cent of the cars in Boston are driving with gas that comes from the Irving refinery and us. They are keen to make sure we will continue to be a reliable supplier of energy to them.' With files from CTV's Todd Battis and Avery MacRae For more New Brunswick news, visit our dedicated provincial page.