Prince Harry is considering starting rival African charity after quitting over Sentebale row, spokesperson for the Duke confirms
The Duke of Sussex last week walked away from the charity following a damning report.
But, as exclusively revealed by the Mail on Sunday, his spokesperson has now confirmed Harry is weighing up how to carry on supporting the region.
'The duke remains absolutely committed to continuing the work he started, supporting the children and young people of Lesotho and Botswana, nearly 20 years ago,' the spokesperson said today.
'In what form that support takes - no decisions have been made.
'All options remain on the table; whether that be starting a new charity or working to support pre-existing charities operating in the same sector in the region.'
Sources have told MoS Harry is determined to continue the work of Sentable, which he co-founded with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho in 2006 in honour of their mothers.
'The Duke is anxious that the fight against poverty and Aids in Lesotho and Botswana carries on,' said an insider.
'He and Prince Seeiso are keen to work together on a new venture. They are talking about setting up a new charity or clubbing together to support other existing charities doing similar work in the region.'
Last week, a Charity Commission probe found 'no evidence' to support Sentebale chairman Dr Sophie Chandauka's allegations of bullying, harassment, misogyny and misogynoir – discrimination against black women.
The MoS has learned that Harry has now upped the ante by issuing a formal complaint about Dr Chandauka's conduct, accusing her of 'recycling' unfounded claims.
A letter to the commission from his office notes that since the investigation, Dr Chandauka had revisited 'serious, highly-charged and damaging allegations'.
It said the claims 'directly impact' his other charity work, adding: 'Ms Chandauka continues to publicly recycle these claims, this time beneath the guise of clarification, all while leveraging the charity's public platform to do so.
'This conduct appears to directly contravene your warning about the risks of airing internal disputes in the media and seems to constitute an ongoing misuse of charitable resources for the pursuit of personal vindication.'
Despite rejecting the bullying claims, the Charity Commission found problems in Sentebale's governance and rebuked 'all parties' for allowing the dispute to play out in public.
However it said Dr Chandauka and the board could remain in place – a decision that left the Duke devastated and complaining of a 'hostile takeover'.
This newspaper can now reveal startling new details of the background to Dr Chandauka's 2023 appointment.
In an email to fellow board members, she requested $3,000 (£2,200) a day for her time, claiming this represented 'a very significant compromise/pay cut' as she typically charged £2,500 for 60-minute speaking engagements.
A source said it raised eyebrows among trustees and was in 'stark contrast to the selfless, pro bono spirit in which most serve'.
In the event, the Zimbabwean-born lawyer eventually agreed to work pro bono.
Dr Chandauka said that because a clip of the awkward interaction at the polo match went viral, Harry invited her to make a public statement in support of his wife - but she refused
Other emails show she was originally turned down for the role of chairman, but launched 'an all-out pressure campaign' for a formal explanation for her rejection.
She eventually got the job, with Harry at the time hailing her appointment.
The first hint of trouble came in April 2024, when the Duchess of Sussex ushered the charity boss to the centre of a stage at a polo match.
Dr Chandauka said that because a clip of the awkward interaction went viral, Harry invited her to make a public statement in support of his wife.
She refused, saying the charity 'cannot be an extension of the Sussexes'.
But it was a disagreement over fundraising and a £400,000 bill for consultancy work that caused the relationship to sour further.
In March, Harry and Prince Seeiso, plus some trustees, resigned. A statement said the relationship with Dr Chandauka was 'broken', 'beyond repair' and 'untenable'.
On Saturday, it was reported the Lesotho children's centre run by Sentebale has been 'effectively mothballed' amid a funding crisis – until recently, some 700 children with HIV attended its camps.
In a statement after the commission's report, Sentebale said: 'The Charity Commission is explicitly clear... that it is not the Commission's responsibility to adjudicate or mediate internal disputes.
'The Commission has not investigated any individual allegations and therefore has not made any findings in relation to individuals, including Prince Harry.'
The former trustees also issued a statement rebuking the commission for choosing to 'ignore key concerns' over the 'leadership and oversight' of Sentebale's chairman.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Princess Andre reveals South Africa carjacking ordeal with mum Katie Price
Princess Andre revealed she feared being kidnapped or killed during a carjacking incident in South Africa. The terrifying event took place in 2018 and involved her mother Katie Price and brother Junior. Six men held the family at gunpoint during the ordeal. Andre recounted a man staring at her and hearing threats that they would be shot. She speculated that her blonde hair and blue eyes made her a target, recalling the men instructing her mother to 'give them the kids'.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
‘You spit, we hit': Trump just took over DC with vow to stop ‘thugs' from abusing cops. He already pardoned hundreds of them
Monday marked the beginning of a Trump takeover of Washington D.C.'s law enforcement capabilities and what many Democrats fear could be step one of full federal control over the District of Columbia. At the White House, Donald Trump was flanked by top officials including FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi as he announced that the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), the city's main police force, would be brought under federal control. From behind the podium, the president recalled images of police officers facing abuse by protesters he'd watched on TV screens over the years, clearly evoking anger in him and leaving a city braced for Trump to fulfill a long-awaited desire to 'send in the troops.' He then passed around images of individuals arrested over the weekend, and promised that, going forward, police officers would be unhinged in their treatment of criminals and, likely, dissenters: They'll be able to do 'whatever they want', Trump vowed. 'You spit, and we hit.' It was about as explicit a lean into the 'strongman' image as one could ask for. But the president's fixation on clashes between protesters and law enforcement has one glaring exception: January 6. The violent siege of the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters in 2021 lasted for several hours. In the end, protesters left the building after police officers from neighboring counties in Maryland and Virginia arrived to quell the chaos. A deployment of more than 6,000 National Guard troops was finally authorized at 6 p.m., hours after the chaos began and hours after the worst of it ended. Dozens of officers were injured, several died after the attack including one who sustained injuries during it, Brian Sicknick. Survivors recounted vicious abuse from protesters, especially Black officers who recounted racial slurs and threats of violence. But the Capitol is not where the January 6 story ends. As Trump supporters left the Capitol that day, they fanned out across the entire District of Columbia, some returning to homes and hotels in the region and others spreading mayhem across the city. Businesses were boarded up as far as southeast D.C. and scattered evidence of vandalism was seen around residential areas and various neighborhoods the next day. It was the city's most violent day in decades. But on the campaign trail last summer, Trump vowed his first act would be to pardon all of them. True to his word, and despite the pleas of even some Republican supporters, on the day Trump was sworn in he pardoned some 1,500 people who participated in the siege on the U.S. Capitol and were either convicted or facing charges. MPD officers were part of the initial response as well. Some of the officers who responded that day are now under the command of the same administration that pardoned hundreds of Jan. 6 offenders, including some charged with violence against MPD and Capitol Police officers. One of those rioters, Julian Khater, was charged with spraying officer Sicknick with a chemical repellant during the attack; a colleague later testified that Sicknick looked 'ghostly pale' afterwards. Even so, the MPD's union chief told Fox News on Monday that his outfit 'completely agree[s]' with Trump that crime in D.C. is 'out of control.' He and union officials pointed to an MPD commander under investigation for allegedly falsifying crime data, and claimed that it was a lie that crime in the District of Columbia was decreasing. The Justice Department touted that data as recently as January, days before Trump took office. For Trump, Monday was 'Liberation' day. "Crime, Savagery, Filth, and Scum will DISAPPEAR. I will, MAKE OUR CAPITAL GREAT AGAIN!" he wrote on Truth Social ahead of the press conference he'd teased all weekend. But city officials are adamant that the trends mapped by the data are real, and that all types of crimes including some of the most stubborn categories such as carjackings were dropping in frequency across the board. 'Any comparison to a war-torn country is hyperbolic and false,' D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser told MSNBC on Sunday. 'There are very specific things in our law that would allow the president to have more control over our police department. None of those conditions exist in our city right now. 'We had one of the lowest crime levels and shootings that we've had in a July in recent history. So, not only are we going down year to year, we're seeing the trends go in the right way in every crime category.' There's no question: Trump has been looking for an excuse to do this. A Rolling Stone investigation published earlier this year cited two sources with knowledge of the president's conversations as saying that Trump was speaking to aides just after taking office in January about identifying the earliest possible moment when it would be appropriate to send in federal troops for crime suppression efforts. Anger felt by some city residents (among whom Trump supporters are still a slim minority) on Monday was embodied by restauranteur José Andrés, who tweeted at the president: '[Y]ou didn't have the power to call the National Guard on January 6 but now you do? Washington DC is not only our nation's capital…it's a beautiful city that 700,000 people call home. I'm proud to run a business and raise a family here. DC doesn't need federalized troops…it needs leaders who respect our fundamental founding principles of democracy, dignity, and respect.' Trump finally got his opportunity with the July attack on a man whose online nickname — 'Big Balls' — propelled him to both mockery and notoriety. The former DOGE staffer, who is still a federal employee, named Edward Coristine, was attacked while allegedly intervening during a carjacking attempt. According to police reports, Coristine was mobbed by a large group of teens during the attack and had his iPhone stolen in addition to being viciously assaulted. Groups of teenagers have become a major problem for city officials in recent weeks, with residents reporting large numbers of young adults and school-aged children attacking people on city streets, neighborhoods such as Navy Yard (where many congressional staffers live) and the Metropolitan Branch Trail, a paved route across the northeastern part of the city used by pedestrians and cyclists. In some cases, groups have numbered as high as hundreds of people and have required massive police responses. The only questions for Trump now are how far he takes this, and how much punishment he'll dole out on D.C. elected officials. Even as Bowser continues to avoid a public confrontation, Trump aimed harsh rhetoric at the city council on Monday. And it remains to be seen whether he'll try and take this effort national once again, after being largely stymied in his efforts to impose a sustained presence on the city of Los Angeles over ICE protests. A compliant Congress will likely make any Trump takeover of D.C., no matter how broad, a smooth process. But that same dynamic won't be found if the president tries to reimpose his will on America's blue states, where governors are raring for the chance to show that they have the backbones which their voters are demanding they show.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Finland charges tanker crew members with sabotage of undersea cables
Finnish authorities have filed charges against members of the crew of an oil tanker suspected of damaging five undersea cables by dragging its anchor between Finland and Estonia. Finland's deputy prosecutor general's office said on Monday it had filed charges of aggravated sabotage and aggravated interference with telecommunications against the captain and first and second officers of the Eagle S. The Cook Islands-registered tanker is understood to be part of Russia's 'shadow fleet' – comprising vessels that sail under foreign flags to evade sanctions. The ship was carrying oil from Ust-Luga in Russia across the Gulf of Finland when, prosecutors allege, it dragged its anchor along the seabed for about 90km (56 miles) in December 2024. The incident was one of several suspected hybrid attacks on telecommunications services in the Nordic region at the end of last year, putting leaders on high alert and prompting accusations of infrastructure sabotage against Russia. Finnish authorities seized the Eagle S on 26 December last year when the border guard's emergency response team and police landed on the ship in the early hours of the morning. The seizure was lifted in February and the ship left Finland the following month. Damage to the cables had cost their owners, Cinia and Elisa, 'at least €60m in repair costs alone', the office of the deputy prosecutor general, Jukka Rappe, said in a statement. It added: 'The rupture of the extremely high-capacity electricity transmission and telecommunications cables is also suspected of having caused a serious danger to energy supply and telecommunications in Finland, although services have been secured by using alternative connections.' The defendants, it said, had denied any wrongdoing in the preliminary investigation. They believed that Finland 'does not have jurisdiction in the matter because the cable damage sites are outside Finnish territorial waters', the statement said. A lawyer for the United Arab Emirates-based Caravella LLC FZ, the owner of the Eagle S, has said previously that Helsinki lacked jurisdiction to intervene. Rappe disagreed, saying: 'The characteristics of the crimes,ie the dangers caused, occurred within the borders of Finland, even though the measures themselves were taken outside Finland.' He told the Guardian that the question of jurisdiction was 'one of the critical questions', but that 'the effects of the crime materialised here in Finland. That brings it to the jurisdiction of Finland, I think. But of course it is up to [the] district court to decide whether Finland has jurisdiction or not.' He said he hoped the trial would have an impact on investigations into other alleged cable-cutting incidents in the region over the last two years. Because of its geographical positioning, between Russia and the Baltic, Finland is particularly vulnerable. 'Finland is like an island because of the Baltic sea. All of our connections go via undersea cables to Sweden, Estonia and central Europe,' said Rappe. The indictment has been filed with the Helsinki district court, which will decide on a date for the hearing. The state prosecutor, special prosecutor and regional prosecutor have been assigned to prosecute the charges in court. The three suspects have been under a travel ban in Finland since the start of the investigation. Cinia and Elisa declined to comment.
