Infections linked to wipes which may have been used to clean cuts
Certain products should be binned to avoid contamination, officials said.
It comes after an outbreak of a bacteria, burkholderia stabilis (B. stabilis).
There have been 51 confirmed cases of B. stabilis between 2018 and 2025, with 'some serious infections which have required hospital treatment', the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) said.
Health chiefs said the outbreak is 'suspected to be associated with some non-sterile alcohol-free wipe products'.
UKHSA and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) are advising people to stop using the products, which they may find in their at-home first aid kit, and to put them in the bin.
This includes: ValueAid Alcohol Free Cleansing Wipes; Microsafe Moist Wipe Alcohol Free and Steroplast Sterowipe Alcohol Free Cleansing Wipes.
Testing also found contamination of Reliwipe Alcohol Free Cleansing Wipes, though with a different strain of the bacteria linked to the outbreak.
While the warning only relates to the wipes listed, officials have reminded the public that non-sterile alcohol-free wipes should not be used for the treatment of wounds.
Dr James Elston, consultant in epidemiology at the UKHSA said: 'While the overall risk to the public remains very low, a number of non-sterile alcohol-free wipe products have been linked to an outbreak of Burkholderia stabilis.
'It is important these types of wipes are not used for the treatment of injuries, wounds, or broken skin, and that they are not used to clean intravenous lines.
'When treating cuts and grazes, it is important to follow NHS advice.'
Dr Alison Cave, MHRA's chief safety officer, added: 'We consider wipes which are intended for a medical purpose to be medicines. These products do not have a medicines authorisation, and we are taking appropriate action to ensure compliance with the requirements of the applicable legislation governed by MHRA.
'If you have these wipes at home or in a first aid kit, please check the label and only use wipes marked as 'sterile' on broken skin.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
How noise sensitivity disrupts the mind, brain and body
Though noise sensitivity is often dismissed by doctors, it can have long-term effects on our mental and physical health. Tap, tap, tap. Tap, tap, tap. There it was again: the incessant noise from my new upstairs neighbours, evidently still in the process of hanging up pictures or cobbling together new furniture. In my well-insulated building in central Berlin, the noise was well below decibels that would irritate anyone else. But it sent me into a rage. A tight sensation of stress rushed through my body. Even worse was the anxiety: "When will they ever be finished?" That's not the only noise that is bothering me. I notice the soft thudding across my ceilings as people get ready for bed. Somewhere in the building, I hear the high-pitched hum of a vacuum cleaner and the muffled thumping of a washing machine. The neighbour's dachshund yapping for a treat. And don't get me started on the leaf blowers and pressure washers outside. Noise – however slight – breaks my concentration and peace of mind. It is fair to say that I – along with 20-40% of the general population – am noise-sensitive, meaning that I feel more upset and disturbed by noise than the average person. It would be easy to dismiss noise sensitivity as a personality flaw, a symptom of generally being belligerent, whiny, and irritable. But, in recent years, scientists have learned that it has real biological roots. The brains of noise-sensitive people respond differently to sound and some may actually be born that way. What's more, it affects not only people's immediate mood but also their long-term mental and physical health. While there are few easy solutions, being aware of these effects can help noise-sensitive people take action to make their lives more tolerable. "It's been one of those what we might call a wastepaper basket sort of issues… that just gets pushed away by health professionals," says neuroscientist Daniel Shepherd of Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand. Only in recent years "have people actually really started to say, right, this is at an experiential level really impacting patients", he adds. "We really need to actually start getting a handle on this." Noise sensitivity isn't a formal medical diagnosis. People can find out if they're noise sensitive by taking questionnaires like the 21-question Weinstein's noise sensitivity scale (which asks, for instance, if you're bothered by people whispering and crinkling sweet wrappers in a movie theatre, if you get mad at people making noise when you're trying to sleep or work, even if the sound of bothers you if you're trying to concentrate.) Noise sensitivity is different from other sound-related conditions like misophonia. This is a specific decreased tolerance to certain sounds, like chewing, throat-clearing, tapping or ticking, which trigger intense feelings of disgust or rage, explains Jennifer Brout, a clinician and the founder of the US-based International Misophonia Research Network. Noise sensitivity is also different from hyperacusis, where people feel pain or extreme discomfort because they perceive sounds more loudly than they actually are. Noise sensitivity, by contrast, is a general reactiveness to all sounds, regardless of how loud they're perceived or how loud they actually are. At the very least, noise-sensitive people find sound disruptive and become annoyed, angry, or even fearful or anxious. "I remember a person describing it like having a mosquito flying around you," Shepherd says. "You just can't not attend to it." For those who are afraid of noise, the condition might make them so stressed that their bodies go into a fight-or-flight response. "Your heart rate goes up, your blood pressure goes up," says Stephen Stansfeld, a psychiatrist and professor emeritus at Queen Mary University of London. Sleep quality can also take a hit. In one 2021 study, researchers tracked the sleeping patterns of 500 adults in China and nighttime noise levels over the course of a week. They found that, while the noise itself didn't affect people's sleep quality, noise-sensitive individuals tended to find their sleep less restorative, rating their sleep as less refreshing and saying they felt moodier and had less energy during the day. Noise exposure has also been linked to a range of long-term health effects, including heart disease and diabetes – and noise-sensitive people may suffer the most from mental health impacts, Stansfeld says. In one 2021 study, Stansfeld and his colleagues surveyed 2,398 men in the Welsh town of Caerphilly who were exposed to different levels of road traffic noise. Those who were noise-sensitive were more likely to have long-term anxiety and depression. While that may be partly because anxious people are more vigilant about their surroundings and therefore more likely to notice noise, it's also possible that being noise sensitive can worsen anxiety. And, one 2023 survey of 1,244 adults living near airports in France found that people severely annoyed by aircraft noise levels – especially some noise-sensitive individuals – were more likely to rate their general health as poor. But why do some people react more negatively to noise than others? Studies on the brains of noise-sensitive people reveal some clues. When Shepherd and his colleagues hooked people up to devices that measured the electrical activity in their brains, those without noise sensitivity only showed heightened activity when the researchers played them threatening sounds. But in noise-sensitive people, "their brains tend to go up the gears irrespective of the sound, whether it's a threatening sound or a non-threatening sound", Shepherd recalls. Both Shepherd and the neuroscientist Elvira Brattico of Denmark's Aarhus University have independently found evidence that this has to do with how the brain filters out information about unimportant sounds. Shepherd's team found evidence that in noise-sensitive people, a specific clump of cells within the medial geniculate nucleus – a relay station for sound information entering the brain – are less efficient at this filtering task compared to the brains of those without the condition. Where most people can "filter this information out and get on with life, those who have noise sensitivity don't do it as easily", he says. This kind of filtering also seems to be important during sleep. While most people show patterns of electrical activity called spindles as they fall asleep, which are thought to be important in getting used to surrounding noise, people with noise-sensitivity have less of them – helping explain why they stay so reactive to sounds that normal people aren't bothered by. How brains end up this way, though, is a mystery. One Finnish study on twins suggests that noise sensitivity is often heritable, so some people might be predisposed to have it from birth. But it's also possible that people living in noisy environments develop sensitivity over time, Brattico says. People with anxiety, schizophrenia and autism are especially likely to develop noise sensitivity. While some people can get it after suffering traumatic brain injuries, for most it's usually something that persists over a lifetime, Stansfeld says. "It is very difficult, as compared to someone who's not noise-sensitive, to actually habituate to sound and actually desensitise to it." The ideal solution, of course, would be to tackle the sources of noise themselves. Urban planners could build quiet inner courtyards for residential buildings, use rubberised asphalt ingredients that reduce traffic noise, or erect sound-diffracting walls around highways and noisy areas like highways. Some cities in Belgium and France have already begun implementing such measures, as well as reducing vehicle speed limits, encouraging bike infrastructure and creating quiet zones in parks and along rivers. While noise is a real cause of health problems, "it's also one which is potentially avoidable", Stansfeld says. But progress is slow, leaving many noise-sensitive people to fend for themselves – for instance by avoiding noisy areas, soundproofing their living spaces or turning to earplugs, earmuffs or noise-cancelling headphones. But these methods often just dampen sounds rather than removing them altogether. "Even quiet noises might be annoying to a noise-sensitive person," Brattico says. More like this:• How traffic noise hurts children's brains• Why noise pollution is hurting your heart• The rise of highly sensitive parents Sometimes, treating underlying conditions like anxiety with medications may help, Stansfeld says. Cognitive behavioural therapy, a kind of talking therapy that centres on managing one's psychological reactions and behaviours, can make sense in settings where people are afraid of noise. "I treated somebody myself with cognitive behaviour therapy, and I think it could be quite helpful," Stansfeld says. Meanwhile, Brattico believes that music therapy with qualified practitioners could also be useful, which involves selecting soothing, soft music that calms people and builds positive associations with sound. For those wanting to try self-soothing, Brattico recommends music with few, soft instruments like piano or harp, such as Renaissance or Baroque chamber music. When even music is annoying, art therapy might help – "something that's relaxing and allows expressions and regulation of emotions", Brattico says. As for myself, it was earplugs, jazz-playing noise-cancelling headphones and a towel wrapped around my head, that eventually helped somewhat. Until the world around me becomes quieter, I can at least try to find some peace in my own mind. -- For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook and Instagram.
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Would YOU pay £250 for placenta pills? As Calvin Harris' wife Vick Hope reveals she's taking them after the birth of their son, experts give their verdict
Vick Hope has announced that she will eat her own capsulated placenta following the birth of her son Micha. Eating the placenta after birth is not an entirely foreign concept, with many claiming it can boost energy levels, aid milk production and even slash post-natal depression. But experts have previously sounded the alarm over the trend, and suggested there are no known health benefits to the mother—and even some risks. The trend has gained popularity in recent years, after Kim Kardashian and Millie Mackintosh, former Made In Chelsea star, have opened up about eating the organ, which forms during pregnancy, acting as the baby's lifeline while in the uterus. No one doubts that the placenta keeps a foetus healthy, delivering key nutrients to the baby via the umbilical cord. But a growing body of research suggests that eating it—either raw, cooked or in pill form—could be at best pointless, and even harmful. Placentophagy is the practice of eating the placenta. In the UK, mothers are usually permitted to take their placenta home if their intentions are made clear to the midwife before birth. He included a photo of Vick's placenta, which was dehydrated before being turned into supplements Routinely, the placenta and umbilical cord are stored by the hospital for 48 hours after birth so in the event that a baby becomes unwell, the organ can be sent for testing—in which case it is no longer safe to eat. Advice is given on how to look after the placenta at home safely—in a freezer—to reduce the possibility of cross-contamination. Placenta encapsulation, however, involves grinding the placenta down in its raw state, or after it has been dehydrated, costing around £250. The capsules are usually favorless and odorless. The mother then takes the placenta tablets like supplements following the birth of their child. But, speaking to the Daily Mail, health experts have criticised celebrities for promoting the practice—for which there is very little affirming research. Dr Ellie Cannon, a GP specialising in paediatric health, said: 'No healthcare professional with any integrity would endorse these pills. 'There is no scientific basis for any benefit whatsoever, physical or mental.' She continued: 'But also, when high profile people say they can do things like alleviate postpartum depression, it's dangerous. 'There's a real risk that the public will choose to take this unproven, pseudoscientific treatment rather than seek medical help.' Meanwhile, Dr Ashfaq Khan, a consultant obstetrician and gynecologist said there are 'no scientific studies' that suggest consuming a placenta boasts any health benefits. This view is echoed in several review papers published in medical journals. A 2018 study found that women who were given placebo capsules or placental pills experienced no significant changes in mood, energy levels or the emotional bond with their newborn baby. One study that evaluated the amount of hormones in the placenta could potentially reach a level of physiological impact if ingested. However, once the placenta is handled, dehydrated and packaged into a pill, it is unclear if the hormones are biologically present anymore. Nevada-based researchers also found that eating the placenta after birth offers no benefit to new mothers, highlighting that consuming placenta pills is not a sufficient source of iron. Dr Sharon Young, lead author of the study said: 'While the study doesn't provide firm support for or against the claims about the benefits of placentophagy, it does shed light on this much debated topic. 'What we have uncovered are interesting areas for future exploration, such as small impacts on hormone levels for women taking placenta capsules, and small improvements in mood and fatigue in the placenta group.' In 2017, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention issued a warning against the practice after a baby was diagnosed with a strep infection after his mother consumed placenta pills. The infection - which kills one baby a week in the UK - was transferred to the baby through breast milk when the mother took placental capsules. In a shocking report the corona said: 'That's the case that still haunts everyone in the industry.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Houseplant clinic: why is my mistletoe cactus turning brown?
What's the problem? My mistletoe cactus (Rhipsalis) thrived for more than five years, but recently started to brown, with strands falling off. I repotted it into a slightly larger pot with no drainage holes and a layer of gravel at the bottom, but it continues to decline despite weekly watering. How can I save my plant? Diagnosis Your mistletoe cactus probably isn't getting sufficient hydration. Cautious watering can lead to soil that is superficially damp but remains dry at a deeper level. This often manifests as browning stems, shrivelling and segments dropping off as the plant becomes stressed due to a lack of moisture at the roots. Prescription Repot into a pot with drainage holes, or use a nursery pot inside the decorative pot. Use compost specifically designed for succulents or cacti. After repotting, give it a thorough watering until water flows from the drainage holes. Then, let it dry out somewhat between waterings, typically every one to two weeks. Mistletoe cacti thrive on consistent moisture but detest waterlogged conditions, so good drainage is essential. Prevention Ensure that pots used for succulents and cacti have sufficient drainage holes. Regularly checking soil moisture by touching the soil a few centimetres down helps you accurately judge watering needs. Got a plant dilemma? Email saturday@ with 'Houseplant clinic' in the subject line
