Texas AG Ken Paxton accuses Coppell ISD of violating Texas' 'critical race theory' ban
In the lawsuit filed last week in Dallas County, Paxton's office accused Coppell ISD administrators of violating a state law that, among other prescriptions, prohibits schools from teaching that 'one race or sex is inherently superior to another' or requiring students to understand the New York Times' 1619 Project, a Pulitzer Prize-winning report that examined U.S. history from the date when enslaved people first arrived to America.
The school district has about 13,000 students, according to state data, most of whom are Asian and Hispanic while about a quarter are white.
The lawsuit points to a video published in February by Accuracy in Media, a group with right-wing ties, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate and bigotry targeting marginalized communities.
The two-minute-long video depicts an undercover representative of Accuracy in Media talking to Evan Whitfield, Coppell ISD's director of curriculum and instruction.
'Our concern is more that they're going to, and I don't know where you are politically, but it's like, learn a [Make America Great Again] version of history instead of an accurate depiction of real world events,' the undercover person told Whitfield.
'One thing that I love about this district is that despite what our state standards say and despite what, you know, is going on, we do what's right for kids,' Whitfield responded in the video.
The remarks are among the ones cited by Paxton's office in the lawsuit.
'Liberal administrators who want to ignore state law and unlawfully push divisive and racist CRT curriculum in classrooms will be held responsible for their actions,' Paxton said in a statement Wednesday that drew attention to the suit. 'Texas children deserve to receive the best education in the world, not have woke ideology forced upon them.'
A request for comment sent to Coppell ISD spokespeople Wednesday returned an automatic response that the school system is closed this week for spring break.
Gov. Greg Abbott signed in 2021 legislation that prescribes how teachers in Texas classrooms can talk about American racism history and current events. The state joined a short list of those across the nation that sought to ban the teaching of 'critical race theory' in K-12 public school classrooms — an advanced academic concept that discusses systemic racism and is more often found in law school and college syllabi, according to scholars. The discipline is not taught in public schools but the term has become shorthand for some conservatives' criticism of how children learn about race and racism.
As the 2021 measure was debated in the Legislature, proponents argued they were trying to rid public education of personal biases. Educators and education advocates expressed worries that politics were dictating instruction for the state's 5.5 million public schoolchildren.
The video of the Coppell ISD administrator was first published by Corey DeAngelis, a senior fellow at Accuracy in Media and self-described 'school choice evangelist.'
Accuracy in Media has drawn controversy in the past, most recently in August at Columbia University. The group's Center for Investigative Journalism is directed by Cliff Kincaid, who the Southern Poverty Law Center said 'is actually an unrepentant propagandist for extremist right-wing causes who knows few boundaries in his attempts to smear liberal foes.'
On Wednesday, Accuracy in Media touted its undercover video and celebrated Paxton's office citing it in the suit.
'This lawsuit proves why investigative journalism matters,' the group said in a statement. 'Accuracy in Media has repeatedly exposed how school districts violate state laws and mislead parents about what is being taught in classrooms. Now, thanks to our work, Texas is taking action.'
Disclosure: Southern Poverty Law Center and New York Times have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Video appears to show the moment a Palestinian activist is killed as an Israeli settler opens fire
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — New video footage appears to show the moment a Palestinian activist was killed as an Israeli settler fired toward him during a confrontation with unarmed Palestinians in the occupied West Bank last month. The video released Sunday by B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights group, shows Israeli settler Yinon Levi firing a gun toward the person filming. The footage cuts but the camera keeps rolling as the person moans in pain. B'Tselem says it obtained the video from the family of Awdah Hathaleen, 31, an activist, English teacher and father of three who was shot dead on July 28, and who they said had filmed it. Levi, who was shown firing his gun twice in video shot by another witness and obtained by The Associated Press, was briefly detained and then released from house arrest by an Israeli court, which cited lack of evidence. The shooting occurred in Umm al-Khair, a village that has long weathered settler violence in an area profiled in the Oscar-winning film 'No Other Land.' Settler attacks on Palestinians have spiked since the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war, as have attacks by Palestinian militants. 'Awdah's killing is another horrific example of how Palestinians, both in Gaza and in the West Bank, are currently living without any sort of protection, fully exposed to Israeli violence, while Israeli soldiers or settlers can kill them in broad daylight and enjoy full impunity while the world watches," said Sarit Michaeli, the international outreach director for B'Tselem. Levi was previously under U.S. sanctions that were lifted by the Trump administration. Both videos appear to show the same confrontation between Levi and a group of Palestinians. The earlier video showed him firing two shots from a pistol but did not show where the bullets struck. Several witnesses told the AP they saw Levi shoot Hathaleen. Avichai Hajbi, a lawyer representing Levi, told the AP that Levi acted in self-defense — without specifying what his actions were. Hajbi pointed to a court's decision earlier this month that released Levi from house arrest, citing insufficient evidence. The judge said Levi did not pose a danger justifying continued house arrest, but barred him from contact with the villagers for a month. The Israeli police didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about whether they'd seen the videos. B'Tselem said Levi was with a crew that brought an excavator from a nearby settlement into Umm al-Khair. Residents, fearing it would cut the village's main water line, gathered on a dirt road to try and block its path, and at least one individual threw a stone at the vehicle's front window. Levi then confronted the crowd while waving a handgun. The new video shows Levi arguing heatedly with three men before firing the gun in the direction of the person filming. Hathaleen was standing at the village community center about 40 meters (130 feet) from the confrontation, said B'Tselem. The bullet hit him in the chest and he collapsed on the spot, it said. Eitan Peleg, a lawyer for Hathaleen's family, said they told him Hathaleen had shot the footage on his phone. He said the police asked him for the video, which they hadn't seen. Peleg said he's urging the district court to investigate Levi for more serious crimes. Levi helped establish a settler outpost near Umm al-Khair that anti-settlement activists say is a bastion for violent settlers who have displaced hundreds since the start of the war. Palestinians and rights groups have long accused Israeli authorities of turning a blind eye to settler violence. In a 2024 interview, Levi told the AP he was protecting his own land and denied using violence. After Hathaleen's killing, Israel's army initially refused to return his body for burial unless conditions were met for the funeral, including limiting the number of people and the location. After an agreement was made with the police about a week later, Hathaleen's body was returned and buried. Hathaleen had written and spoken out against settler violence and had helped produce the Oscar-winning film. Supporters have erected murals in his honor in Rome, held vigils in New York and have held signs bearing his name at anti-war protests in Tel Aviv.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs Could Deliver ‘Crippling Blow' to India's Fashion Producers
As President Donald Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff scheme roared to life this week, the fallout is already becoming apparent. Among the most swiftly and acutely impacted targets of tariff terror is India, which, in addition to being hit with 25-percent duties on Thursday, will face an additional tariff burden of 25 percent beginning Aug. 28. More from Sourcing Journal Green Eagle Railroad Aims to Decongest Trade at US-Mexico Border China's Exports Surge as Global Trump Tariffs Take Effect Maersk Lifts 2025 Outlook as Global Container Market Defies Tariff Turbulence While all United States trading partners now face double-digit duties, even the hardest hit apparel sourcing destinations pale in comparison to India's hefty 50-percent duty rate. Nearby neighbors like Pakistan (19 percent) and Bangladesh (20 percent) will also face hardships, along with Asian sourcing locales like Laos and Myanmar (40 percent), Vietnam (20 percent) and Cambodia and Indonesia (19 percent), but the adverse effects of Trump's new duties to India's burgeoning apparel and textile industry could prove devastating. Ratings agency Moody's said as much on Friday, commenting that the duties could stymie the growth of the country's manufacturing sector. Moody's predicted that should the weight of the full, 50-percent duties be thrust upon the country's producers, India's gross domestic product (GDP) growth could slow, contracting by 0.3 percent from its 6.3-percent forecast for fiscal 2025-2026. 'Beyond 2025, the much wider tariff gap compared with other Asia-Pacific countries would severely curtail India's ambitions to develop its manufacturing sector…and may even reverse some of the gains made in recent years in attracting related investments,' Moody's said Friday. Clothing Manufacturers Association of India (CMAI) president Santosh Katariya was more to the point, saying the imposition of the additional 25-percent tariffs 'will deliver a crippling blow to the Indian apparel industry.' A 50-percent duty increase will up the cost of India-made apparel by 30 to 35 percent compared with analogous goods from countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh, 'making Indian exports uncompetitive in the global market,' Katariya said. 'Buyers are unlikely to bear such a substantial pricing gap, which could lead to a sharp decline in export orders,' he added, with multiple outlets reporting that he denounced the tariffs as 'unjustified, unfair, and arbitrary.' According to the U.S. Fashion Industry's 2025 benchmarking study released in July, which relied on input from 25 leading U.S. apparel executives at the nation's largest brands and retailers, India earned a four-out-of-five score in terms of price competitiveness as a sourcing destination—a distinction that stands to be threatened massively should this reality take hold. The CMAI's sense of alarm is far from premature, according to recent reports. Indian publication NDTV Profit wrote Friday that the biggest American apparel purchasers, from Walmart and Target to Amazon and Gap, have pulled back on orders from India-based suppliers. Sources told the news outlet that exporters have received notice from U.S. brands and retailers demanding a pause on shipments. NDTV, which spoke to some of India's most prominent exporters, reported that the heightened duties could drive down U.S. orders by 40 to 50 percent—a loss of $4 billion to $5 billion. This comes just as India was gaining on apparel production stalwarts in the region. Total apparel exports grew 11.3 percent year-over-year in May, and industry insiders had been targeting double-digit growth again this year. In fiscal year 2025, India's textile and apparel exports rose by 6.3 percent to reach $36.6 billion. Apparel exports alone saw a 10-percent increase, while textile exports grew by 3.61 percent. USFIA's study said 'it has become more common for respondents this year to allocate more than 10 percent of their apparel sourcing orders to India, Cambodia, and Indonesia, signaling improved production capacity and a larger role for these countries as apparel suppliers for U.S. fashion companies'—while orders from China have, on the whole, decreased. Indonesia, India and Cambodia were the three most popular emerging sourcing destinations, the data showed, with more than 60 percent of executives saying they plan to increase sourcing from these countries over the next two years. But that progress could be thwarted by tariffs, with global investment bank UBS estimating that $8 billion worth of exports—clothing and textiles among them—are now at risk. The tariff ramp-up has prompted hand-wringing and contingency planning, with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi seeking an audience with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this month. The country is also deepening its ties with the United Kingdom, having announced a landmark trade deal earlier this year. But Trump appears undeterred by the shifting of allegiances and deepening of trade ties beyond U.S. borders. The president took to Truth Social on Friday to tout the 'huge positive impact' tariffs have had on the American stock market and the hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue that are 'pouring into our Country's coffers.' Still, the president's tariff agenda continues to face legal challenges, with a Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington expected to deliver a ruling on whether Trump overstepped his authority as Commander in Chief by imposing sweeping duties without the approval of Congress. The panel of 11 judges largely expressed skepticism about the president's leveraging of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for such a purpose. 'If a Radical Left Court ruled against us at this late date, in an attempt to bring down or disturb the largest amount of money, wealth creation and influence the U.S.A. has ever seen, it would be impossible to ever recover, or pay back, these massive sums of money and honor,' Trump wrote Friday, clearly mulling the forthcoming decision. 'There is no way America could recover from such a judicial tragedy, but I know our Court System better than anyone, there is no one in history that has gone through the trials, tribulations and uncertainties such as I, and absolutely terrible, but also amazingly beautiful, things can happen,' he added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump rips Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman as ‘deranged bum' after he criticized sweeping tariffs
President Trump blasted Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman as a 'deranged bum' after the ex-New York Times columnist was critical of his administration's tariff regime. 'Paul Krugman of the New York Times has been predicting Doom and Gloom ever since my great election success in 2016,' Trump raged in a Truth Social post late Sunday. 'In other words, he has been wrong for YEARS, as ALL markets have been hitting new HIGHS, and are now higher than ever before.' Advertisement 3 Trump ripped Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman as a 'deranged bum.' REUTERS 3 Paul Krugman delivers a speech during the 33rd CIRIEC International Congress in Valencia, Spain, 13 June 2022 EPA 'People stayed out of the 'BEST MARKET IN HISTOY' [sic] because of this Trump Deranged BUM. Sue them!' he added. It comes after Krugman, who late last year abruptly quit the Times after more than two decades there, started trashing Trump's tariffs in his newly created Substack. Advertisement In one article published earlier Sunday, the economist described most of the tariffs as 'clearly illegal.' 3 Trump's post about the Nobel prize winner. @realDonaldTrump/TruthSocial He also ripped Trump for reversing '90 years of tariff reductions.' 'Not to be coy about it, what I'll argue in today's post is that Trump's trade war should be seen as part of a package of policies that amounts to class warfare — class warfare against middle and lower-income Americans in favor of the affluent, especially the top 10% of the income distribution,' he wrote. Advertisement Trump's higher tariff rates of 10% to 50% on dozens of trading partners officially went into effect last week.
