Starmer's national security strategy to call for resilience across society
The UK's national security strategy is due to be published on Tuesday as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer travels to the Nato summit.
The document will bring together a series of reviews commissioned by the Government, including the recent strategic defence review, a review of the Aukus alliance with the US and Australia and an audit of relations with China.
It will also tie in the industrial and trade strategies and a resilience strategy.
It is expected to call for the whole of society to become more resilient and recognise national security 'means more than it used to'.
It will look at a range of areas including border security, supply chains and safety in the online world.
The strategy is expected to set out 'systematic' plans to face a world of increasing 'grey zone' threats.
Sir Keir said: 'The UK has long argued that investment in things like energy security and tackling smuggling gangs is vital to national security.
'That is reflected in the national security strategy and the spending review and is now expected to be recognised by Nato.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's strikes on Iran could upend delicate plans for NATO summit deal on defense spending
On Tuesday, two major diplomatic happenings will get underway: the start of a NATO summit in the Netherlands, which President Donald Trump is expected to attend, and the reported beginning of a ceasefire ending the hostilities between Israel and Iran. The president's decision to unilaterally intervene in the latter could drastically change the former, European officials and commentators suggest. 'Of course, the news about Iran is at this moment, grabbing all the headlines,' NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte told reporters on Monday. NATO leaders had hoped the two-day summit would be short, sweet, and concrete, producing a commitment from the 32 member nations to spend five percent of their GDP on defense, a figure high enough to reverse what Trump sees as decades of Europe freeloading on American defense largesse, reenergizing US interest in the transatlantic alliance after Trump once suggested the US might do its 'own thing' if its allies didn't invest more. Planners for the event reportedly sought to appeal to Trump by throwing a lavish dinner at the Dutch king's palace and tiptoeing around the role of Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. As the war between Israel and Iran intensified, Trump seemed to be charting a different course from his allies on a number of issues. The US operation to launch strikes on multiple Iranian facilities was underway on Friday even as European diplomats attempted to negotiate with Tehran in Geneva over the war and Iran's supplying of drones to Russia. The 15-ton US bunker buster bombs that hit Iran's nuclear site at Fordow were another reminder of the vast distance on the Iran issue between Europe and the US, which pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal during Trump's first term. The same day as Europe was attempting in vain to stall further hostilities with Iran, Trump suggested the US might not need to hit the five percent defense spending target. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' Trump said of European nations. The stance, after months of American tariffs on European nations and quickly eroding support for Ukraine, left some European observers alarmed over what Trump may do if he attends the summit. 'Our American ally has became so elusive and hostile that no one dares to imagine how this NATO summit will unfold,' columnist Sylvie Kauffmann wrote in the French newspaper Le Monde. Trump is not the only wildcard at the summit. Last week, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez warned in a letter to Rutte that his country 'cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP.' On Monday, Rutte fired back, insisting NATO members don't have the option for 'opt-out' provisions or 'side deals.' 'The fact is that Spain thinks they can achieve those targets on a percentage of 2.1 percent,' Rutte said. 'NATO is absolutely convinced Spain will have to spend 3.5%, to get there.'
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Political correctness is damaging our language
Correcting the self-censoring autocue has become an act of resistance. The formidable BBC newsreader Martine Croxall discovered as much when she amended a gender-neutral teleprompter line about 'pregnant people' to say 'women' during a live broadcast. Her quick-thinking was enthusiastically picked up on social media, praised by no less than JK Rowling, the Harry Potter author, and hailed as a fightback against the creeping encroachment of woke language. For very new readers, it behoves us to point out that only females become pregnant. True, there was once a well-regarded Saatchi & Saatchi advertising campaign featuring men disguised as expectant mothers but this was making a political point about men making decisions about women's bodies. The fundamental biological differences have not been changed either by BBC News style guides or National Health Service gender self-identification rules (which render expectant women as 'birthing persons'). What has changed is that language is becoming increasingly caged, for fear of causing offence. Anne Robinson, former presenter of The Weakest Link quiz show, found that language once seen as funny or edgy ('I never let a thought go unsaid') was later viewed as cruel or bullishly blunt. The hypersensitivity of a few is constraining language and creating a pablum of double-speak. • BBC bosses back Martine Croxall over 'pregnant people' correction The result is that the likes of Ms Croxall must add paralinguistic signals, such as the arching of a brow or the rolling of an eyeball, to distance themselves from the prepared text on the autocue. There is charm in these subversive gestures; few have forgotten the interviewer Jeremy Paxman's curled lip as he struggled to remain courteous. But too much ground has been surrendered in the name of political correctness. The result is damaging our language and clouding our expression.
Sky News
41 minutes ago
- Sky News
Amazon to invest £40bn in UK - with more warehouses and thousands of new jobs
Amazon has said it will invest £40bn in the UK over the next three years as it creates thousands of jobs and opens four new warehouses. The online shopping giant will build two huge fulfilment centres in the East Midlands, which it expects to open in 2027. The exact locations are still to be revealed. Two others - in Hull and Northampton - were previously announced and are set to be finished this year and in 2026 respectively, with 2,000 jobs expected at each site. Amazon is already one of the country's biggest private employers - with around 75,000 staff. Two new buildings will also go up at its corporate headquarters in east London, while other investment includes new delivery stations, upgrading its transport network and redeveloping Bray Film Studios in Berkshire - which it bought last year. The £40bn figure also includes most of the £8bn announced in 2024 for building and maintaining UK data centres, as well as staff wages and benefits. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the investment into Amazon's third-biggest market after the US and Germany was a "massive vote of confidence in the UK as the best place to do business". "It means thousands of new jobs - real opportunities for people in every corner of the country to build careers, learn new skills, and support their families," said Sir Keir. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, said it was a "powerful endorsement of Britain's economic strengths". Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy stressed the investment would benefit communities across the UK. "When Amazon invests, it's not only in London and the South East," he said. "We're bringing innovation and job creation to communities throughout England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, strengthening the UK's economy and delivering better experiences for customers wherever they live." However, Amazon's immense power and size continues to raise concerns among some regulators, unions and campaigners. There have long been claims over potentially dangerous conditions at its warehouses - denied by the company, while last week Britain's grocery regulator launched an investigation into whether it breached rules on supplier payments.
