
How much battery range has this electric Volkswagen lost after clocking 107,000 miles in four years?
But a team of professional vehicle testers have revealed the impact of heavy use on the condition of EV battery is not all that dramatic.
ADAC, Germany's equivalent to the AA, and its team of vehicle accessors have been extensively using an electric Volkswagen ID.3 for the last four years.
In that time, it has clocked 107,000 miles. As such, it has now exceeded the 77kWh high-voltage battery's 100,000-mile warranty.
It analysed the battery's health and found it had declined 9 per cent – an average of 2.25 per cent annually.
However, this has translated to a loss of just eight miles for its measured full-charge range, the motoring organisation claims.
Now find out how much it has cost service, fix and run in general...
Due to the relative infancy of EVs, for the meantime it is difficult to truly measure the lifecycle of their batteries.
While testers can accelerate the impact of mileage and charging by repeatedly running them in artificial scenarios in laboratory conditions, this is not a robust reflection of typical driving behaviour - and doesn't play to the advantages of batteries, which do not perform optimally when subjected to extended periods of consistent use.
Therefore, ADAC's latest 'endurance test' results using a Volkswagen ID.3 with the 77kWh battery (costing from £39,000 in the UK, which is marginally over the threshold for Labour's new Electric Car Grant) can be considered an accurate depiction of what drivers should expect from EV battery performance and longevity as these cars get older and driven over longer distances.
The same car it originally tested in 2021 was retained by the team of testers and driven by various employees over the last four years through all seasons.
The VW has been regularly recharged up to 100 per cent and left at that level for several days while being shared by its team of engineers, it explained.
The company says most recharges have been completed using a rapid charger at its testing headquarters, meaning the battery was fast charged much more often than would be the case for a typical EV owner.
Studies have shown that UK drivers of electric cars are most likely to recharge using a slower 7kW wallbox at their home overnight using their domestic energy tariff.
ADAC's report at 107k miles says that software updates over the car's life have gradually improved its energy efficiency, which has offset some of the losses from the battery.
When it lab tested the ID.3 in 2021, it was measured at covering 3.11 miles per kWh.
Having retested the same vehicle after surpassing the battery's warranty, it is now doing 3.40 miles per kWh.
The team has also calculated the real-world performance outside lab conditions, with the EV achieving an average of 2.70 miles per kWh over 107,000 miles.
Over the air software updates provided by Volkswagen since 2021 have also improved the battery's charging speed as well as range efficiency.
Four years earlier, ADAC said the ID.3 was measured drawing a maximum of 125kW when charging. However, since the software upgrades, it can now achieve charging speeds of 160kW.
This translated to a two-minute time saving when charging from 10 to 80 per cent, it said.
Tests of the battery's sate of health was also consistently monitored.
Between 13,500 and 43,200 miles, ADAC said it was showing a sustained health level of 96 per cent, dropping by 1 per cent when it reached the latter distance.
It fell again to 95 per cent at 52,400 miles, slipping to 93 per cent at 64,000 and 92 per cent by 80,000 miles.
Between 90,600 and 107,000 miles, it has a battery health reading of 91 per cent.
This puts the battery condition well above the battery warranty's minimum level, which is 70 per cent after 100k or 10 years, whichever comes first.
Its team of technicians said more recent VW models should perform even better than the ID.3.
This is because newer EVs from the German car giant have battery heaters that can be activated remotely by drivers, meaning they will require shorter charging breaks during colder temperatures.
Last year, a separate study of 5,000 'real-life' modern EVs concluded that batteries are showing slower signs of degradation than engine components used in petrol and diesel cars.
Geotab - a leading firm in fleet and business telematics - carried out analysis of the battery health of fleet and private EVs, using 1.5 million days of telematics data to explore how the latest battery technology holds up to the rigours of daily use.
The data suggested that EV batteries in current models degrade, on average, by 1.8 per cent annually.
When it conducted the same study back in 2019, it found that the efficiency of batteries was declining at a rate of 2.3 per cent per year on average, suggesting advances have been made in the last five years to extend the lifespan of the technology.
The report went on to say that EV batteries now 'generally degrade more slowly than internal combustion engine drivetrain components'.
ADAC drove and charged the VW ID.3 through all seasons over the last 4 years. The battery has now surpassed its warranty mileage, though is proving reliable. But the car itself has suffered a few hiccups over the last 48 months...
Not all plain sailing...
While the battery performance of the electric Volkswagen impressed, ADAC said the four-year spell with the car hasn't been entirely faultless.
It reported an issue with the GPS antenna, which also rendered the eCall system [which automatically calls VW's emergency line if the car is involved in a crash] unavailable. The cost to put this right was €525 (£455).
And at 98,000 miles the ID.3 'briefly broke down' due to a fault with the automatic door opening system prevented it from starting.
'This problem could only be resolved with a software update,' the German testers said.
A defect in the charging flap also had to be repaired at the workshop for €227 (£197).
That said, ADAC claims the running costs for the Golf-sized electric VW have been 'pleasingly' low.
Despite covering more than 100,000 miles, it has undergone just two scheduled services costing a total of €427 (£370), of which almost half was to re-gas the air conditioning system.
All Volkswagen electric ID models have two-year service intervals, irrespective of the mileage. This is due to the fewer moving mechanical parts.
ADAC will continue to measure the performance of the electric hatchback.
It said it will be testing the battery health and measuring the maximum available range again at 250,000km (155k miles).
'The endurance test is far from over and will continue to monitor the battery after the warranty expires and to document any unforeseen repairs,' it said in an official statement.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Auto Car
an hour ago
- Auto Car
New Tesla Model Y squares up to Skoda Enyaq in family EV showdown!
Open gallery Model Y or Enyaq - which takes the family EV crown? Quick steering and a more rear-biased drive set-up make the Tesla seem agile Minimalist Tesla interior feels solidly built overall and provides good space Skoda's front end will tend to run wide of the apex if you push hard Skoda's cabin creates a slightly more upmarket ambience and is roomy Close Tesla's in a spot of bother. Its sales across Europe have dropped and profits have taken an even more vertiginous slump. Adding to its woes was the recent news that it was forced to issue its eighth (yes, you read that right) recall of its cubist Cybertruck, this time to remedy its propensity for shedding stainless steel bodywork. So what's going on? If you look at many of the headlines, the finger points directly at the company's controversialist CEO, Elon Musk. His appetite for attracting attention of the wrong kind certainly hasn't helped lure customers into showrooms – although it has created a cottage industry in 'not in my name' bumper stickers – but as ever the answer is, well, more complicated than that. For starters, there's the current tariff situation. Then there's the fact that Tesla is actually more of a tech company than a car firm, which brings its own challenges. Like a smartphone manufacturer, it's all about the software, and in this respect it's one of the best in the business, streets ahead of the legacy brands (and that also includes its understanding of battery chemistry). Yet this means it doesn't follow some of the tried and tested methods of the established practitioners, such as model cycles that include visually appealing mid-life refreshes designed to persuade people to part with their cash for cars that might otherwise be getting close to their sell-by date. By contrast, Tesla's line-up comes across visually as a bit old hat, as if the company has been peddling the same, unchanged product from day one. The recent Model 3 'Highland' is a case in point. It's a thoroughly overhauled car, but to the casual observer it could just as easily be the 2017 original. The same can be said of the Model S and Model X, which have both benefited from top to bottom technical titivation but are indistinguishable from their decade-old progenitors. However, the stakes are higher for the Model Y, which is the brand's best-seller and until very recently topped the sales charts across Europe. As a result, Tesla has taken a leaf out of rivals' books and delivered a facelift that will leave buyers in no doubt this is a box-fresh proposition. Speaking of which, the Tesla isn't the only family-sized all-electric EV to have gone under the knife. The Skoda Enyaq Coupé (and its more sensible SUV sibling) has always been one of our favourite protagonists in this corner of the market, and five years on from its debut the Czech machine has been treated to the industry-standard nip and tuck. Looks are clearly subjective but, to our eyes, Tesla's tweaks are more eye-catching. You can see the DNA of the original car between the A- and C-pillars, but at the front there's a Cybertruck-inspired nose complete with a pencil-thin LED light bar, while the rear features a neat-looking, indirectly lit, full-width tail-light. By contrast, Skoda has grafted its bold new 'Tech-Deck' nose onto the Enyaq, but the rest of the car's appearance has been left largely untouched. It's a similar story inside, where the Skoda looks and feels very much the same as the old car. There's a revised 13in infotainment screen that looks slicker and responds more swiftly but otherwise it's business as usual. This means that, unlike in the Model Y, you do get some handy physical shortcut keys and a separate display ahead of the driver for speed and range information. As ever, the Tesla's dashboard is dominated by its centrally mounted infotainment screen, which literally controls all of the car's major functions (although, unlike in the Model 3, there is an actual column stalk for the indicators. Hallelujah!). Still, the set-up is one of the best around, proving a doddle to navigate and always responding crisply to your demands. It's sufficiently good that you almost don't miss the odd button or two. With its greater mix of rich materials and more complex dashboard and door mouldings, the Skoda's cabin looks a little more upmarket than the Model Y's, but in terms of touchy-feely perceived quality, there's little to separate the two. In fact, it's the uplift in solidity that you notice most in the starkly minimalist cabin of the Tesla. There are still some areas of the car that look a little hand-finished – the cheap LED spotlight in the boot and the thin fabric covering the A-pillar-mounted tweeters – but overall the Model Y is full of appealing materials and exhibits a tight fit and finish. The Tesla also scores strongly for space and versatility, which is surely one of the biggest considerations with cars like these. There's a large load area with plenty of underfloor storage compartments, plus the trademark 117-litre frunk. (The Skoda's bonnet lifts to reveal various EV ancillaries but no space for luggage overspill from its 570-litre boot.)Rear occupants in the Model Y also have plenty of head and leg room, while a powered reclining backrest and completely flat floor add to the feeling of comfort. What's more, the addition of a small touchscreen now allows occupants to adjust the temperature and switch on their heated seats without having to issue orders to the driver. Up front, the sense of space is enhanced by the low scuttle and large windscreen, which helps deliver a more panoramic view of the road than in the Skoda. However, this Sportline-trim Enyaq hits back with heavily bolstered front seats that offer greater support. Grab the tape measure and you'll find the Enyaq pretty much matches the Model Y for accommodation. Where the Skoda edges ahead is in those thoughtful details that have become a calling card for the Czech brand, such as the umbrellas secreted in the front doors and the multitude of handy boot dividers, hooks and nets. That said, you're unlikely to run out of room for odds and ends in the Model Y, with its large, carpeted door bins, cupholders galore and a lidded cubby between the front seats that's so deep you'll need to send Lassie for help if you ever fall in. So it's even-stevens for practicality, but what about performance and poise? Once again, our two dual-motor contenders are separated by the width of a Tesla key card, but they go about their business in slightly different ways. If outright urge is your thing, though, the Model Y is a slam-dunk choice. With 375bhp and a lower, 1997kg kerb weight, the Tesla is seriously rapid and feels especially so in Sport mode, when its throttle response is even sharper. The 282bhp Enyaq, with a claimed 0-62mph of 6.7sec, is no slouch but it's left gasping in its rival's wake on a straight road. Throw some corners into the mix and there's less clear air between the two. With its quick, albeit lifeless, steering, the Tesla feels more agile – an impression exaggerated by a rear-biased power delivery that allows you to tighten your cornering line with a dose of throttle. Special mention also has to go to the new brake-by-wire set-up, which offers a firm pedal and plenty of progression. With its slower but better-weighted steering, the Skoda feels a little lazier in its reactions, its narrower-section front tyres gently squealing into safe understeer at the limit. Yet despite its heftier kerb weight, the Enyaq feels better tied down over bumpier stretches of Tarmac, containing body movements more effectively than the Tesla, which can hop and corkscrew a little when pressing on. Traction isn't a problem for either all-wheel-drive vehicle. The Skoda maintains a narrow advantage when it comes to cruising comfort. Both have firm low-speed rides – although the newly softened Tesla is much better here than its predecessor – that calm down at speed, and while each delivers decent refinement, the Enyaq does a marginally better job of isolating you from road and wind noise. You can also tailor the regen brake assistance in each – a first for Tesla – although the Model Y has a more effective one-pedal calibration. As you would expect, both cars have driver aids galore – and you'll be either fine or frustrated with that depending on your point of view. On the plus side, turning off the lane keeping assistance is a doddle in either car and the other systems are as unobtrusive as they get these days. Mind you, because the Model Y uses plenty of cameras (the Enyaq favours radar), its various warnings become increasingly inconsistent as each lens becomes coated with road grime. So we have established that each of these cars is practical, delivers all the performance you're ever likely to need and, while you're unlikely to pick either for a dawn raid on your favourite roads, they both steer and stop with admirable accuracy and agility. Tesla Model Y vs Skoda Enyaq Coupe: Verdict Ultimately, then, it comes down to the numbers – and again the margins are tight, although the more cost-effective contender probably isn't the one you would expect. When it comes to claimed range, the Model Y totes a figure of 364 miles as standard, reduced to 353 miles with the optional wheels of our test car, while the Skoda stretches to 334 miles. Thanks to Tesla's mastery of battery chemistry, motor efficiency and (relatively) lightweight construction methods, the Model Y gets closer to its WLTP numbers in real-world use. Over the course of our test, it delivered an impressive efficiency return of 3.8mpkWh, whereas the Enyaq could manage only 3.4mpkWh. Then there's the thorny issue of cash. In Long Range AWD form, the Tesla's sticker price is £51,990, a scant £1330 more than the Enyaq. Yet nobody turns up to a dealer with a suitcase full of banknotes for cars like these: they plonk down a deposit and finance the rest. Put your pen to a PCP deal and over four years you'll shell out £499 a month for the Model Y and £527 for the Skoda. Again, not that much in it, but there's something significant about Tesla getting one over on a brand famed for delivering value for money. Are these cost savings enough to swing the result in favour of the Model Y? By the tightest of margins, we would say yes. Sure, Tesla has some PR issues bubbling away in the background, but as a spacious, sensible and swift family wagon that packs genuinely innovative engineering, the new Model Y makes a compelling choice. Maybe that will give Elon something to smile about. 1st. Tesla Model Y The revised Tesla Model Y fixes most of its predecessor's flaws yet retains its efficiency, performance and impressive practicality. 2nd. Skoda Enyaq Coupe It's a close-run thing for the Skoda Enyaq, which in facelifted form remains a refined, thoughtfully designed and thoroughly likeable car. Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you'll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here. Next Prev In partnership with


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
New tool could revolutionise skin cancer diagnosis
A groundbreaking artificial intelligence tool, developed by PhD student Tess Watt at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, aims to revolutionise skin cancer diagnosis. The system allows patients to photograph skin complaints using a camera attached to an inexpensive Raspberry Pi device, which then analyses the image against a vast dataset for real-time diagnosis. Designed for early detection, the tool is intended to provide rapid assessments globally, particularly in remote regions, without requiring direct access to dermatologists or internet connectivity. The research team reports the tool is up to 85 per cent accurate, with ongoing efforts to enhance its diagnostic capabilities by accessing more skin lesion datasets. Discussions are underway with NHS Scotland for ethical approval, with a pilot project anticipated within the next one to two years, aiming for eventual widespread implementation.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Farmers warn of 'toe curling' risks on roads
Farmers have urged motorists to be patient when travelling on rural roads during the harvest season after "several scary moments".Henry Moreton, who farms near Woodhall Spa in Lincolnshire, said he had encountered multiple incidents of drivers attempting to overtake his tractor and combine harvester when it is not safe to do so."It does make your toes curl up," he said. "You're better getting home two minutes later than not getting home at all. There are too many accidents, head on collisions with tractors and machinery. Just be vigilant." Jason Butler, the owner of Pumpkin Patch Produce in Bewholme, East Yorkshire, said: "You do see some daft things - people overtaking on blind corners and taking unnecessary risks. "If everyone went a bit steadier and had a bit more patience, then everyone would get there safely." A spokesperson for insurer NFU Mutual said collisions between agricultural vehicles and third parties were 65% more likely between the start of May and the end of September, compared with other months. Mr Moreton, who is Lincolnshire county chair of the National Farmers' Union (NFU), described a "terrifying wincing moment" when a minibus with children on board attempted to overtake him on a blind bend."The thing is, we will have to deal with the consequences," he said. "We're the first responder. We're going to be the people getting people out of those cars or that bloke out of the hedge on his motorbike. It's a really scary thing. It's terrifying really."NFU president Tom Bradshaw said: "We'll do our best to make sure we have safe loads, that we're not holding up the traffic too much, but this is a two-way thing. There needs to be a bit of understanding from everybody." According to the Highway Code, if you are planning to overtake a large vehicle you should: Drop back, make sure there is enough room, and do not cut in too quicklyBe aware large vehicles may need extra space when turningDo not cross double white lines where the line nearest you is solid unless it is safe and you need to enter an adjoining premises or roadYou can also cross double white lines to overtake a vehicle traveling at 10mph (16km/h) or lessIf you are driving a large vehicle: Do not hold up a long queue of trafficCheck your mirrors frequently and, if necessary, pull in where it is safe and let traffic passVehicles with a maximum speed of 25mph (40km/h) or less must use a flashing amber beacon on unrestricted dual carriagewaysMr Moreton said: "We will pull over if we can, but in certain conditions, we can't."We're very proud to serve the British public by growing food, so if the British public could give us a minute or two of their time, we will get out of the way as quick as possible." Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices