
I fear Britain is lurching towards civil war, and nobody knows how to stop it
On one night in Westminster, I met someone who argued for voluntary repatriation, two generations back; a Labour activist told me we must 're-educate' Muslims; and Jacob Rees-Mogg, debating me on GB News, said Britain should take 'zero' refugees. I spluttered a reply about the good Samaritan and staggered off to bed, confused and depressed.
For two decades I've argued for controlling immigration, and successive governments, including Jacob's, increased it. Suddenly I've woken up in a land where everyone manically wants to reduce or even reverse it, and they've leapfrogged me into a pool of dark resentment.
Nigel Farage is mocked as a 'dhimmi' for appointing a Muslim to chair his party; he looks nervous of his own supporters. Even Labour has turned on the Sentencing Council, which, for all its faults, was trying to fix a genuine racial disparity (it's black people who tend to get longer sentences than whites, not the other way around).
On that last saga, so much hinges. It goes to the heart of how a society kills itself with kindness.
Nearly 200,000 YouTubers have watched an interview given to Louise Perry by David Betz, a professor of conflict studies at King's, London. Betz argues that the conditions for a failed state we ordinarily apply overseas are now found here: frayed social contract, falling trust, polarisation. Into this mix Britain injected multiculturalism, encouraging millions to move here without expecting integration.
If you think 'fear of the other' is a human instinct, the policy was mad to begin with. Combine it with economic decline and you invite ethnic competition over services and jobs.
Implicit in the Sentencing Council's guidance is the belief that when you operate a multicultural society – packed with groups with different values and experiences, advantages and handicaps – the only way to achieve equal outcomes is to treat people differently. In this spirit, says Betz, the modern state acts like an imperial administrator, promoting the interests of preferred minorities while trying to avoid a riot.
I grew up in a post-colonial world where we said 'I don't see race' and honestly, if naively, meant it. Over the past 30 years, liberal institutions have taught us to see race again – by stressing the wonders of diversity so persistently that some white people feel the state has actively taken a side against them. Ancient, binding concepts, such as 'equality before the law' ring hollow. The latest Police Race Action Plan openly rejects the principle of 'treating everyone the same' in favour of 'equality of police outcomes'.
A situation in which millions believe cops are not impartial public servants but an occupying force is the headline metric of state failure. Mainland Britain has become Ulster.
It isn't an endorsement of white resentment to acknowledge that it's real and growing, that beyond the curated Question Time audience, millions have evolved from irony to nihilism to something more disturbing. Just read the comments beneath the Betz video. 'As a 28-year-old, fighting-age male, I am ready to lay down my life for Mother England and the survival of my folk.' Viewers refer in code to Rotherham – to avoid being muted in the forum – and the grooming scandal that suggested the authorities were willing to cover up rape to maintain the peace.
The UK is 'a tinder box waiting to explode', writes an unhappy reviewer, which is also the worry of Canadian officials. In 2024, its police force produced a report warning their nation might be further buffeted by inequality, climate change and 'paranoid populism'. Separately, a government think tank warned of 'civil war… in the United States' as a potential 'underanticipated disruption'.
In fact, the low level insurgency has already begun. Ireland has seen arson at asylum hotels. Last year, Britain had riots. Why did No10 insist that so many be thrown into jail? Betz notes that while Islamist terrorism is more lethal than far-Right extremism, there are only 4 million Muslims whereas there are around 50 million whites.
Were the latter group radicalised, things might go south very fast, hence some in the security forces clearly regard white Britons as the emergent threat.
Well, when 'a formerly dominant social majority fears it is in danger of losing that dominance,' to quote Betz, it doesn't surrender its position quietly – and yet this is what elites constantly tell the white working-class they must do, while refusing to abandon their own privileges.
Labour, the party of racial and gender equality, has never seen fit to elect a non-white or a woman as leader. Neither is it willing to revive the economy with free market capitalism; nor to revive solidarity with socialism.
Instead it tries to knit the country back together with petty cash thrown at potholes or a roundtable on the spectre of white male violence. Centrist dad redux.
Labour's instinct is to lean into multiculturalism, flirting with laws against islamophobia: the worst response imaginable. In that vein, what moron thought it would be clever to ban Marine Le Pen from running for office?
Every conspiracy theory is confirmed, and without a democratic outlet for anger – seeing their aspirations limited and being too poor to emigrate – where else will a militant faction of angry whites go but to violence?
Reform is a vehicle for dissent but offers no programme for change. The Tories lack imagination, and the world they exist to preserve is dead. We have no national culture to reunite us; no universalising religion to appeal to. When I saw a Tory MP tell GB News that the Sentencing Council evinced a bias against 'white Christian' defendants, I laughed at the innocence. If someone's in the dock for murder or rape, they probably don't go to Evensong.
Betz sees no solution, so suggests we prepare for anarchy. I'm more concerned about fascism. We're not far away from a politician running for office as explicitly anti-Muslim, and to those who say authoritarianism cannot happen here, I reply: lockdown.
Did you ever think the state could imprison us in our homes? And if it can isolate the diseased from the healthy, the vaxed from the unvaxed, do you think it can't, or won't, someday separate us based on race or religion? We are literally debating the legalisation of euthanasia, a favourite tool of tyrants.
As my companion on that horrid evening spoke of repatriation, I imagined foreign-made parts of me being politely invited to leave and floating off through the window, an arm to Ireland, a foot to France. What remained prayed silently that if this country does go mad, I won't lose my head.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Inheritance tax changes under consideration amid spending gap concerns
The Treasury is reportedly exploring options to raise additional revenue from inheritance tax ahead of the autumn budget. According to The Guardian, officials are examining whether tightening rules around the gifting of assets and money could help address the UK's multi-billion-pound fiscal shortfall. Government U-turns over winter fuel payments and welfare reform have left Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a multibillion-pound spending gap to fill, amid similarly controversial pushes for a 'wealth tax' by some Labour MPs. Among the reported inheritance tax measures under consideration is a potential cap on lifetime gifts, part of a broader review into how assets can be transferred before death to minimise inheritance tax liabilities. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'The best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.' Under current UK rules, gifts made more than seven years before a person's death are exempt from inheritance tax. Gifts made between three and seven years prior are taxed on a sliding scale, depending on their value and the total estate. Last week, National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr) predicted Rachel Reeves is now set for a £41.2 billion shortfall on her 'stability rule' in 2029-30 and has been left with an 'impossible trilemma' of trying to meet her fiscal rules while fulfilling spending commitments and upholding a manifesto pledge not to raise taxes. She will need to raise taxes or cut spending in the autumn budget to plug the gap, Niesr cautioned. In July, some Labour Party figures, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan, called for a wealth tax. Ms Reeves has not ruled out the possibility of a new wealth tax but has been eager to highlight that she will stick to her commitment not to hike tax for 'working people'. However, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismissed the idea. 'This Labour Government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income – the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax,' he told GB News. 'But the idea there's a magic wealth tax, some sort of levy… that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. 'Switzerland has a levy but they don't have capital gains or inheritance tax. 'There's no kind of magic (tax). We're not going to do anything daft like that.'


The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Treasury considers inheritance tax reforms to fill £50bn spending gap in budget
Rachel Reeves is looking to raise more money by tightening the rules around inheritance tax in the autumn budget, it's been reported. Amid growing pressure regarding the state of the UK's finances ahead of the autumn budget, the chancellor is looking to address a blackhole left by Labour U-turns, higher borrowing and sluggish economic growth. Economists have warned Ms Reeves that she must raise taxes or tear up her flagship borrowing rules to fill the shortfall in public finances. According to a report in The Guardian, the Treasury is now looking at options on inheritance tax like changing rules to restrict the gifting of money and assets Under current rules, unlimited amounts of money and assets can be gifted to relatives and friends which avoids inheritance tax, provided that it is gifted at least seven years before the benefactor dies. Money given less than three years before is taxed at the full inheritance tax rate of 40 per cent, while gifts given between seven and three years has a 'taper relief' tax, which is between eight and 32 per cent. The Guardian reports that the Treasury is considering a lifetime cap to limit the amount of money an individual can donate outside of inheritance tax, as well as reviewing rules around the taper rate. 'With so much wealth stored in assets like houses that have shot up in value, we have to find ways to better tap into the inheritances of those who can afford to contribute more,' a source told the newspaper. 'It's hard to make sure these taxes don't end up with loopholes that undermine their purpose. But we are trying to work out what revenue might be raised and how to ensure it's a fair approach.' However, it has been reported that no substantive talks at a senior level have occurred about inheritance tax, and no decisions have been made. Reeves has already ruled out increases to income tax, national insurance and VAT, while inheritance tax brought in a record £6.7bn in 2022-2023. However, recent analysis that showed wealthy investors are leaving the UK because of measures such as the abolition of non-dom status has caused nervousness. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.'


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
More than HALF of women say they do not feel safe in their local area - as Labour minister admits there are not enough police on the streets
More than half of women are now concerned for their personal safety in their local area, new polling for Reform UK has revealed. Some 60 per cent of women fear for their safety when out shopping or going for a walk and 51 per cent are worried about being harassed or sexually assaulted. Reform leader Nigel Farage described it as the 'next big issue in British politics' and said Labour and the Tories have 'prioritised the interests of illegal migrants over the safety of women and girls'. It comes as the party launched a new drive to tackle violence and sex assaults against women and girls as Reform's only female MP blamed migrants with 'medieval views' for a decline in public safety. Meanwhile a Labour minister admitted that 'there aren't enough police officers on our streets' while Kemi Badenoch said women have stopped jogging in the park because of 'men lurking in bushes'. Polling shared exclusively with the Daily Mail shows that 60 per cent of women are concerned about their safety in public - with a quarter saying they are 'very concerned'. Even amongst men, some 38 per cent say they are now concerned for their safety in public and 12 per cent are very concerned. Over half of women are worried about the risk of sexual assault or harassment and this is felt more amongst younger people, with 63 per cent of 25-34 year olds concerned about the risk, the poll by Survation found. Damian Lyons Lowe, chief executive of the pollster, said the findings shows a 'stark gender divide in perceptions of safety'. He added: 'These perceptions feed into a wider public mood that favours tougher sentencing, with strong majority support for life sentences without parole for the most serious crimes.' The representative poll of 2,131 UK adults found that Britons resoundingly support minimum sentences of 10 years or life imprisonment for physical, violent, and sexual crimes. A large majority are in favour of convicted criminals never having the chance to be released early while 72 per cent back life sentences without parole for serious crimes such as murder or terrorism. And by far the most popular punishment for repeat offenders of minor crimes such as shoplifting is longer prison sentences of a year or more, with 42 per cent backing this compared to 15 per cent who were in favour of electronic tagging. When it comes to which party the public trusts to reduce crime in the UK, Reform has a nine-point lead over Labour with 35 per cent backing the party to best tackle crime. However a significant proportion - some 27 per cent - chose neither when asked which party they trusted most to bring crime levels down in Britain. It comes as former home secretary Baroness Jacqui Smith said she 'shares the concerns' of Reform about women feeling safe in this country and admitted that 'there aren't enough police officers on our streets'. The Labour women and equalities minister told Times Radio: 'I think what it says about the state of the country is that the last government undermined our neighbourhood policing so that it's not surprising that people in communities aren't feeling the confidence that we would want them to feel.' But on Reform's criticism Baroness Smith said that the party had voted against legislation to keep women safe, adding: 'They're very good at pointing at problems, slightly less good at actually getting behind the solutions.' It came as Kemi Badenoch said that women have 'stopped jogging in the park because there are men lurking in bushes'. Referring to her visit to Epping on Monday, the Conservative leader told reporters: 'Mothers told me that they're worried about their daughters going to school. They're getting harassed. They stopped jogging in the park because there are men lurking in bushes. 'Communities shouldn't have to be paying for this. And what I saw in Epping really, really upset me. I can see why many of those people are protesting.'