South Korea: FM Cho says his Japan visit preceding US trip can help 'upgrade' 3-way cooperation
Cho made the remark ahead of his departure for Tokyo, where he was scheduled to meet one-on-one with Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya for the first time since taking office early last week.
The foreign ministry announced Monday that Cho will visit Japan before flying to Washington later this week for talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Yonhap news agency reported.
"The reason I am going to Japan first is because I believe it will help upgrade not only our bilateral relations with Japan, but also trilateral cooperation with the US and Japan," Cho told reporters at Gimpo International Airport ahead of his departure.
"I don't think there has ever been a case where a foreign minister's first trip abroad after taking office was to Japan," he said.
Cho's decision to stop in Japan before the US is seen as atypical, as newly appointed foreign ministers have generally chosen Washington as their first stop for diplomatic talks.
With Iwaya, Cho said he will discuss ways the two sides can work together to advance the bilateral relations in a "forward-looking" manner, as well as issues related to the situation in Northeast Asia and beyond.
"Discussions could include long-running historical issues," Cho said. "It is crucial to take a long-term approach and identify mutually beneficial issues for discussion, for a future-oriented Korea-Japan relationship."
Cho also said he plans to convey a message to Japan regarding President Lee Jae Myung's "strong commitment" to continuing "shuttle diplomacy" of regular visits by leaders, restored by the two countries' previous leaders.
In Washington, Cho said he plans to have broad discussions with Rubio on the alliance and other shared issues, including the notion of "modernisation of alliance" as recently mentioned by the US administration.
The concept is largely seen as reflecting US calls for its allies to shoulder more of the defence burden and its focus on addressing an assertive China.
Cho's two-nation swing also comes as South Korea's tariff negotiations with the US are at a critical juncture this week amid the looming August 1 deadline set by the Donald Trump administration. Unless a trade deal is reached, South Korean goods will be subject to a 25 per cent US reciprocal tariff and sectoral duties.
"I plan to provide as much support as possible (for the tariff negotiations)," Cho said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
K-pop, weather news, and scraping metal: Behind the sounds unleashed at the Korean border
The South Korean government on Monday (August 4) started removing loudspeakers which were placed at its border with North Korea for transmitting propaganda and information about the country. Over the years, these speakers blared everything from Michael Jackson songs and K-pop (Korean pop music) to weather reports. The Defence Ministry described it as a 'practical measure that can help ease inter-Korean tensions without affecting the military's readiness posture'. It follows another decision two months ago by the new President Lee Jae Myung, who ordered the suspension of loudspeaker broadcasts in frontline areas, according to the Korean Yonhap News Agency. It is being seen as part of a softer approach from the new administration, led by President Lee of the liberal Democratic Party. Although just a week ago, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's sister Kim Yo Jong said the government's 'blind trust' in its alliance with the US, and hostility toward North Korea, made it no different from its conservative predecessor. Why were these rather unconventional tactics employed in the decades-old discord between the two nations, who are still technically at war? The history North and South Korea were formed after the end of World War 2 (1939-45) as the peninsula was liberated from Japanese rule. Soon, the communist Soviet Union and the liberal capitalist United States competed to extend their influence, with the onset of the Cold War. The USSR and the US took control of the northern region and the south, respectively, for what was to be a temporary arrangement. The 38th parallel (or latitude) would be the dividing line, and according to former US Secretary of State Dean Rusk (then a military officer), he and Colonel Charles 'Tic' Bonesteel did it without much thought. Rusk later wrote in his memoir, As I Saw It, 'Neither Tic nor I was a Korea expert, but it seemed to us that Seoul, the capital, should be in the American sector… Using a National Geographic map, we looked just north of Seoul for a convenient dividing line but could not find a natural geographical line. We saw instead the thirty-eighth parallel and decided to recommend that…' The subsequent war and the influence of the occupying powers made the division permanent. An armistice agreement was signed on July 27, 1953, rather than a peace treaty, leaving North and South Korea technically still at war. Today, a buffer zone called the demilitarised zone (DMZ) runs along the 38th parallel to prevent border skirmishes, with both armies guarding it. The DMZ runs for almost 250 km and is around 4 km wide. Over the decades, a range of sounds has been blasted through rows of loudspeakers on either side. South Korean officials have claimed their broadcasts can be heard upto 10 km during the day, while North Korean broadcasts have not been heard as easily. Music, patriotism and more In the book Music and Conflict, musicologist Keith Howard wrote about the sounds in the early 2000s: 'From the North, verbal abuse juxtaposed with music, revolutionary songs, and songs telling of a land of plenty. The South aired a mixture dominated by American pop of the Michael Jackson kind, reflecting that American troops supplement South Korean forces'. What was the idea behind it? In an essay, South Korean researcher Yechan Moon of Seoul's Yonsei University wrote about the 'unique intersection of media technology, sensory experience, and geopolitical strategy' ('Sound and Access to Information: The Political Implications of the Loudspeaker Broadcasts to North Korea'). 'In the case of loudspeakers, the sensory immediacy and omnipresence of sound play a critical role. Unlike print or digital media, sound cannot be easily escaped or ignored when it envelops an environment,' Moon wrote. It assumes particular significance for North Korea, often called the 'hermit kingdom' for its strict control of information and isolationist policies. 'Unlike radio receivers or foreign DVDs (which North Korean authorities can criminalize and confiscate in clandestine raids), loudspeaker broadcasts require no active agency by North Korean listeners,' Moon added. This can make them aware of the world beyond through a common language. Many defectors from the North have said that they knew about South Korean popular culture, such as films, TV shows and music, but accessing smuggled media was difficult and dangerous. Moon wrote that the medium of sound itself is potent in provoking emotional and physiological responses. Furthermore, 'North Korea's own media strategy reflects its acknowledgment of sound's power. Domestically, the regime itself employs ubiquitous loudspeaker systems — every North Korean town has public address speakers that broadcast approved news and martial music every morning — essentially a one-way internal loudspeaker propaganda network.' Shifting policy The sound has been turned on and off periodically, depending on the state of the ties and specific incidents. Last year, under the former conservative Yoon Suk Yeol administration, South Korea turned on the loudspeakers for the first time in six years, as Pyongyang launched thousands of trash-carrying balloons across the border. Seoul had previously conducted the campaign after North Korea's fourth nuclear test in 2016, Yonhap News Agency said. This time around, it reportedly included K-pop group BTS's English language mega-hits 'Butter' and 'Dynamite,' weather forecasts and news, and criticism of the North's missile program and its crackdown. The North launched its own propaganda in return. After a few weeks, the Incheon Metropolitan Government said it would request the central government to devise a framework for 'compensating residents near the inter-Korean border who have been affected by disruptive noises,' The Korea Times reported. Residents said they heard high-pitched noises resembling scraping metal, sirens and drums. (With Associated Press inputs) Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India. ... Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 hours ago
- First Post
Does India's engagement with Japan a sign of shift in Indo-Pacific policy?
India's deepening ties with Japan, amid high-level military exchanges and PM Modi's upcoming visit, have raised questions about a possible shift in its Indo-Pacific strategy. Is New Delhi now prioritising bilateral partnerships alongside the Quad? read more The Operation Sindoor outreach will reach Japan to spread the the country's stand on terrorism. File image/PTI With Prime Minister Narendra Modi scheduled to visit Japan later this month and a series of high-level military exchanges already underway, India's deepening engagement with Tokyo has raised an important question, is New Delhi shifting its Indo-Pacific focus from multilateralism under the Quad to more targeted bilateralism? In recent weeks, senior Indian military officials have actively engaged with their Japanese counterparts. Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan visited Tokyo and held talks with General Yoshida Yoshihide, Chief of Staff of Japan's Self-Defense Forces (JSDF). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This was followed by a four-day official visit by Indian Navy Chief Admiral Dinesh K Tripathi, aimed at strengthening maritime and strategic cooperation between the two countries. These developments come ahead of PM Modi's expected visit, during which discussions are likely to extend beyond defence cooperation to include economic initiatives, most notably, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad high-speed rail project. This flurry of diplomatic and military activity raises critical strategic questions and comes at a time of significant geopolitical shifts. According to the Ministry of External Affairs' latest brief on the Quad (February 2025), India remains firmly committed to 'a free, open, inclusive, and resilient Indo-Pacific through collective efforts.' However, it also stresses that the Quad 'complements, not replaces, India's bilateral relationships in the region.' Strategic analysts argue that India's growing bilateral engagement with Japan is not an abandonment of the Quad but rather an attempt to add depth where mutual interests align. These developments also come against the backdrop of escalating trade tensions with the United States. President Donald Trump has imposed 25% tariffs on Indian imports and introduced additional penalties for trade with Russia, signalling a sharp turn in US economic policy and a broader reshaping of the global order. Notably, Japan has also taken a more assertive stance under these changing dynamics. Japan, under its evolving security doctrine, is gradually moving away from its post-war pacifist stance and is seeking stronger defence partnerships in the Indo-Pacific, making India a natural and strategic partner. India's approach, meanwhile, reflects pragmatism. While the Quad offers a platform for collective dialogue and strategic coordination, bilateral arrangements provide greater flexibility, quicker implementation, and more focused cooperation, especially in areas like joint defence exercises, technological exchange, and maritime security. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD PM Modi's upcoming visit is expected to cement both strategic and economic ties further, positioning the Indo-Japanese axis as a key pillar in India's Indo-Pacific strategy, complementary to, rather than in competition with, the Quad. This recalibration also comes in the wake of past confrontations with China, from the deadly Galwan clashes in 2020 to the standoff at Doklam in 2017, underlining the urgency for India to forge strong regional partnerships in an increasingly turbulent Indo-Pacific.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
South Korea removes loudspeakers on border with North
A North Korean military guard post, left, and loudspeaker are seen from Paju, South Korea, near the border with North Korea, June 12, 2025. (AP Photo) South Korea began dismantling loudspeakers broadcasting anti-North Korea messages along the border on Monday, according to the country's defense ministry. The move is part of President Lee Jae-myung's efforts to improve relations with Pyongyang. "Starting today, the military has begun removing the loudspeakers," Lee Kyung-ho, spokesperson for the South's defense ministry, told reporters. "It is a practical measure aimed at helping ease tensions with the North, provided that such actions do not compromise the military's state of readiness." He added that all loudspeakers are expected to be removed by the end of the week. Will tensions ease between the North and South? Shortly after taking office in June, following the impeachment of his predecessor, Lee's administration halted the broadcasts to "restore trust." A day later, Pyongyang also stopped its broadcasts, which had long been a source of irritation for South Korean residents near the border. Although the two countries remain technically at war, Lee seeks to reduce tensions and revive long-stalled dialogue with the North. However, North Korea recently rejected the overture, stating it had no interest in talks with Seoul. "If the ROK... expected that it could reverse all the results it had made with a few sentimental words, nothing is more serious miscalculation than it," Kim Yo Jong, sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, said last week, using South Korea's official name.
