Tony Holohan's reluctance to admit mistakes sits badly with the national mood
Tony Holohan's
withdrawal from the presidential race
is a mercy – not just for him, but for the rest of us.
We are spared the bear-baiting with the cervical-cancer controversy and the pandemic, the performative outrage and vile social media that would have plunged all concerned into a sewer stripped of nuance and context.
That Covid still scratches the national psyche hardly helps.
A recent five-year anniversary Mass for a Kildare man who died during lockdown morphed into the warm, crowded service denied to his family in 2020. His favourite music was sung and the same eulogies given by his adult children five years ago at his lonely graveside were delivered to a packed congregation. What was surprising for a five-year memorial was how immediate and raw it felt.
READ MORE
It was an experience hardly unique to Ireland, but it is Holohan's burden to be forever associated with it. That his wife Emer was also buried under the harshest Covid rules would not have spared him from the vitriol. Inevitably, some were salivating at the idea of using his appearances as Covid inquisitions.
Which raises the question – again – of why people put their heads above the presidential parapet.
Holohan must have felt he had done the state some service. He had answered the call for a calm, firm, trustworthy medical leader to guide Ireland through an unprecedented public health crisis, while attending to his dying wife – all of which surely made him the very definition of a president.
But no leader survives those multiple levels of hell without making mistakes – and Holohan's reluctance to admit to any mistakes sits badly with the mood of the times.
Issues can be argued – as he did in his memoir – but few will listen. They don't want to hear ifs or buts or blame being ascribed elsewhere, even if it belongs there. They want to hear humility and unconditional admissions: 'Yes, I made a mistake.' Ill-wishers will grab it as vindication of course – 'Hah, told you he had blood on his hands.'
But unlike other hapless hopefuls, Holohan would have known all the questions about to be catapulted at him. His USP would have been that of someone intimately familiar with the ferocity, filthy betrayals and short-termism of politics without being an actual politician.
Even before his withdrawal, the weekend's media was distinguished by the startling number of pundits trotting out several of those same points as reasons
Bertie Ahern
should proceed with confidence.
He has the experience, the likability and the peace process in his arms, they say. He has been interrogated to the max. No question on earth would surprise the one who – to quote the revered Blackadder – is as cunning as a fox who's just been appointed professor of cunning at Oxford University.
And time, as we know, can soften even the sharpest memories. It's 17 years since he was taoiseach, 13 since he resigned from
Fianna Fáil
following the
Mahon tribunal
finding that he failed to account truthfully for payments of IR£165,000 made to accounts connected to him.
Anyone seeking signs of contrition might catch a 2018 Deutsche Welle 'Conflict Zone' interview which sees him happily answering questions about the peace negotiations – until asked about the tribunal.
'Did you clear your name?' the interviewer asks.
'Yes, I did. I'm quite happy I cleared my name', he answers.
But that wasn't 'truthful', the interviewer says.
'The tribunal gave its views … and I gave my evidence. I was very happy with my evidence', he replies, as if it were all just a matter of opinion. He ends it by getting up and leaving.
'A first on dwZone,' as DW's Twitter link described it.
Since then,
Micheál Martin
– who sought to kick Ahern out of the party before he resigned – has consulted him about issues around the Northern Ireland protocol, acknowledging his 'invaluable insights' and range of contacts.
When reminded of that threatened expulsion a few years ago, Martin said: 'It's 10 years on, I'm conscious of the contribution he has made to peace in the country. He made a very significant contribution.'
Leo Varadkar
, who in the Dáil once described Ahern's claims of wins on the horses as 'a defence for drug dealers and pimps', had also ratcheted down his tone by 2023, saying the remarks were made 'at a particular point in time and if you look at the totality of Bertie Ahern's career, you know, let's not forget that he was one of the architects of the Good Friday Agreement … I don't think anyone can diminish the role that he played'.
Just a month ago, Ahern was at 5 per cent in an Irish Times/IpsosB&A presidency poll. Last Sunday he was up at 14 per cent, tying for third place with
Mary Lou McDonald
in a Sunday Independent/Ireland Thinks poll.
Which brings us back to the old question: is there an optimum time for society to say, enough punishment, all that was at a particular point in time, look at the balance of his life? How many years? Does it matter if the offender has never acknowledged they did wrong in the first place?
As one professor leaves the stage, the professor of cunning hovers, batting his eyelashes, saying nothing, waiting, smiling and waiting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
29 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the presidential race: contortions and expediency
Less than a week after Mairead McGuinness's shock withdrawal from the presidential election, Fine Gael appears already well on its way to settling on a replacement. Heather Humphreys has established such a commanding lead over Seán Kelly in pledged parliamentary support that the race may effectively be over before a single vote is cast. Kelly, however, may be less inclined to bow out gracefully this time. After all, had he stayed in the contest earlier in the summer, rather than stepping aside for McGuinness, he would by now be the party's standard-bearer. What has followed since McGuinness's announcement has been a study in political flexibility, not to say expediency. Both contenders have been obliged to explain why they now covet a role they had so recently declined. In June, Kelly reflected aloud that he was content in Brussels, invoking John B Keane as he wondered whether he truly wanted to trade Kerry for seven years in the Áras. His conclusion was no. Humphreys, for her part, told RTÉ in May that she had no interest in returning to public life, having retired from frontline politics to spend time with her family. All, it seems, has now changed utterly. READ MORE Fine Gael, which carefully stage-managed McGuinness's uncontested nomination, now benefits once again from having a bench of plausible successors to choose from. The same cannot be said for its rivals. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin continue to deliberate, with little sign of consensus around a credible nominee. Their reluctance reflects a more basic problem: neither party has a clear candidate who could avoid the fate of the also-ran. Sinn Féin is reported this week to be edging towards endorsing Catherine Connolly. Should that materialise, and with the route for an Independent nominee narrowing by the day, attention will turn squarely to Fianna Fáil. It has been more than 50 years since the presidency was last contested in a straight two-way contest. It may fall to Micheál Martin to avoid such a narrow choice being presented to the electorate. There are strong arguments for Fianna Fáil to enter the fray. First, it would signal confidence from the State's largest party, which has not contested a presidential election this century. Second, neither Connolly nor Humphreys (assuming she is the Fine Gael nominee) are unbeatable. Neither has been tested in the uniquely unforgiving environment of a presidential campaign. Each is perfectly capable of the sort of verbal slips or missteps that have derailed hopefuls before. If, as some in Leinster House suspect, Martin already has a name in his pocket, the only question now is when he chooses to reveal it.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules
A US judge has denied the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, saying the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. Manhattan-based US District Judge Richard Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump sought to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's decision not to release files of the case. The judge wrote that it would be more logical for the government to directly release the vast amount of information it has collected from its investigation into Epstein than to petition the court to release the more limited grand jury materials, whose secrecy is protected by law. "The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials," Judge Berman wrote. "The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct," the judge said. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. President Trump had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. However, in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Mr Trump's supporters. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. In July, Mr Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On 11 August, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Mr Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her monthlong trial four years ago. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Mr Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the US Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Heather Humphreys v Sean Kelly: Strengths and weaknesses of rival Fine Gael candidates
Heather Humphreys Who is she? She retired in November 2024 after 13 years in the Dáil, 10 of which she spent as a senior minister. Born in 1963, she lives in Newbliss, Co Cavan, and was a bank official and credit union manager before becoming a TD. She is a Presbyterian. Humphreys had an unsteady start as the new minister for arts in 2014 after being catapulted into the role from the backbenches by then-taoiseach Enda Kenny. Her political naivety showed in her poor handling of a controversy over the party's backing of a Donegal businessman and Fine Gael activist in a byelection to fill a vacancy in Seanad Éireann. Despite having no experience in the area, John McNulty was appointed to the board of the Irish Museum of Modern Art so he could show he was a qualified person for the Seanad's cultural panel. It was a ready-up, and Humphreys, as arts minister, had to deal with the flak. She floundered in the early interviews. READ MORE She learned a lesson from that and never repeated the mistake, being careful and prepared in all subsequent public interviews. Over time, Humphreys became an indispensable ally to three taoisigh: Kenny, Leo Varadkar and Simon Harris. Her ministries were in areas where she had a strong suit. She was minister for enterprise during Brexit and had to work to ensure the North-South hard border did not re-emerge. She was minister for social protection during Covid. Her other brief in rural and community affairs saw her visit virtually every community in the country. Strengths Humphreys is one of the few Fine Gael politicians who is popular across party lines. Her time in the rural affairs brief has made her a familiar figure in virtually every hamlet in the State. That popularity is reflected in the fact that three Independent Ministers – all from the Fianna Fáil gene pool – have backed her. They are Michael Healy-Rae, Seán Canney and Noel Grealish. Fine Gael candidates have not traditionally had a broad appeal, but there is hope that Humphreys, like Mairéad McGuinness, can change that. That she is a border politician and member of a minority religion would be a boon for North-South relations. From a republican perspective, she was the minister who oversaw the successful Decade of Centenaries, including the commemoration of the 1916 Rising. Potential weaknesses Opposition parties have zeroed in on her role in Enda Kenny's 'austerity' government and her policies when minister for social welfare that affected people with disabilities. She told two reporters from the Ditch to f*** off outside her constituency office. That is similar to Michael D Higgins using an expletive during a radio row with a right-wing American commentator, when he was still a TD. It's not something that will affect her chances. She would be seen by others as an old-school, establishment and veteran Fine Gael grandee even though she is 10 years younger than Seán Kelly, and six years younger than Catherine Connolly. Having had an antagonistic political relationship with Sinn Féin during her Dáil career, Humphreys would need to convince its supporters she would represent them while not sharing their views. She is associated with rural Ireland and may struggle to attract non-Fine Gael votes in Dublin. Her Irish language skills are poor. Possible political banana skin? No particular skeletons in the cupboard. She is seen as a 'safe pair of hands' and is unlikely to take risks or push boundaries in the same way Higgins has done. Some voters may look for more 'vision' for the presidency and find her to be too conventional a candidate. Seán Kelly Who is he? Seán Kelly is now 73 but the Kerryman is still an energetic presence in Irish politics. A former schoolteacher in St Brendan's Killarney, he came to national prominence as a GAA administrator, first in Kerry and then nationally before making the transition into politics. He has been involved in GAA administration since his 20s, first in Kerry, then in Munster. He was elected president of the GAA in 2003, the first person from Kerry to hold the office. His greatest achievement during his term was overseeing the change to Rule 42, which prohibited the playing of non-Gaelic games in GAA stadiums. It paved the way for rugby internationals and soccer internationals to be played in Croke Park from 2007. [ The presidency is not a Rose of Tralee contest for over-35s Opens in new window ] Fine Gael made a number of approaches to him before he accepted an invitation to stand for the party in the European elections in 2009. It followed a trend of parties, particularly Fine Gael, seeking high-profile candidates outside conventional politics to become candidates. His Fine Gael EU parliamentary colleagues Mairéad McGuinness and Maria Walsh came into politics in the same way. Kelly's candidacy put some noses out of joint internally in Fine Gael. Simon Coveney had been elected to the parliament in 2004 but stood down in 2007, being replaced by Colm Burke. Supporters of Burke were resistant to a two-candidate strategy. In the event, Kelly finished second to Brian Crowley, winning almost 20 per cent of the vote. He has performed strongly in the three subsequent elections. Strengths? Kelly's great strengths are as an organiser, networker and communicator, as well as his willingness to travel far and wide. He is a very active politician in Brussels and the constituency. His extensive GAA experience, especially in Munster, has given him a strong base and network of support, outside of Fine Gael. He is a fluent Irish speaker and often speaks as Gaeilge in parliament. He has had a special interest in energy policy. Weaknesses? He could be considered too Munster. While amassing an impressive 123,000 votes in last year's European election, his appeal outside his southwest base is limited. Having spent his entire career as an MEP, it has put him at a disadvantage with parliamentary colleagues based in Leinster House, who would have closer connections to Heather Humphreys. Both of those factors are reflected in his struggle to reach the threshold of 20 parliamentary nominations, where most of his backers are Munster-based. Having demonstrated in his GAA career that he is a moderniser, he is nevertheless seen as a traditional Fine Gael politician in terms of outlook. Possible political banana skin? Some controversies from his time in the EU parliament. He was one of four Fine Gael MEPs, including Mairéad McGuinness, who voted against a non-binding motion in parliament that proposed increasing, improving and better organising search-and-rescue missions for migrants and refugees setting out in boats from North Africa to cross the Mediterranean. He defended the stance saying that, under the proposal, people traffickers could have gained access to information being shared by rescuers. 'It would lead to more lives being lost and more money for people smugglers who would now have carte blanche to do what they like,' he said at the time.
