logo
Secret Recordings Show President Roosevelt Debating Military Desegregation with Civil Rights Leaders

Secret Recordings Show President Roosevelt Debating Military Desegregation with Civil Rights Leaders

Yahoo15-04-2025

More than a year before Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt heard arguments from the civil rights leaders of the era for the desegregation of the military in preparation for the wars in Europe and Asia that would soon engulf the U.S., but a generally sympathetic FDR said the nation was just not ready to see "Negro" troops fighting alongside whites.
The remarkable exchanges were caught on recording devices Roosevelt had secretly installed in the basement under the Oval Office. FDR had a microphone hidden in a desk lamp and an on-off switch in a lower desk drawer to feed the device in the basement called a "Continuous-film Recording Machine."
The intent was to record press conferences, but the machine was often left running and would catch exchanges such as the meeting with the civil rights leaders, according to the Miller Center nonpartisan affiliate of the University of Virginia. The center highlighted the Roosevelt tapes in its archives to mark the 80th anniversary of FDR's death at age 63 of a cerebral hemorrhage at his retreat in Warm Springs, Georgia, on April 12, 1945.
Read Next: Pentagon Turns Focus to Potentially Privatizing Commissaries, Military Exchanges
In the Oval Office on Sept. 27, 1940, A. Philip Randolph, a Black labor leader and president of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, made the case for what would now be called the "inclusion" part of diversity, equity and inclusion, in the military: "Mr. President, it would mean a great deal to the morale of the Negro people if you could make some announcement on the roles the Negroes will play in the armed forces of the nation."
Roosevelt tried to interject, apparently to note that only 11 days earlier he had signed into law the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 that established a draft for all Americans, but Randolph continued: A speech or an announcement by Roosevelt on desegregation of the military "would have tremendous effect" because discrimination in the ranks "is the irritating spot among the Negro people."
"They feel that they -- they're not wanted in the various armed forces of the country, and they feel they have earned the right to participate in every phase of the government by virtue of their record in past wars for the nation. And they're feeling that they're being shunted aside, that they're being discriminated against, and that they're not wanted now," said Randolph, who would become a main figure in the 1962 March on Washington where Martin Luther King Jr. would make his iconic "I Have a Dream" speech.
Also present at the Oval Office meeting was Walter Francis White, then head of the NAACP. White backed up Randolph on desegregation and told Roosevelt that, at least in the Northern states, "Negroes and whites go to school together, they play on the same athletic fields. And yet, when it comes to the Army, fighting for democracy, they say, 'Well, Negroes are not good enough. They've got to be shunted aside.'"
Roosevelt told White that his arguments had merit and added that he would be approving Black troops for non-combat service but desegregation would take more time: "Well, you see, Walter, my general thought on it is this -- it's a thing that we've got to work into," FDR said.
At the Oval Office meeting with the civil rights leaders, Navy Secretary Frank Knox told Roosevelt that desegregating the Navy would risk violence between whites and Blacks.
"You have a factor in the Navy, which is not present in the Army, and that is that these men live aboard ships," Knox said. The problem was to find "a way to permit the Negro to serve the Navy without raising the question of conflict between white men and Black men together living in the same ship."
At that point, White appeared to rile the president by reminding him that there were "petitions from 85 American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars posts, California to Maine, protesting against discrimination" in the military. Roosevelt shot back: "Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah."
Roosevelt also appeared to be thinking out loud about ways to increase the opportunities for Blacks to serve in the military, and made what would be seen today as a cringeworthy suggestion to Knox.
"Another thing, Frank, that I forgot to mention. I thought of it about, oh, a month ago, and that is this: We are training a certain number of musicians on board ship -- the ship's band. Now, there's no reason why we shouldn't have a colored band on some of these ships, because they're darn good at it. And that's something I wish you would look into," Roosevelt said.
The tapes provide a "fabulous window into the texture of another time," said Marc Selverstone, the Gerald L. Baliles professor and director of presidential studies at UVA's Miller Center.
"We get to hear a largely unscripted FDR. Here, he's more or less winging it with the reporters and, as a result, you can hear him in perhaps a more authentic way," said Selverstone, who also is co-chair of the Presidential Recordings Program at the Miller Center.
Roosevelt decided to make the recordings after he felt he had been misquoted by reporters at a press conference in the summer of 1940. He wanted the recordings to serve as possibly a more accurate record than his stenographer could provide but employed the device for less than three months. The recordings began in August 1940, and the last one was made on Nov. 8, 1940.
The placement of the recording device under the Oval Office was a closely guarded secret, and none of the visitors to the Oval Office knew they were being recorded, Selverstone said. The existence of the tapes did not become known until the 1980s.
"As a historian, I think it's essential that we all have a better understanding of what has come before to understand why we are in the situation we are today," Selverstone said in commenting on the value of the tapes. "It helps to humanize history. You get a sense of the emotion involved" and a sense of "how the country has been able to move ahead and overcome certain dimensions of its history that are not terribly attractive."
Selverstone also noted that it was first lady Eleanor Roosevelt who arranged the Oval Office meeting between the civil rights leaders and FDR as part of her advocacy for desegregation in the military and society as a whole.
At a time when many white people thought that Black Americans were incapable of flying an airplane, Eleanor Roosevelt went on her own to the Tuskegee Army Air Field in Alabama to show support for the Tuskegee Airmen
To the consternation of the Secret Service, and her husband, the first lady climbed into the back seat of a two-seater piloted by the legendary instructor Charles Alfred "Chief" Anderson, believed to be the first Black American to obtain a commercial pilot's license, and they took off for an hourlong flight over Alabama. The flight generated huge publicity and support for the Tuskegee Airmen.
"She had a ton of moxie and was quite bold and forthright, particularly with her husband, to get on the right side of history," Selverstone said.
Related: Battle of Manila 80th Anniversary: Reclusive Son of Gen. Douglas MacArthur Makes Rare Statement

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hegseth takes fire from Republicans at heated Senate hearing
Hegseth takes fire from Republicans at heated Senate hearing

The Hill

time19 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hegseth takes fire from Republicans at heated Senate hearing

Republican senators came out firing during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's hearing on Wednesday before the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on armed forces. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) immediately pressed Hegseth over the Russia-Ukraine war, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) driving home the point later in the hearing; Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the top Senate appropriator, scolded the Pentagon's delays with budget information; and Sen. Lisa Murkowski closed out the hearing by questioning the administration's focus on Greenland in its Arctic strategy. McConnell, one of three Republicans who opposed Hegseth's confirmation, gaveled in the hearing by calling out the Trump administration for what he views as a flat base-line defense budget. He then launched into strong warnings against the U.S. cozying up to Russia in its bid to end its war in Ukraine. McConnell said Washington's allies are 'wondering whether we're in the middle of brokering what appears to be allowing the Russians to define victory. I think victory is defined by the people who have to live there — the Ukrainians.' The former Senate majority leader who now chairs the subcommittee, McConnell asked Hegseth which side he wanted to win the war. The Defense chief said the Trump administration wanted the killing to end but would not choose a side. 'America's reputation is on the line,' McConnell said. 'Will we defend Democratic allies against authoritarian aggressors?' Later in the hearing, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) asked Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan 'Razin' Caine Caine if Russian President Vladimir Putin is going to stop at Ukraine. 'I don't believe he is,' Caine replied. Hegseth, meanwhile, said it 'remains to be seen. Graham fired back, referring to his previous allusion to appeasement of Adolph Hitler: 'Well, he says he's not. This is the '30s all over. It doesn't remain to be seen.' The line of questioning laid bare the ideological divide within the GOP as to how the U.S. should confront Russia, seen by defense hawks as a global threat that must be countered with military assistance to prop up Ukraine and assert U.S. force in the European theater. But many in the Trump administration, including Hegseth, have taken a more ambivalent tone, arguing for an America First approach that could see American troops rotated out of bases in Europe and an end to the flow of military aid from Washington to Kyiv. 'We don't want a headline at the end of this conflict that says Russia wins and America loses,' McConnell told Hegseth. The hearing had a far more adversarial tone compared to Hegseth's appearance before the House Appropriations defense subcommittee a day prior, in which the Pentagon chief emerged largely unscathed, particularly at the hands of GOP members. Democratic and Republican senators grilled Hegseth over a sparsely outlined defense budget for next fiscal year, echoing rare bipartisan criticism during the House hearing. Collins reprimanded the Pentagon for being 'unacceptably slow' in submitting a detailed Pentagon spending request for the fiscal year 2026. Congress is waiting on the information as the GOP struggles to agree on Trump's reconciliation package. She also told Hegseth that Trump's budget request represented a reduction in buying power compared to the 2025 military budget, when inflation is taken into account, but suggested the Senate might correct that. McConnell earlier was also critical of the administration's defense spending plan, pushing back at Hegseth's argument that the U.S. would be making the largest investment in the military in 20 years via Trump's reconciliation package. McConnell said putting funneling defense dollars into that package while declining to increase military spending in the regular budget 'may well end up functioning as a shell game to avoid making the most significant annual investments that we spent years urging the Biden administration to make.' There was also no shortage of criticism from the panel's Democrats. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), bashed the Pentagon for cutting military medical research while spending $45 million for a grand military parade marking the Army's 250th birthday, set for Saturday 'This is not consistent with what the men and women in uniform deserve,' Durbin said. Others, including Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) berated Hegseth for the Trump administration's decision to send National Guard troops and active-duty Marines into Los Angeles this week, calling the actions a wildly out-of-proportion response to sometimes violent protests against Trump's escalating immigration crackdowns. 'Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented, it is unconstitutional, and it is downright un-American,' Murray said, noting that the actions were undermining the readiness of the U.S. military. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) pressed Hegseth to reveal the cost or timeline of refurbishing Trump's luxury jet from the Qatari government, meant to become Air Force One. 'You have signed a contract with a company to reconfigure the Qatari aircraft. What is the price of that contract?' Reed asked. Hegseth replied that the information 'cannot be revealed in this setting,' prompting Reed to fire back. 'Why can't it be revealed? This is the appropriation committee of the United States Senate. We appropriate the money that you will spend,' Reed said.

EPA moves to repeal rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from US power plants
EPA moves to repeal rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from US power plants

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EPA moves to repeal rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from US power plants

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, an action that Administrator Lee Zeldin said would remove billions of dollars in costs for industry and 'unleash' American energy. The EPA also proposed weakening a regulation that requires power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults. The rollbacks are meant to fulfill Republican President Donald Trump's repeated pledge to "unleash American energy" and make it more affordable for Americans to power their homes and operate businesses. If approved and made final, the plans would reverse efforts by Democratic President Joe Biden's administration to address climate change and improve conditions in areas heavily burdened by industrial pollution, mostly in low-income and majority Black or Hispanic communities. The power plant rules are among about 30 environmental regulations that Zeldin targeted in March when he announced what he called the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' Zeldin said Wednesday the new rules would help end what he called the Biden and Obama administration's 'war on so much of our U.S. domestic energy supply.' 'The American public spoke loudly and clearly last November,'' he added in a speech at EPA headquarters. 'They wanted to make sure that ... no matter what agency anybody might be confirmed to lead, we are finding opportunities to pursue common-sense, pragmatic solutions that will help reduce the cost of living ... create jobs and usher in a golden era of American prosperity." Environmental and public health groups called the rollbacks dangerous and vowed to challenge the rules in court. Dr. Lisa Patel, a pediatrician and executive director of the Medical Society Consortium on Climate & Health, called the proposals 'yet another in a series of attacks" by the Republican president's administration on the nation's 'health, our children, our climate and the basic idea of clean air and water.' She called it 'unconscionable to think that our country would move backwards on something as common sense as protecting children from mercury and our planet from worsening hurricanes, wildfires, floods and poor air quality driven by climate change.' 'Ignoring the immense harm to public health from power plant pollution is a clear violation of the law,'' added Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'If EPA finalizes a slapdash effort to repeal those rules, we'll see them in court.' The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments and a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated — they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. Even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems, the AP analysis found. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. Biden, a Democrat, had made fighting climate change a hallmark of his presidency. Coal-fired power plants would be forced to capture smokestack emissions or shut down under a strict EPA rule issued last year. Then-EPA head Michael Regan said the power plant rules would reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting a reliable, long-term supply of electricity. The power sector is the nation's second-largest contributor to climate change, after transportation. In its proposed regulation, the Trump EPA argues that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel-fired power plants 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution' or climate change and therefore do not meet a threshold under the Clean Air Act for regulatory action. The Clean Air Act allows the EPA to limit emissions from power plants and other industrial sources if those emissions significantly contribute to air pollution that endangers public health. If fossil fuel plants no longer meet the EPA's threshold, the Trump administration may later argue that other pollutants from other industrial sectors don't either and therefore shouldn't be regulated, said Meghan Greenfield, a former EPA and Justice Department lawyer now in private practice. The EPA proposal 'has the potential to have much, much broader implications,' she said. Zeldin, a former Republican congressman of New York, said the Biden-era rules were designed to 'suffocate our economy in order to protect the environment,' with the intent to regulate the coal industry "out of existence" and make it "disappear.'' Dr. Howard Frumkin, a former director of the National Center for Environmental Health and professor emeritus at the University of Washington School of Public Health, said Zeldin and Trump were trying to deny reality. 'The world is round, the sun rises in the east, coal-and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change, and climate change increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms and many other health threats,'' Frumkin said. 'These are indisputable facts. If you torpedo regulations on power plant greenhouse gas emissions, you torpedo the health and well-being of the American public and contribute to leaving a world of risk and suffering to our children and grandchildren." A paper published earlier this year in the journal Science found the Biden-era rules could reduce U.S. power sector carbon emissions by 73% to 86% below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with a reduction of 60% to 83% without the rules. 'Carbon emissions in the power sector drop at a faster rate with the (Biden-era) rules in place than without them,'' said Aaron Bergman, a fellow at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research institution and a co-author of the Science paper. The Biden rule also would result in "significant reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, pollutants that harm human health," he said. ___ Associated Press writers Michael Phillis and Seth Borenstein contributed to this story. Matthew Daly, The Associated Press Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.

U.S. evacuating personnel from the Middle East amid growing tensions with Iran
U.S. evacuating personnel from the Middle East amid growing tensions with Iran

Axios

time33 minutes ago

  • Axios

U.S. evacuating personnel from the Middle East amid growing tensions with Iran

The U.S. is evacuating nonessential staff from the embassy in Baghdad and families members of military personnel from several bases in the Gulf amid growing concerns about the security situation, according to two State Department and Pentagon officials. Why it matters: The unusual steps are taking place ahead of a crucial round of nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran and amid threats made by Tehran to launch missiles against U.S. military bases in the region in retaliation for any attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. Israeli officials said the IDF has been on extremely high alert in recent days for possible escalation with Iran. The evacuations were announced three days after President Trump held a meeting on Iran with his top national security team at Camp David. Driving the news: On Wednesday, the U.K. government's maritime trade operations division issued a warning to mariners about "increased tensions" in the Middle East "which could lead to an escalation of military activity." "Vessels are advised to transit the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz with caution and are to report incidents or suspicious activity," the statement said. Several hours later, the U.S. embassy in Baghdad started preparing for an evacuation of non-essential staff. Between the lines: Trump set a two-month deadline for a deal with Iran that expires this week. He has long warned the alternative to a deal would be conflict, and Israel has been preparing to strike Iran's nuclear facilities in the event talks fail. For now, Trump has continued to say he would prefer a deal and believes he can get one. Iran's mission to the UN said Wednesday that diplomacy is "the only path forward" and that "threats of 'overwhelming force' won't change facts: Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and U.S. militarism only fuels instability." What they're saying: A State Department official said that based in a latest security analysis, a decision was made "to reduce the footprint of our Mission in Iraq." White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told Axios that the evacuation of personnel from the embassy in Baghdad is a result of the State Department's recent security review regarding U.S. personnel abroad. At the same time, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth authorized the "voluntary departure" of military families from several U.S. bases in the Middle East due to the security situation, a Pentagon official said. "The safety and security of our service members and their families remains our highest priority and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) is monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East," the Pentagon official said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store