Corruption hunters say Trump's USAID cuts just made organized crime groups 'much more dangerous'
While most of the fallout from the destruction of USAID will be felt abroad, journalists who were formerly funded by the agency say that the cuts are likely to enable organized crime and corruption abroad, which ultimately impact everyday Americans.
The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project is among the largest international investigative journalism outfits, and up until a few weeks ago, the project received significant funding from USAID. The group's reporting has been involved with some of the biggest international corruption stories in recent memory, including the Panama Papers, the Paradise Papers and the Russian Laundromat.
Drew Sullivan, an investigative reporter and one of the founders of OCCRP, told Salon that the organization received about 38% of its operational budget from the United States government, coming through agencies like USAID, the National Endowment of Democracy and the State Department. Since the cuts came down, Sullivan said the organization has had to lay off about 40% of its staff.
This has impacted reporting projects covering topics from Tren de Aragua in El Salvador to 'Ndrangheta in Italy to money laundering operations buying up real estate in the United States. Sullivan said, from even from strictly an efficiency standpoint, the cuts don't make sense, because OCCRP's investigations, and the investigations conducted by its partner organizations, have helped return more money to Americans than it costs to keep these outfits open.
'We've had a tremendous return to U.S. taxpayers. Over $3 billion has been returned to U.S. coffers in the United States,' Sullivan said. 'Every dollar invested in OCCRP has returned $100 to the U.S. Treasury or other government agencies'
This, Sullivan says, is in addition to the fact that cutting funding for journalists leaves many of them vulnerable to arrest or at risk of being removed from the country they work in, as many require work visas.
Pavla Holcova, a regional editor for OCCRP in Central Europe, worked on investigations into topics like the Pegasus Project and the Russian Asset Tracker.
'It's kind of short-sighted to think that the U.S. will save money by cutting this budget, because we, as journalists, getting this kind of grants, we are just keeping the environment for business much more transparent and much more accountable than it would be otherwise,' Holcova told Salon.
One OCCRP investigation, for example, exposed how real estate in American cities like New York and Miami have become top destinations for those seeking to invest laundered cash. The demand for such investment properties rose to a level that developers appear to have contributed millions to New York City politicians in what appears to have been a successful effort to secure millions of dollars in tax breaks for developers building luxury properties.
Holcova said, in her view, the cuts by President Donald Trump and Republicans are short-sighted and that these issues of corruption and organized crime are likely to become 'much more dangerous' if reporting teams are disassembled.
Attila Biro, another journalist associated with OCCRP, reports on crime and corruption from Romania. His work in Romania led him to cover a credit-card skimming operation in Latin America. In the operation, an international gang operating in Romania and Mexico allegedly stole the credit card information of tourists by tampering with ATMs. The scheme brought in around $1.2 billion, which was funneled into real estate investments in the United States and Brazil.
'If you were a tourist and you were going to Cancun, and you were using your credit card there, there were big, big chances that your data was stolen by this organized crime group that we have investigated. We have exposed them. We have showed the authorities how they are acting, and the FBI and other law enforcement in Mexico, in Romania and other parts shut this group down,' Biro told Salon. 'You know, we are going after organized crime figures that affect everyone, no matter what type of political affiliation you have, you know, like monsters who steal from, you know, Democrats and Republicans at the same rate.'Biro said funding through OCCRP and the United States government enabled their investigation and the training of reporters to do these sorts of investigations. He said without this funding, his organization is taking things 'month by month.'
As it stands, OCCRP is one of the organizations that has sued the federal government in an attempt to restore the funding it was supposed to receive, as allocated by Congress, and it joined with the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition in the suit.
While the federal judge hearing the case agreed and ordered funding restored, the White House responded by claiming that, despite the court order, the administration still maintained the authority to freeze funds and terminate grants.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
20 minutes ago
- Business Insider
American tourists can't quite quit Europe
The American dream may be struggling, but for many, the Euro summer dream is alive and well. Jimin Shim, a millennial copywriter who lives in Denver, has plenty of concerns about the economy, from stock market volatility that she feels has been brought on by the current administration to a tough job market. Still, she's vacationing in Portugal later this month, and treating her mom to the trip too. "Traveling is very important to me. I try to do at least one international trip a year and then maybe a couple of domestic trips," she told Business Insider. "And because I know that that is a priority for me, it's something that I budget for and am saving up for all year round." While there's been some softening in leisure travel demand this year, data and surveys suggest Shim is one of many Americans who are weighing their international travel plans against their worries about the economy and saying, "book it." The extent to which Americans are pulling back on international trips this summer is not fully clear. An analysis from Cirium, an aviation analytics company, found summer bookings from the US to Europe were down nearly 10% from January to May compared to last year. Meanwhile, a summer travel survey from Deloitte, released in May, found more Americans were traveling internationally this summer compared to 2024, with most headed to Europe. And a recent data analysis by Allianz Partners, a travel insurance and assistance company, found summer travel from the US to Europe would increase by 10% in 2025. The economy isn't the only reason Americans might rethink travel to Europe this summer. The weakening US dollar doesn't go as far as it used to, and some Americans are worried about their safety or not feeling welcomed abroad due to the current administration's approach to foreign policy. Americans are also waiting longer to book their trips, which could complicate the picture. Still, it's clear that many Americans are traveling abroad despite the downturn in consumer sentiment. "I think you're seeing a hesitancy," Amir Eylon, president and CEO of Longwoods International, a market research consultancy that specializes in the travel tourism industry, told BI. "I still believe a majority of American travelers who were planning to go abroad are still going to go abroad." The enduring appeal of Euro summer Eylon said that while there are indications of a slowdown, it does not look like a "game-changing" shift. His firm's monthly consumer sentiment survey of 1,000 travelers found the number of American travelers who said they were very likely to take an international trip in the next 12 months declined from 25% in January to 19% in May. He noted travelers seemed to be in a "wait and see" mode this spring, echoing what other industry experts have said and previously told BI — that travelers are booking closer to travel dates, in part as they search for good deals. Eylon said it is possible there will be an overall decline in Americans visiting Europe this year, but it's too soon to tell the full picture. He thinks those canceling or ditching trip plans will be in the minority. "American travelers view it as a need more than a want," he said of travel, adding that many see it as a "right." Meredith Pierce, a travel content creator based in Atlanta, said that's exactly how she and many other millennials and Gen Zers view travel, including to Europe. Pierce posts a lot of popular "Euro summer" content and sees it as a persistent and lasting travel trend, even when folks have financial concerns. "Everyone loves the idea of sipping an Aperol spritz and looking at the Mediterranean," Pierce said, "especially if maybe you are stressed in your day-to-day life because of politics or the economy or budgets, or anything like that. A bit of escapism I think comes into play there as well." The hesitancy fueled by economic uncertainty could also make it a bit more affordable to travel to Europe this summer. Eylon noted the slowdown in leisure travel led to some declines in airfare prices, which may have pushed some hesitant Americans to take the plunge. When economic concerns, largely fueled by Trump's tariff policy, intensified in March and April, some airlines suspended their forecasts for the year, and flight prices declined. Rather than get spooked by the economic uncertainty, Pierce believes plenty of people pounced. Her "Euro summer" content from last year started going viral, and she was getting flooded with DMs and questions from people who found a cheap flight to Europe and were suddenly planning their trips. Pierce said some budget-conscious travelers are opting for more affordable and under-the-radar destinations in Europe, such as Albania or Poland, which feature similarly picturesque scenes but at a lower cost than Italy or Paris. More frugal spending once they get to their destination Deloitte's summer travel survey noted that many American travelers already had their big summer trips partially or even fully booked by April, when concerns around tariffs and the economy intensified. The survey also found that while consumers' sense of financial well-being was down year-over-year in April, slightly more Americans planned to take leisure vacations this summer compared to 2024. Deloitte found travelers looking to save were cutting back on in-destination spending as well as opting for more affordable lodging and flight classes. The survey also found that while some are being more frugal, many Americans are prioritizing bucket list trips and international travel, or trips that are otherwise special in some way. Deloitte found 42% of air travelers were flying internationally on their longest summer trip, compared to 38% in 2024. Those traveling internationally were also more likely to increase their travel budget compared to last year. Shim, the copywriter from Denver, also has a special reason for making her Portugal trip work this year, despite her financial concerns. Her family has been going through a tough time after her grandfather's death last year. This vacation is a way to spend quality time with and treat her mom, who has never been to Europe, and take the first trip that's just the two of them. "I also think that sometimes in these times of uncertainty and tumultuousness and a lot of tension and division, traveling and spending quality time with family who loves you is a great way to just take care of your mental and emotional health too," she said, "which I think is also very important to do."
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How to put Dave Ramsey's ‘7 Baby Steps' into action
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Breaking out of the debt cycle isn't easy. According to research by Empower, 37% of Americans can't cover a $400 emergency expense without borrowing money or dipping into their savings. And a startling 145 million Americans have less than $1,000 in savings. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) So how do you beat debt and build wealth if you're living paycheck to paycheck? You may have already heard of Dave Ramsey's 7 Baby Steps. The radio host and personal finance personality has popularized this step-by-step guide to take control of your money. "It's not a fairy tale. Anyone can do it, and the plan works every single time,' according to Ramsey. 'Many people have used the plan to ditch debt, increase wealth, and live and give like no one else.' Whether it's high-yield savings accounts or low-fee investment options, here are tools that can help you put Dave Ramsey's 7 Baby Steps into action. An emergency fund is a savings buffer set aside for unexpected expenses like home or car repairs – so you can avoid going into debt in case of an unplanned financial situation. 'Without an emergency fund, you are one car repair or medical bill away from financial disaster,' Ramsey noted. But starting an emergency fund doesn't have to be overwhelming. One of the easiest ways to kickstart your emergency fund is by automatically saving your spare change. Starting a new bank account and contributing any extra money can help grow your emergency fund over time. Another smart way to grow your emergency fund is by reducing monthly expenses. For instance, many people are overpaying for car insurance simply because they don't compare rates regularly. makes it easy to compare quotes from leading insurers in your area, potentially saving you hundreds of dollars annually on premiums. The process is 100% free and won't affect your credit score. In just a few clicks, you could pay as little as $29 a month. The money you save on lower insurance rates can go directly into your emergency fund, accelerating your progress toward financial security. As of the third quarter of 2024, total credit card debt in the U.S. reached an all-time high of $1.17 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve. Dave Ramsey recommends using the debt snowball method to pay off your debts. Focus on paying off the smallest debt first while making minimum payments on the others. Once the smallest is paid off, move that payment to the next smallest debt and keep going. "Debt isn't a math problem; it's a behavior problem. The debt snowball method helps you change your behavior by giving you quick wins and keeping you motivated,' according to Ramsey. Consolidating all your debts is an effective way to get rid of your debt faster. Instead of juggling multiple monthly payments, you'll have one predictable payment to manage each month. Even after consolidating your major debts, staying debt-free can be challenging especially with rising costs and unforeseen expenses. Budgeting and tracking can help you understand where your money is going, so you can make every dollar work for you. With YNAB, you can track spending and saving all in one place. Link your accounts so you can see a big-picture look of your expenses and net worth growth. You can prioritize saving for short or long term goals — like a vacation or a down payment for a house — with the app's goal tracking feature. If you want to pay debts faster, you can create personalized paydown plans to calculate how much interest you'd save if you topped up your monthly payments with a little extra. The easy-to-use platform allows you to simplify spending decisions and clarify your financial priorities. Plus, you don't need to add your credit card information to start your free trial today. Now that your debt is behind you, keep moving forward with Dave Ramsey's Baby Steps by focusing on building your fully funded emergency fund. 'Take the money you were using to pay down debt and set aside three to six months' worth of expenses,' according to Ramsey. This will safeguard you from life's bigger unexpected bumps – like job loss or a medical emergency – and help you stay on track without slipping back into debt. Parking your cash in a high-yield savings account can significantly boost your savings and keep you on course to reach your financial goals. Such accounts offer interest rates that are often 10 to 12 times higher than the national average for traditional savings accounts, which currently stands at around 0.41%. Unfortunately, over 82% of Americans aren't using such high-yield savings accounts — leaving money on the table, according to CNBC Select. So, it's important to shop around and compare rates. The next Baby Step is to start investing 15% of your gross income towards retirement. 'By the time you're 67, you should still be working because you want to, not because you have to,' said Ramsey. A trusted, pre-screened financial advisor can help you develop a solid retirement strategy. According to research by Vanguard, people who work with financial advisors see a 3% increase in net returns. This difference can be substantial over time. For instance, if you start with a $50,000 portfolio, you could potentially retire with an extra $1.3 million after 30 years of professional guidance. With Vanguard, you can connect with a personal advisor who can help assess how you're doing so far and make sure you've got the right portfolio to meet your goals on time. Vanguard's hybrid advisory system combines advice from professional advisers and automated portfolio management to make sure your investments are working to achieve your financial goals. All you have to do is fill out a brief questionnaire about your financial goals, and Vanguard's advisers will help you set a tailored plan, and stick to it. Once you're set, you can sit back as Vanguard's advisors manage your portfolio. Because they're fiduciaries, they don't earn commissions, so you can trust that the advice you're getting is unbiased. Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — By this point, following Dave Ramsey's 7 Baby Steps, you've paid off most of your debts (except the mortgage) and started saving for retirement. The next step is to begin saving for your children's college expenses. For example, you can open a high-yield checking and savings account which helps to build your savings over time. By combining these two powerful tools – earning higher interest rates on your cash while systematically funding a tax-advantaged 529 plan – you can build a solid college savings strategy that works in the background while you focus on other aspects of family life and the next Dave Ramsey Baby Step. Now, bring it all home. Your mortgage is the only thing between you and complete freedom from debt. Ramsey said, 'Baby Step 6 is the big dog!' Refinancing your home loan could help you pay off your mortgage early in two effective ways. By securing a lower interest rate, you can either maintain your current monthly payment while more of it goes toward the principal, or you can opt for a shorter loan term to accelerate your path to homeownership. When you refinance to a shorter term, such as moving from a 30-year to a 15-year mortgage, you'll typically receive a lower interest rate while significantly reducing the total interest paid over the life of your loan. Though your monthly payments may increase, you'll build equity faster and own your home outright years earlier than planned. The average homeowner sits on roughly $311,000 in equity as of the third quarter of 2024, according to CoreLogic. Having access to your home equity could help to cover unexpected expenses, pay substantial debt, fund a major purchase like a home renovation or supplement income from your retirement nest egg. Rates on HELOCs and home equity loans are typically lower than APRs on credit cards and personal loans, making it an appealing option for homeowners with substantial equity. Ramsey said the last step is the most rewarding: keep building wealth, become outrageously generous and leave a legacy. Real estate has long been a proven path to building generational wealth. For the 12th year in a row, Americans have ranked real estate as the best long-term investment in 2024, according to a new Gallup survey. Today it's easier than ever to enter the market with crowdfunding investing platforms like Arrived. For as little as $100, Arrived offers you access to shares of SEC-qualified investments in rental homes and vacation rentals, curated and vetted for their appreciation and income potential. Backed by world class investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived makes it easy to fit these properties into your investment portfolio regardless of your income level. Their flexible investment amounts and simplified process allows accredited and non-accredited investors to take advantage of this inflation-hedging asset class without any extra work on your part. The next factor to consider is the preservation and protection of your wealth. Life insurance is one such tool for protecting your wealth, offering financial security for your family and ensuring your legacy is preserved. When selecting an insurance type, Dave Ramsey recommends that families choose term life insurance over whole life insurance and invest the significant savings in a tax-advantaged retirement account. Term life insurance offers coverage for a predetermined period that typically ranges from 10 to 30 years. If the insured person dies during this term, the policy pays a death benefit to the designated beneficiaries. Term insurance is usually a less expensive and more flexible option compared to whole life insurance. Young families and busy professionals looking for fast and affordable insurance can easily connect with Ethos and get term life insurance in 5 minutes, with no medical exams or blood tests. With Ethos, you can get a policy with up to $2 million in coverage, starting at just $2 per day. The application process ensures you get flexible coverage options quickly and transparently, allowing you to focus on what matters most. JPMorgan sees gold soaring to $6,000/ounce — use this 1 simple IRA trick to lock in those potential shiny gains (before it's too late) Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among America's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now Access to this $22.5 trillion asset class has traditionally been limited to elite investors — until now. Here's how to become the landlord of Walmart or Whole Foods without lifting a finger ¹ Terms and Conditions apply. NMLS# 1136 This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Los Angeles Times
33 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Democrats are busy bashing themselves. Is it needed, or just needy?
To hear Republicans tell it, California is a failed state and Donald Trump won the presidency in a landslide that gives him a mandate to do as he pleases. No surprise there. But more and more, Democrats are echoing those talking points. Ever since Kamala Harris lost the election, the Democratic Party has been on a nationwide self-flagellation tour. One after another, its leaders have stuck their heads deep into their navels, hoping to find out why so many Americans — especially young people, Black voters and Latinos — shunned the former vice president. Even in California, a reliably blue state, the soul-searching has been extreme, as seen at last weekend's state Democratic Party convention, where a parade of speakers — including Harris' 2024 running mate, Tim Walz — wailed and moaned and did the woe-is-us-thing. Is it long-overdue introspection, or just annoying self-pity? Our columnists Anita Chabria and Mark Z. Barabak hash it out. Chabria: Mark, you were at the convention in Anaheim. Thoughts? Barabak: I'll start by noting this is the first convention I've attended — and I've been to dozens — rated 'R' for adult language. Apparently, Democrats think by dropping a lot of f-bombs they can demonstrate to voters their authenticity and passion. But it seemed kind of stagy and, after a while, grew tiresome. I've covered Nancy Pelosi for more than three decades and never once heard her utter a curse word, in public or private. I don't recall Martin Luther King Jr., saying, 'I have a [expletive deleted] dream.' Both were pretty darned effective leaders. Democrats have a lot of work to do. But cursing a blue streak isn't going to win them back the White House or control of Congress. Chabria: As someone known to routinely curse in polite society, I'm not one to judge an expletive. But that cussing and fussing brings up a larger point: Democrats are desperate to prove how serious and passionate they are about fixing themselves. Gov. Gavin Newsom has called the Democratic brand 'toxic.' Walz told his fellow Dems: 'We're in this mess because some of it's our own doing.' It seems like across the country, the one thing Democrats can agree on is that they are lame. Or at least, they see themselves as lame. I'm not sure the average person finds Democratic ideals such as equality or due process quite so off-putting, especially as Trump and his MAGA brigade move forward on the many campaign promises — deportations, rollbacks of civil rights, stripping the names of civil rights icons off ships — that at least some voters believed were more talk than substance. I always tell my kids to be their own hero, and I'm starting to think the Democrats need to hear that. Pick yourself up. Dust yourself off. Move on. Do you think all this self-reproach is useful, Mark? Does Harris' loss really mean the party is bereft of value or values? Barabak: I think self-reflection is good for the party, to a point. Democrats suffered a soul-crushing loss in November — at the presidential level and in the Senate, where the GOP seized control — and they did so in part because many of their traditional voters stayed home. It would be political malpractice not to figure out why. That said, there is a tendency to go overboard and over-interpret the long-term significance of any one election. This is not the end of the Democratic Party. It's not even the first time one of the two major parties has been cast into the political wilderness. Democrats went through similar soul-searching after presidential losses in 1984 and 1988. In 1991, a book was published explaining how Democrats were again destined to lose the White House and suggesting they would do so for the foreseeable future. In November 1992, Bill Clinton was elected president. Four years later, he romped to reelection. In 2013, after two straight losing presidential campaigns, Republicans commissioned a political autopsy that, among other recommendations, urged the party to increase its outreach to gay and Latino voters. In 2016, Donald Trump — not exactly a model of inclusion — was elected. Here, by the way, is how The Times wrote up that postmortem: 'A smug, uncaring, ideologically rigid national Republican Party is turning off the majority of American voters, with stale policies that have changed little in 30 years and an image that alienates minorities and the young, according to an internal GOP study.' Sound familar? So, sure, look inward. But spare us the existential freakout. Chabria: I would also argue that this moment is about more than the next election. I do think there are questions about if democracy will make it that long, and if so, if the next round at the polls will be a free and fair one. I know the price of everything continues to rise, and conventional wisdom is that it's all about the economy. But Democrats seem stuck in election politics as usual. These however, are unusual times that call for something more. There are a lot of folks who don't like to see their neighbors, family or friends rounded up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in masks; a lot of people who don't want to see Medicaid cut for millions, with Medicare likely to be on the chopping block next; a lot of people who are afraid our courts won't hold the line until the midterms. They want to know Democrats are fighting to protect these things, not fighting each other. I agree with you that any loss should be followed by introspection. But also, there's a hunger for leadership in opposition to this administration, and the Democrats are losing an opportunity to be those leaders with their endless self-immolation. Did Harris really lose that bad? Did Trump really receive a mandate to end America as we know it? Barabak: No, and no. I mean, a loss is a loss. Trump swept all seven battleground states and the election result was beyond dispute unlike, say, 2000. But Trump's margin over Harris in the popular vote was just 1.5% — which is far from landslide territory — and he didn't even win a majority of support, falling just shy of 50%. As for a supposed mandate, the most pithy and perceptive post-election analysis I read came from the American Enterprise Institute's Yuval Levin, who noted Trump's victory marked the third presidential campaign in a row in which the incumbent party lost — something not seen since the 19th century. Challengers 'win elections because their opponents were unpopular,' Levin wrote, 'and then — imagining the public has endorsed their party activists' agenda — they use the power of their office to make themselves unpopular.' It's a long way to 2026, and an even longer way to 2028. But Levin is sure looking smart. Chabria: I know Kamala-bashing is popular right now, but I'd argue that Harris wasn't resoundingly unpopular — just unpopular enough, with some. Harris had 107 days to campaign. Many candidates spend years running for the White House, and much longer if you count the coy 'maybe' period. She was unknown to most Americans, faced double discrimination from race and gender, and (to be fair) has never been considered wildly charismatic. So to nearly split the popular vote with all that baggage is notable. But maybe Elon Musk said it best. As part of his messy breakup with Trump, the billionaire tweeted, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' Sometimes there's truth in anger. Musk's money influenced this election, and probably tipped it to Trump in at least one battleground state. Any postmortem needs to examine not just the message, but also the medium. Is it what Democrats are saying that isn't resonating, or is it that right-wing oligarchs are dominating communication? Barabak: Chabria: Mark? Barabak: Sorry. I was so caught up in the spectacle of the world's richest man going all neener-neener with the world's most powerful man I lost track of where we were. With all due respect to Marshall McLuhan, I think Democrats need first off to figure out a message to carry them through the 2026 midterms. They were quite successful in 2018 pushing back on GOP efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, if you prefer. It's not hard to see them resurrecting that playbook if Republicans take a meat-ax to Medicare and millions of Americans lose their healthcare coverage. Then, come 2028, they'll pick a presidential nominee and have their messenger, who can then focus on the medium — TV, radio, podcasts, TikTok, Bluesky or whatever else is in political fashion at the moment. Now, excuse me while I return my sights to the sandbox.